Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/823230/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Security And Tactical Vehicles
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $390.0K
- FY26
- $129.0K
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $6.09M | $382.0K | $390.0K | ||
| Enacted | – | $382.0K | $390.0K | $438.0K | |
| Request | – | – | $390.0K | $438.0K | $129.0K |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Description — Security And Tactical Vehicles
Funding provides for a variety of security and tactical vehicles essential to strategic military operations. This program previously procured the standard diesel-powered High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV) and all configurations used by the Air Force and cargo trailers. M1101 and M1102 light tactical trailers: The M1101 and M1102 are a single axle, two wheel trailer designed to be towed by a HMMWV. The trailers have the same tires, wheels, and track width as the HMMWV. The only difference between the M1101 and the M1102 trailer is the model information and payload capacity. The trailers have various applications and provide the forces with a light, nimble, rugged trailer built primarily for hauling cargo. FIAR Compliance Statement: - This requirement (or modification) supports performance of a full financial audit as required by title 10 U.S.C. Chapter 9A, Sec 240-D. **Funding for this exhibit contained in PEs: 0207227F, 0502831F, and 0202834F.
Justification
Justification — Security And Tactical Vehicles
- BASIS FOR FY 2026 BUDGET REQUEST: FY2026 procurement dollars in the amount of 0.129M will procure, but not be limited to, 3 vehicles in support of installation and unit mission requirements for Air Force personnel. Quantities are based on current requirements provided by the 441 Vehicle Support Chain Operations Squadron (VSCOS) IAW the process outlined in AFI 24-302, Vehicle Management. The requirements are generated from the priority buy model that is used to support the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) process. The model calculates vehicle requirements by fund year by BPAC using end of life projections based on depreciation and service life of the vehicle, cumulative sustainment cost and mission priority. Quantities reflected on the PDOCs show current requirements for each year supporting Active Duty, Air Force Reserve Center (AFRC), Air National Guard (ANG), Rapid Airfield Damage Repair (RADR), Regional Base Cluster Prepositioning Kits (RBCP) for PACOM, and other initiatives as they arise. As the model applies the life expectancy/sustainment cost/mission priority logic in generating requirements, there can be gaps in individual vehicle type (NSN) requirements from year-to-year. Unit Cost is subject to change from year-to-year based on buy quantities, CONUS/OCONUS locations, inflation and additional requirements (options required by users). Examples of options include, but are not limited to, specialized trailer towing packages, export (non-Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel) engines, and mission specific specialized attachments for construction vehicles. Unit cost is also subject to change based on fluctuations in contract pricing. Subcategories regrouped to provide more accurate average costs. FY26 request was reduced by .010M for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiatives. Increase/Decrease narrative: The Cargo Trailer reflects a 56% increase in unit cost. Industry standards such as inflation, cost of building materials (i.e. chassis, electronic components) and supply shortages are seen across the board for BPAC 823230 and all acquisition efforts. In addition, contracts that were negotiated at a certain price point are expiring in the next couple of years. The prices associated with the replacement contracts are expected to increase.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit P-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $390.0K |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $438.0K |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY26 Disc. Request | $129.0K |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY26 Total | $129.0K |
Exhibit P-1R
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $24.0K |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $121.0K |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY 2026 request | $128.0K |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $390.0K | $438.0K | $129.0K | $129.0K |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →