Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Standard Missiles Mods

NavyProcurementReconciledBLI2356
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
Standard Missiles Mods (2356) is a Navy procurement line funded in the Weapons Procurement, Navy account.
What changed
-$29.5M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 2 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$80.5MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$61.7MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$32.1MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$29.5MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $80.5MFY25: $61.7MFY26: $32.1MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$80.5M
FY25$61.7M
FY26$32.1M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$130.5M$71.2M$80.5M
Enacted–$71.2M$89.3M$61.7M
Request––$89.3M$75.7M$32.1M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $89.3M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $80.5M as actual total obligation authority — $8.72M below the request. 80.536 − 89.255 = -8.719 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Standard Missiles Mods

SM-2 BLK IIIAZ: The DDG 1000 Standard Missile Program of record plan is to procure SM-2 BLK IIIAZ modifications to support deployment of DDG 1000 Class Ships. This line item provided funds to procure SM-2 modification kits to support the DDG 1000 Program. Funding includes modification kit installation in SM-2 BLK IIIA rounds. SM-2 BLK IIIA AEGIS missiles require hardware and software changes to be compatible with the new (non-AEGIS) DDG 1000 radar, combat system, X-band link and interrupted continuous wave illumination. SM-2 BLK IIIC: SM-2 BLK IIIC was designated as an accelerated acquisition Maritime Accelerated Capabilities Office (MACO) program, on 3 November 2017, by the CNO and ASN (RDA), which enabled the procurement of SM-2 medium range active capability beginning in FY 2021 for AEGIS cruisers, destroyers, and frigates. SM-2 BLK IIIC provides enhanced stream-raid performance against numerous threats, via target resolution and missile/target pairing logic, over-the-horizon capability for increased depth of fire, enhanced capability against electronic attack and improved firepower due to decreased dependence on illuminators. Effort leverages, to the maximum extent, existing SM-2 inventory and common technology to provide an affordable mix of complimentary weapons to meet a broad range of mission requirements. The inventory objective is 1,000 units. FY 2025 will be the last year that the SM-2 BLK IIIC AURs will be using the existing guidance section, as there will be a transition to a new guidance section upon Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) completion. FY 2025 matches the Base for Reprogramming Actions, DD 1414 and does not include supplemental funding from Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2024 (Division A of Public Law 118-50). In FY 2025, DON has received $47.6 million for the procurement of replenishment parts and Bench Test & Repair equipment stations for the replacement of Navy stock.

Justification

Justification — Standard Missiles Mods

SM-2 BLK IIIC: The decrease from FY 2025 to FY 2026 is due to the cancellation of AUR procurement in FY 2026. FY 2025 will be the last year that the SM-2 BLK IIIC AURs will be using the existing guidance section, as there will be a transition to a new guidance section upon ECP completion. The FY 2026 budget provides $32.352 million for SM-2 BLK IIIC production support. Cost Element 2.1.4: FK971 Containers: Funds procurement and support of the containers used to transport missile hardware from the component manufacturer to the missile All Up Round facility. Containers are required to return hardware from disassembled missiles to the component manufacturer for rework and follow-on build up into new AURs. Funding is required to meet two-year lead-time for delivery of components to SM production line. The increase in funding from FY 2025 to FY 2026 is for inflation. Cost Element 2.1.5: FK970 SM-2 Installation/Checkout Equip/Training Material: FY 2026 procures flight termination systems to support fleet firings using the new SM-2 BLK IIIC guidance section. Cost Element 2.1.6: FK980 ILS/Fleet Documentation: Funds production of formal Fleet Firing Guidance and Fleet Handling Procedures with updates as required to reflect current doctrine, new missile variant capabilities and the changing threat. Also develops and updates the Capabilities and Liabilities (C&L) documentation as well as round requirement plans for delivery and on-load for AURs for firing events. An increase for SM-2 BLK IIIC in FY 2026 is for inflation. Cost Element 2.1.7: FK850 Diminishing Manufacturing Resources (DMS): Provides funding for production engineering and life-type buys for missile components that are, or will be, no longer available through the prime contractor/sub vendors. SM-2 BLK IIIC program leverages three legacy programs (SM-2, SM-6, AMRAAM) that have been in production for more than 10 years and shares many of the same recurring obsolescence issues as the predecessor variants from which the design is derived. DMS in FY 2026 procures additional SM-2 BLK IIIC resources required to support round procurement, major obsolescence as a result of the advanced age of components, and increased requirements due to SM-2 BLK IIIC specific items, such as jet tab assemblies. Cost Element 2.1.8: FK830 Production Engineering/Support: Provides field activity and contract production support for missile modification and delivery to include production engineering, design and analysis, quality and safety assurance, documentation, and production test support for SM-2 BLKIIIC. SM-2 BLK IIIC increases in FY 2026 to incorporate lessons learned and investigate efficiencies such as the requirement for a new TDD.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY24 Actuals$80.5M
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY25 Enacted$61.7M
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$32.1M
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY26 Total$32.1M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$296.5M$80.5M$61.7M$32.1M$32.1M

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 2356 (Standard Missiles Mods), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 2356 (Standard Missiles Mods), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSNProcurement appropriation235632.1M FY26N0002415C5408RAYTHEON COMPANY41.7MRTX CorporationAZ-07

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
AZ-07$40.9M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0002415C5408high
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0002413C5403medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Standard Missiles Mods. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.