Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0603512N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Carrier Systems Development
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $10.2M |
| FY25 | $5.66M |
| FY26 | $8.36M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $5.95M | $8.21M | $7.52M | $9.18M | $5.39M | $4.91M | $7.41M | $7.11M | $11.4M | $10.2M | ||
| Enacted | $8.35M | $7.61M | $9.30M | $5.44M | $5.00M | $7.53M | $7.18M | $11.6M | $6.09M | $5.66M | ||
| Request | $7.61M | $9.30M | $5.44M | $5.00M | $7.56M | $7.18M | $11.6M | $6.09M | $5.66M | $8.36M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $6.09M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $10.2M as actual total obligation authority — $4.15M above the request. 10.2 − 6.1 = 4.1 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
0603512N — Carrier Systems DevelopmentSuccessors (funding flowed out)
- renamed to · per FY2026 J-book · BA4
show sentence
“This Program Element (PE) and associated projects represent a continuation of efforts previously funded under PE 0603512N projects 2208 and 4004 in FY 2014 and earlier and PE 0604567N projects 3179, 3180, and 4007 in FY 2023 and earlier.”
Family Funding Line
Funding chain: 0603512N0604112N — Carrier Systems Development
- FY2017
0603512N$7.61M0604112N$70.5M - FY2018
0603512N$9.30M0604112N$83.9M - FY2019
0603512N$5.44M0604112N$58.1M - FY2020
0603512N$5.00M0604112N$121.3M - FY2021
0603512N$7.56M0604112N$107.9M - FY2022
0603512N$7.18M0604112N$121.5M - FY2023
0603512N$11.6M0604112N$116.5M - FY2024
0603512N$6.09M0604112N$118.2M - FY2025
0603512N$5.66M0604112N$96.7M - FY2026
0603512N$8.36M0604112N$112.7M
Description
Mission — Carrier Systems Development
This Program Element (PE) addresses technology areas associated with Command and Control (C2) of the MH-60R/S Seahawk Helicopter, as well as the development of other technologies and enhancements for Aircraft Carrier-based systems. PROJECT 3216: The AN/SQQ-34 Aircraft Carrier Tactical Support Center (CV-TSC) program delivers Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) and Surface Warfare (SUW) combat capability to the Aircraft Carrier supporting Aircraft Carrier, Nuclear power (CVN) Tactical Action Office (TAO) and embarked Carrier Strike Group (CSG) Sea Combat Commander. This project develops, tests, certifies, and fields improved combat capability and critical cyber-security enhancements via incremental Fleet Capability Releases (FCR). The project maintains interoperability with current interfaces and develops interoperability with future interfaces; supports mission data exchange; improves ASW/SUW track/sensor processing and analysis techniques; improves mission planning; improves data recording, reconstruction, and distribution; improves embedded simulation and training capabilities; and implements cyber-security measures to effectively employ overall CVN self-defense capabilities. CV-TSC integrates sensor data from organic rotary wing aircraft (MH-60R), organic platform sensors and tracks via Ship Self Defense System (SSDS) (both Product Line Architecture (PLA) and non-PLA), Link-16 track data, Global Command and Control System (GCCS) Over-the-Horizon (OTH) track data, and environmental and threat databases to assess the threat and assist the TAO and CSG to effectively employ overall CVN self-defense capabilities against ASW/SUW threats. Current development efforts are focused on extending non-organic ASW/SUW data sources to provide situational awareness and targets beyond the CSG surveillance area. This includes Minotaur Family of Services (MFoS)/Joint Tactical Terminal - Maritime (JTT-M) and Maritime Targeting Cell - Afloat (MTC-A), Integrated Broadcast Service (IBS), and future Resilient Command & Control, Communication (RC3) data links. CV-TSC generates real-time ASW/SUW information and recommendations, tactical planning and employment of ASW/SUW assets, ASW/SUW sensor data processing and analysis, and distribution of tactically significant data. Aircraft supported include the MH-60R/S Seahawk, with P-8 Poseidon and MQ-4C Triton as future ASW/SUW non-organic supporting platforms. FY 2026 will focus on final development and testing of FCR-7, to include critical software architecture upgrades, MTC-A integration, MH-60S interface enhancements, cyber-security upgrades, as well as the initiation of FCR-8 development, to include Integrated Combat System (ICS) integration, development, and testing. PROJECT 4005: The In-Service Carrier Systems Development Demonstration and Validation Program develops new technology and enhancements to deliver an affordable, robust, operator-friendly automation control environment for Navy Aircraft Carrier shipboard equipment. The program provides the system architecture, requirements/specification development, technology selection, software development (including software baseline), manpower requirements, Total Ownership Costs (TOC), cyber-security engineering and integration, as well as land-based and shipboard testing of new technologies to improve shipboard operations. PROJECT 9999 / C989: CONGRESSIONAL ADD - Digital Component Certification Center tri-service, Army-Air Force-Navy installation for Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst to address cyber threats to Naval Aviation Aircraft Carrier Systems.
Mission — Tactical Support Center-Integration
The AN/SQQ-34 CV-TSC project delivers ASW and SUW combat capability to the Aircraft Carrier. This project delivers capability updates to the Fleet, developing, testing, certifying, and fielding system upgrades and cyber-security patches. The project maintains interoperability with current and future interfaces; supports mission data exchange; improves track/sensor processing and analysis techniques; improves mission planning; improves data recording, reconstruction, and distribution; improves embedded simulation and training capabilities and implements cyber-security measures to effectively employ overall CVN self-defense capabilities. CV-TSC integrates sensor data from off-board aircraft, organic platform sensors, Minotaur multi-sensor fused track data, Link-16 track data, SSDS track data (PLA and non-PLA), GCCS OTH track data, and environmental and threat databases to assess the threat and assist the TAO and Composite Warfare Commander (CWC) to effectively employ overall CVN self-defense capabilities. CV-TSC generates real-time ASW/SUW information and recommendations, tactical planning and employment of ASW/SUW assets, ASW/SUW sensor data processing and analysis, and distribution of tactically significant data. Aircraft supported include MH-60R/S Seahawk, and P-8 Poseidon and MQ-4C Triton as future ASW/SUW systems. System development is accomplished through the following initiatives: 1) Maintaining interoperability with the local CVN warfare systems through current and future interfaces; 2) Continuing to support mission data exchange and tactical control with current and future ASW/SUW assets and their mission systems; 3) Improving track and sensor processing and analysis techniques as new track and sensor data becomes available; 4) Improving mission planning support for the ASW/SUW missions conducted from the CVN; 5) Improving data recording, reconstruct, and distribution to meet the decreasing timelines associated with getting tactically significant data to other end users both on and off platform; 6) Improving embedded simulation and training capabilities to enable operator proficiencies; and 7) Implementing cyber security measures.
Mission — In-Service Carrier Systems Development
The In-Service Carrier Systems Demonstration and Validation Program develops new technology and enhancements for 11 nuclear powered Aircraft Carriers with nearly 300 systems onboard each vessel. These systems are a combination of historical and new initiatives that deliver an affordable, robust, operator-friendly automated control environment. In order to deter threats and properly integrate all of the systems, the Demonstration and Validation Program segments the testing and upgrades into four areas: system architecture, requirements/specification development, technology selection, cyber-security engineering and integration, and software development. The Demonstration and Validation Program also focuses on the Total Ownership Costs of each system and any equipment obsolescence issues. Initial technologies include the Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) Replacements, the Integrated Condition Assessment System (ICAS), the On-Machine I/O development for Low Pressure Air Plants (LPAP) and LPAP Air End Re-design. Demonstration technologies include Advanced Damage Control System (ADCS) software improvements, Input / Output Controller (IOC) Replacement, Fleet wireless Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), Weapons Elevator Laser Positioning System (WELPS), Legacy Steering Interface (LSI) upgrades, Passive Countermeasures System (PCMS) alternate measurement capability, additive manufacturing efforts, and Weapons Elevators Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) redesign.
Mission — Congressional Adds
Establishing a Digital Component Certification Laboratory on Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, where overseas and domestic manufactured digital components can be scanned and certified before their installation in weapon systems, would significantly enhance our ability to test components and certify digital integrity. The mission of the laboratory will include developing the processes, metrics, and tools to evaluate internal component designs and the embedded software (i.e., Firmware) with the ability to evolve a trustworthiness factor for each component. This mission intends to identify infected chip lots before installation in weapon systems, identify and track those manufacturers that deliver infected components, eliminate identified manufacturers as component suppliers, document the cyber tactics being employed in components, and assure that U.S. military systems are reliable, secure, and operable in the event of a conflict.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
CV-TSC Development / Integration / Test / Certification
CV-TSC's evolutionary acquisition approach to developing, testing, certifying, and fielding system upgrades and cyber-security patches is implemented through a series of phased Fleet Capability Releases (FCRs).
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $10.2M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $5.66M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $5.66M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $8.36M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $8.36M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $114.5M | $10.2M | $5.66M | $8.36M | $8.36M |
| 3216: Tactical Support Center-Integration | $80.3M | $5.25M | $4.58M | $4.39M | $4.39M |
| 4005: In-Service Carrier Systems Development | $34.3M | $1.14M | $1.08M | $3.97M | $3.97M |
| 9999: Congressional Adds | $0 | $3.86M | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Carrier Systems Development. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J278
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J246
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J273
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J275
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J291
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J304
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J275
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J266
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J264
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J265
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil