Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0606301D8Z/ — data as of August 12, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Aviation Safety Technologies
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $0P-40 detail · PB2026 |
| FY25 | $1.89MR-1 TOA · PB2026 |
| FY26 | $1.70MR-1 TOA · PB2026 |
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $0 | – | – | ||
| Enacted | – | $0 | $213.0K | $1.89M | |
| Request | – | – | $213.0K | $1.89M | $1.70M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Aviation Safety Technologies
This effort supports the Department's priority of Taking Care of Our People. The requirements are aligned to Department of Defense (DoD)/Federal strategic direction, including the DoD Digital Modernization Strategy, DoD and Federal Data Strategies, Personnel and Readiness Strategy for 2030, and the DoD Safety and Occupational Health (SOH) Strategic Plan. To protect the lives, safety, health, and welfare of the DoD workforce, and the significant investments we make in our weapons systems, platforms, and infrastructure, we must acknowledge and provide adequate resources for SOH. Ensuring the safety of our workforce requires an enduring culture of safety, where consistent and standardized mishap, near-miss, and hazard reporting is the norm – at least on-par with industry and the private sector aviation and industrial communities. According to the 2020 National Commission on Military Aviation Safety (NCMAS) report, this begins with a centralized system and processes with which to gather, synthesize, and report Safety information at all levels. In addition to the NCMAS report, 10 United States Code Service (USCS) 184 directs the Department to establish uniform data collection standards and a centralized collection system and repository for mishap information. Currently, the DoD collects SOH information from disparate, incomplete, and often overlapping sources - a process that hinders opportunities for timely and in-depth trending and analysis to support Department-wide risk mitigation and mishap prevention efforts. Many of the DoD Components, including some of the Combatant Commands, do not have a safety information management system to enter, track, or manage mishaps, near-misses, or hazards. Without such a system and process, the Department is unable to adequately identify and analyze trends across the DoD Components, efficiently share lessons learned, and track corrective actions in response to recommendations. This effort addresses the Congressional requirements and fulfills capability gaps through modernization of the Force Risk Reduction tool to a safety information case management system. The system will be based on the Department’s safety business processes and data standards, which are being incorporated into Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6055.07 “Mishap Notification, Investigation, Reporting, and Record Keeping.” A central SOH information management system based on the safety business processes and data standards will be available for all DoD Components, providing the capability to those DoD Components without an existing automated tool. It will continue to consolidate all SOH information serving as the Department’s authoritative repository for all standardized SOH data, and ensuring leaders have current, accurate, and actionable safety information and insights to forecast, mitigate, and prevent future mishaps, injuries, and occupational illnesses, and to drive safety innovation and modernization. Failure to receive this funding will result in non-compliance with Title 10 U.S.C. §184 requirements. Expanding FR2 functionality is the most efficient and effective approach to providing a compliant centralized safety collection and information management capability and repository. Without this funding, the Department will continue to lack a complete understanding of safety impacts to our personnel and operational readiness. Mishap reporting will continue to be inconsistent, and the Department will struggle to manage and share recommendations and lessons learned across the enterprise and respond effectively to external inquiries (e.g., Congress, Government Accountability Office). These persistent gaps will negatively impact our ability to make timely and informed risk decisions and resource investments for mishap prevention solutions. Oversight of the Department’s safety enterprise requires a deliberate data informed focus and priority commensurate with the Department’s overall governance approach.
Mission — Force Safety & Occupational Health (FSOH)
This effort supports the Department's priority of Taking Care of Our People. The requirements are aligned to Department of Defense (DoD)/Federal strategic direction including the DoD Digital Modernization Strategy, DoD and Federal Data Strategies, Personnel and Readiness Strategy for 2030, and the DoD Safety and Occupational Health (SOH) Strategic Plan. To protect the lives, safety, health, and welfare of the DoD workforce, and the significant investments we make in our weapons systems, platforms, and infrastructure, we must acknowledge and provide adequate resources for SOH. Ensuring the safety of our workforce requires an enduring culture of safety, where consistent and standardized mishap, near-miss, and hazard reporting is the norm – at least on-par with industry and the private sector aviation and industrial communities. According to the 2020 National Commission on Military Aviation Safety (NCMAS) report, this begins with a centralized system and processes with which to gather, synthesize, and report Safety information at all levels. In addition to the NCMAS report, 10 United States Code Service (USCS) 184 directs the Department to establish uniform data collection standards and a centralized collection system and repository for mishap information. Currently, the DoD collects SOH information from disparate, incomplete, and often overlapping sources - a process that hinders opportunities for timely and in-depth trending and analysis to support Department-wide risk mitigation and mishap prevention efforts. Many of the DoD Components, including some of the Combatant Commands, do not have a safety information management system to enter, track, or manage mishaps, near-misses, or hazards. Without such a system and process, the Department is unable to adequately identify and analyze trends across the DoD Components, efficiently share lessons learned, and track corrective actions in response to recommendations. This effort addresses the Congressional requirements and fulfills capability gaps through modernization of the Force Risk Reduction tool to a safety information case management system. The system will be based on the Department’s safety business processes and data standards, which are being incorporated into Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6055.07 “Mishap Notification, Investigation, Reporting, and Record Keeping.” A central SOH information management system based on the safety business processes and data standards will be available for all DoD Components, providing the capability to those DoD Components without an existing automated tool. It will continue to consolidate all SOH information and serve as the Department’s authoritative repository for all standardized SOH data, providing the capability to those DoD Components without an existing automated tool. It will continue to consolidate all SOH information and provide leaders, serving as the Department’s authoritative repository for all standardized SOH data, and ensuring leaders have current, accurate, and actionable safety information and insights to forecast, mitigate, and prevent future mishaps, injuries, and occupational illnesses, and to drive safety innovation and modernization. Failure to receive this funding will result in non-compliance with Title 10 U.S.C. §184 requirements. Expanding FR2 functionality is the most efficient and effective approach to providing a compliant centralized safety collection and information management capability and repository. Without this funding, the Department will continue to lack a complete understanding of safety impacts to our personnel and operational readiness. Mishap reporting will continue to be inconsistent, and the Department will struggle to manage and share recommendations and lessons learned across the enterprise and respond effectively to external inquiries (e.g., Congress, Government Accountability Office). These persistent gaps will negatively impact our ability to make timely and informed risk decisions and resource investments for mishap prevention solutions. Oversight of the Department’s safety enterprise requires a deliberate data informed focus and priority commensurate with the Department’s overall governance approach.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
Force Safety & Occupational Health (FSOH)
Modernize Force Risk Reduction with a safety information case management tool for entering, tracking, and managing the lifecycle of mishaps, near misses, and hazards from identification through investigation to implementation of recommendations for mitigation, as well as the sharing of lessons learned and best practices.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Enacted | $1.89M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Total | $1.89M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Disc. Request | $1.70M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Total | $1.70M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $0 | $0 | $1.89M | $1.70M | $1.70M |
| 057: Force Safety & Occupational Health (FSOH) | $0 | $0 | $1.89M | $1.70M | $1.70M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
Showing 25 of 197 from the Senate LDA disclosure database.
Funding, programs and projects pertaining to transportation and infrastructure investment, including funding for…
House and Senate FAA legislation as it pertains to aviation safety, unmanned aircraft systems, advanced air mobility…
H.R.4552 & S.2465 - Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026. FY27…
Issues related to aviation safety improvements.
FY27 Defense Appropriations, all provisions related to Missile Defense & Tactical Communications FY27 Interior…
Issues related to aviation and trucking, policies and regulations related to trucking efficiencies, infrastructure…
Legislative monitoring on aviation security and aviation safety issues including all-cargo flight time and duty rules…
Issues related to aviation, corporate structure, express carrier, labor and aviation policy. Legislative monitoring on…
Issues and funding related to Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) Defense Appropriations (bill numbers not yet assigned); FY27…
Aircraft certification and safety issues, Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization issues and implementation…
Issues related to FY25 and FY26 NASA Aeronautics appropriations. Issues related to FY25 and FY26 Transportation…
Issues related to classification of certain aerospace components for export licensing purposes Helicopter terrain…
Aviation safety technology, Advanced Air Mobility, and other aviation issues; H.R.4704 - ROTOR Act; H.R.7613 - ALERT…
Issues related to FAA operations, aviation safety, regulatory frameworks, and funding priorities.
Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, National Transportation Safety Board, Commercial…
P.L.119-75 - Consolidated Defense, LHHSED, Nat. Sec., State, THUD, FSGG Appropriations Act FY26, Transportation…
Support funding for air traffic improvements, human space flight technology, aviation propulsion technologies…
Education and outreach regarding original equipment manufacturers, advancement of production standards, Federal…
Issues related to aviation and aerospace programs in FY2026 Department of Defense Appropriations Act…
Aviation quality and safety; commercial aviation; supply chain;commercial and aftermarket operations.
Aviation quality and safety; commercial aviation; supply chain;commercial and aftermarket operations.
implementation of PL 118-63, FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 S 2503, Rotorcraft Operations Transparency and Oversight…
Funding, programs and projects pertaining to transportation and infrastructure investment, including funding for…
Funding, programs and projects pertaining to transportation and infrastructure investment, including funding for…
Funding, programs and projects pertaining to transportation and infrastructure investment, including funding for…
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Aviation Safety Technologies — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →