Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

CIWS Mods

NavyProcurementReconciledBLI4205
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
CIWS Mods (4205) is a Navy procurement line funded in the Weapons Procurement, Navy account.
What changed
+$3.86M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 4 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$4.09MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$4.27MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$8.12MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$3.86MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $4.09MFY25: $4.27MFY26: $8.12MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$4.09M
FY25$4.27M
FY26$8.12M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$6.27M$3.17M$4.09M
Enacted–$2.65M$4.09M$4.27M
Request––$4.09M$4.27M$8.12M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Close-In Wpns Sys (CIWS) Mods

Phalanx Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) is an autonomous combat system that searches, detects, tracks (radar and electro-optic), and engages threats with a 20mm Gatling gun capable of firing 4,500 tungsten penetrator rounds per minute. Integral to ship self-defense and the anti-air warfare "defense-in-depth" concept, CIWS provides terminal defense against anti-ship missiles and high-speed aircraft penetrating other fleet defenses. Phalanx CIWS can operate autonomously or be integrated with a ship's combat system. The CIWS Block 1B configuration provides further defense against asymmetric threats such as small, fast surface craft, low slow-flying fixed and rotary-winged aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles through the addition of an integrated Forward-Looking Infra-Red (FLIR) sensor. Block 1B also incorporates an Optimized Gun Barrel (OGB) for tighter ordnance dispersion. Enhanced Lethality Cartridges (ELC) can be used with the OGB for improved target penetration. The MK 15 MOD 40 CIWS RAM Defense Capability (CRDC) configuration is fielded aboard select Nimitz Class Carriers (CVN). It is a fast reaction, rapid fire, computer-controlled radar system that employs the Rolling Airframe Missiles (RAM) as an effector for Anti-Ship Missile (ASM) defense. The latest RAM missile variant (Block 2B) defends against highly maneuverable Anti-Ship Cruise Missile (ASCM) threats and emerging complex raid attacks utilizing an advanced infrared (IR) seeker and Missile-to-Missile Link (MML) while maintaining all the proven capabilities of previous RAM variants: accurate terminal guidance, proven lethality, and post-launch fire and forget capability. [P5 / DT001 CIWS BLOCK 1B]: This budget provides for hardware procurements to address safety, obsolescence, and reliability improvements. There are 237 U.S. (USN/USCG) shipboard systems, 8 trainers, and 3 Engineering Development Module (EDM)/Periodic Conformance Inspection (PCI) mounts. [P5 / DT001 CIWS (CRDC) MK 15 MOD 40]: Funding supports MK 15 MOD 40 hardware procurement and installation of Ordnance Alterations (ORDALT) to address safety, obsolescence, and reliability.

Justification

Justification — Close-In Wpns Sys (CIWS) Mods

The FY 2025 to FY 2026 funding increase procures corrective action and reliability ORDALTs for the MK 15 MOD 40 CRDC sensor. It also continues 10 procurements for the Gun Ammo Handling System (GAHS) and Electronic Gun Drive (E-Gun) ORDALTs. The GAHS ORDALT improves system operational availability and reliability by introducing a modified design with improved materials for components that are prone to fatigue and causing ammo handling jams. The E-Gun ORDALT replaces the pneumatic gun drive components with an electric drive system providing an increased number of engagements thru better control of fire rates and a reduced rate of fire variability. It also reduces maintenance hours, improves Built-In Test (BIT) and troubleshooting, increases reliability by eliminating high failure pneumatic components and reduces gun jams. The CRDC reliability ORDALTs increase reliability of the CRDC sensor. The sensor is the primary reliability degrader of the system and corrective actions are necessary to achieve the systems required operational availability. CRDC corrective action and reliability improvement kit procurements (two per hull) for the Linear Oscillator (LO) and Transformer Rectifier Unit (TRU) begin in FY2026.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY24 Actuals$4.09M
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY25 Enacted$4.27M
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$8.12M
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY26 Total$8.12M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$1.85B$4.09M$4.27M$8.12M$8.12M

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 4205 (CIWS Mods), its 5 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 2 congressional districts the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 4205 (CIWS Mods), its 5 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 2 congressional districts the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSNProcurement appropriation42058.12M FY26N0002421C5406RAYTHEON COMPANY400.3MN0002419C5406RAYTHEON COMPANY346.1MN0002417C5405RAYTHEON COMPANY296.9MN0002415C5406RAYTHEON COMPANY58.3MN0002415C5406RAYTHEON COMPANY1.26MRTX CorporationAZ-07KY-03

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
AZ-07$687.1M
KY-03$403.0M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

RecipientPIIDConfidence
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0002415C5406high
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0002417C5405high
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0002419C5406high
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0002421C5406high

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not CIWS Mods. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.