Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Strategic Command And Control

Air ForceProcurementReconciledBLI833140
What it is
Strategic Command And Control (833140) is an Air Force procurement line funded in the Other Procurement, Air Force account.
What changed
+$32.9M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 1 linked award record is listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$73.9MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$50.0MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$82.9MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$32.9MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $73.9MFY25: $50.0MFY26: $82.9MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$73.9M
FY25$50.0M
FY26$82.9M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$38.2M$101.0M$73.9M
Enacted–$121.3M$73.6M$50.0M
Request––$73.6M$50.0M$82.9M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $73.6M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $73.9M as actual total obligation authority — $300.0K above the request. 73.9 − 73.6 = 0.3 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Strategic Command And Control

This procurement document supports multiple programs. PE 0101127F, B-2: B-2 SUPPORT: The B-2 weapon system relies heavily on C2 equipment to meet its operational capability. Funding is used to replace obsolete computer equipment, backbone infrastructure hardware and software, and long haul communications equipment at the Weapon System Support Center (WSSC) Ground Test Facility (GTF), and contractor laboratories. This includes commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) items such as computers, displays, printers, disk and tape drives, software (e.g. computer-aided design (CAD) and analysis software) as well as engineering and logistical support. Funds also procure specialized computers that provide on-line access to B-2 aircraft data and low observable analysis capabilities. Unique B-2 security and communication infrastructure needs are also addressed. The B-2 WSSC GTF, located at Oklahoma Air Logistics Center, Tinker AFB, OK, supports two critical functions: aircraft software development and maintenance/support, plus systems engineering support for the fielded weapon system. Software maintenance fixes to aircraft systems include flight controls, flight management, navigation systems, weapons/armament and the defensive management system. These software fixes are accomplished and tested with the use of the WSSC software development system and integration/test laboratory complex by analyzing and designing fixes to the existing aircraft software. The WSSC GTF also provides engineering support with specialized computer systems that provide online access to B-2 aircraft data. This data consists of items such as engineering and organic low observable analysis, manufacturing, aircraft design data used to help solve technical issues on the B-2. Locations where this data is used include Tinker AFB, Whiteman AFB, Wright-Patterson AFB, Northrop-Grumman in Palmdale, CA and forward operating locations (FOL). Funding for this exhibit contained in PE 0101127F. PE 0101316F, Worldwide Joint Strategic Communications: Emergency Action Messages (EAMs) are highly structured, authenticated messages primarily used in the command and control of nuclear forces. They are disseminated over numerous survivable and nonsurvivable communication systems including terrestrial and space systems. Programmed funds procure system components, spares, software, and necessary support services for systems such as the Strategic Automated Command and Control System (SACCS), Phoenix Air-to-Ground Communication Network (PAGCN), and Defense Injection Reception EAM C2 Terminals (DIRECT). SACCS is a secure Nuclear Command, Control, and Communications (NC3) system that directly supports National Command Authority (NCA) communications in the command and control of strategic and nonstrategic forces. SACCS enables the NCA to disseminate Higher Authority Command Messages, Force Direction Messages, EAMs, and automated intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) re-targeting data to the USAF's two legs (ICBM and bomber fleets) of the nuclear triad; the reconnaissance, tanker, USAFE munitions, and Special Operations communities; and to other Active Duty, Guard, and Reserve DoD users worldwide. DIRECT includes the hardware and software to enable the NCA to transmit nuclear and non-nuclear EAMs and other time-critical messages to strategic and non-strategic forces. The specific items procured may vary depending upon available technology at the time of procurement. Funding may be used to address Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS) issues. PAGCN is a critical component of the Senior Leadership Command, Control and Communications System (SLC3S) that extends terrestrial Defense Information Systems Network (DISN) connectivity via an air-to-ground line-of-sight (LoS) communications path to select Airborne and Ground Mobile platforms, and provides an air-to-air LoS communications path between PAGCN-equipped platforms. The FY2018 NDAA directed the transfer of the PAGCN program from the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) to the Air Force Program Executive Officer for Nuclear Command, Control and Communications (AFPEO NC3); the program office transition from DISA to the Air Force was completed on 1 Oct 2020. FY 2026 funds will be used to procure 2 new Ground Entry Points, initial spares and repair parts for each new site (2 sites per year) as they come online in order to build the PAGCN capability to the level required by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC)-validated Capability Production Document (CPD). Funding will also be used for MRT2 Retrofit: Effort started to mitigate Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) however it expanded to increase capability. Additional information can be provided at higher classification levels. Development funding for this exhibit contained in PE 0101316F. PE 0304115F, Joint All Domain Command & Control (JADC2): PE 0304115F supports the United States Air Force's (USAF) Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) Battle Lab to provide a warfighter-centric environment for experimentation, innovation, and Tactics Techniques and Procedures (TTP) development for multiple Advanced Battle Management/Joint All Domain Command & Control (ABMS/JADC2) events and capabilities. The mission of the ABMS Battle Lab is to evolve Joint All-Domain Operations (JADO) concepts and architectures to accelerate delivery of agile, resilient, and integrated joint Command & Control (C2) capabilities. This program builds the USAF's Distributed ABMS/CJADC2 Battle Lab communication and information technology Secret and Secret//Releasable architecture to support ABMS experimentation and integration activities required to evaluate advanced technologies from agencies such as Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), Missile Defense Agency (MDA), Air Combat Command (ACC), and other leading intel, air, space, and cyber C2 capabilities being developed for possible inclusion into the Battle Management Command & Control (BMC2) ecosystem. PE 0304115F also supports the United States Air Forces Europe and Africa (U-A) C2 architecture, which requires a high-quality, robust, secure, and resilient radiofrequency (RF) voice communication platform that extends ground-to-air radio coverage in theater and enhances theater C2 capability. US tactical C2 nodes in theater are unable to maintain positive control of assigned air assets due to lack of ground-to-air radio coverage in theater. A highly accessible radio network, consisting of ultra high frequency (UHF/VHF), high frequency (HF), tactical satellite (TACSAT), and Link-16 with Over The Air Encryption capability emplaced on US controlled and Partner facilities will close RF communication gaps in the United States European Command (EUCOM) theater. The capability must also be postured for network accreditation to enable quick implementation to enable agile/dispersed tactical command and control (i.e. Agile Battle Management Command and Control (BMC2) mission employment). Increased ground-to-air coverage enhances the ability to distribute recognized air picture and improve overall theater indications and warning, safety of flight, and situational awareness across mission sets. Funding for this exhibit contained in PE 0304115F PE 0303248F, All Domain Common Platform (ADCP): The ADCP is an extensible cloud-based Infrastructure and Platform as a Service (IaaS/PaaS) hosting medium built to deliver highly resilient Command and Control (C2) mission applications and data to Airmen deployed around the world. ADCP is a warfighting capability that enables on-boarded users to build, deploy and monitor mission applications to the end state of production. Having applications operational in various environments ensures data is accessible as it is needed across United States Air Force (USAF) mission sets. The ADCP's collection of technologies, services, and tooling enables warfighter outcomes by abstracting away technical complexity and enabling the deployment of products onto its infrastructure. The ADCP is the primary path to production for modernized C2 software-intensive systems. Platform customers include the Air Operations Center (AOC), Intelligence Programs, the 309th Software Engineering Group, the 350th Spectrum Warfare Group, and others. ADCP is USAF's contributing platform to the DAF Battle Network and Joint All-Domain Command and Control (JADC2), meeting system resiliency requirements through the escalating phases of warfare. Funding supports hardware technology refresh kits that replace critical components within on-premise ADCP hardware suites at key site locations as they reach the end of their useful life. Funding also supports procurement of networking and compute/store equipment required to support distributed and disconnected operations requirements. Funding for this exhibit contained in PE 0303248F.

Justification

Justification — Strategic Command And Control

PE 0101127F B-2 Squadrons: FY2026 funding will procure B-2 Weapon System Support Center software. PE 0101316F Worldwide Joint Strategic: PAGCN: FY 2026 PB funds (27.629M) will be used to procure 2 new Ground Entry Points as to build the PAGCN capability to the level required by the Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC)-validated Capability Production Document (CPD). Additional information can be provided at higher classification levels. PE 0304115F Joint All Domain Command & Control (JADC2): FY 2026 procurement funds will be used to continue advancing the US Air Force's Distributed Air Battle Management System (ABMS)/Joint All Domain Command and Control (JADC2) Battle Lab communications and infrastructure technology architecture to support ABMS experimentation and integration activities required to evaluate advanced technologies such as the Air Force Research Laboratory's (AFRL) Rapid Deployable Air Operations Center (RDAOC), Air Combat Command's Project Nexus, the Maven Smart System, and other advanced C2 and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) and targeting capabilities being developed for possible inclusion in the US Air Force's Battle Network. Planned and ongoing procurements include: a. An Impact Level 6 (IL-6) Experimentation Environment for Secret experimentation activities. b. Dynamic mission replanning and instrumentation hardware, software, and support c. Commercial solutions for classified (CSfC) networking equipment to supplement the established CSfC architecture used for remote connectivity to the Air Battle Management System (ABMS) Battle Lab. d. A sensitive controlled information (SCI) Experimentation Environment for Top Secret experimentation activities. e. Capital equipment replacement (CER) of Battle Lab components reaching end-of-life/end-of-support. FY 2026 procurement funds also supports the United States Air Forces Europe and Africa (U-A) C2 architecture. European Command (EUCOM)/United States Air Forces in Europe (USAFE) requires the ability to detect and track airborne assets across the theater, both friendly and adversarial, and report the status to the EUCOM/North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) leadership chains. The Sensor Fusion and Processing Hub will give USAFE the ability to ingest both partner nation and US sensors to create a Recognizable Air Picture for enhanced Air Domain Awareness. The capability will close multiple gaps that exist across the EUCOM theater with a lack of US-controlled sensors. These funds will procure 6 additional communication notes across EUCOM to reduce voice and data capability gaps. These funds will also procure one sensor fusion and processing system as part of the U-A C2 architecture. FY 2026 funding for U-A C2 increases due to a planned funding ramp to procure the necessary number of C2 sites in order to complete the required C2 architecture. PE 0303248F, All Domain Common Platform (ADCP) In FY 2026, funds will be used for tech refresh kits to replace end-of-life critical components of on-premise suites at key operational locations. Tech refresh of these components is necessary to maintain operational capability of ADCP on-premise hardware suites until such time that the ADCP operational infrastructure has been fully migrated to the cloud and cloud-connected edge devices. FY 2026 funding decreases to account for a reduced equipment requirements during ADCP's migration to a cloud-based infrastructure.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Other Procurement, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$73.9M
Other Procurement, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$50.0M
Other Procurement, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$82.9M
Other Procurement, Air ForceFFY26 Total$82.9M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$73.9M$50.0M$82.9M$82.9M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — none of this program's high-confidence awards records a positive obligation at any place of performance (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

RecipientPIIDConfidence
GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC.FA854017D0005high

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Strategic Command And Control. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.