Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (BLI 823210) · Air Force

What it is

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (823210) is an Air Force procurement line funded in the Other Procurement, Air Force account.

What changed

+$2.72M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026

Who gets it

No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 2 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals

$42.6MP-1 TOA · PB2026

FY25 Enacted

$59.5MP-1 TOA · PB2026

FY26 Request

$62.2MP-1 TOA · PB2026

FY25→26 Change

+$2.72MP-1 TOA · PB2026

Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.

Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal year	Amount
FY24	$42.6M
FY25	$59.5M
FY26	$62.2M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
Series	FY22	FY23	FY24	FY25	FY26
Actuals	$110.4M	$87.7M	$42.6M
Enacted	–	$87.7M	$57.8M	$59.5M
Request	–	–	$57.8M	$69.5M	$62.2M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $57.8M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $42.6M as actual total obligation authority — $15.2M below the request. 42.6 − 57.8 = -15.2 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Joint Light Tactical Vehicle

The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) Family of Vehicles (FoV) has been chosen by the Department of Defense (DOD) as the multi-service (Marine Corps, Army, Navy, and Air Force) tactical vehicle replacement for the Up-Armored High Mobility Multipurpose-Wheeled Vehicle (UAHMMWV). The Army has been assigned lead service responsibilities for the JLTV and has established the Army Joint Program Office (JPO). All JLTVs must be acquired through the Army JPO contract. The JLTV provides major operational improvements in Force Protection (FP), payload, mobility, fuel efficiency and reliability, along with the growth potential to meet future mission requirements. The JLTV also has a companion trailer that is available with the vehicle to replace the HMMWV trailer (M1101/M1102). The Air Force (USAF) investment in JLTVs began in FY2017 and FY2018 under Weapons System Code (WSC) 823230 Security and Tactical Vehicles. Starting in FY2019, JLTV procurement changed to WSC 823210. Currently, the USAF plans on purchasing 2,905 JLTVs and trailers. The USAF JLTVs span 3 different vehicle variants consisting of 9 different mission configurations and a JLTV trailer. The 4 primary functional users for the Air Force are Security Forces, Explosive Ordnance Disposal, Tactical Air Control Party, and Special Operations. Additional modernized configurations are continuously being developed through Work Directives generated and coordinated through the JPO. General Purpose (GP) JLTV - The GP JLTV is the base vehicle that carries a 4 person-crew with a payload of 3,500 lbs. Current/projected users: Air Combat Command (ACC), Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC), Air Mobility Command (AMC), Pacific Air Forces (PACAF), US Air Forces Europe (USAFE). Utility (UTL) JLTV - The Utility JLTV carries a 2 person-crew for cargo delivery or shelter carrier. It supports a payload of 5,100 lbs. Current/projected users: ACC, AFMC, AMC, PACAF. Heavy Guns Carrier (HGC) JLTV - The HGC JLTV carries a 4 person-crew and a Gunner in Turret or Common Remotely Operated Weapon System (CROWS). It supports crew served weapons with an Objective Gunner's Protection Kit (OGPK) or CROWS. Current/projected users: Air Education & Training Command (AETC), Air Forces Central (AFCENT), Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC), AMC, PACAF, USAFE, United States Space Force (USSF). JLTV Trailer - The JLTV Trailer is capable of meeting similar mobility characteristics to the prime mover and is capable of safely carrying payload of 5500 lbs. Current/projected users: AETC, AFCENT, AFGSC, AMC, PACAF, USAFE, USSF. Contractor Furnished Equipment (CFE) Kits: These are options that come fully installed and integrated into the vehicle during production. CFE kits include, but are not limited to, armor kits, intercom kits, run flat tires, combat bumpers, and expansion kits. Expansion Kits: These kits are installed during vehicle production and provide all necessary cabling (power, signal, Radio Frequency), connectors, and hardware to enable installation of Mission Specific Equipment above and beyond the Contractor furnished Base Vehicle Platform Infrastructure. These expansion kits include, but are not limited to, Vehicular Radio Communications (VRC) radio kits, Improvised Explosive Device (IED) jamming kits, Driver Vision Enhancement (DVE) kits, and gunshot detection kits. Government Furnished Equipment (GFE): This consists of overhead equipment for the JLTV. Currently, the only Overhead GFE approved for procurement funds includes the M1114 Turret Ring and Hatch, OGPK, Improved Turret Drive System (ITDS), and the CROWS systems. The M1114 will apply to all HGC JLTV configurations, while OGPK, ITDS or CROWS applies to their respective HGC configurations. Integration and Field Service Representative (FSR) Support: OEM and/or contractor FSR support is required to provide de-processing (acceptance inspections) when the vehicles are delivered. During integration and delivery to final destinations, FSR's will install and function check Mission Support Equipment and additional overhead GFE as required. Work Directives: Studies and engineering tasks performed by the Army Joint Program Office or OEM engineers to ensure compatibility and operability on any new AF specific requirements that will be added to the JLTV based on user requirements. FIAR Compliance Statement: - This requirement (or modification) supports performance of a full financial audit as required by title 10 U.S.C. Chapter 9A, Sec 240-D. FY26 request was reduced by .056M for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiatives. Increase/Decrease narrative: Unit costs for the JLTV Trailer indicates a 6% increase. Industry standards such as inflation, cost of building materials (i.e. chassis, electronic components) and supply shortages are seen across the board for BPAC 823210 and all acquisition efforts. **Funding for this exhibit contained in PEs: 0207588F, 0208047F, 0804731F, 0502831F, 0507831F, 0702831, and 0202834F

Justification

Justification — Joint Light Tactical Vehicle

- BASIS FOR FY 2026 BUDGET REQUEST: FY 2026 procurement dollars in the amount of 62.202M will procure, but not be limited to, 105 vehicles in support of installation and unit mission requirements for Air Force personnel. Quantities are based on current requirements provided by the 441 Vehicle Support Chain Operations Squadron (VSCOS) IAW the process outlined in AFI 24-302, Vehicle Management. The procurement priorities are generated from functional community input and the priority buy model that is used to support the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) process. The model calculates vehicle requirements by fund year by WSC using end of life projections based on depreciation and service life of the vehicle, cumulative sustainment cost and mission priority. Quantities reflected show current requirements for each year supporting Active Duty, Air Force Reserve Center (AFRC), Air National Guard (ANG), Rapid Airfield Damage Repair (RADR), Regional Base Cluster Prepositioning Kits (RBCP) for PACOM, and other initiatives as they arise. Unit Cost is subject to change from year-to-year based on buy quantities of each JLTV variant and user CFE requirements based on their mission needs. Unit cost is also subject to change based on fluctuations in contract pricing. Unit cost is provided by the Joint Program Office at TACOM (Army). Crows, OGPKs, and FSRs are included in part of government furnished equipment (GFE). Based on SAC/HAC professional staff member feedback, the GP, UTL, and HGC base unit costs written to match Army contract prices. Increase/Decrease narrative: Industry standards such as inflation, cost of building materials (i.e. chassis, electronic components) and supply shortages are seen across the board for BPAC 823210 and all acquisition efforts.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

Account	Org	Type	Amount
Other Procurement, Air Force	F	FY24 Actuals	$42.6M
Other Procurement, Air Force	F	FY25 Enacted	$59.5M
Other Procurement, Air Force	F	FY26 Disc. Request	$62.2M
Other Procurement, Air Force	F	FY26 Total	$62.2M

Exhibit P-1R

Account	Org	Type	Amount
Other Procurement, Air Force	F	FY25 Enacted	$1.41M
Other Procurement, Air Force	F	FY 2026 request	$2.75M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

Project	FY24 Actuals	FY25 Total	FY26 Base	FY26 Request
Program Element	$42.6M	$59.5M	$62.2M	$62.2M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

Recipient	PIID	Confidence
OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC	W56HZV15C0095	medium
OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLC	W56HZV20C0050	medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

22 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERSLight|Vehicle2026matched 2+ title words

Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program (ATVM). Domestic Manufacturing Conversion grants. Autonomous…

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle

Budget figures

Budget trajectory

Decade view

Program lineage

Description

Description — Joint Light Tactical Vehicle source

Justification

Justification — Joint Light Tactical Vehicle source

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

Follow the dollar

Related awards

Contractor concentration

Lobbying mentions

Oversight

Program dossier

Primary sources

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

Description — Joint Light Tactical Vehicle

Justification — Joint Light Tactical Vehicle