Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Sidewinder (AIM-9X)

Air ForceProcurementReconciledBLIM09HAI
What it is
Sidewinder (AIM-9X) (M09HAI) is an Air Force procurement line funded in the Missile Procurement, Air Force account.
What changed
-$1.45M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 8 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$157.7MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$101.8MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$100.4MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$1.45MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $157.7MFY25: $101.8MFY26: $100.4MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$157.7M
FY25$101.8M
FY26$100.4M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$102.5M$220.9M$157.7M
Enacted–$111.9M$95.6M$101.8M
Request––$95.6M$107.1M$100.4M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $95.6M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $157.7M as actual total obligation authority — $62.0M above the request. 157.666 − 95.643 = 62.023 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Sidewinder (AIM-9X)

The AIM-9X Block II/II+ Sidewinder (AIM-9X Blk II/II+) continues the evolution of the AIM-9 series of missiles. This missile program delivers a launch and leave, air combat munition that uses passive Infrared (IR) energy to acquire and track enemy air targets and complements the radar guided Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM). The inner-boundry missile provides first shot, first kill opportunities while conducting air combat maneuvering which is essential for aircrew survival. The AIM-9X provides these opportunities with unmatched offensive and defensive capabilities against threats within the inner boundary, even when IR countermeasures are employed. The AIM-9X also provides air superiority in the Beyond Visual Range (BVR) air-to-air battle. Anti-tamper features have been incorporated to protect improvements inherent in this design. The AIM-9X Block II missile is critical for projecting power and winning decisively against current and emerging threats. AIM-9X is a Post Milestone C, Acquisition Category IC (ACAT-IC) joint service program led by the Department of the Navy (DoN). In June 2011, the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) established the AIM-9X Block II missile program which was approved for entry at Milestone C for Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP). The Block I program ended with the Sec 2366 A/B certification and Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) for AIM-9X Block II approval on December 23, 2011. In August 2015, the program received approval for Full Rate Production (FRP), and the APB was re-established. In December 2017, the program began to procure a third variant of the missile labeled the AIM-9X Block II PLUS (Block II+) to satisfy the requirements of the Joint Strike Fighter platform. This version of the missile is being produced on the same production line as the AIM-9X Block II missile. For contracting purposes, the nomenclature of the AIM-9X Block II missile is identified as AIM-9X-2 or AIM-9X-4 and the AIM-9X Block II+ missile is identified as AIM-9X-3. The AIM-9X-4 variants are the System Improvement Program (SIP) III configuration with upgraded hardware for obsolescence that cut into Lot 21. In February 2019, the APB for DoN and USAF was revised to increase total missile procurements from 6,000 to 11,635 missiles and to extend USAF missile procurements through 2035. The current APB quantity of 11,635 missiles is made up of 5,326 DoN missiles and 6,309 USAF missiles. Funding for this exhibit contained in PE 0207161F. Funding may be used to address Diminishing Manufacturing Source (DMS) issues. This requirement supports performance of a full financial audit as required by title 10 U.S.C. Chapter 9A, Sec 240-D. Differences in USAF and USN All-Up Rounds (AUR) unit cost is the result of the variations in procurement of missile types by each service.

Justification

Justification — Sidewinder (AIM-9X)

FY 2026 provides funding to procure the twelfth lot of FRP AIM-9X Block II (Blk II) missiles for the Air Force. The program unit costs are based on quantities procured by the DoN, USAF, and Army, as well as Foreign Military Sales (FMS) customers. Total Program quantity by service includes a mix of AUR missiles Captive Air Training Missiles (CATM). In FY 2026, the Air Force will procure 173 missiles. Specifically, 149 All-Up Rounds (AURs) and 24 Captive Air Training Missiles (CATMs). Funding may be used to resolve production Diminishing Manufacturing Sources (DMS)/Material Shortages/Obsolescence issues through studies, bridge buys, life of type buys, supplier/parts replacement and qualification activities to preserve future production capabilities and capacities. Note: Procurement quantities can change based on negotiated options/pricing bands and available funding, in accordance with Title 10, U.S Code Section 3069 BUY-TO-BUDGET ACQUISITION. Tranche funding received via FY 2025 reprogramming actions that is not included in the FY 2025 Enacted Amount contained in the above FY26PB P-40 Resource Summary table • Ukraine Tranche 28: 81.7M for Lot 25 AURs (177 AUR) • Israel Tranches 3 & 4: 23.0M for Lot 25 AURs (50 AUR) • Israel Tranches 6: 4.668M for Lot 26 AURs (10 AUR)

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Missile Procurement, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$157.7M
Missile Procurement, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$101.8M
Missile Procurement, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$100.4M
Missile Procurement, Air ForceFFY26 Total$100.4M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$1.64B$157.7M$101.8M$100.4M$100.4M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0001911C0001medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0001911C0026medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0001912C0111medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0001915C0092medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0001918C1068medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0001920C0071medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0001920F0040medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0001920F0698medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Sidewinder (AIM-9X). No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.