Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0603601F/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Conventional Weapons Technology
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $122.9M
- FY25
- $125.5M
- FY26
- $99.3M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $41.4M | $42.2M | $105.5M | $157.7M | $191.7M | $202.0M | $124.0M | $144.1M | $144.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Enacted | $43.0M | $102.0M | $167.4M | $204.8M | $225.8M | $133.9M | $155.3M | $154.6M | $132.3M | $125.5M | ||
| Request | $102.0M | $167.4M | $195.0M | $225.8M | $0 | $157.4M | $187.4M | $132.3M | $125.5M | $99.3M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $0 for FY2021; the PB2023 book reports $124.0M actually spent — $124.0M above the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Weapon Technology Development
This project develops, matures, assesses, and demonstrates advanced/innovative ordnance and guidance component and subsystem technologies for conventional weapons. The project focuses on maturation of advanced explosives, fuzes, warheads, sub-munitions, and weapon airframes, carriage and dispensing; as well as innovative munition seekers, weapon aerodynamics, navigation and control, and guidance subsystem integration/simulation.
Mission — Weapon Concept Development
This project develops, refines, integrates, demonstrates, and assesses ordnance and guidance technologies to reduce risk for potential conventional weapons acquisitions. The project concentrates in two effort areas, Air-to-Air Concept Development and Air-to-Ground Concept Development. The project focuses on risk reduction of advanced explosives, fuzes, warheads, sub-munitions, and weapon airframes, carriage and dispensing; as well as innovative munition seekers, weapon aerodynamics, navigation and control, and guidance subsystem integration/simulation.
Mission — Conventional Weapons Technology
This program develops, integrates, and demonstrates advanced ordnance and guidance technologies for conventional weapons. The effort focuses on conventional ordnance component technologies such as warheads, fuzes, and explosives, as well as munition guidance component technologies such as navigation and control systems and seekers. Technologies to be developed, demonstrated, and integrated into system concepts will address blast, fragmentation, penetration, low collateral damage, variable depth/location fuzing, precise guidance, and high-performance and insensitive explosives. Efforts in this project have been coordinated through the Department of Defense Science and Technology Executive Committee process to harmonize efforts and eliminate duplication. Funds in this PE may be used to investigate specified technology advancements in air, space and/or cyber domains. The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) is focused on high-impact, multi-domain science & technology (S&T) solutions that drive innovation now while laying the groundwork for the Air and Space Force to win the future fight. AFRL effectively synchronizes the Department of the Air Force (DAF) S&T enterprise and workforce to align towards the most consequential DAF priorities and accelerate the delivery of game-changing S&T. This program includes funding for the requisite DAF Science & Engineering (S&E) and mission enabling civilian workforce with the necessary technical competencies to develop, manage, and deliver science & technology capabilities. The use of program funds in this program element is in conjunction with the civilian pay expenses budgeted in the following program elements: 1206601SF, 0601102F, 0602020F, 0602102F, 0602202F, 0602203F, 0602204F, 0602298F, 0602336F, 0602605F, 0602788F, and 0603680F. The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) utilizes 10 USC 4091, "Authorities for certain positions at science and technology reinvention laboratories” to manage the workforce strength, structure, positions, and compensation. This program element may include necessary expenses to support the operation and maintenance of facilities to manage, execute, and deliver science and technology capabilities. This program is in Budget Activity 3, Advanced Technology Development because this budget activity includes development of subsystems and components and efforts to integrate subsystems and components into system prototypes for field experiments and/or tests in a simulated environment.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (4)
Air-to-Ground Concept Development
Mature, integrate, and demonstrate air-to-ground weapon components and systems (ordnance, guidance, and carriage and release technologies) to demonstrate war-fighter capability.
Air-to-Air Concept Development
Mature, integrate, and demonstrate air-to-air weapon components and systems to include ordnance, guidance, and carriage and release technologies to demonstrate war-fighter capability.
Guidance Technologies
Develop guidance technologies to improve the precision, controlled lethality, and flexibility of conventional munitions. Specific technical areas include precision navigation and terminal seekers.
Ordnance Technologies
Develop and demonstrate integrated ordnance technologies to improve conventional munitions. Specific technical areas of focus include energetic materials, fuze technology, warhead sciences, and modeling and simulation tools.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $122.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $125.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Total | $125.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Disc. Request | $99.3M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Total | $99.3M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63670B: Weapon Concept Development | $0 | $59.7M | $51.8M | $43.0M | $43.0M |
| 63670A: Weapon Technology Development | $0 | $63.2M | $73.7M | $56.3M | $56.3M |
| Program Element | $0 | $122.9M | $125.5M | $99.3M | $99.3M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →