Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Systems Engineering

OSDRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0605142D8Z
What it is
Systems Engineering (0605142D8Z) is an OSD research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 3 projects.
What changed
-$1.26M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$29.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$24.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$23.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$1.26MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $29.6MFY25: $24.7MFY26: $23.4MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$29.6M
FY25$24.7M
FY26$23.4M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$43.2M$38.3M$31.3M$36.3M$37.4M$35.9M$44.2M$38.6M$37.2M$29.6M
Enacted$39.6M$32.4M$37.6M$38.8M$37.1M$45.6M$39.9M$38.6M$39.9M$24.7M
Request$32.4M$37.6M$38.9M$37.1M$49.4M$40.0M$39.0M$39.9M$24.7M$23.4M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $39.9M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $29.6M as actual total obligation authority — $10.4M below the request. 29.5739.95 = -10.38 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Systems Engineering

The Systems Engineering program element establishes dedicated funding to carry out the duties as described in 10 U.S.C 133a and the Department of Defense Directive 5137.02, “Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (USD(R&E)),” dated July 15, 2020. In alignment with the 2025 Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance, the program element supports the administration’s top priorities of Rebuild Our Military and Reestablish Deterrence by reforming the acquisition process, rapidly fielding emerging technologies, and building a resilient Joint Force and defense ecosystem. This funding directly supports defense acquisition programs and supports rapidly fielding emerging technologies identified by the USD (R&E). Furthermore, it supports the implementation of Department initiatives and advances the development, modernization, and adoption of emerging technologies with speed and agility in the areas of systems engineering, interoperability, digital engineering, software engineering, model-based systems engineering, specialty engineering, value engineering, modular open systems approaches, standardization, and workforce development.

Mission Systems Engineering

The Systems Engineering project provides resources to develop and promote advanced engineering principles, techniques, and practices across the Department of Defense (DoD); connects and strengthens the technical community; develops the engineering and technical workforce; advances and manages standards; and provides technical expertise for independent engineering assessments to advance the development and adoption of emerging technologies with speed and agility. Engineering is the backbone of technology development and transition, playing a crucial role in turning innovative ideas into practical and real solutions. On behalf of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (USD(R&E)), this project executes the following activities: • Supports USD(R&E)’s initiatives to modernize the DoD’s systems and software engineering practices to include the use of modular open systems approaches (MOSA) and advanced systems engineering techniques to build systems capable of seamlessly incorporating new technologies to respond to emerging threats. • Furthers the adoption of digital engineering, modeling, and simulations to allow the DoD to rapidly field and implement innovative technologies for the Joint warfighter. • Furthers the adoption of modern Agile/DevSecOps (Development, Security, and Operations) software practices and improves cross-organizational collaboration to modernize DoD software processes, capability, and expertise. • Facilitates execution of the Secretary of Defense initiative to modernize software acquisition to acquire, deliver, and iterate on our weapon and business systems software. Supports collaboration and management activities through the DoD Software Modernization Senior Steering Group in coordination with the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (OUSD(A&S)), DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO), and the Military Services. • Improves delivery of advanced capability to warfighters by modernizing reliability and maintainability, manufacturing and quality, system safety, human systems integration, and value engineering practices. • Identifies, develops, manages, and provides access to standardization processes and products for the defense community to promote interoperability, reduce cost, and sustain readiness. • Leads production of policy, guidance, and workforce development initiatives for the DoD engineering and technical workforce.

Mission Engineering Architectures

The Engineering Architectures project advances efforts in system-of-systems architecture for the Department of Defense. The project supports the development of an enterprise-wide strategy to integrate existing and future systems to improve the Department’s technological advantage in joint, multidomain operations. Systems Engineering & Architecture (SE&A) develops policy, guidance, and training to enable rigorous engineering and the accelerated delivery of affordable, innovative, and operationally relevant mission capabilities for U.S. all-domain dominance in an environment with scarce resources, near-peer threats, and continual, rapid, and complex technological change. On behalf of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research & Engineering (OUSD(R&E)), this project executes the following activities: • Supports acquisition programs in the development and execution of system-of-systems engineering and architectures to enable accelerated delivery of innovative mission capabilities. • Supports the development of enterprise system-of-systems engineering architecture guidance to facilitate improved interoperability in acquisition programs. • Develops a workforce capable of fielding and sustaining enterprise system-of-systems engineering and architectures.

Mission Mission Engineering

In FY 2025, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research & Engineering (USD(R&E)) realigned funding from Project Code 842 to Mission Engineering and Integration (ME&I) Program Element 0603142D8Z, Project Code 123 to fund the Office of Mission Integration (MI). This funding structure, which separated funding for MI from funding for the Office of Systems Engineering and Architecture (SE&A), better reflects the organizational structure of the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

Systems Engineering

The Systems Engineering project supports and improves the OUSD(R&E)’s efforts in systems engineering, digital engineering, MOSA, software modernization, and standardization management. In addition, the funds facilitate workforce development to ensure the DoD maintains its advantage in warfighter readiness in a rapidly evolving technological environment.

Engineering Architectures

The Engineering Architectures project supports and improves OUSD(R&E)’s efforts in Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications (NC3) and Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) as they progress through the acquisition life cycle. In addition, the funds support the development of policy and guidance for system-of-systems (SoS) architectures.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY24 Actuals$29.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Enacted$24.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Total$24.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Disc. Request$23.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Total$23.4M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$392.8M$29.6M$24.7M$23.4M$23.4M
142: Systems Engineering$360.1M$17.4M$20.5M$20.1M$20.1M
152: Engineering Architectures$0$3.06M$4.13M$3.34M$3.34M
842: Mission Engineering$32.7M$9.14M$0$0$0

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Systems Engineering — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →