Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Combat Information Center Conversion

NavyRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0604518N
What it is
Combat Information Center Conversion (0604518N) is a Navy research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
No FY25→26 comparison — endpoints unavailable or on different bases.
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$11.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$10.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$0P-40 detail · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
No comparison: endpoints unavailable or on different bases

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $11.2MFY25: $10.6MFY26: $0FY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$11.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25$10.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26$0P-40 detail · PB2026
Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2025): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2025): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY15FY17FY19FY21FY23FY25

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25
Actuals$0$0$6.09M$4.29M$18.6M$15.5M$12.3M$11.4M$16.6M$11.2M
Enacted$0$6.28M$8.06M$19.3M$16.1M$12.7M$11.6M$16.2M$11.4M$10.6M
Request$6.28M$8.06M$19.3M$16.1M$12.7M$11.6M$11.2M$11.4M$10.6M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $11.2M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $16.6M as actual total obligation authority — $5.41M above the request. 16.611.2 = 5.4 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Combat Information Center Conv

Effective FY 2026, Projects 3094 and 3439 move from PE 0604518N to PE 0603561N as part of the PE/BLI consolidation effort in the DoD Implementation Plan from the Commission on Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Reform Final Report in an effort to rapidly increase Navy Lethality in the Submarine and Surface Fleet. This Program Element (PE) addresses the development and integration of new and improved technologies into the Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) and Theater Undersea Warfare (TUSW) Command & Control (C2) systems supporting the warfighter. PROJECT 3094: Undersea Warfare Decision Support System (USW-DSS) is the Navy Program of Record Net-Centric ASW/TUSW C2 system supporting the warfighter. USW-DSS continues to develop and test the software changes and perform the certification testing necessary to address end-of-life (EOL) support issues impacting USW-DSS Build 3, as well as address emerging mandated cybersecurity requirements. USW-DSS has shifted to a Continuous Improvement / Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) model leveraging multiple Development and Secure cloud Operational environments (DevSecOps) which produces baseline software upgrades twice annually. Within this CI/CD process, this project develops, designs, integrates, and tests additional tools/capabilities for USW-DSS Build 3 including, but not limited to: Waterspace Management (WSM) and Prevention of Mutual Interference (PMI), Common Track Manager, Link 16 Connectivity, Common Tactical Picture (CTP), Platform Data Fusion Integration, Cross-Platform Data Fusion, Automated Asset Allocation, Asset/Threat State Information, Vulnerability Analysis enhancement, ASW Track Management, Automated Re-planning, Engagement Target Pairing, improved Theater ASW (TASW) capabilities, Data-Focused Navy Tactical Cloud Integration, and virtualization of the electronic Master Tactical Plot (eMTP) visualization/display service as 'Web USW-DSS' on which to render the CTP/Common Operational Picture (COP). These improvements address requirements from the Commander U.S. Fleet Forces endorsement of "Theater ASW Capability Requirements" letter (dated 24 February 2017). Future USW-DSS Build 3 Fleet Capability Releases (FCRs) will focus on required system re-architecture to keep pace with the latest network and system hardware obsolescence as well as expanded processing and user interface capacity requirements that are driven by expanded multi-system and multi-level security inputs. These FCRs will also achieve commonality between afloat and ashore USW-DSS systems, such that continuous development improvements impact both shipboard and TUSW Command Headquarters (TUSWCHQ) watch floors, as well as training and Fleet support installations uniformly. FCR 3 will focus on expanding and sharing operational data and artifacts between systems across multiple security classification and releasability standards to support system to system and allied and coalition interoperability. This effort complements parallel Foreign Military Sales (FMS) efforts that expand cooperative TUSW operations. PROJECT 3439: The Networked Architecture for Undersea Theater Integrated C2 Advantage (NAUTICA) Project provides Theater ASW (TASW) architecture development, systems engineering, and design, and continues the system engineering effort required to design, develop, and deliver an integrated TASW battle management suite in accordance with the 2007 ASW Initial Capabilities Document (ICD). The plan prioritizes NAUTICA investments in accordance with the Commander U.S. Fleet Forces endorsement of "Theater ASW Capability Requirements" letter (dated 24 February 2017) and Center for Security Forces (CSF) letter "Criticality of Sustaining PMI and WSM Capability and Meeting Emerging Requirements for Great Competition" submitted to OPNAV N2N6. The design of the integrated TASW battle management suite will include a system-of-systems TASW architecture to enable the existing Programs of Record under development from the Program Executive Office (PEO) for Integrated Warfare Systems (IWS), PEO Command, Controls, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (C4I), PEO AIR, PEO Submarines, and N9SP to exploit a common framework. The common architecture will define the key data exchanges, common displays and processing, data models, cross domain interfaces, and multi-level security software to fuse TUSW C2 data within USW-DSS and an ever-increasing number of C4I tactical data sources into a CTP. This development will include tactical dissemination of USW tactical picture and targeting data to the submarine, allied system-to-system interoperability, Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (UUV), and Sub-surface and Seabed Warfare (SSW) situational awareness. NAUTICA will focus on closing seams issues across the multi-program system-of-systems that provides C2 tools for TUSW and will support the curation of tactical picture, targeting, and cueing data to allow for transmission to ships and submarines in emission control (EMCON) status to support USW and Anti-Surface Warfare (ASuW).

Mission USW Decision Support

Undersea Warfare Decision Support System (USW-DSS) is the Navy Program of Record Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Command and Control (C2) Net-Centric system supporting the warfighter. USW-DSS provides an integrated, near-real time, net-centric ASW Common Tactical Picture (CTP) and Common Operational Picture (COP) for the Carrier Strike Groups (CSGs). USW-DSS is a C2 capability identified in the ASW Initial Capabilities Document (ICD) for the Sea Combat Commander (SCC) and Theater USW Commander (TUSWC). USW-DSS enables effective planning and execution of USW operations, optimizes placement of sensors for exploitation of the environment, manages available resources, balances operations versus risk, and provides a clear vulnerability assessment of the operational environment. USW-DSS ensures safe operational and tactical C2 of submerged U.S. and allied submarines via Prevention of Mutual Interference (PMI) capability, and protects from blue-on-blue engagement with a Waterspace Management planning and execution tool. USW-DSS shortens C2 decision processes for detection-to-engagement across multiple platforms, including those with low-bandwidth communications or intermittent connectivity. Tactical data such as tracks, environmental, and sensor processing data is ingested into USW-DSS through platform specific interfaces such as the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System, the Global Command and Control System - Maritime (GCCS-M), and the AN/SQQ-34 Aircraft Carrier Tactical Support Center (CV-TSC). USW-DSS processes this and other tactical data and supports intelligent dissemination of the data to unit and theater level platforms in support of an enhanced USW tactical picture. USW-DSS provides USW Commanders with an expanded, net-centric USW collaborative capability across CSG platforms (CVNs, CGs, DDGs, FFGs) as well as supporting shore nodes to include Commander Task Force (CTF), the Naval Oceanographic Processing Facility (NOPF), and Tactical Operations Center (TOC) and Maritime Operations Center (MOC). On afloat platforms, USW-DSS processing software is virtualized for portability and is hosted on the Consolidated Afloat Networks and Enterprise Services (CANES) system and implements a Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) with display generation and operator interfaces provided via USW-DSS hardware. For support and ashore nodes, USW-DSS processing software is hosted on Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) hardware. Starting in 2024, USW-DSS fielding will be entirely hosted on CANES with no additional USW-DSS hardware. This software-only fielding plan will allow for more frequent system patching and upgrades. To accommodate this transition, USW-DSS is developing a secure container-based architecture. Future USW-DSS capability is phased to deliver timely and cost-effective software improvements to the warfighter via the Fleet Capability Release (FCR) process. USW-DSS Build 3 FCR incremental developments implement cost-effective cyber security and Theater ASW (TASW) functionality by integrating inputs from data sources and platforms such as the P8-A Poseidon aircraft and associated Air ASW sensors, provide improved and additional functionality, and improve stability and reliability. USW-DSS Build 3 provides common and improved visualization, integrated USW platform sensor data sharing, reduced data entry, improved sensor performance predictions, data fusion, and reduced redundancy across USW Tactical Decision Aids (TDAs). The project provides a greater understanding of the undersea battle space by allowing the entire force (carrier and expeditionary strike group, theater, or other) to have a common and thorough understanding of the battle space with characterized uncertainties. The Navy continues to modernize and add sensor capabilities to existing programs of record that are significant data sources of information for USW-DSS. These include, but are not limited to the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System, AN/SQQ-34 CV-TSC, GCCS-M, and Link Monitoring and Management Tool (LMMT). As the sensor capabilities and systems mature, the tactical data valuable to USW-DSS is incorporated as part of a future FCR. Through targeted architectural improvements, follow-on FCRs will facilitate the migration of select components of USW-DSS to a DoD commercial cloud computing environment, thus improving software performance and scalability while keeping future hardware costs in check. Additionally, follow-on FCRs are targeted to support operations across different security enclaves and additional platform tactical data interfaces such as those associated with P-8A Poseidon aircraft, and submarines. Additionally, USW-DSS is adopting agile Information Technology (IT) developments to align with the Compile to Combat in 24 Hours (C2C24) initiative. USW-DSS will continue to address end-of-life (EOL) support issues impacting USW-DSS Build 3 as well as address emerging mandated cybersecurity requirements. Funding will be used to continue to develop, design, integrate, and test additional USW-DSS tools/capabilities for Build 3 including, but not limited to: Waterspace Management and PMI, Common Track Manager, Link 16 Connectivity, CTP, Platform Data Fusion Integration, Cross-Platform Data Fusion, Automated Asset Allocation, Asset/Threat State Information, Vulnerability Analysis enhancement, ASW Track Management, Automated Re-planning, Area Planning, improved TASW capabilities, Data-Focused Navy Tactical Cloud Integration, and virtualization of the electronic Master Tactical Plot (eMTP) visualization/display service as 'Web USW-DSS' on which to render the CTP/COP. These improvements address requirements from the Commander U.S. Fleet Forces endorsement of "Theater ASW Capability Requirements" letter (dated 24 February 2017).

Mission Project NAUTICA: Integrated Theater ASW C4I

The Networked Architecture for Undersea Theater Integrated C2 Advantage (NAUTICA) project provides Theater Anti-Submarine Warfare (TASW) architecture development, systems engineering, and design. NAUTICA will identify requirements to integrate intelligence (operational and tactical) and sensor (national and organic) systems to provide a fully informed Naval Integrated Fires - Counter Undersea (N2CX) Common Operational Picture (COP) of enemy undersea forces, maximizing decision superiority and theater level planning, and address TASW C2. Using Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE), NAUTICA decomposes warfighting requirements into system requirements allocated to existing Programs of Record or identified as new program requirements. Theater Undersea Warfare Operations Center's (TUSWOC) systems today are not integrated to support performance requirements during all threat levels. This results in failure to most effectively employ Theater USW assets. Near term, the Project will continue to accelerate development by rapidly prototyping the framework for existing legacy systems to be federated, to exchange key information and significantly improve existing TASW capability. NAUTICA will also establish a transition path for new USW technologies such as the Operational Planning Tool (OPT), Water Space Planner (WASP), Battlespace Management Tactical Decision Aid (BAM TDA), and other Future Naval Capabilities (FNCs) that will start to transition Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 5/6 enabling technologies into the USW-DSS Program of Record. NAUTICA investments are prioritized in accordance with the Commander U.S. Fleet Forces endorsement of "Theater ASW Capability Requirements" letter (dated 24 February 2017) and Center for Security Forces (CSF) letter "Criticality of Sustaining Prevention of Mutual Interference (PMI) and Water Space Management (WSM) Capability and Meeting Emerging Requirements for Great Competition" submitted to OPNAV N2N6. The design of the integrated TASW battle management suite will include a system of systems TASW architecture to enable the existing programs of record under development from the Program Executive Office (PEO) for Integrated Warfare Systems (IWS), PEO Command, Controls, Communications, Computers and intelligence (C4I), PEO AIR, PEO Undersea Warfare Systems (UWS), and N9SP to exploit a common framework. The common architecture will define the key data exchanges, common displays and processing, data models, cross domain interfaces, and multi-level security software that will enable systems such as USW-DSS to exchange, display, and exploit information at the appropriate classifications. NAUTICA focuses development of Theater USW C2 multi-system integration challenges that require coordination across multiple programs, multiple platforms, and multiple resource sponsors.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

USW-DSS Capability Improvements

Design, develop, integrate, and test additional USW-DSS tools/capabilities for Build 3 including Common Tactical Picture (CTP), Platform Data Fusion integration, Cross-Platform Data Fusion, Theater Level Mission Planning, Automated Asset Allocation, Asset/Threat State Information, Vulnerability Analysis enhancement, Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Track Management, Automated Re-planning, Engagement Target Pairing, improved Theater Undersea Warfare (TUSW) capabilities, Data-Focused Navy Tactical Cloud Integration, and virtualization of the Electronic Master Tactical Plot (eMTP) visualization/display service as 'Web USW-DSS', and cyber security protection requirements. Improve USW-DSS node-to-node data sharing to allow for global TUSW situational awareness, allied interoperability, and cross-area of responsibility (AOR) tracking.

NAUTICA - Theater Architecture Development and System Integration

This project is responsible for the analysis of the TASW Command Center System of Systems (SoS), design, and planning. The effort will make specific recommendations for the design and development of the interfaces and test procedures for the systems being developed under separate Programs of Record. Specifically, the GCCS-M, USW-DSS, and Maritime Tactical Command & Control-2 (MTC-2) systems have evolved on separate timelines. This project will develop near term solutions and propose a long-range plan for these systems. The investment will design the interfaces that will federate the systems to close the gaps. The objective is to replace the manpower-intense operations with machine-to-machine interfaces, and then assess the warfighting benefit of integration to inform future decisions. This investment addresses TASW Command and Control (C2) needs identified in the ASW Initial Capabilities Document (ICD). This investment will provide modeling and requirements development to support the Undersea Domain.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$11.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$10.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$10.6M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$129.2M$11.2M$10.6M$0$0
3094: USW Decision Support$107.3M$10.3M$9.87M$0$0
3439: Project NAUTICA: Integrated Theater ASW C4I$21.9M$854.0K$755.0K$0$0

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Combat Information Center Conversion — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →