District dossier
District AZ-07 — AZ
21 linked programs via high-confidence USAspending crosswalk.
191 of 435 congressional districts have high-confidence linked defense dollars. why not all districts? →
21
linked programs
$24.3B
linkable obligations FY2017–FY2026 · 40 distinct awards
every linked dollar carries a USAspending citation
Coverage note
These are high-confidence program links, not a total of defense spending in this district.
How this evidence is linked and how much it covers
The programs below come from A, AF, DARPA, F, MDA, N, and that is a limit of the method rather than a fact about this district. An award record carries a Treasury account, and one account funds dozens to hundreds of program elements — so an account code alone cannot say which line paid for a contract. This page counts only links the crosswalk grades high, where more than an account code ties the award to the program; methodology §4 says what does. Everything else is absent here rather than approximated.
Aggregate totals are derived from USAspending award transaction data. Each figure opens to its formula and query. Recipients and transaction counts are USAspending’s own; no additional verification applied.
This crosswalk only resolves for a small slice of all award dollars recorded with a district — sitewide, the 502.6B linked to a budget program is roughly 12.98% of the 3.87T in award obligations recorded across every U.S. district. Ranking districts by this figure would rank them by the high-confidence-linked slice, not by total defense spending — see the district index for that comparison in full.
Obligations by fiscal year
The same linkable obligations as the total above, split by the fiscal year each award transaction was recorded in. The years add up to that total, though the figures here are rounded for display, so adding them by eye need not land on it exactly. Award counts do not add up: an award active in two years appears in both.
| Fiscal year | Obligations |
|---|---|
| FY2017 | $2.37B |
| FY2018 | $2.30B |
| FY2019 | $1.32B |
| FY2020 | $4.04B |
| FY2021 | $2.32B |
| FY2022 | $3.32B |
| FY2023 | $1.65B |
| FY2024 | $2.48B |
| FY2025 | $2.60B |
| FY2026partial year | $1.94B |
FY2026 runs only through 2026-09-04 in this corpus — a part-year total, not comparable to the full years above it.
“Obligations” is the net figure: money obligated in that year minus money deobligated from earlier awards, which is why a year can be smaller than the gross column beside it, or negative. We publish the net number as the headline and show the gross so the difference is visible rather than implied.
Program connections
Follow a program to its receipts.
Amounts below are linked award obligations over FY2017–FY2026. Shared awards may appear against more than one program; the district total counts each award once.
| Program | Obligations |
|---|---|
| SM-3 IIAsMD14 | $6.75Bsame award, matched to 2 programs |
| ESSM2307 | $4.23Bsame award, matched to 2 programs |
| AEGIS BMD0603892C | $3.03Bsame award, matched to 2 programs |
| Aegis BMDMD09 | $2.83B |
| Javelin (AAWS-M) System Summary0648CC0007 | $2.34B |
| Ship Self Defense (Engage: Hard Kill)0604756N | $1.80Bsame award, matched to 2 programs |
| TOW 2 System Summary2104C59300 | $1.80B |
| Ram2242 | $1.46B |
| SMALL DIAMETER BOMB IISDB002 | $1.08B |
| CIWS Mods4205 | $687.1M |
| Standard Missile2234 | $604.7Msame award, matched to 2 programs |
| Naval Strike Missile (NSM)2292-WPN | $556.5M |
| JAVELIN0604611A | $311.3M |
| Tactical AIM Missiles0207161F | $275.6M |
| Ground Based Air Defense3006 | $208.6M |
| Advanced Aerospace Systems0603286E | $202.0M |
| Tomahawk and Tomahawk Mission Planning Center (TMPC)0204229N | $108.6M |
| Artillery Weapons System2212 | $107.3M |
| Standard Missiles Mods2356 | $40.9Msame award, matched to 2 programs |
| AGM-88A HarmM88AAG | $253.4K |
| LETHAL MINIATURE AERIAL MISSILE SYSTEM (LMAMS6870C88001 | $0 |
Obligations are high-confidence USAspending award links only. Cited figures (underlined) open a USAspending citation with the API query used to verify the amount. See methodology for crosswalk details.