Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/823210/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Joint Light Tactical Vehicle
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $42.6M
- FY26
- $62.2M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $110.4M | $87.7M | $42.6M | ||
| Enacted | – | $87.7M | $57.8M | $59.5M | |
| Request | – | – | $57.8M | $69.5M | $62.2M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $57.8M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reports $42.6M actually spent — $15.2M below the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Description — Joint Light Tactical Vehicle
The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Family of Vehicles (FoV) has been chosen by the Department of Defense (DOD) as the multi-service (Marine Corps, Army, Navy, and Air Force) tactical vehicle replacement for the Up-Armored High Mobility Multipurpose-Wheeled Vehicle (UAHMMWV). The Army has been assigned lead service responsibilities for the JLTV and has established the Army Joint Program Office (JPO). All JLTVs must be acquired through the Army JPO contract. The JLTV provides major operational improvements in Force Protection (FP), payload, mobility, fuel efficiency and reliability, along with the growth potential to meet future mission requirements. The JLTV also has a companion trailer that is available with the vehicle to replace the HMMWV trailer (M1101/M1102). The Air Force (USAF) investment in JLTVs began in FY2017 and FY2018 under Weapons System Code (WSC) 823230 Security and Tactical Vehicles. Starting in FY2019, JLTV procurement changed to WSC 823210. Currently, the USAF plans on purchasing 2,905 JLTVs and trailers. The USAF JLTVs span 3 different vehicle variants consisting of 9 different mission configurations and a JLTV trailer. The 4 primary functional users for the Air Force are Security Forces, Explosive Ordnance Disposal, Tactical Air Control Party, and Special Operations. Additional modernized configurations are continuously being developed through Work Directives generated and coordinated through the JPO. General Purpose (GP) JLTV - The GP JLTV is the base vehicle that carries a 4 person-crew with a payload of 3,500 lbs. Current/projected users: Air Combat Command (ACC), Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC), Air Mobility Command (AMC), Pacific Air Forces (PACAF), US Air Forces Europe (USAFE). Utility (UTL) JLTV - The Utility JLTV carries a 2 person-crew for cargo delivery or shelter carrier. It supports a payload of 5,100 lbs. Current/projected users: ACC, AFMC, AMC, PACAF. Heavy Guns Carrier (HGC) JLTV - The HGC JLTV carries a 4 person-crew and a Gunner in Turret or Common Remotely Operated Weapon System (CROWS). It supports crew served weapons with an Objective Gunner's Protection Kit (OGPK) or CROWS. Current/projected users: Air Education & Training Command (AETC), Air Forces Central (AFCENT), Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC), AMC, PACAF, USAFE, United States Space Force (USSF). JLTV Trailer - The JLTV Trailer is capable of meeting similar mobility characteristics to the prime mover and is capable of safely carrying payload of 5500 lbs. Current/projected users: AETC, AFCENT, AFGSC, AMC, PACAF, USAFE, USSF. Contractor Furnished Equipment (CFE) Kits: These are options that come fully installed and integrated into the vehicle during production. CFE kits include, but are not limited to, armor kits, intercom kits, run flat tires, combat bumpers, and expansion kits. Expansion Kits: These kits are installed during vehicle production and provide all necessary cabling (power, signal, Radio Frequency), connectors, and hardware to enable installation of Mission Specific Equipment above and beyond the Contractor furnished Base Vehicle Platform Infrastructure. These expansion kits include, but are not limited to, Vehicular Radio Communications (VRC) radio kits, Improvised Explosive Device (IED) jamming kits, Driver Vision Enhancement (DVE) kits, and gunshot detection kits. Government Furnished Equipment (GFE): This consists of overhead equipment for the JLTV. Currently, the only Overhead GFE approved for procurement funds includes the M1114 Turret Ring and Hatch, OGPK, Improved Turret Drive System (ITDS), and the CROWS systems. The M1114 will apply to all HGC JLTV configurations, while OGPK, ITDS or CROWS applies to their respective HGC configurations. Integration and Field Service Representative (FSR) Support: OEM and/or contractor FSR support is required to provide de-processing (acceptance inspections) when the vehicles are delivered. During integration and delivery to final destinations, FSR's will install and function check Mission Support Equipment and additional overhead GFE as required. Work Directives: Studies and engineering tasks performed by the Army Joint Program Office or OEM engineers to ensure compatibility and operability on any new AF specific requirements that will be added to the JLTV based on user requirements. FIAR Compliance Statement: - This requirement (or modification) supports performance of a full financial audit as required by title 10 U.S.C. Chapter 9A, Sec 240-D. FY26 request was reduced by .056M for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiatives. Increase/Decrease narrative: Unit costs for the JLTV Trailer indicates a 6% increase. Industry standards such as inflation, cost of building materials (i.e. chassis, electronic components) and supply shortages are seen across the board for BPAC 823210 and all acquisition efforts. **Funding for this exhibit contained in PEs: 0207588F, 0208047F, 0804731F, 0502831F, 0507831F, 0702831, and 0202834F
Justification
Justification — Joint Light Tactical Vehicle
- BASIS FOR FY 2026 BUDGET REQUEST: FY 2026 procurement dollars in the amount of 62.202M will procure, but not be limited to, 105 vehicles in support of installation and unit mission requirements for Air Force personnel. Quantities are based on current requirements provided by the 441 Vehicle Support Chain Operations Squadron (VSCOS) IAW the process outlined in AFI 24-302, Vehicle Management. The procurement priorities are generated from functional community input and the priority buy model that is used to support the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) process. The model calculates vehicle requirements by fund year by WSC using end of life projections based on depreciation and service life of the vehicle, cumulative sustainment cost and mission priority. Quantities reflected show current requirements for each year supporting Active Duty, Air Force Reserve Center (AFRC), Air National Guard (ANG), Rapid Airfield Damage Repair (RADR), Regional Base Cluster Prepositioning Kits (RBCP) for PACOM, and other initiatives as they arise. Unit Cost is subject to change from year-to-year based on buy quantities of each JLTV variant and user CFE requirements based on their mission needs. Unit cost is also subject to change based on fluctuations in contract pricing. Unit cost is provided by the Joint Program Office at TACOM (Army). Crows, OGPKs, and FSRs are included in part of government furnished equipment (GFE). Based on SAC/HAC professional staff member feedback, the GP, UTL, and HGC base unit costs written to match Army contract prices. Increase/Decrease narrative: Industry standards such as inflation, cost of building materials (i.e. chassis, electronic components) and supply shortages are seen across the board for BPAC 823210 and all acquisition efforts.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit P-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $42.6M |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $59.5M |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY26 Disc. Request | $62.2M |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY26 Total | $62.2M |
Exhibit P-1R
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $1.41M |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY 2026 request | $2.75M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $42.6M | $59.5M | $62.2M | $62.2M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →