Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Maintaining Technology Advantage

OSDRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0605797D8Z
What it is
Maintaining Technology Advantage (0605797D8Z) is an OSD research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 4 projects.
What changed
-$1.95M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$37.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$31.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$29.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$1.95MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $37.7MFY25: $31.6MFY26: $29.7MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$37.7M
FY25$31.6M
FY26$29.7M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
9 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2018–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
9 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2018–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$0$20.2M$24.7M$25.9M$31.7M$37.7M
Enacted$0$20.9M$25.6M$26.8M$32.8M$38.9M$31.6M
Request$19.9M$29.6M$25.9M$35.4M$38.9M$31.6M$29.7M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $29.6M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reported $24.7M as actual total obligation authority — $4.83M below the request. 24.7429.57 = -4.83 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Maintaining Technology Advantage

This program supports the President’s priority to achieve peace through strength, and the Department's priorities to advance deterrence, work with Allies and partners to reorient to key threats and build a resilient defense industrial base and acquisition process. This program develops and implements effective technology and program protection to support rapidly and securely fielding military technologies. We must protect sensitive technologies and military programs from theft, diversion, and exploitation by our strategic competitors. Maturing and implementing the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering's (OUSD(R&E)) technology priorities requires a healthy and capable U.S. National Security Innovation Base (NSIB). The targeting of U.S. capabilities by our strategic competitors creates the potential to degrade core U.S. military technological advantages through unwanted technology transfer to and from the NSIB. Unwanted technology transfer includes exfiltration of unclassified technology, sensitive data, and of intellectual property, and malicious introduction of supply chain risk, jeopardizing DoD's ability to maintain the technology advantage required to support the lethality and survivability of the Joint Force. DoD's technology and program protection plan includes: (1) Research Security to ensure the intellectual capital generated by the NSIB are not stolen or exploited. (2) Development of tools and techniques to ensure the Department's strategic technology investments are protected to enable the U.S. to engage in technology transfer at the time, place, and parties of our choosing. (3) Securing defense acquisition programs, systems, and components through robust program protection planning that holistically and efficiently manages technology and program risk without impeding capability delivery to the warfighter. The Department will support these three efforts by developing the appropriate suite of analytic tools and protection activities across the science and technology (S&T) and acquisition enterprise and programs to address the threat over the long term. S&T protection focuses on ensuring the integrity of the research enterprise through execution of due diligence on technology development efforts. Acquisition program protection comprises traditional Defense Acquisition System activities, such as Program Protection Planning and Independent Technical Risk Assessment, and developing new concepts, training, and best practices, such as Secure Cyber Resilient Engineering, to address ever evolving threats to our acquisition programs and our ability to deliver military capability to the warfighter.

Mission Technology Industrial Innovation Base

The Technology Industrial Innovation Base (TIIB) effort develops near- and long-term strategies and employs mechanisms to retain the U.S. advantage in current and emerging modernization technology priorities by addressing the capabilities of the industrial innovation base to develop, test, manufacture, and sustain them. This project provides support to technology priority leaders in identifying industrial innovation base needs; characterizing and assessing priority technology investments, identifying and mitigating issues and risks impacting the industrial innovation base, and exploiting opportunities to advance technology development, testing, and manufacturing. One of TIIB’s main objectives is to create balance between promotion of the industrial innovation base while protecting the technology from interference or exploitation by competitors. This balance will aid the Department’s advancing critical and emergent technologies ahead of competitor nations and actors while sustaining a healthy, resilient, and globally competitive industrial innovation base. This portfolio of activity extends efforts initiated in response to FY 2019 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Section 1793.

Mission S&T Protection

As the Department develops advanced technologies, it must use a rigorous, repeatable methodology to protect technology advantage. For example, the Department will establish and implement procedures to protect critical technology in science and technology (S&T), encompassing the lifecycle of basic and applied research, advanced technology development, prototyping, and technology transition to programs. This includes driving consistency across risk-based security reviews for fundamental research and Small Businesses Innovation Research / Small Business Technology Transfer (SBIR/STTR) programs. This also include working with the acquisition community to identify Programs of Record and S&T Projects that require enhanced protection to maintain U.S. technological advantage. The production, updating, and use of Technology Area Protection Plans (TAPPs) generate consistent protection of critical technology, provide foundational guidance for communicating about the technology to particular audiences, and inform protection and controls integrated with technology promotion activities. The implementation of the guidance and TAPPs have broad impacts across DoD and interagency-wide activities associated with critical technologies, including development of protection practices with DoD research performers (e.g., the DoD and national laboratories, academia, small businesses, and the broader industrial innovation base); international agreements; counterintelligence and law enforcement priorities and activities; export controls; and foreign investment screening through the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).

Mission Joint Acquisition Protection Exploitation Cell (JAPEC)

The DoD established a joint analysis capability, the Joint Acquisition Program and Exploitation Cell (JAPEC), to produce analytics products in support of the technology protection mission, such as for foreign investment screening; engage with acquisition, intelligence, counterintelligence, and law enforcement sources to determine consequences of, and appropriate preventative/mitigation actions against unwanted technology transfer; and assess controlled unclassified technical information losses. JAPEC detects and characterizes past technology losses, conducts damage assessments of lost information, and provides insights with predictive value to support and promote activities. JAPEC enables comprehensive, detailed assessments of U.S. military technological vulnerability, as well as inform the development and application of effective policies, countermeasures, and enforcement actions to preserve U.S. technical superiority in all warfighting domains. JAPEC engages with select allies and partners to develop protection efforts across the extended supply chains resulting from the partnerships created by the global S&T community. JAPEC and supporting organizations synchronize, integrate, coordinate, and inform DoD efforts to protect critical technologies from malign investment by strategic competitors and to combat malign activities. JAPEC conducts trend analysis of protection efforts for the Department’s critical acquisition programs and technologies, incorporates findings into protection processes and activities, and analyzes losses, to determine consequences and appropriate courses of action, such as deterrence of our strategic competitors as well as promotion of the NSIB. JAPEC also manages OUSD(R&E)’s responsibilities for CFIUS, including the assessments, reviews, and investigations of transactions on the CFIUS docket, especially those pertaining to critical technology, sensitive personal data (such as genomic data), and the NSIB, as well as the identification of “non-notified” transactions that are not yet before CFIUS but which may raise national security concerns for OUSD(R&E) programs and mission space, meriting formal review. This line of effort involves the initial screening of all CFIUS transactions (to determine OUSD(R&E) equities), coordination with subject matter experts who provide vulnerability and consequence information to support the analysis of the risks to national security presented by each transaction affecting OUSD(R&E) mission space, and full market analytics to consider risks presented by aggregate industry investment trends and the 2025 America First Investment Policy to scrutinize and prohibit Chinese investments in critical technology sectors. JAPEC is also the focal point for related efforts, such as OUSD(R&E)’s screening of mergers and acquisitions for antitrust consideration, when they might impair the health of the Defense Industrial Base, and OUSD(R&E)’s export control activities where JAPEC provides technical advice and recommendations to the Defense Technology Security Administration regarding regulations of, and applications for licenses to export critical technology. This project also funds collaborative activities to ensure consistent technology protection guidance and actions across the DoD enterprise, leading the way for reviving our defense industrial base and reforming acquisition processes on technology and program protection matters.

Mission Program and Technology Protection

The Department of Defense (DoD) must address System Security Engineering risk, including cyber resilience, cybersecurity, and supply chain risks to DoD networks, weapon systems, and information stored and processed on both the DoD and the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) unclassified contractor information networks that The Department of Defense (DoD) must address System Security Engineering risk, including cyber resilience, cybersecurity, and supply chain risks to DoD networks, weapon systems, and information stored and processed on both the DoD and the Defense Industrial Base (DIB) unclassified contractor information networks that support DoD programs. Advanced persistent threats (APTs) that can evade commercially available security tools and defeat generic security best practices, drives the need for diligent program protection planning and execution. This project supports implementation of DoDI 5000.83, Technology and Program Protection to Maintain Technological Advantage. Activities carried out for Program Protection Planning include providing Program Protection Plan (PPP) review and oversight for Acquisition Category 1D Acquisition Programs and providing guidance to ensure consistency and comprehensive protection of the acquisition program. Program protection planning must address protection of controlled technical information, critical program information, critical components and critical mission functions; and integration of system security policies and acquisition and S&T practices, secure cyber resilient engineering activities, and system security risk reduction activities. This initiative is developing new and maturing existing system security engineering methodologies and capabilities to advance DoD Programs’ ability to protect critical information, functions, and components. This initiative is supporting the education and training of system security and program protection acquisition professionals through the establishment and course development of Defense Acquisition Credentials. This project funds continual engagement with other Department stakeholders;, acquisition programs, and the defense industrial base to ensure protection of controlled unclassified information; improve software and hardware assurance mitigations and management of information communication technology (ICT) supply chain risk management risks; improve integration of cybersecurity into the engineering processes through secure cyber resilient engineering methods; improve software assurance and hardware assurance practices; mature processes to identify and protect Critical Program Information; and mature processes to integrate defense exportability features to allow for expediated transfer of U.S. defense systems. This project supports the maturation of SSE and assurance best practices through community and working group engagements. Methodologies, tools, and capabilities are made available and scaled through enterprise resources to maximize adoption. Activities funded by this initiative support DoD Instruction 5200.44 Trusted Systems and Networks with the use of proven mitigation techniques and tools, the ongoing refinement of ICT risk management processes, and creation of needed technology; implementation of DoD Instruction 5200.39 Critical Program Information (CPI) Identification and Protection Within Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) and DoD Directive 5200.47 Anti Tamper to identify and protect Critical Program Information; and implementation of DoD Instruction 8582.01 Security of Unclassified DoD Information on Non-DoD Information Systems for Safeguarding Controlled Unclassified Information on contractor owned networks.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (4)

Technology Industrial Innovation Base (TIIB)

This project uses a three-step approach: (1) Assess, (2) Protect/Promote; and (3) Monitor. In the first step, TIIB uses emerging technology assessments to translate technology needs to manufacturing and industrial innovation base requirements in order to identify industrial innovation base issues, risks, and opportunities. TIIB created an assessment methodology that incorporates four types of studies to provide a full overview of the technology from a manufacturing and industrial innovation base point of view. The results of the assessments are used to generate industrial-innovation-base inputs to technology roadmaps, develop an investment plan addressing the needs of the industrial innovation base, and create technology and industrial innovation base protection and promotion strategies (second step of the approach). TIIB leverages DoD and Federal Government tools and initiatives to implement the strategies. In the third step, TIIB uses data analytics to measure the success of mitigation and exploitation strategies, establish trends in the markets, and identify the need for additional assessments or changes in investments and strategies. TIIB applied these three steps to Advanced Battery Supply Chain Disruptions, Capabilities within the Directed Energy Industrial Base, DoD Battery Standardization for 2030, Directed Energy Early Supply Chain, and began an assessment of the Strength and Resilience of the U.S. Quantum Technology Supply Chain. Additionally, TIIB organized and hosted the Trusted AI and Autonomous Systems (TAIA) Defense Technology Review Conference, the inaugural Hypersonics Horizontal Protection Workshop, and the Hypersonics Government-Industry Engagement Event (HGIEE).

Science and Technology (S&T) Protection

This project supports efforts to maintain DoD’s technology advantage by establishing activities to ensure accountability for mitigating strategic competitor exploitation of technologies critical to national security objectives. This project will develop and oversee S&T guidance and practices for informed horizontal protection of emerging and critical technology areas.

Joint Acquisition Protection Exploitation Cell (JAPEC)

Integrate controlled unclassified information, to include Controlled Technical Information (CTI), protection efforts across the DoD to proactively mitigate losses resulting from unwanted technology transfer and to exploit opportunities to combat strategic competitors that may threaten U.S. military advantage.

Program and Technology Protection

This project provides system security engineering and secure cyber resilient engineering policy, guidance and technical implementation assessments to inform and reduce risks in sharing and storing Controlled Technical Information and data, improve mitigation of ICT supply chain risk management risks, improve integration of cybersecurity into the engineering processes, improvements in defense exportability and anti-tamper practices, improve processes and tools to identify Critical Program Information and improve program protection planning. Activities carried out support implementation of DoD instruction 5000.83, Technology and Program Protection to Maintain Technological Advantage; DoD Instruction 5200.44 Trusted Systems and Networks; DoD Instruction 5200.39 Critical Program Information (CPI) Identification and Protection within RDT&E and DoD Directive 5200.47E Anti Tamper to identify and protect Critical Program Information; DoD Instruction 8582.01 Security of Unclassified DoD Information on Non-DoD Information Systems.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY24 Actuals$37.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Enacted$31.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Total$31.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Disc. Request$29.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Total$29.7M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$31.7M$37.7M$31.6M$29.7M$29.7M
043: Technology Industrial Innovation Base$8.95M$8.05M$0$0
138: S&T Protection$8.77M$11.7M$13.4M$11.8M$11.8M
139: Joint Acquisition Protection Exploitation Cell (JAPEC)$9.08M$13.2M$13.1M$12.9M$12.9M
158: Program and Technology Protection$4.89M$4.82M$5.14M$4.93M$4.93M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Maintaining Technology Advantage — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →