Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Passenger Carrying Vehicles

FProcurementFully Reconciled821800
What it is
Passenger Carrying Vehicles — a procurement program run by Air Force.
What changed
No FY25→26 comparison — trajectory data incomplete for this line.
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$6.68M
FY25 Total
FY26 Request
$5.56M
FY25→26 Change

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
FY24: $6.68MFY26: $5.56MFY24FY26
FY24
$6.68M
FY26
$5.56M
Decade view — each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY26

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$8.45M$3.92M$6.68M
Enacted$3.80M$6.12M$6.80M
Request$6.12M$6.80M$5.56M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $6.12M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reports $6.68M actually spent — $557.0K above the request.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description Passenger Carrying Vehicles

Passenger Carrying Vehicles includes the procurement of sedans, law enforcement sedans, ambulances, armored sedans, small buses, transit buses, large buses, intra-city motorcoach, and work buses. These vehicles are general in nature, but they fulfill unique and distinct needs commensurate with their design. Sedans are available in compact, mid-size, and large, and are used to support a variety of functions and missions at all levels of the Air Force. A portion of these sedans is dedicated for use by the Office of Special Investigations (OSI). Law Enforcement Sedans (LE Sedans) come equipped with a heavy-duty component package for law enforcement and security missions. Security forces personnel use this type of vehicle for emergency response, traffic control, patrol duties, and base security operations. Ambulances include both bus ambulances and modular ambulances used for medical evacuation operations. The bus ambulance is a 44-passenger bus converted to accommodate massive patient transport for medical emergency situations and humanitarian/disaster relief operations. The modular models are standard commercial ambulances available in 4x2 and 4x4 configurations. They are used for the movement of patients under field conditions, aircraft crash rescue operations, and routine transportation of patients to and from medical facilities. Buses include a variety of commercial vehicles that support a broad range of mass transit requirements. Bus sizes range from the 16-passenger shuttle bus to the 52-passenger bus. These vehicles support Air Education and Training Command (AETC) training units, Air Force band organizations, protocol offices, and several other missions. FIAR Compliance Statement: - "This requirement (or modification) supports performance of a full financial audit as required by title 10 U.S.C. Chapter 9A, Sec 240-D. Funding for this exhibit contained in PEs: 0207597F, 0502831F, 0507831F, 0702831F, 0202834F

Justification

Justification Passenger Carrying Vehicles

BASIS FOR FY 2026 BUDGET REQUEST: - FY2026 procurement dollars in the amount of 5.557M will procure, but not be limited to, 38 vehicles in support of installation and unit mission requirements for Air Force personnel. Quantities are based on current requirements provided by the 441 Vehicle Support Chain Operations Squadron (VSCOS) IAW the process outlined in AFI 24-302, Vehicle Management. The requirements are generated from the priority buy model that is used to support the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE) process. The model calculates vehicle requirements by fund year by BPAC using end of life projections based on depreciation and service life of the vehicle, cumulative sustainment cost and mission priority. Quantities will vary year to year based on end-of-life projections. Quantities reflected on the PDOCs show current requirements for each year supporting Active Duty, Air Force Reserve Center (AFRC), Air National Guard (ANG), Rapid Airfield Damage Repair (RADR), Regional Base Cluster Prepositioning Kits (RBCP) for PACOM, and other initiatives as they arise. As the model applies the life expectancy/sustainment cost/mission priority logic in generating requirements, there can be gaps in individual vehicle type (NSN) requirements from year-to-year. Increase/Decrease narrative: Transit Buses (7%), Sedans (16%), and Workbuses (19%) have all seen a 6% or higher increase in unit costs. Contributing factors for these increases is attributed to parts shortages, inflation, a worldwide vehicle computer chip shortage and rising transportation/delivery costs associated with increased fuel prices. In addition, higher demand due to a shortage of vehicles from stagnant production during the pandemic also played a key role in unit cost increases.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Other Procurement, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$6.68M
Other Procurement, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$6.80M
Other Procurement, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$5.56M
Other Procurement, Air ForceFFY26 Total$5.56M

Exhibit P-1R

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Other Procurement, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$251.0K
Other Procurement, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$256.0K
Other Procurement, Air ForceFFY 2026 request$313.0K

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

ProjectFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$6.68M$6.80M$5.56M$5.56M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →