Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Tech Transition (Space)

Air ForceRDT&EPartial Reconciliation1206458SF

Watch this program: RSS · Atom

What it is
Tech Transition (Space) (1206458SF) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Space Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
+$116.9M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$144.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$209.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$326.1MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$116.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $144.2MFY25: $209.2MFY26: $326.1MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$144.2M
FY25$209.2M
FY26$326.1M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
6 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2021–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span, and 1 year is a break in the line rather than a low value: an edition the program is absent from, never interpolated. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
6 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2021–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span, and 1 year is a break in the line rather than a low value: an edition the program is absent from, never interpolated. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$50.0M$144.2M
Enacted$50.0M$0$164.6M$209.2M
Request$0$164.6M$228.5M$326.1M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $164.6M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $144.2M as actual total obligation authority — $20.5M below the request. 144.17164.65 = -20.48 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Tech Transition (Space)

The Tech Transition (Space) Program addresses the gaps between USSF Force Design activities, initial system-level technology or concept development and demonstration, and successful acquisition and operational capability implementation. This program also matures new warfighting concepts to rapidly develop and experiment with fieldable prototypes to assess military utility of transition-ready weapon systems. Following the guidance in the National Defense Strategy, the Department of the Air Force has institutionalized Experimentation and Prototyping to achieve smarter, faster, and more efficient acquisitions that move technologies rapidly to support the most critical warfighting capabilities. Project 649493 eases and accelerates the architectural pivots required by the Space Warfighting Analysis Center's future force design recommendations through engagement with commercial and industry partners, prototyping and demonstration, test buys and contracts, warfighter engagement, and the capturing of lessons learned to feed back into Force Design analytics and forward into requirements and acquisition. Project 64S444, Experimentation (Space), explores new space-related concepts and their applications in potential future operating environments within a system-of-systems context, taking risks early in the acquisition process to drive a more optimized and efficient acquisition process and significantly reduce overall acquisitions costs. The Tech Transition Program allows acquisition program managers (the capability developers) and warfighters (the capability recipients and end users) to prototype, integrate, and demonstrate candidate technologies and assess them in an operational system-of-systems environment in partnership with Combatant Commanders, Major and Field Commands, Program Executive Officers, schoolhouses, simulation facilities, and development planning organizations. This Program is a parallel effort to United States Air Force Program Element (PE) 0604858F, Tech Transition Program, Project 645350, Experimentation, and continues space-related work executed in that Program in prior fiscal years. Through FY 2030, the Projects quantify the performance and resilience of a Hybrid SATCOM architecture in an operational environment by connecting flexible terminals (from multiple vendors) to multiple SATCOM paths spanning low, medium, and geosynchronous orbits. Each of these new SATCOM pathways offer unique attributes to the DOD. The terminal flexibility will allow rapid incorporation of new commercial SATCOM vendors as they emerge, thus ensuring low-cost SATCOM options for DOD in the foreseeable future. The Resilient Architecture Design and Evaluation project coupled with Hybrid SATCOM terminals will prototype and test techniques for dynamic networking, enhancing cybersecurity, and rapid switching capabilities between DoD and commercial paths, including broadband, narrowband and other mission services through both space-to-ground and space-to-space connectivity. The knowledge will transition to USSF to inform contract structures for operations that enable switching between DoD systems and multiple vendors at minimum cost. Together, these Projects will directly inform COCOMS, MAJCOMS, Field Commands, and PEOs in the acquisition and sustainment of Hybrid SATCOM capability for multiple Joint Force applications using commercial service level agreements and advanced cybersecurity architectures. In order to manage, execute, and deliver science and technology capabilities, this program element may include: necessary civilian pay expenses; expenses to support the operation and maintenance of facilities; as well as expenses related to travel, supplies, IT hardware, software and support, administrative contractor services, etc. This effort is in Budget Activity 4, Advanced Component Development and Prototypes (ACD&P), because efforts are necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative modes or prototype systems in a high fidelity and realistic operating environment.

Mission Resilient Architecture Design and Evaluation

The Resilient Architecture Design and Evaluation project conducts experimentation within an interconnected hybrid SATCOM architecture to validate the performance, scalability and resilience of providing the Joint Force with multiple separate communications paths. To achieve these resiliency gains, the hybrid network requires 1) on-demand management of multi-band, multi-orbit DoD, allied and commercial data links; and 2) management and control capabilities to orchestrate paths through the space and ground networks. The effort validates the "Resilience by Design” approach in the Space Warfighting Analysis Center (SWAC) Space Data Transport Force Design recommendations through a combination of 1) modeling and simulation; 2) hardware- and software-in-the-loop analysis; and 3) terrestrial and on-orbit demonstration. The project leverages Hybrid SATCOM terminal prototyping in the Experimentation (Space) project along with direct relationships with commercial terrestrial and space data transport providers to demonstrate dynamic networking, understand commercial offerings, assess security and resiliency, and jump-start future acquisition approaches that enable a pivot to a more resilient architecture.

Mission Experimentation (Space)

Experimentation (Space), Project 64S444, efforts conduct experimentation and field prototyping of Hybrid Satellite Communications (SATCOM) terminals for Joint operational implementation. In FY 2022, this included experimentation for Arctic Communications, leveraging Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) Global Lightning efforts. In FY 2024 through FY 2028, the Experimentation (Space) efforts will extend Hybrid SATCOM capabilities to an expanded set of DOD platforms, and enable assured communications through both commercial and military satellite constellations in multiple orbital regimes, while accessing multiple frequency bands to maintain resilient connectivity and security. The Hybrid SATCOM terminal effort implements and experimentally flight tests multi-band, multi-constellation, multi-orbit SATCOM terminals at three ground installations and on nine different aircraft types. Specific platforms and platform details are available through proper channels. The Project also demonstrates the ability of Hybrid SATCOM terminals to seamlessly switch between vendors and satellite constellations. The Hybrid SATCOM terminal prototyping will include secure connectivity using National Security Agency-approved approaches, and authority approvals at least to the interim levels needed for experimentation as required for DOD communications.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

Resilient Architecture Design and Evaluation

Prototype and optimize a cyber-secure multi-orbit space-based data transport capability that is resilient by design, as a core element of the USSF Hybrid Space Architecture for enterprise capability. Through collaborative modeling and simulation, prototype software and hardware in the loop systems, and on-orbit operational experimentation, validate critical underlying assumptions of the USSF Future Force Design elements built upon the integration of allied and commercial SATCOM capabilities across decoupled paths. Prototype existing high-TRL commercial capabilities in operational experiments to identify and resolve key unknowns regarding network topology management, data forwarding, quality of service, availability, security, and scalability. The product is prototypes that are validated with quantitative performance and scalability data suitable to develop USSF requirements and reduce risk to future acquisition.

Experimentation Space

Experimentation Space addresses significant gaps identified by COCOMs, MAJCOMs, and Department Air Force (DAF) Senior Leaders, often by quickly leveraging emerging capability into DOD systems.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Space ForceFFY24 Actuals$144.2M
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Space ForceFFY25 Enacted$209.2M
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Space ForceFFY25 Total$209.2M
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Space ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$326.1M
Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Space ForceFFY26 Total$326.1M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$144.2M$209.2M$326.1M$326.1M
649493: Resilient Architecture Design and Evaluation$0$11.1M$60.1M$107.5M$107.5M
64S444: Experimentation (Space)$0$133.1M$149.1M$218.7M$218.7M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Tech Transition (Space) — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →