Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0604112N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78 - 80)
Watch this program
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $112.6M |
| FY25 | $96.7M |
| FY26 | $112.7M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $46.3M | $95.4M | $69.2M | $82.5M | $81.0M | $106.4M | $111.6M | $117.9M | $112.5M | $112.6M | ||
| Enacted | $98.1M | $70.5M | $83.9M | $83.1M | $105.8M | $104.4M | $121.5M | $116.5M | $118.2M | $96.7M | ||
| Request | $70.5M | $83.9M | $58.1M | $121.3M | $107.9M | $121.5M | $116.5M | $118.2M | $96.7M | $112.7M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2019 book requested $58.1M for FY2019; the PB2021 book reported $81.0M as actual total obligation authority — $22.9M above the request. 81.0 − 58.1 = 22.9 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
Predecessors (funding flowed in)
- renamed from · per FY2026 J-book · BA3
show sentence
“This Program Element (PE) and associated projects represent a continuation of efforts previously funded under PE 0603512N projects 2208 and 4004 in FY 2014 and earlier and PE 0604567N projects 3179, 3180, and 4007 in FY 2023 and earlier.”
0604112N — Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78 - 80)Family Funding Line
Funding chain: 0603512N0604112N — Carrier Systems Development
- FY2017
0603512N$7.61M0604112N$70.5M - FY2018
0603512N$9.30M0604112N$83.9M - FY2019
0603512N$5.44M0604112N$58.1M - FY2020
0603512N$5.00M0604112N$121.3M - FY2021
0603512N$7.56M0604112N$107.9M - FY2022
0603512N$7.18M0604112N$121.5M - FY2023
0603512N$11.6M0604112N$116.5M - FY2024
0603512N$6.09M0604112N$118.2M - FY2025
0603512N$5.66M0604112N$96.7M - FY2026
0603512N$8.36M0604112N$112.7M
Description
Mission — GERALD R FORD CI NUC AIRCRAFT CARRIER CVN 78-80
This Navy program addresses unique technologies on Ford Class carriers. The program includes: - (2208) - Development of ship hull, mechanical, propulsion, electrical, aviation, and combat support systems, subsystems and components to significantly improve aircraft carrier affordability, manpower requirements, survivability, and operational capabilities, and to meet the requirements of existing and pending regulations and statutes critical to the operation of existing and future aircraft carriers. - (4004) - The Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) is an advanced technology system developed as part of, and integrated on new FORD Class Carrier ships, beginning with CVN78. EMALS provides better control of applied forces, both peak and transient dynamic loads, improved reliability and maintainability, increased operational availability, and reduced operator and maintainer workload. The EMALS program will undergo future system improvements to address safety, obsolescence, and reliability. This Program Element (PE) and associated projects represent a continuation of efforts previously funded under PE 0603512N projects 2208 and 4004 in FY 2014 and earlier and PE 0604567N projects 3179, 3180, and 4007 in FY 2023 and earlier.
Mission — CVN 21
This project provides the development of aircraft carrier specific technologies, the infusion of the ship technology base into existing and future aircraft carriers, and the potential realization of subsystem design capabilities not currently feasible. All systems developed in this project support current or emerging requirements and other promising systems technologies for insertion into existing and new aircraft carrier designs. The emphasis is directed toward developing ship hull, mechanical, propulsion, electrical, aviation, and warfare systems to significantly improve aircraft carrier affordability, manpower requirements, survivability, and operational capabilities required to meet existing and pending regulations and statutes critical to the operation of future aircraft carriers. This project also encompasses those tasks required to support CVN 78 Class procurement, including, but not limited to engineering support, programmatic and program support, logistics support, modeling and simulation, test and evaluation, manpower and program related studies, and design support systems, such as the Integrated Digital Environment (IDE).
Mission — EMALS
The Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) is an advanced technology system developed as part of, and integrated on new FORD Class Carrier ships, beginning with CVN 78. EMALS provides better control of applied forces, both peak and transient dynamic loads, improved reliability and maintainability, increased operational availability, and reduced operator and maintainer workload. The EMALS program will undergo future system improvements to address safety, obsolescence, and reliability, to include but not limited to Automated software testing, Electrical Isolation, Advancing Additive at Large Scale to Address Readiness and Sustainment (AALSTARS), Block Switch Controller (BSC) Complex Programmable Logic Device (CPLD), Software Support Activity (SSA), Autosuspends, Maintenance Laptop, Catapult Status Dashboard (CSD), and other emergent requirements. Automated software testing development provides for rapid, repeatable tests, resulting in higher quality software. Automated testing enables rapid diagnosis of system faults and decrease troubleshooting response time for the fleet. EMALS is a software intensive system and highly dependent on reliable software operation. The readiness and mission benefits include the ability to provide the fleet with affordable, quality, well-tested software capable of launching and recovering aircraft on Ford-Class carriers. Development of Electrical Isolation provides for EMALS capabilities to continue launch operations while being able to isolate catapults for regular maintenance, in turn improving maintenance cycle times. This provides readiness and mission benefits to enable continued operations and increases system mission capability. Implementing the AALSTARS initiative will demonstrate alternative manufacturing methods of select EMALS components. This will reduce manufacturing lead time and costs for highly complex, long lead time items. Developing BSC CPLD provides additional space on a critical control card to allow for future firmware and logic updates in order to ensure timely functionality and to support future changes. This also addresses a known obsolescence issue. Software Support Activity (SSA) development provides a high-level hybrid SSA planning document (Software Test Plan) to ensure software test activities are developed and implemented. In addition, the hybrid SSA will execute software investigations, Correction of Deficiencies, and the EMALS SSA lab design and upgrade plan in support of future EMALS systems improvements. Autosuspends effort is to develop software improvements for several key EMALS Computer Software Configuration Items (CSCIs) that will mitigate the EMALS Autosuspends associated with faults and communication dropouts, which terminates the launch process and causes delays to launch operations. These software improvements will significantly lessen the number of experienced Autosuspends and improve CVN launch operations in order to meet the operational need. Development of a software maintenance laptop provides organizational level support of EMALS software. The current procedure requires onboard engineering support in order to reduce troubleshooting and Mean Time To Repair (MTTR). Catapult Status Dashboard (CSD) development will provide enhanced user situational awareness, improving EMALS operational efficiency. The current EMALS primary operational station equipment, the Maintenance Workstation (MWS), was developed only for maintenance and does not adequately support user awareness of EMALS launch operations.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (5)
CVN 78 Class Digital Transformation
CVN 78 Class Digital Transformation - to develop, refine, and implement digital structures such as the FORD class product model, Integrated Digital Shipbuilding (iDS), and cloud based product exchanges.
CVN 78 Class Test & Evaluation (T&E)
Test and Evaluation includes test planning, system modeling and simulation, incorporating laboratory and land based facilities support, conducting test events, and evaluating and documenting test results. Title 10, US Code, Section 2366 also requires survivability assessment; for the CVN 78 Class this entails testing, analysis, and documentation. T&E results in refinement of future FORD Class capabilities and survivability, system analysis, verification and validation of requirements, and fulfilling statutory requirements.
CVN 78 Class Transformation and Affordability
Investments in technology insertion to assist in stabilizing the supply chain, reducing the cost of production, improving industrial capacity, increasing supplier throughput, reducing schedule risk, improving material quality and performance specifications. These investments provide opportunities to incorporate affordability into the design, engineering, manufacturing and overhead of future Aircraft Carriers.
CVN 78 Class Systems Analysis & Total Ship Integration
Integrate mission systems into platform design, while also addressing fact-of-life configuration changes from obsolescence, advances in technology, late and/or poor quality material, and other adverse program impacts to mitigate cost, schedule or performance risk. This includes divestments in legacy technologies and materials, which offset forward pricing rates in procurement, and feasibility and tradeoff studies that enhance naval capability and reduce total ownership cost.
EMALS System Improvements
EMALS System Improvements
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $112.6M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $96.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $96.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $112.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $112.7M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $842.5M | $112.6M | $96.7M | $112.7M | $112.7M |
| 2208: CVN 21 | $671.8M | $111.8M | $86.9M | $90.4M | $90.4M |
| 4004: EMALS | $170.7M | $762.0K | $9.79M | $22.4M | $22.4M |
Follow the dollar
Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.
Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →
The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.
| District | Program obligations |
|---|---|
| CA-50 | $11.6M |
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| GENERAL ATOMICS | N0001922F2298 | high |
| GENERAL ATOMICS | N0001919F2709 | medium |
| GENERAL ATOMICS | N6833504C0167 | medium |
| HUNTINGTON INGALLS INC | N0002408C2110 | medium |
| HUNTINGTON INGALLS INC | N0002409C2116 | medium |
| HUNTINGTON INGALLS INC | N0002415C2114 | medium |
| HUNTINGTON INGALLS INC | N0002415C2121 | medium |
| HUNTINGTON INGALLS INC | N0002416C2116 | medium |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
Showing 25 of 42 from the Senate LDA disclosure database.
Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…
Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…
FY26 and FY27 State and Foreign Operations & FY26 and FY27 Department of State issues and funding including but not…
FY27 State and Foreign Operations & FY27 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to relevant…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Implementation of PL 118-63, FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 S 2503, Rotorcraft Operations Transparency and Oversight…
Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…
Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…
Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…
Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…
Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…
FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…
FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…
FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…
FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Carrier Replacement Program VCS CVN RCOH DDG-51 Class Multi-year Procurement DDG(X) DDG 1002 LHA and LPD Flight II…
Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025 (H.R. 4275 / S. 524), Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026 (H.
PL 119-4, Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 Department of Homeland Security Appropriations…
Oversight
GAO oversight of this program
GAO assessed CVN 78 Gerald R. Ford Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78) in its June 2025 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as a Navy MDAP program.
“The Navy developed the CVN 78 (or Ford class) nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to create operational efficiencies and increase the rate of sustained flight operations compared with legacy aircraft carriers. The Ford class introduced new propulsion, aircraft launch and recovery, and survivability capabilities to the carrier fleet. It is the successor to the Nimitz class aircraft carriers. The Navy also expects the new technologies to enable Ford class carriers to operate with smaller crews than Nimitz class ships.”
GAO-25-107569, p. 121 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2025 report
Earlier editions of the same assessment: June 2024 · June 2023
GAO assessed CVN 78 Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78) in its June 2024 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as a Navy MDAP program.
“The Navy developed the CVN 78 (or Ford class) nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to introduce new propulsion, aircraft launch and recovery, and survivability capabilities to the carrier fleet. The Ford class is the successor to the Nimitz class aircraft carriers. Its new technologies are intended to create operational efficiencies and increase the rate of sustained flight operations, compared with legacy carriers. The Navy also expects the new technologies to enable Ford class carriers to operate with smaller crews than Nimitz class ships.”
GAO-24-106831, p. 131 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2024 report
GAO assessed CVN 78 Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78) in its June 2023 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as a Navy MDAP program.
“The Navy developed the CVN 78 (or Ford class) nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to introduce new propulsion, aircraft launch and recovery, and survivability capabilities to the carrier fleet. The Ford class is the successor to the Nimitz class aircraft carriers. Its new technologies are intended to create operational efficiencies and increase sustained operational flights, compared with legacy carriers. The Navy also expects the new technologies to enable Ford class carriers to operate with a smaller crew than Nimitz class ships.”
GAO-23-106059, p. 141 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2023 report
GAO assessed the program, not this budget line. Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78 - 80) is one of the lines that funds it, and GAO’s work above says nothing about this line’s own figures. Which line each GAO item attaches to is a hand-ratified crosswalk — how it was checked.
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Gerald R. Ford Class Nuclear Aircraft Carrier (CVN 78 - 80). GAO's program-level work on this line is above. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J323
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J286
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J313
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J320
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J334
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J348
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J319
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J309
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J307
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J308
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil