Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78 - 80)

NavyRDT&EReconciledPE0604112N
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78 - 80) (0604112N) is a Navy research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
+$16.0M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 8 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$112.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$96.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$112.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$16.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $112.6MFY25: $96.7MFY26: $112.7MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$112.6M
FY25$96.7M
FY26$112.7M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$46.3M$95.4M$69.2M$82.5M$81.0M$106.4M$111.6M$117.9M$112.5M$112.6M
Enacted$98.1M$70.5M$83.9M$83.1M$105.8M$104.4M$121.5M$116.5M$118.2M$96.7M
Request$70.5M$83.9M$58.1M$121.3M$107.9M$121.5M$116.5M$118.2M$96.7M$112.7M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2019 book requested $58.1M for FY2019; the PB2021 book reported $81.0M as actual total obligation authority — $22.9M above the request. 81.0 − 58.1 = 22.9 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

Predecessors (funding flowed in)

  • renamed from · per FY2026 J-book · BA3
    show sentence
    “This Program Element (PE) and associated projects represent a continuation of efforts previously funded under PE 0603512N projects 2208 and 4004 in FY 2014 and earlier and PE 0604567N projects 3179, 3180, and 4007 in FY 2023 and earlier.”
This program
0604112N — Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78 - 80)

Family Funding Line

Funding chain: 0603512N0604112N — Carrier Systems Development

See this family in the lineage map →

Description

Mission — GERALD R FORD CI NUC AIRCRAFT CARRIER CVN 78-80

This Navy program addresses unique technologies on Ford Class carriers. The program includes: - (2208) - Development of ship hull, mechanical, propulsion, electrical, aviation, and combat support systems, subsystems and components to significantly improve aircraft carrier affordability, manpower requirements, survivability, and operational capabilities, and to meet the requirements of existing and pending regulations and statutes critical to the operation of existing and future aircraft carriers. - (4004) - The Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) is an advanced technology system developed as part of, and integrated on new FORD Class Carrier ships, beginning with CVN78. EMALS provides better control of applied forces, both peak and transient dynamic loads, improved reliability and maintainability, increased operational availability, and reduced operator and maintainer workload. The EMALS program will undergo future system improvements to address safety, obsolescence, and reliability. This Program Element (PE) and associated projects represent a continuation of efforts previously funded under PE 0603512N projects 2208 and 4004 in FY 2014 and earlier and PE 0604567N projects 3179, 3180, and 4007 in FY 2023 and earlier.

Mission — CVN 21

This project provides the development of aircraft carrier specific technologies, the infusion of the ship technology base into existing and future aircraft carriers, and the potential realization of subsystem design capabilities not currently feasible. All systems developed in this project support current or emerging requirements and other promising systems technologies for insertion into existing and new aircraft carrier designs. The emphasis is directed toward developing ship hull, mechanical, propulsion, electrical, aviation, and warfare systems to significantly improve aircraft carrier affordability, manpower requirements, survivability, and operational capabilities required to meet existing and pending regulations and statutes critical to the operation of future aircraft carriers. This project also encompasses those tasks required to support CVN 78 Class procurement, including, but not limited to engineering support, programmatic and program support, logistics support, modeling and simulation, test and evaluation, manpower and program related studies, and design support systems, such as the Integrated Digital Environment (IDE).

Mission — EMALS

The Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) is an advanced technology system developed as part of, and integrated on new FORD Class Carrier ships, beginning with CVN 78. EMALS provides better control of applied forces, both peak and transient dynamic loads, improved reliability and maintainability, increased operational availability, and reduced operator and maintainer workload. The EMALS program will undergo future system improvements to address safety, obsolescence, and reliability, to include but not limited to Automated software testing, Electrical Isolation, Advancing Additive at Large Scale to Address Readiness and Sustainment (AALSTARS), Block Switch Controller (BSC) Complex Programmable Logic Device (CPLD), Software Support Activity (SSA), Autosuspends, Maintenance Laptop, Catapult Status Dashboard (CSD), and other emergent requirements. Automated software testing development provides for rapid, repeatable tests, resulting in higher quality software. Automated testing enables rapid diagnosis of system faults and decrease troubleshooting response time for the fleet. EMALS is a software intensive system and highly dependent on reliable software operation. The readiness and mission benefits include the ability to provide the fleet with affordable, quality, well-tested software capable of launching and recovering aircraft on Ford-Class carriers. Development of Electrical Isolation provides for EMALS capabilities to continue launch operations while being able to isolate catapults for regular maintenance, in turn improving maintenance cycle times. This provides readiness and mission benefits to enable continued operations and increases system mission capability. Implementing the AALSTARS initiative will demonstrate alternative manufacturing methods of select EMALS components. This will reduce manufacturing lead time and costs for highly complex, long lead time items. Developing BSC CPLD provides additional space on a critical control card to allow for future firmware and logic updates in order to ensure timely functionality and to support future changes. This also addresses a known obsolescence issue. Software Support Activity (SSA) development provides a high-level hybrid SSA planning document (Software Test Plan) to ensure software test activities are developed and implemented. In addition, the hybrid SSA will execute software investigations, Correction of Deficiencies, and the EMALS SSA lab design and upgrade plan in support of future EMALS systems improvements. Autosuspends effort is to develop software improvements for several key EMALS Computer Software Configuration Items (CSCIs) that will mitigate the EMALS Autosuspends associated with faults and communication dropouts, which terminates the launch process and causes delays to launch operations. These software improvements will significantly lessen the number of experienced Autosuspends and improve CVN launch operations in order to meet the operational need. Development of a software maintenance laptop provides organizational level support of EMALS software. The current procedure requires onboard engineering support in order to reduce troubleshooting and Mean Time To Repair (MTTR). Catapult Status Dashboard (CSD) development will provide enhanced user situational awareness, improving EMALS operational efficiency. The current EMALS primary operational station equipment, the Maintenance Workstation (MWS), was developed only for maintenance and does not adequately support user awareness of EMALS launch operations.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (5)

CVN 78 Class Digital Transformation

CVN 78 Class Digital Transformation - to develop, refine, and implement digital structures such as the FORD class product model, Integrated Digital Shipbuilding (iDS), and cloud based product exchanges.

CVN 78 Class Test & Evaluation (T&E)

Test and Evaluation includes test planning, system modeling and simulation, incorporating laboratory and land based facilities support, conducting test events, and evaluating and documenting test results. Title 10, US Code, Section 2366 also requires survivability assessment; for the CVN 78 Class this entails testing, analysis, and documentation. T&E results in refinement of future FORD Class capabilities and survivability, system analysis, verification and validation of requirements, and fulfilling statutory requirements.

CVN 78 Class Transformation and Affordability

Investments in technology insertion to assist in stabilizing the supply chain, reducing the cost of production, improving industrial capacity, increasing supplier throughput, reducing schedule risk, improving material quality and performance specifications. These investments provide opportunities to incorporate affordability into the design, engineering, manufacturing and overhead of future Aircraft Carriers.

CVN 78 Class Systems Analysis & Total Ship Integration

Integrate mission systems into platform design, while also addressing fact-of-life configuration changes from obsolescence, advances in technology, late and/or poor quality material, and other adverse program impacts to mitigate cost, schedule or performance risk. This includes divestments in legacy technologies and materials, which offset forward pricing rates in procurement, and feasibility and tradeoff studies that enhance naval capability and reduce total ownership cost.

EMALS System Improvements

EMALS System Improvements

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$112.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$96.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$96.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$112.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$112.7M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$842.5M$112.6M$96.7M$112.7M$112.7M
2208: CVN 21$671.8M$111.8M$86.9M$90.4M$90.4M
4004: EMALS$170.7M$762.0K$9.79M$22.4M$22.4M

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 0604112N (Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78 - 80)), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 0604112N (Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78 - 80)), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSNRDT&E appropriation0604112N112.7M FY26N0001922F2298GENERAL ATOMICS11.6MGeneral AtomicsCA-50

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
CA-50$11.6M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
GENERAL ATOMICSN0001922F2298high
GENERAL ATOMICSN0001919F2709medium
GENERAL ATOMICSN6833504C0167medium
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCN0002408C2110medium
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCN0002409C2116medium
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCN0002415C2114medium
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCN0002415C2121medium
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCN0002416C2116medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

Showing 25 of 42 from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

FEDEX CORPORATIONClass|Aircraft2026matched 2+ title words

Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…

FEDEX CORPORATIONClass|Aircraft2026matched 2+ title words

Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPClass|Aircraft2026matched 2+ title words

FY26 and FY27 State and Foreign Operations & FY26 and FY27 Department of State issues and funding including but not…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPClass|Aircraft2026matched 2+ title words

FY27 State and Foreign Operations & FY27 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to relevant…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDClass|Carrier2026matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDClass|Carrier2026matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDClass|Carrier2026matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

TEXTRON INCAircraft|Carrier2026matched 2+ title words

Implementation of PL 118-63, FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 S 2503, Rotorcraft Operations Transparency and Oversight…

FEDEX CORPORATIONClass|Aircraft2025matched 2+ title words

Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…

FEDEX CORPORATIONClass|Aircraft2025matched 2+ title words

Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…

FEDEX CORPORATIONClass|Aircraft2025matched 2+ title words

Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…

FEDEX CORPORATIONClass|Aircraft2025matched 2+ title words

Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…

FEDEX CORPORATIONClass|Aircraft2025matched 2+ title words

Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPClass|Aircraft2025matched 2+ title words

FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPClass|Aircraft2025matched 2+ title words

FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPClass|Aircraft2025matched 2+ title words

FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPClass|Aircraft2025matched 2+ title words

FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDClass|Carrier2025matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDClass|Carrier2025matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDClass|Carrier2025matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDClass|Carrier2025matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDClass|Carrier2025matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATEDClass|Carrier2025matched 2+ title words

Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…

ROLLS-ROYCE NORTH AMERICA AND ITS AFFILIATESClass|Aircraft2025matched 2+ title words

Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025 (H.R. 4275 / S. 524), Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026 (H.

TEXTRON INCAircraft|Carrier2025matched 2+ title words

PL 119-4, Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 Department of Homeland Security Appropriations…

Oversight

GAO oversight of this program

GAO assessed CVN 78 Gerald R. Ford Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78) in its June 2025 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as a Navy MDAP program.

“The Navy developed the CVN 78 (or Ford class) nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to create operational efficiencies and increase the rate of sustained flight operations compared with legacy aircraft carriers. The Ford class introduced new propulsion, aircraft launch and recovery, and survivability capabilities to the carrier fleet. It is the successor to the Nimitz class aircraft carriers. The Navy also expects the new technologies to enable Ford class carriers to operate with smaller crews than Nimitz class ships.”

GAO-25-107569, p. 121 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2025 report

Earlier editions of the same assessment: June 2024 · June 2023

GAO assessed CVN 78 Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78) in its June 2024 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as a Navy MDAP program.

“The Navy developed the CVN 78 (or Ford class) nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to introduce new propulsion, aircraft launch and recovery, and survivability capabilities to the carrier fleet. The Ford class is the successor to the Nimitz class aircraft carriers. Its new technologies are intended to create operational efficiencies and increase the rate of sustained flight operations, compared with legacy carriers. The Navy also expects the new technologies to enable Ford class carriers to operate with smaller crews than Nimitz class ships.”

GAO-24-106831, p. 131 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2024 report

GAO assessed CVN 78 Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78) in its June 2023 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as a Navy MDAP program.

“The Navy developed the CVN 78 (or Ford class) nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to introduce new propulsion, aircraft launch and recovery, and survivability capabilities to the carrier fleet. The Ford class is the successor to the Nimitz class aircraft carriers. Its new technologies are intended to create operational efficiencies and increase sustained operational flights, compared with legacy carriers. The Navy also expects the new technologies to enable Ford class carriers to operate with a smaller crew than Nimitz class ships.”

GAO-23-106059, p. 141 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2023 report

GAO assessed the program, not this budget line. Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78 - 80) is one of the lines that funds it, and GAO’s work above says nothing about this line’s own figures. Which line each GAO item attaches to is a hand-ratified crosswalk — how it was checked.

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78 - 80). GAO's program-level work on this line is above. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.