Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Development Test and Evaluation

OSDRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0605804D8Z
What it is
Development Test and Evaluation (0605804D8Z) is an OSD research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 3 projects.
What changed
+$148.0K FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$36.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$37.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$37.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$148.0KR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $36.0MFY25: $37.2MFY26: $37.4MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$36.0M
FY25$37.2M
FY26$37.4M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$18.8M$20.7M$20.8M$19.8M$19.4M$21.4M$26.2M$26.3M$25.3M$36.0M
Enacted$21.3M$19.5M$20.6M$20.1M$22.2M$27.2M$27.3M$26.0M$37.4M$37.2M
Request$19.5M$20.6M$20.2M$22.2M$27.2M$27.4M$26.7M$37.4M$37.2M$37.4M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $26.7M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $25.3M as actual total obligation authority — $1.37M below the request. 25.326.7 = -1.4 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Development Test & Evaluation

This program carries out the duties in accordance with Title 10 U.S.C. Section 133a, FY 2018 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (Public Law 115-91) section 838, and the Department of Defense (DoD) Directive 5137.02 dated July 15, 2020. In FY 2020, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (USD(R&E)) established the Developmental Test, Evaluation, and Assessments (DTE&A) organization to provide consolidated Developmental Test and Evaluation (DT&E) and Independent Engineering Assessment functions in a single office. The Director, DTE&A, is the principal advisor to the Secretary of Defense; USD(R&E); and the Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisition and Sustainment (USD(A&S)) on DT&E, Independent Engineering Assessments, and Technical Risk Assessments in the Department of Defense (DoD). The assessment products developed by this program inform investment decisions for critical Warfighter capabilities that align to the Department's 17 priorities including Nuclear Modernization, Virginia-class submarines, executable surface ships, Homeland Missile Defense, One Way Attack/Autonomous Systems, and Munitions. This program supports the Department's initiatives to rebuild the military and reestablish deterrence. The Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (OUSD(R&E)) engages with Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs) within the Adaptive Acquisition Framework, providing engineering and DT&E/Cybersecurity DT&E planning expertise to ensure decision-quality data is available at major engineering program reviews and program milestones. This engagement directly helps Program Managers succeed in rebuilding the military and rapidly fielding emerging technologies. OUSD(R&E) engages with programs to help meet interoperability requirements to deepen interoperability and Strengthen Alliances. Finally, OUSD(R&E) works with Director, Operational Test and Evaluation to streamline T&E policy and guidance to improve test efficiency and reduce acquisition cost and schedule to reform acquisition processes. This program supports and improves the engineering and DT&E efforts of Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP), Rapid Prototyping/Fielding efforts, and other Special Interest (SI) acquisition programs designated by USD(R&E) or USD(A&S) as they progress through the acquisition/development lifecycle; supports development of the defense acquisition workforce Test and Evaluation (T&E) career field; and supports development of policy and guidance for the conduct of DT&E and Cyber DT&E within the DoD. This program also provides dedicated resources to support MDAP and Rapid Prototyping/Fielding Program Managers, Chief Developmental Testers, and Lead Development Test & Evaluation organizations in the development of comprehensive, efficient, and innovative Cybersecurity DT&E strategies/plans to support key acquisition milestones and engineering/programmatic decisions.

Mission Cybersecurity DT&E for Weapon Systems

The Cybersecurity Development Test and Evaluation (DT&E) for Weapon Systems project 048 provides dedicated resources to support Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP) and Rapid Prototyping/Fielding Program Managers, Chief Developmental Testers, and Lead DT&E Organizations in the development of comprehensive, efficient, and innovative cyber DT&E strategies to support key acquisition milestones and engineering/programmatic decisions. Cyber DT&E includes cybersecurity and cyber resilience as the components of cyber survivability. On behalf of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (USD(R&E)) this project executes the following activities: - Support acquisition programs in the development of comprehensive, efficient, and innovative cyber DT&E strategies that can be documented in Test and Evaluation Master Plans (TEMPs). For Acquisition Category (ACAT) ID programs, review and approve/disapprove the cyber DT&E strategy/plans within the TEMP. For ACAT IB and IC programs, review the cyber DT&E strategy/plans within the TEMP and provide a recommendation to the Service Milestone Decision Authority as to whether or not the strategy is adequate. - Support rapid prototyping, rapid fielding, and technology demonstrations efforts in the development of tailored comprehensive, efficient, and innovative cyber DT&E strategies/plans. - Support the development of independent technical risk assessments and advise the Secretary on the progress towards meeting the cyber survivability Key Performance Parameter before any decision to grant Milestone A or B approval, or enter into low-rate initial production or full-rate production for ACAT ID programs or when requested by the Secretary. - Identify DoD cyber test infrastructure gaps and support development of the OUSD(R&E) test resources strategic plan. - Evolve the cyber DT&E 'state of practice' to keep pace with emerging technologies and improve test efficiency to field systems faster. - Coordinate with Director, Operational Test and Evaluation to improve cyber T&E efficiency and make best use of integrated testing.

Mission Independent Engineering Assessments

The Independent Engineering Assessments project 149 provides resources to support Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP) Program Managers and Chief Engineers/Systems Engineers in the development of comprehensive, efficient, and innovative engineering strategies/plans to support key acquisition milestones and engineering decisions. For Acquisition Category (ACAT) ID programs, this project also conducts independent engineering assessments, including Independent Technical Risk Assessments (ITRAs), and assessments at the Preliminary and Critical Design Reviews. On behalf of the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (USD(R&E)) this project executes the following activities: -Support acquisition programs in the development of comprehensive, efficient, and innovative systems engineering strategies. Provide Systems Engineering support to ACAT ID programs. For ACAT ID programs, review and approve/disapprove the System Engineering Plans (SEPs) to ensure engineering activities, strategies, and plans are comprehensive and consistent with best practices. - Monitor and advise USD(R&E) and Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (USD(A&S)) on technical and engineering aspects of MDAPs and select alternate acquisition pathway programs to ensure they are adequate to support fielding and the achievement of cost, schedule and performance goals to include readiness, i.e., producibility, reliability, maintainability, sustainment, and other considerations. - For ACAT ID programs, provide ITRAs to the Defense Acquisition Executive (DAE) at the Milestone (MS) A, B, and C decisions with the goal of identifying technical risk and outlining potential mitigation measures that should be considered during program execution. For select high priority ACAT IB and IC programs, review and approve service conducted ITRAs prior to the applicable milestone decision point. - For ACAT ID programs, conduct Preliminary and Critical Design Review assessments to inform the Defense Acquisition Executive of technical risks, maturity of the technical baseline, and the program’s readiness to proceed in accordance with statute. - For ACAT ID programs, the ITRA and Preliminary Design Review (PDR) assessments support the DAE decision to approve MS B in accordance with statute. They also support the DAE as the milestone decision authority in satisfying requirements to notify congress a written record of the decision to grant MS B for a major defense acquisition program including identification of risks, mitigation measures, and technology maturity in accordance with statute. - Support acceleration of USD(R&E) modernization initiatives in accordance with the interim National Defense Strategy (NDS). - Conduct other technical reviews as requested, such as Nunn-McCurdy certification reviews, Non-Advocate Reviews, focused technical assessments, schedule risk assessments, and software readiness reviews to identify and mitigate program risk. - Coordinate with the Services to improve engineering practices for Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs) and rapid prototyping/fielding programs. Identify, document, and share lessons learned to improve Systems Engineering across the DoD. - Guide Service and other component organizations in the development planning process to ensure proposed MDAP programs are executable within acceptable levels of risk.

Mission Development Test & Evaluation

The Development Test & Evaluation (DT&E) project 804 provides resources to support Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP) and Rapid Prototyping/Fielding Program Managers, Chief Developmental Testers, and Lead DT&E Organizations in the development of comprehensive, efficient, and innovative DT&E strategies/plans to support key acquisition milestones and engineering decisions. This project also supports the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering (OUSD(R&E)) to manage the Test & Evaluation (T&E) career field and curriculum for the Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition workforce and develop policy and guidance for the conduct of DT&E within DoD. On behalf of the USD(R&E) this project executes the following activities: - Support acquisition programs in the development of comprehensive, efficient, and innovative test strategies that can be documented in Test and Evaluation Master Plans (TEMPs). For Acquisition Category (ACAT) ID programs, review and approve/disapprove the DT&E strategy/plans within the TEMP. For ACAT IB and IC programs, review the DT&E strategy/plans within the TEMP and provide a recommendation to the Service Milestone Decision Authority as to whether or not the strategy is adequate. - Support rapid prototyping, rapid fielding, and technology demonstrations efforts in the development of tailored comprehensive, efficient, and innovative DT&E strategies/plans. - For ACAT ID programs, provide independent DT&E Sufficiency Assessments to the Defense Acquisition Executive at the Milestone B and C decisions with the goal of reducing discovery of performance issues later in the acquisition lifecycle when deficiencies are more costly to correct. - For ACAT IB and IC programs, provide an independent DT&E program assessment to the Service Milestone Decision Authority prior to the development Request for Proposal (RFP) release decision point and at the Milestone B and C decisions with the goal of reducing discovery of performance issues later in the acquisition lifecycle when deficiencies are more costly to correct. - When requested by the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Defense, provide independent developmental test assessments in support of Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (USD(A&S)) and Service Major Defense Acquisition Programs. - Support the development of independent technical risk assessments and advise the Secretary on the progress toward meeting Key Performance Parameters, technology maturation, reliability growth projections, interoperability, and cyber resilience before any decision to grant Milestone A or B approval, or enter into low-rate initial production or full-rate production for ACAT ID programs or when requested by the Secretary. - Support the Scientific Test and Analysis Techniques Center of Excellence (STAT COE) that provides scientific analytical expertise to service MDAPs. - Identify the DoD test infrastructure gaps and support development of the OUSD(R&E) test resources strategic plan. - Evolve the DT&E 'state of practice' to keep pace with emerging technologies and improve test efficiency to field systems faster. - Coordinate with Director, Operational Test and Evaluation to improve T&E efficiency and make best use of integrated testing.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

Cybersecurity DT&E for Weapon Systems

Cybersecurity DT&E for Weapon Systems project 048 supports and improves the cyber DT&E efforts of MDAP, Rapid Prototyping/Fielding efforts, and other Special Interest (SI) acquisition programs as they progress through the acquisition/development lifecycle; and support development of policy and guidance for the conduct of cyber DT&E within the DoD. Cyber DT&E includes cybersecurity and cyber resilience as the components of cyber survivability.

Development Test and Evaluation

The Development Test & Evaluation (DT&E) project 804 supports and improves the DT&E efforts of Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP), Rapid Prototyping/Fielding efforts, and other Special Interest (SI) acquisition programs as they progress through the acquisition/development lifecycle; lead the defense acquisition workforce T&E career field; and support development of policy and guidance for the conduct of DT&E within the DoD.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY24 Actuals$36.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Enacted$37.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Total$37.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Disc. Request$37.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Total$37.4M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$217.6M$36.0M$37.2M$37.4M$37.4M
048: Cybersecurity DT&E for Weapon Systems$20.3M$8.30M$7.05M$7.17M$7.17M
149: Independent Engineering Assessments$0$9.67M$10.2M$9.93M$9.93M
804: Development Test & Evaluation$197.3M$18.0M$19.9M$20.3M$20.3M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Development Test and Evaluation — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →