Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

TOW 2 System Summary

ArmyProcurementReconciledBLI2104C59300
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
TOW 2 System Summary (2104C59300) is an Army procurement line funded in the Missile Procurement, Army account.
What changed
-$93.6M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 3 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$180.8MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$105.3MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$11.7MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$93.6MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $180.8MFY25: $105.3MFY26: $11.7MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$180.8M
FY25$105.3M
FY26$11.7M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$101.9M$261.8M$180.8M
Enacted–$103.9M$120.5M$105.3M
Request––$120.5M$121.4M$11.7M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $120.5M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $180.8M as actual total obligation authority — $60.3M above the request. 180.8 − 120.5 = 60.3 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — TOW 2 System Summary

Tube launched, Optically tracked, Wireless guided (TOW) missiles (BGM-71 Series) are combat proven munitions that provide heavy anti-armor/assault capability to the Army's Infantry Brigade Combat Teams (IBCT), Stryker Brigade Combat Teams (SBCT) and Armor Brigade Combat Teams (ABCT). TOW missiles continue to be used as the weapon of choice in precision combat engagements. TOW missiles are also the primary heavy anti-armor/ assault missile for the U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) and more than 43 allied nations. Warfighters also employ TOW missiles against buildings and field fortifications, taking advantage of the missile's precision assault capabilities. The TOW weapon system is an Army-led, Acquisition Category (ACAT) IC Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP) that has joint interest with the USMC. The TOW weapon system includes the Improved Target Acquisition System (ITAS) launcher, TOW missiles, and associated tactical training aids/devices. The ITAS is a combat proven TOW missile launcher that provides long-range, lethal anti-armor and precision assault fires capability for Active, Reserve, and National Guard component IBCT and SBCT across a spectrum of operational environments. The USMC employs the TOW missile from its ITAS derived M41A7 Saber launchers and Anti-Tank Guided Missile (ATGM) vehicles.

Justification

Justification — TOW 2 System Summary

FY 2026 base funding of $11.731M is required to support Engineering Services, Acceptance Testing, Management and fielding of prior year(s) production of TOW 2 missiles. Funding decrease from FY 2025 to FY 2026 is due to the completion of the procurement of TOW 2 missiles, in support of Army Transformation Initiative (ATI) to cease TOW missile procurement. In accordance with Section 1815 of the FY 2008 National Defense Authorization Act, this item is necessary for use by the active components and reserve components of the Armed Forces for homeland defense missions, domestic emergency responses and providing military support to civil authorities.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$180.8M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$105.3M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$11.7M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Total$11.7M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$4.24B$180.8M$105.3M$11.7M$11.7M

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the A appropriation, program element 2104C59300 (TOW 2 System Summary), its 2 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the A appropriation, program element 2104C59300 (TOW 2 System Summary), its 2 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSAProcurement appropriation2104C5930011.7M FY26W31P4Q17C0194RAYTHEON COMPANY1.40BW31P4Q12C0265RAYTHEON COMPANY486.0MRTX CorporationAZ-07

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
AZ-07$1.80B

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
RAYTHEON COMPANYW31P4Q12C0265high
RAYTHEON COMPANYW31P4Q17C0194high
RAYTHEON COMPANYSPRRA223F0029medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not TOW 2 System Summary. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.