Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0205620N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Surface ASW Combat System Integration
Watch this program
Budget figures
No FY2026 R-1/P-1 request line for this program element. The FY2026 President's Budget request workbook carries no FY2026 line for it; its last workbook figure is FY2025. The PB2026 J-book detail below does carry an FY2026 row for this line, recorded as zero. A workbook blank and a documented zero are different records, and this page shows both. An absent line is not by itself an ending — PB2026 renumbered program elements at scale across the services and defense agencies, so this work may continue under a different number. Where this line's funding went is recorded under Program Lineage below.
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $28.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026 |
| FY25 | $29.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026 |
| FY26 | $0J-book detail · PB2026 |
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $25.6M | $23.7M | $23.8M | $28.4M | $25.5M | $28.4M | $28.1M | $27.8M | $27.9M | $28.9M | |
| Enacted | $24.4M | $24.6M | $29.4M | $26.3M | $29.6M | $29.2M | $28.8M | $29.0M | $30.0M | $29.9M | |
| Request | $24.6M | $29.4M | $28.4M | $29.6M | $29.3M | $28.8M | $29.0M | $30.0M | $29.9M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2019 book requested $28.4M for FY2019; the PB2021 book reported $25.5M as actual total obligation authority — $2.94M below the request. 25.5 − 28.4 = -2.9 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
0205620N — Surface ASW Combat System IntegrationSuccessors (funding flowed out)
- realigned to · per FY2026 J-book · BA3
show sentence
“Effective FY 2026, Project 1916 moves from PE 0205620N to PE 0603561N as part of the PE/BLI consolidation effort in the DoD Implementation Plan from the Commission on Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Reform Final Report in an effort to rapidly increase Navy Lethality in the Submarine and Surface Fleet.”
Family Funding Line
Funding chain: 0205620N — Surface ASW Combat System Integration
- FY2017$24.6M
- FY2018$29.4M
- FY2019$28.4M
- FY2020$29.6M
- FY2021$29.3M
- FY2022$28.8M
- FY2023$29.0M
- FY2024$30.0M
- FY2025$29.9M
This family branches — the funding line above is shown for the 1:1 chain only. Branch arms (splits or merges) are not summed into this series.
Description
Mission — Surface ASW Cmbt Sys Integr
Effective FY 2026, Project 1916 moves from PE 0205620N to PE 0603561N as part of the PE/BLI consolidation effort in the DoD Implementation Plan from the Commission on Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Reform Final Report in an effort to rapidly increase Navy Lethality in the Submarine and Surface Fleet. The objective of this Program Element (PE) is to significantly improve existing AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) sonar system capabilities through quick and affordable development and integration of emergent, transformational technologies in support of Surface Ship and Theater ASW (TASW) as required to pace the threat. Detection and classification play uniquely vital roles in the success of any ASW campaign. The Advanced Capability Build (ACB) spiral development process is the primary means by which these improvements are developed. ASW remains a Navy core competency in a dynamic and uncertain maritime environment. U.S. adversaries continue to develop asymmetric capabilities and capacities to deter, disrupt, or delay the entry of U.S. and allied naval forces, and pose a constant challenge as we implement the Maritime Strategy. Evolving submarine technologies offer enhanced stealth, speed, endurance, weapons, and operational proficiency, foretelling that the adversary submarine of the future will have a significantly larger sphere of influence, while presenting less vulnerability to U.S. forces. The effective offensive engagement range of the adversary submarine of the future will continue to match or outrange individual U.S. and multi-national platform sensors and weapons in many tactical environments. Submarines are an increasing threat to all Naval and Allied ships, particularly modern diesel subs and faster torpedoes. Not only can the presence of potential hostile submarines delay naval combatant action until they are located and neutralized, submarines can also disrupt all seaborne logistics supply for any ground campaign as well as maritime commerce. U.S. forces must be effective in all operating environments, ranging from the deep open ocean to the littorals, and are key to countering adversarial anti-access and area denial strategies. This PE takes advantage of the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Open System Architecture (OSA) and Acoustic Rapid Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Insertion (ARCI) initiatives to integrate Torpedo Detection, Classification, and Localization (TDCL) and ASW sonar combat system capability improvements. The AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 COTS-based Surface Ship ASW Combat System is planned as a backfit program for all DDG51 class ships. The Open Architecture (OA) system enables the ACB process and provides budget flexibility to make COTS/OA technology solutions and ARCI-type initiatives affordable. Improvements are tested in the laboratory and at-sea. Undersea Warfare (USW) technology implementation will take advantage of improvements developed under the submarine Advanced Processing Build (APB) and Advanced Surveillance Build (ASB) programs and will in turn share unique improvements developed under this program with the submarine and surveillance USW communities. The ACB and APB programs are managed under a common development organization and process titled 'AxB'. While each platform retains its uniqueness and focus in functional domains essential to mission success, a premium is placed on development of common capabilities and modular architecture technologies to maximize commonality and cost effectiveness. This PE includes funding for the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Test & Evaluation (T&E) program, which conducts testing and analysis to support certification of AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System ACBs prior to fielding. Additionally, finalization of Test & Evaluation Master Plans (TEMPs) and AN/SQQ-89(V) Developmental Test (DT) and Operational Test (OT) events are conducted under this program. This PE includes funding for the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship Engineering Measurement Program (SSEMP), which measures the performance of existing and new AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System Technical Insertion (TI)/ACB baselines and enables data-based assessment of the capabilities and shortfalls in the performance of these systems in realistic scenarios. (Note about TI nomenclature: After TI-20, there will be a nomenclature shift for hardware baselines. Hypervisor Technology 0 (HT0) will replace what would have been TI-22. HT0 enables the deployment of virtualization technologies that create a logical separation between hardware and software, which can simplify future upgrades and accelerate software certification.) This PE includes funding to support cyber security initiatives to align future AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System baselines with future AEGIS Integrated Combat Systems. This PE contributes to the development of the ASW component of the guided missile Frigate (CONSTELLATION Class, FFG 62) program.
Mission — Surface ASW System Improvement
The Surface Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Systems Improvements project will support essential performance enhancements to the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System. This project will improve Measures of Performance (MOP) by enhancing operator interface methods and tools; active and passive detection; tracking, classification, and localization; Torpedo Detection, Classification, and Localization (TDCL); sonobuoy data processing and display capabilities; and increasing acoustic sensor frequency bandwidth (Operational Requirements Document (ORD) #667-76-05 titled 'AN/SQQ-89 Improvement Program' and Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) 802-2). This project will take advantage of the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System Open System Architecture (OSA) and Acoustic Rapid Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Insertion (ARCI) initiatives to integrate TDCL and ASW sonar and combat system capability improvements. The AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System is planned as a backfit program for CG47 (select CG59-73 Baseline 3 and 4 ships) and all DDG51 class ships. The OSA and high-performance COTS processing hardware on ships fielded with the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System provides an opportunity to integrate emergent, transformational ASW and Undersea Warfare (USW) technological improvements that were previously unachievable. The ASW/USW suites on these ships will require periodic upgrades to remain effective well into the 21st century and to pace the threat. Software upgrades developed under this project will target capability increases in high interest areas as prescribed by the Fleet and captured in campaign analysis. To achieve this, the project will package and deliver incremental upgrades every two (2) years to the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System production program via an Advanced Capability Build (ACB) spiral development process. The project has undergone a transition in software development methodology from a legacy waterfall approach to an Agile development, security, and operations (DevSecOps) approach. This new Agile approach involves modern Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) modular software architectures, coding, and automated testing to enable much more rapid delivery of updated capabilities as required to address cyber or operational performance needs. The Navy is pursuing a transformation across all Tactical Systems to maximize cyber-resiliency and the speed of capability delivery. The transformation implements an agile development process comprised of a continuous series of 12-week software program increments in a DevSecOps environment. This process will better align with industry practice and enable the AN/SQQ-89 combat systems to leverage industry capability improvements in Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and other emerging technologies, while also being more responsive to cyber needs. As ACB delivers, changes are required in the project's software development and integration methodologies to remain well synchronized with the production programs. Instead of delivering an improved ACB to the production programs at the end of development (which the production program then had to integrate, mature, test, and certify), development capabilities will now be integrated into the latest production hardware baseline as they are ready, on a continuing basis. This adds flexibility to the program, allowing urgent changes to be fielded more rapidly, and provides an integrated software build requiring less effort at the end of development. For major capability updates, the project will maintain an every-other-year delivery posture to ensure mature products are supporting Fleet Integrated Logistic Support (ILS) and Training. Primary areas of ASW and USW improvements are as follows: - Undersea Fire Control/Engagement - Localization and Contact Management - Medium Frequency (MF) Pulsed Active Sonar (PAS) - Continuous Active Sonar (CAS) - Acoustic Communications - TDCL - Torpedo Defense - Passive Sonar - Automated Detection and Tracking - Sonar Tactical Decision Aids (STDA) - Embedded Operator Training Resources
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (4)
AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Advanced Capability Build (ACB) Development
Develop enhancements to the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Combat System Open System Architecture (OSA) via the integration of transformational technologies through the four step ACB spiral development process. These items will be integrated and delivered to DDG51 class AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System backfit production programs via ACB updates. The ACB Four Step Process: Step 1: Algorithm/technology assessment by peer review panels of Subject Matter Experts (SME) to down-select technologies and assist developers with technical guidance. Step 2: Algorithm/technology testing with open and closed data sets to further down-select and refine capabilities prior to integration and testing. Step 3: Land-based system-level testing in a realistic tactical environment. Step 4: At-sea testing on an operational surface combatant. Step 4 is conducted only if an appropriate platform is available. ACB rapidly addresses problems/deficiencies in processing, capability, or operations within the following areas of the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System architecture: sensor processing, acoustics, fire control, contact management, performance prediction, operator productivity and on-board training, Multi-Function Towed Array (MFTA), Digital Fire Control Interface (DFCI), Mid-Frequency Active (MFA) processing, Torpedo Detection Classification and Localization (TDCL), Torpedo Defense (TD), and adaptive beamforming. ACB requirements are generated through discussions with the Fleet, then vetted and provided as direction by the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), OPNAV N96. Steps 1 and 2 are conducted in a pipeline style parallel to system integration and production. This makes Steps 1 and 2 independent of any particular ACB Build and allows for development of longer lead technologies. The content of a specific ACB build (every two years on the odd year) is then determined through a series of discussions with the Fleet aimed at selecting the most relevant and mature technologies available in the ACB pipeline. Integration at the string and system level is then performed followed by Steps 3 and 4, as applicable, and transitioned to production. Additionally, advanced development capabilities from the submarine Advanced Processing Build (APB) project are re-used in ACB, as appropriate. ACB capabilities are also shared with submarine APB. The ACB development program also resolves issues/deficiencies discovered through the AN/SQQ-89(V) Test & Evaluation program.
AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Test & Evaluation (T&E)
The AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) Test & Evaluation (T&E) Program conducts testing and analysis to support certification of AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System Advanced Capability Builds (ACBs) prior to fielding. Additionally, finalization of Test & Evaluation Master Plans (TEMPs) and AN/SQQ-89(V) Developmental Test (DT) and Operational Test (OT) events are conducted under this program. In general, testing events and the testing schedule are driven by the availability of both platform and target assets.
AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship Engineering Measurement Program (SSEMP)
Analyze the AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System and employment in the operational setting and report results for improvement of future systems, training and employment guidance. Perform Fleet exercise data reconstruction and post-test analysis each year. Conduct selected at-sea data collection activities (Initial Operational Test & Evaluation (IOT&E) and Operational Test (OT)) by providing planning support, ship riders, and analyst support. Evaluate prototype sonar employment tactics, sonar processing and automation algorithms, and communication protocols for the detection, classification, tracking, and intra-Fleet hand-off to Fleet USW assets, and provide summary reports to document results.
AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Cyber Security Architecture Upgrade
Cyber security capability development to improve cyber security and resiliency posture within the combat system, and align future AN/SQQ-89A(V)15 Surface Ship ASW Combat System baselines with future AEGIS integrated combat system baselines.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $28.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $29.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $29.9M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $431.7M | $28.9M | $29.9M | $0 | $0 |
| 1916: Surface ASW System Improvement | $431.7M | $28.9M | $29.9M | $0 | $0 |
Follow the dollar
Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.
Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →
The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.
| District | Program obligations |
|---|---|
| VA-10 | $966.4M |
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | N0002418C5218 | high |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
2 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.
Issues related to energy efficiency in commercial and residential buildings, and advanced building controls Issues…
Issues related to energy efficiency in commercial and residential buildings, and advanced building controls Issues…
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Surface ASW Combat System Integration. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J466
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J416
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J448
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J467
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J478
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J487
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J453
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J446
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J440
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J448
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil