Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0604567N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Ship Contract Design/ Live Fire T&E
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $22.3M |
| FY25 | $13.7M |
| FY26 | $28.4M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $39.5M | $38.1M | $82.9M | $65.9M | $69.3M | $45.0M | $61.8M | $52.9M | $59.5M | $22.3M | ||
| Enacted | $38.9M | $63.3M | $67.2M | $71.1M | $46.8M | $63.5M | $54.8M | $60.8M | $22.5M | $13.7M | ||
| Request | $65.0M | $67.2M | $60.1M | $46.8M | $51.9M | $54.8M | $60.8M | $22.5M | $13.7M | $28.4M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2017 book requested $65.0M for FY2017; the PB2019 book reported $82.9M as actual total obligation authority — $17.9M above the request. 82.9 − 65.0 = 17.9 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
0604567N — Ship Contract Design/ Live Fire T&ESuccessors (funding flowed out)
- renamed to · per FY2026 J-book · BA5
show sentence
“This effort was previously funded under PE 0604567N under projects 3133 and 3137 (FY 2014 and prior).”
Family Funding Line
Funding chain: 0604567N0605220N — Ship Contract Design/ Live Fire T&E
- FY2017
0604567N$65.0M0605220N$11.1M - FY2018
0604567N$67.2M0605220N$22.4M - FY2019
0604567N$60.1M0605220N$1.44M - FY2020
0604567N$46.8M0605220N$4.91M - FY2021
0604567N$51.9M0605220N$5.16M - FY2022
0604567N$54.8M0605220N$6.32M - FY2023
0604567N$60.8M0605220N$2.89M - FY2024
0604567N$22.5M0605220N$1.34M - FY2025
0604567N$13.7M0605220N$5.70M - FY2026
0604567N$28.4M0605220N$8.96M
Description
Mission — Ship Contract Design/ Live Fire T&E
This Program Element (PE) directly supports the Navy's Shipbuilding Plan by providing for the development of engineering, programmatic and acquisition documentation including ship specifications (including performance specifications) and contractual documentation associated with acquisition of Navy ships. This PE also supports the Congressionally mandated Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E) program for new ship designs. Contract Design has traditionally been the engineering development of the technical and contractual definition of the ship design (including ship specifications and drawings) to a level of detail sufficient for shipbuilders to make a sound estimate of the construction cost and schedule. Additionally, the contract design package developed under this PE has provided the technical baseline from which the Navy selects the shipbuilder who then develops the detail design package required to support the construction and eventual delivery of the ship. This PE also supports the development of design methodologies/tools which facilitate and optimize the transition from ship design documents to efficient production of new ships and ship conversions, and supports engineering planning and ship affordability studies. Under Acquisition Reform for new design ships, traditional distinct phasing of the design process has been replaced with a continuous concurrent engineering Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD) process extending through and after contract award. This serves to maintain the focus of multi-discipline teams consisting of the government, shipbuilder, system programs, and suppliers. Government/Industry Integrated Product Team(s) (IPTs) will utilize the IPPD process to develop the design in an Integrated Product and Data Environment (IPDE). The design approach is part of an acquisition strategy that is based on commercial practices and incorporates a phased technical definition.
Mission — Ship Contract Design
Provides for innovation in engineering solutions for the DDG Modernization program in support of delivering added Fleet capability within Depot Modernization Periods (DMPs). Efforts include development of ship's design (e.g. ship specifications and drawings), installation and test plans, and installation and duration analysis products to evaluate and inform installation alternatives and evolve existing design processes. Provides the Navy with a digital, ship design knowledge base, including lessons learned, required to ensure that a proper development, analysis and evaluation can be conducted of any current or future planned ship alteration. Additionally supports the development of specific Navy ship design criteria and standards for newly developed technologies, new safety regulations and environmental criteria, or other legal/Congressional requirements. This project also funds the translation of the traditional Ship Specifications into performance-based criteria, which supports the development of design methodologies/ tools that facilitate and optimize the transition from ship design documents to ship alterations. This project also supports ship survivability studies, superstructure integrity analysis, developmental and operational testing, and system integration efforts. Expeditionary Sea Base (ESB) (formerly MLP AFSB) Prior year funding included the performance specification development and Dynamic Interface Testing for various airframes as part of the ESB Special Operations Forces (SOF) Backfit.
Mission — LHA(R) FLT Design and Total Ship Integration
This project provides the contract design, development, and testing efforts for the Amphibious Assault Ship General Purpose Replacement Program - LHA(R). The LHA(R) is a ship construction program designed to: (1) provide a functional replacement for the Amphibious Assault Ships which reached the end of their extended service lives (2) be a key platform in the Amphibious Readiness Group (ARG) of the future and (3) provide for an affordable and sustainable amphibious ship development program. LHA(R) ships will provide forward presence and power projection as an integral part of Joint, inter-agency, and multi-national maritime expeditionary forces. Additionally, LHA(R) will be designed to operate for sustained periods in transit to and operations in an Amphibious Objective Area to include the embarkation, deployment, and landing of a Marine Landing Force in an assault with landing craft, helicopters and tilt rotors (MV-22) supported by Joint Strike Fighters (F-35B).
Justification
No accomplishments or planned-program narratives in this line's J-book detail — some exhibits carry figures without per-project prose.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $22.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $13.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $13.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $28.4M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $28.4M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $453.0M | $22.3M | $13.7M | $28.4M | $28.4M |
| 1803: Ship Contract Design | $152.7M | $3.01M | $2.00M | $792.0K | $792.0K |
| 2465: LHA(R) FLT Design and Total Ship Integration | $300.3M | $19.3M | $11.7M | $27.6M | $27.6M |
Follow the dollar
Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.
Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →
The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.
| District | Program obligations |
|---|---|
| MS-04 | $85.2K |
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED | N0002413C2402 | high |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Ship Contract Design/ Live Fire T&E. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J386
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J336
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J366
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J377
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J389
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J401
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J375
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J366
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J365
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J367
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil