Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0101127F/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
B-2 Squadrons
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $83.0M |
| FY25 | $37.9M |
| FY26 | $12.5M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $112.7M | $105.9M | $123.0M | $89.8M | $101.8M | $85.7M | $147.4M | $123.7M | $100.6M | $83.0M | ||
| Enacted | $108.2M | $152.5M | $193.1M | $105.5M | $93.1M | $181.1M | $131.6M | $101.8M | $87.6M | $37.9M | ||
| Request | $152.5M | $193.1M | $105.6M | $97.3M | $187.4M | $144.0M | $112.0M | $87.6M | $41.2M | $12.5M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2018 book requested $193.1M for FY2018; the PB2020 book reported $89.8M as actual total obligation authority — $103.3M below the request. 89.8 − 193.1 = -103.3 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — B-2 Squadrons
The B-2 Program Office's mission is to modernize and sustain the nation's only long-range penetrable strike bomber serving both the nuclear and conventional missions. The B-2 must remain ready, effective, and survivable every time the nation calls and cannot relax on modernization or sustainment efforts until its replacement is fully operational - a moving goal that continues to slip into the future. The Air Force must continue to modernize the B-2 to ensure its mission effectiveness exceeds the pacing threat, which continues to advance in technology and capabilities. The B-2 Program Office's portfolio includes projects that sustain weapon system effectiveness while seeking opportunities to lower life-cycle costs; incrementally improve subsystem capabilities across a range of sustainment and modernization efforts; combine existing technologies with innovative processes to solve supportability challenges; and integrate novel technologies to ensure our warfighters' can outpace the threat, while at the same time reducing integration risk for future platforms. The B-2 is continuing modernization efforts to improve its avionics, communications systems, cockpit displays, armament systems, low observable components, core training system components, aircraft supportability improvements, and support equipment development. The Air Force will also study, prototype, and demonstrate, multiple structural, avionics, and engine modifications, as well as advanced weapons capabilities, carriage systems integration, and communications, that could improve the performance of the aircraft and engines and reduce maintenance man-hours and the logistics footprint of the fleet. Focus of the studies, prototypes, and demonstrations will be on non-mission capable (maintenance) drivers, safety issues, and obsolescence issues through modernization of key components in the airframe, avionics, and engines resulting in improved aircraft availability of a high demand/low density fleet. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program's funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605827F, 0605828F, 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605832F, 0605833F, 0605898F, 0606398F. In FY 2024 $0.0M was expended for civilian pay expenses in this program element, and in FY 2025 $0.0M is forecasted for civilian pay expenses in this program element. This program is in Budget Activity 7, Operational System Development because this budget activity includes development efforts to upgrade systems that have been fielded or have received approval for full rate production and anticipate production funding in the current or subsequent fiscal year.
Mission — B-2 Modernization
The B-2 is currently undergoing modernization of avionics, communications systems, cockpit displays, armament systems, low observable components, core training system components, aircraft supportability improvements, and support equipment development. The Air Force will continue to study multiple structural, avionics, and engine modifications, as well as advanced weapons integration, communications upgrades, and innovative low observable enhancements, that could improve the performance of the aircraft and engines and reduce maintenance man-hours and the logistics footprint of the fleet. The Adaptable Communications Suite (ACS) Increment 4.0 provides secure beyond line-of-sight SATCOM Command and Control connectivity. ACS 4.0 will replace the current radios and ancillaries to transition the B-2 SATCOM's capability from the Ultra High Frequency Follow-On (UFO) satellite constellation to the Mobile User Objective System satellite constellation bringing enhanced capability over UFO's waveform. Along with the aircraft system, the ACS ground systems and infrastructure will be redesigned to support this new waveform. ACS 4.0 significantly improves the transfer time for real-time mission planning data, and allows for simultaneous use of SATCOM voice and data. Funds will support the development and integration of a highly secure communications pathway that will enable the B-2 warfighter's to communicate and receive updated targeting data while operating in highly contested environments. This capability can be used globally, but it is critical once the B-2 enters a highly contested airspace. B-2 Battlespace Collaborative Combat Communications (B2C3) effort integrates an independent Open Mission Systems (OMS) avionics architecture on the B-2, as well as upgrades the B-2's current line-of-site capability. B2C3's objective is to identify, leverage, and integrate existing capabilities to meet Air Force Global Strike's B-2 communications requirements. B2C3 will be implemented in two main increments defined as Spiral 1 