Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/822990/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Cargo and Utility Vehicles
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $51.0M
- FY26
- $56.9M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $50.7M | $43.8M | $51.0M | ||
| Enacted | – | $43.5M | $45.0M | $66.9M | |
| Request | – | – | $45.0M | $41.6M | $56.9M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $45.0M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reports $51.0M actually spent — $5.94M above the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Description — Cargo and Utility Vehicles
This vehicle group consists of pickup trucks, trailers, semi-trailers, trucks, vans, utility trucks, maintenance, armored utility vehicles, cargo truck, truck tractors, armored sport utility vehicles, sport utility vehicles, and facility vehicles essential to base and flying operations. Assets are vital to the Air Force mission and are essential to flight line operations (aircraft maintenance), depot maintenance, component routing to depot back shops and airfield maintenance, and Air Base Civil Engineers performing base housing maintenance and repairs. These items are critical across the spectrum of functional users throughout the Air Force and provide multi-purpose capabilities. These vehicles also support mission needs for light to heavy cargo transport, as well as transportation for air/flight crew personnel. Cargo utility vehicles also provide heavy cargo movement for civil engineering and construction projects. Without the procurement of these replacement vehicles, the Air Force will not have the ability to support broad spectrum Air Force operations. FIAR Compliance Statement: - "This requirement (or modification) supports performance of a full financial audit as required by title 10 U.S.C. Chapter 9A, Sec 240-D. **Funding for this exhibit contained in PEs: 0101113F, 0207597F, 0208028F, 0502831F, 0507831F, 0702831F, 0404011F 0207430F, and 0202834F.
Justification
Justification — Cargo and Utility Vehicles
- BASIS FOR FY 2026 BUDGET REQUEST: FY2026 procurement dollars in the amount of 56.940M will procure, but not be limited to, 514 vehicles in support of installation and unit mission requirements for Air Force personnel. Quantities are based on current requirements provided by the 441 Vehicle Support Chain Operations Squadron (VSCOS) IAW the process outlined in AFI 24-302, Vehicle Management. The requirements are generated from the priority buy model that is used to support the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) process. The model calculates vehicle requirements by fund year by BPAC using end of life projections based on depreciation and service life of the vehicle, cumulative sustainment cost and mission priority. Quantities will vary year to year based on end-of-life projections. Quantities reflected show current requirements for each year supporting Active Duty, Air Force Reserve Center (AFRC), Air National Guard (ANG), Rapid Airfield Damage Repair (RADR), Regional Base Cluster Prepositioning Kits (RBCP) for PACOM, and other initiatives as they arise. As the model applies the life expectancy/sustainment cost/mission priority logic in generating requirements, there can be gaps in individual vehicle type (NSN) requirements from year-to-year. Unit Cost is subject to change from year-to-year based on buy quantities, CONUS/OCONUS locations, inflation and additional requirements (options required by users). Examples of options include, but are not limited to, specialized trailer towing packages, export (non-Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel) engines, and mission specific specialized attachments for construction vehicles. Unit cost is also subject to change based on fluctuations in contract pricing Increase/Decrease narrative: Truck Tractors (6%), 4X2 Passenger Trucks (14%), 4X4 Passenger Trucks (13%), Vans/Multi-stops (9%), Truck Stake & Platforms (9%), SUVs (40%), Law Enforcement Patrol & Military Working Dog Vehicles (9%), Small Trailers (17%) and Large Trailers (8%) have all seen a 6% or higher increase in unit costs. Contributing factors for these increases can be attributed to parts shortages, inflation, a worldwide chip shortage and rising transportation/delivery costs associated with increased fuel prices. In addition, higher demand due to a shortage of vehicles from stagnant production during the pandemic also played a key role in unit cost increases.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit P-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $51.0M |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $66.9M |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY26 Disc. Request | $56.9M |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY26 Total | $56.9M |
Exhibit P-1R
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $10.5M |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $11.1M |
| Other Procurement, Air Force | F | FY 2026 request | $11.3M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $51.0M | $66.9M | $56.9M | $56.9M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →