NANA Regional Corporation Inc
Registered name in the award data: NANA REGIONAL CORPORATION INC. Search USAspending for that string — the display name above is this site’s casing of it, nothing else.
Total obligations carry a derived USAspending citation — click the figure to inspect the derivation. Confidence reflects entity resolution method (see methodology §4).
Family-level obligations: $4.62B— constant across all filing years listed below and non-additive (do not sum across rows; this figure is total family obligations over FY2017–FY2026, across the Department of Defense award corpus this site ingests — not all federal spending).
Lobbying Activity
Filings from the Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act database. Amounts are raw USD from LDA filings. Correlation is shown, not causation.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining columns.
| Filing year | Filings | Income | Expense |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2 | $50.0K | $90.0K |
| 2025 | 8 | $130.0K | $260.0K |
| 2024 | 8 | $160.0K | $340.0K |
Lobbying dollar aggregates carry derived LDA citations — click a figure for the formula and constituent filings. This table shows lobbying activity side by side with federal obligations; lobbying and contracts reflect correlation, not causation. Income and expense are alternative disclosures on an LDA filing — a registrant reports one or the other — so they are not summed here. Read each column on its own.
Budget Program Mentions
Program elements with keyword co-occurrence in this company’s lobbying filings — a documented connection, not a statement that the filing names the program or that the company holds the program’s budget or work. For links backed by an actual award record, see Budget-Linked Awards below.
LDA Filing Mentions (17)
Lobbying filings with keyword co-occurrence against a tracked budget program — never a claim that the filing names the program. One row per filing × program, qualifying only when the exact PE/BLI code appears, a curated alias appears, or at least two distinct, non-generic title words appear together in the same filing (a single common word is never sufficient on its own — see the evidence tier badge on each row below). This is a documented co-occurrence, not evidence that the company works on the program.
Filed by NANA Regional Corporation
Filed by VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Filed by NANA Regional Corporation
Filed by NANA Regional Corporation
Filed by NANA Regional Corporation
Filed by NANA Regional Corporation
Filed by VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Filed by VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Filed by VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Filed by VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Filed by NANA Regional Corporation
Filed by NANA Regional Corporation
Filed by NANA Regional Corporation
Filed by NANA Regional Corporation
Filed by VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Filed by VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Filed by VAN NESS FELDMAN, LLP
Budget-Linked Awards
Award linkage is shown for 20 of 200 profiled companies — only high-confidence USASpending matches are included. why partial award coverage? →
No crosswalk-linked award rows for this family — our budget→award links are confidence-tiered; see methodology.
The crosswalk mart contains R&D performers, not primes. Approximately 20 of the top-200 contractor families have award links in the current dataset. A family-level awards mart is on the roadmap.