and Spiral 2. Spiral 1 will provide the OMS architecture (multi-mission domain) within the B-2 and Spiral 2 will implement Airborne Integrated Terminal Group (AITG) providing Line-of-Sight Ultra High Frequency (UHF) and Very High Frequency (VHF) anti-jam, encrypted, and unencrypted voice communications. AITG will replace the AN/ARC-234 radio (reaches end-of-life effective 01 Oct 2026) with two AN/ARC-210 radios and will transition from the HAVEQUICK waveform (sunsetted 01 Oct 2024) to the SATURN anti-jam waveform for voice communications. The Low Observable Signature and Supportability Modifications (LOSSM) is a Continuous Improvement Program that supports the B-2's survivability against pacing and enhancing threats. LOSSM also serves other low observable (LO) platforms by advancing their ability to penetrate anti-access combat environments, perform missions directed by the National Command Authority while ensuring aircrew survivability. The LOSSM program reduces low observable (LO) maintenance, which is the B-2's highest maintenance driver, to improve combat readiness. Additionally, this program encompasses multiple improvement projects including, but not limited to, improved LO materials (electrically conductive materials, adhesives, electrically resistive materials, radar absorbing material, fastener fills, coatings, welds, material removal tools, and improved processes), LO structures (radar radomes, antennas, hot trailing edges and tiles, intermediate section doors, tailpipes, windows, lib bay panels, leading edge, permanent fasteners, exhaust pockets, gust load alleviation system, inlets, radar absorbing structures, overall signature stability, and Alternate High Frequency Material expansion) and additional efforts that enhance LO aircraft survivability; and radio frequency diagnostic tools, evaluation systems, and other key support equipment (Tier I Material Inspection System, Signature Diagnostic System, next generation Tier II and Tier III systems, Test Article 0998 (a B-2 test asset) optimization, conductivity probes, tailpipe inspection tools, LO- related special test equipment, data archival, and communications tools). LOSSM yields a high Return On Investment (ROI) and provides signature confidence for war time readiness posturing. The B-2 Training System upgrades include, but are not limited to, updates to training device hardware and components, simulation software, course ware and academic materials, instructional system design architectures, engineering drawings, and system documentation that are not driven by a funded aircraft modification. Upgrades may include Diminishing Manufacturing Sources efforts to include removal of end-of-life software/hardware within simulator systems and move to a modular, common open system architecture that is sustainable and cyber-resilient. Additional Training System Upgrades may also include efforts to implement requirements and standards defined under the Simulator Common Architecture Requirements and Standards (SCARS) initiative. Continuation of B-2 Armament upgrades integrate new and/or advanced weapons on the B-2 to attack a wider array of target sets, to include hardened, deeply buried targets, as well as destroy more targets per sortie. Studies and efforts will refine B-2 targeting accuracy using GPS guided weapons. Nuclear modernization will continue with software and crypto modifications. B-2 funding may be used to resolve emerging safety of flight and diminishing manufacturing sources issues, and fulfill FAA or other mandates necessary to ensure continued aircrew safety and mission effectiveness. Funding may also support innovation activities including, but not limited to, studies, analyses, requirements definition, and quick-reaction capability prototypes/demonstrations to accelerate planning for technology transition, technology insertion, and future acquisition programs.
Mission — BASELINE SUPPORT
Baseline Support maintains and upgrades the B-2 unique flight test aircraft as well as hardware/software and instrumentation and test equipment to support developmental systems integration, and flight test, reducing the need for additional operational aircraft and accelerating deployment of advanced operational capabilities to the warfighter. Baseline Support also provides for other B-2 unique government costs and includes assorted studies of aircraft performance as well as acquisition planning activities, up to and including proposal preparation, for future aircraft, engine, weapon, communication, navigation or other capabilities. B-2 funding may be used to resolve emerging safety of flight and diminishing manufacturing sources issues, and fulfill FAA or other mandates necessary to ensure continued aircrew safety and mission effectiveness. Funding may also support innovation activities including, but not limited to, studies, analyses, requirements definition, and quick-reaction capability prototypes/demonstrations to accelerate planning for technology transition, technology insertion, and future acquisition programs.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (6)
Low Observable Signature and Supportability Mods and Trainers
B-2 Low Observable Signature and Supportability Modifications (LOSSM) pursues multiple low-cost development upgrades for Low Observable (LO) materials, structures, diagnostics and procedures to enhance LO signature and/or improve aircraft supportability and survivability, as well as other development or study efforts for training system improvements. Program transitions successful research projects to EMD/production implementation.
B-2 Advanced Communications -- Adaptable Communications Suite (ACS) 4.0
ACS 4.0 provides secure beyond line-of-sight SATCOM Command and Control connectivity. ACS 4.0 will involve replacing the current radios and ancillaries to transition B-2 SATCOM to Mobile User Objective System due to the sunset of the current Ultra High Frequency Follow-On satellite constellation. Along with the aircraft system, the ACS ground systems and infrastructure will be redesigned to support this requirement. ACS 4.0 will significantly reduce data transmission time and allow for simultaneous use of SATCOM voice and data.
B-2 Advanced Communications -- B-2 Battlespace Collaborative Combat Communications (B2C3)
B2C3 integrates an independent OMS avionics architecture integrated on the B-2. B2C3 objective is to identify, leverage, and integrate existing capabilities (such as ACS & AITG) to meet B-2 communications requirements. B2C3 is a compilation of multiple efforts the B-2 Program Office incrementally integrates in a spiral fashion where subsequent spirals build off previous spirals as funding becomes available. Spiral 1 is designed to deliver the Open Mission Systems (OMS) architecture (domain) within the B-2. By building an OMS interface, new technologies can be rapidly deployed and fielded. This will provide an integrated concept that merges BLOS and LOS Link-16 data into the cockpit display and provides a single consolidated Tactical Situation Display (TSD) centrally located for the aircrew. B2C3 Spiral 2 effort develops and fields the AITG capability which provides Line-of-Sight UHF and Very High Frequency (VHF) anti-jam, encrypted, and unencrypted voice communications. AITG Replacement will include the replacement of the AN/ARC-234 radio which will reach end-of-life effective 01 Oct 2026. AITG replacement will also implement the SATURN Waveform for anti-jam voice communications; this is a transition from the HAVE QUICK Waveform which will be retired effective 01 Oct 2024.
B-2 Display Modernization (BDM)
The B-2 Display Modernization program is a modernization of the B-2 multi-purpose display units (MDUs) and includes removal of the Defensive Management System-Modernization (DMS-M) modification from the B-2 fleet test aircraft and lab environment. This is not a new start, but a continuation of RDT&E that was part of the previous DMS-M program. FY 2021 and prior years DMS-M efforts were in PE 0605931F. This program completed DMS-M removal from the test aircraft in Dec 2023.
B-2 Trainers Modernization
The B-2 Training System upgrades include, but are not limited to, updates to training device hardware and components, simulation software, courseware and academic materials, instructional system design architectures, engineering drawings, and system documentation that is not driven by a funded aircraft modification. Upgrades may include Diminishing Manufacturing Sources efforts to include removal of end-of-life software/hardware within simulator systems and move to a modular, common open system architecture that is sustainable and cyber-resilient. Additional Training System Upgrades may also include efforts to implement requirements and standards defined under the Simulator Common Architecture Requirements and Standards (SCARS) initiative. Other Training Systems upgrades may include efforts such as Advanced Communications in conjunction with the platform upgrades. Support to include, but not limited to, Program Management Administration (PMA), Advisory and Assistance Services (A&AS), and travel to enable mission requirements.
Baseline Support Flight Test
Baseline Support Flight Test maintains and upgrades the B-2 unique flight test aircraft as well as hardware/software and test equipment to support developmental systems integration and flight test, reducing the need for additional operational aircraft and accelerating deployment of advanced operational capabilities to the warfighter.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $83.0M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $37.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Total | $37.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Disc. Request | $12.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Total | $12.5M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $0 | $83.0M | $37.9M | $12.5M | $12.5M |
| 675345: B-2 Modernization | $0 | $81.1M | $29.8M | $4.53M | $4.53M |
| 676021: BASELINE SUPPORT | $0 | $1.93M | $8.02M | $7.99M | $7.99M |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — none of this program's high-confidence awards records a positive obligation at any place of performance (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP | FA861624DB001 | high |
| ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC. | FA861614C6061 | medium |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not B-2 Squadrons. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J663
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J572
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J652
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J677
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J677
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J698
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J660
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J632
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J622
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J642
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
FY2026 Air Force Research and Development Test and Evaluation, Vol. I · www.saffm.hq.af.mil
PDF page 19