Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Infantry Support Weapons

ArmyRDT&EReconciledPE0604601A
What it is
Infantry Support Weapons (0604601A) is an Army research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 11 projects.
What changed
-$1.13M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$80.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$57.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$56.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$1.13MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $80.8MFY25: $57.7MFY26: $56.6MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$80.8M
FY25$57.7M
FY26$56.6M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$36.8M$87.0M$63.8M$99.1M$74.6M$86.2M$89.5M$77.0M$80.1M$80.8M
Enacted$89.7M$66.9M$87.6M$63.8M$87.2M$88.6M$79.3M$83.3M$64.1M$57.7M
Request$66.9M$87.6M$83.2M$106.1M$91.6M$67.9M$66.5M$64.1M$52.6M$56.6M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2020 book requested $106.1M for FY2020; the PB2022 book reported $86.2M as actual total obligation authority — $20.0M below the request. 86.15 − 106.12 = -19.97 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Infantry Support Weapons

A portion of this funding line directly aligns to the Soldier Lethality Army Modernization Priority. This Program Element (PE) Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) manages the Soldier as a system, with the goal of increasing Soldiers' combat effectiveness, increasing survivability, and improving the Soldiers' quality of life. It develops and tests prototypes of weapons, clothing, equipment, and other items useful to support the Soldier. Project CF3 (Integrated Soldier Systems (SL CFT)) test, maintain and evolve a Soldier/squad equipment configuration baseline, the Architecture Assessment Tool and conduct configuration management at the system level. The Adaptive Squad Architecture (ASA) and the Soldier Integration Facility (SIF) are Program Executive Soldier Office - Soldier (PEO-S) led efforts to support the Close Combat Integration Enterprise. These efforts support maturing and evaluating technologies for Squad as a System (SaaS). The focus is a system of systems approach that includes updating Formations Based Architecture, evaluation of interoperability of systems on the soldier and squad and updating the Architecture Assessment Tool (AAT). Maturing digital models, algorithms, integrating with virtual, constructive and live outdoor evaluation and digital tools across the Army, other Services, and Allies allows the PEO-S to act as the Leading Systems Integrator for SaaS. Funding for this project aligns with the Army's Digital Engineering and Digital Transformation Strategy and is a Soldier Lethality Cross Functional Team priority. Project ES9 (Advanced Tactical Parachute System) improves personnel parachute systems and associated equipment for low and high altitude operations to include canopy improvements based on integration of new technology with the goal of enhancing the insertion capability and safety of the airborne Soldier and increasing the performance, reliability, and durability of personnel airdrop equipment. Project EW4 (Crew Served Weapons Engineering Development) Funding support Crew Served Weapons systems include small and medium caliber weapons ranging up to 40 millimeter and remote weapon stations. These efforts focus on system improvements designed to enhance lethality, target acquisition, fire control, usability, training effectiveness and reliability of weapons to include ammunition and counter UAS when developing and/or evaluating standard, non-standard weapons and remote weapon station enhancements. Focus areas include system development, integration (to include human-systems), demonstration, test and evaluate components, prototypes and operational system prototypes of small arms weapon systems and/or enhancements. Benefits include continuous improvements to small arms weapon systems, fire control equipment, optics, gun barrels, ancillary equipment, training devices, component mounts, weapon mounts, and weapon/ammunition interface of current small arms fleet or new weapon systems. Project FF2 (Small Arms Fire Control) supports the development of an advanced fire control for the Next Generation Automatic Rifle (NGSW-AR) and Rifle (NGSW-R). The Next Generation Fire Control will increase the probability of hit and decrease the time to engage through a variable powered direct view optic with integrated range finder, ballistic calculator, and digital display capable of providing an adjusted aim point. Project FL8 (84mm MAAWS Ammunition) supports test, evaluation and quality up to seven types of 84 millimeter (mm) munitions for the U.S. Army use with the M3/M3A1 Multi-Role Anti-Personnel Weapon Systems (MAAWS). Project FM4 (Next Generation Squad Weapons) supports the rapid prototyping and development of a NGSW-AR, NGSW-R and common cartridge to provide capability improvements in accuracy, range and lethality, in order to maintain overmatch and meet future warfighter requirements. Project GM1 (Future Medium Machine Gun) is intended to replace M240s inside the Closed Combat Force (CCF). The FMMG will increase Squad survivability and lethality in large scale combat operations. The FMMG is a belt fed crew served direct fire weapon system that will enable the rifle platoon to organically suppress and destroy enemy personnel targets and maintain operational tempo. The FMMG will provide increased lethality and capability to the warfighter compared to present Machine Gun technologies fielded to Operational Units. Project S58 (Soldier Enhancement Program) supports accelerated integration, modernization, and enhancement efforts of lighter, more lethal weapons, and improved Soldier items including lighter, more comfortable load-bearing equipment, field gear, survivability items, communications equipment, and navigational aids. Project S60 (Clothing & Equipment) supports pre-production development of state-of-the-art individual clothing and equipment to improve the survivability, mobility and sustainment affecting the quality of life of the individual Soldier. Project S61 (Acis Engineering Development) provides System Development programs with improved aircrew safety, survivability, and human performance that amplify the warfighting effectiveness and facilitates full-spectrum dominance of the Army aircraft including the AH-64 Apache/Longbow, CH-47 Chinook, UH/HH-60 Blackhawk, Light Utility Helicopter, and Future Vertical Lift (FVL) platforms. Project S63 (Individual Weapons Engineering Development) demonstrates engineering development models or integrated commercial items designed to enhance lethality, target acquisition, fire control, training effectiveness, and reliability for small arms weapon systems and ammunition. Programs include Improved Weapons Coatings, Personal Defense Weapon, 30 Round 5.56mm Magazine, Modular Handgun System (MHS), Precision Sniper Rifle (PSR), Sub Compact, Interim Combat Service Rifle (ICR) and Precision Grenadier System (PGS). Project S70 (Personnel Recovery Support System (PRSS)) provides system research, development and testing of the Personal Recovery Support System/Personnel Recovery Support Equipment supporting operations to report and locate isolated, missing, detained or captured Soldiers. Project VS5 (Soldier Protective Equipment) supports engineering and manufacturing development of Individual Soldier Ballistic Protection equipment. It will leverage advancements in technology to continue incremental improvements to body armor (to include improved outer tactical vests, plate carriers, and helmets) and other personal protective equipment. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $4.166 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative."

Mission — Integrated Soldier Systems (SL CFT)

The Adaptive Squad Architecture (ASA) and the Soldier Integration Facility (SIF) are Program Executive Soldier Office - Soldier (PEO-S) led efforts to support the Close Combat Integration Enterprise. These efforts support maturing and evaluating technologies for Squad as a System (SaaS). The focus is a system of systems approach that includes updating Formations Based Architecture, evaluation of interoperability of systems on the soldier and squad and updating the Architecture Assessment Tool (AAT). Maturing digital models, algorithms, integrating with virtual, constructive and live outdoor evaluation and digital tools across the Army, other Services, and Allies allows the PEO-S to act as the Leading Systems Integrator for SaaS. Funding for this project aligns with the Army's Digital Engineering and Digital Transformation Strategy and is a Soldier Lethality Cross Functional Team priority. FY26 funding directly supports IBCT formation based architectures that connect Soldier Borne Mission Command, Nett Warrior, and LASSO with other sensors and robotics to provide 3rd party extensibility on the battlefield. Funding also supports common control/controller architecture development between Nett Warrior and robotics being employed during HMI-F Inc 1, and a dismounted Soldier C2 architecture that is integrated with Next Generation Command and Control (NGC2) and Uncrewed Vehicle Control (UVC)

Mission — Advanced Tactical Parachute System

Funding in this project supports the Army Modernization Priorities. Advanced Tactical Parachute System funding improves Low-Altitude and High-Altitude personnel parachutes and associated equipment to include test and evaluation of items transitioning from Advanced Component Development and prototype (6.4) efforts, with the goal of enhancing the insertion capability and safety of the airborne Soldier and increasing the performance, reliability, and durability of personnel airdrop equipment. Funding also supports improvements and testing/evaluation of personnel parachute systems including integration and interface with the Soldier system. This project will continue to support cross-service initiatives to improve commonality.

Mission — Crew Served Weapons Engineering Development

The Crew Served Weapons Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) program provides funds to transition components or prototypes from Budget Activity 4 (BA 4) Program Element (PE) 0603827A Soldier Systems - Advanced Development Project S54 Small Arms Improvement and other domestic and foreign sources of small arms weapon systems to demonstrate, test and evaluate capability near or at planned operational requirements. Crew Served Weapons systems include small and medium caliber weapons ranging up to 40 millimeter and remote weapon stations. Current and future efforts focus on system improvements designed to enhance lethality, target acquisition, fire control, usability, training effectiveness and reliability of weapons to include ammunition counter unmanned aerial system (C-UAS) when developing and/or evaluating standard, non-standard weapons and remote weapon station enhancements. Focus areas include system development, integration (to include human-systems), demonstration, test and evaluate components, prototypes and operational system prototypes of small arms weapon systems and/or enhancements. Benefits include continuous improvements to small arms weapon systems, fire control equipment, combat optics, gun barrels, ancillary equipment, training devices, component mounts, weapon mounts, and weapon/ammunition interface of current small arms fleet or new weapon systems.

Mission — Small Arms Fire Control

The M157 Next Generation Squad Weapon - Fire Control (NGSW-FC) is an advanced fire control device that supports the Next Generation Squad Weapons. NGSW-FC increases the probability of hit and decreases the time to engage through a variable powered direct view optic with integrated range finder, ballistic calculator, and digital display capable of providing an adjusted aim point. The M157 NGSW-FC will utilize open architecture along with modular interfaces that will deliver the initial increased core capability followed by increasing increments of capability/enhancements over time as technology matures and evolves. Supports development and test of weapon mounted optics, lasers, sensors, and other enablers to increase lethality of dismounted weapon systems.

Mission — Next Generation Squad Weapons

The Next Generation Squad Weapons (NGSW) program will develop weapon systems and common 6.8mm cartridge to maintain overmatch and meet future force warfighter needs. The M7 Rifle is the planned replacement for the M4A1 Carbine in the close combat force and select support units. The M7 Rifle will provide capability improvements in accuracy, range, and lethality. The M250 Automatic Rifle is the planned replacement for the M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW) in the close combat force and select support units. The M250 Rifle combines the firepower and range of a machine gun with the precision and ergonomics of a carbine, yielding capability improvements in accuracy, range, and lethality. The M7 Rifle and M250 Automatic Rifle will use a common 6.8mm cartridge in a variety of ammunition types including but not limited to general purpose (GP), special purpose (SP), reduced range, and blank. Development efforts for additional NGSW variants may follow to replace other legacy systems or provide additional enhanced capabilities.

Mission — Soldier Enhancement Program

The Soldier Enhancement Program (SEP) was established by the National Defense Authorization Act in Fiscal Year 1990 to provide a rapid approach to evaluate Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS), Government off-the shelf (GOTS), or Non-Developmental Items (NDI) capabilities to increase the combat effectiveness of the Soldier. SEP now uses a "buy, try and decide" methodology. SEP provides significant savings and acceleration in the evaluation of leading-edge Soldier capabilities in order to provide combat overmatch. The SEP tri-chair leadership consists of the Director, Maneuver Capabilities Development and Integration Directorate (MCDID), the Infantry Commandant, and Program Executive Officer (PEO) Soldier. Proposals are submitted by Soldiers and industry at any time, are reviewed monthly and new projects are approved semi-annually by the SEP Council of Colonels (CoC). Approved proposals are validated by the Director, MCDID. Validated SEP initiatives are procured and then evaluated by Soldiers for feasibility and suitability. Based on the evaluation findings, the SEP CoC provides one or more of the following courses of action: (1) inform deliberate or urgent/emerging requirements generation, (2) initiate a new Program of Record (POR) or improve an existing POR, (3) provide a national stock number (NSN) for unit procurement or (4) the item did not meet objectives and no further action is necessary. The funding supports SEP evaluation preparation, conducting evaluations, and documenting results. Funding for this project aligns with the Army's priorities in support of the National Defense Strategy and is a priority of the Army Futures Command (AFC).

Mission — Clothing & Equipment

Funding in this effort supports Army Modernization Priorities. It supports engineering and manufacturing development tasks related to clothing and individual equipment with the goal of enhancing the lethality, survivability, and mobility as well as the quality of life of the Warfighter. It funds formal Developmental Testing/Operational Testing (DT/OT) of preproduction and prototypes leveraging technological advancements. Those advancements focus on materials, fabrication techniques, moisture management, flame resistance, vector protection, extreme environmental protection, and camouflage. This effort also funds evaluations of Organizational Clothing and Individual Equipment (OCIE) appropriate for use in extreme or multi-climate environments. Funding supports test and evaluation of both tactical and non-tactical clothing and individual equipment development and enhancement resulting in the integrated systems for the Airborne, Arctic, Arid, Jungle, and Temperate Soldier. This effort will further develop capabilities transitioning from Project S53 to increase performance and safety of Warfighter clothing and equipment. PdM SCIE will continue to support multi-service commonality and modernization initiatives through technology that enables combat operations and enhances lethality.

Mission — Acis Engineering Development

This project conducts development, integration, qualification, and upgrade activities in support of the Air Soldier System (Air SS) and Aviation operational needs as codified in the Air SS requirements document, which provides aviators with improved sustainability, safety, and lethality. The Air SS addresses capability gaps identified in combat operations, as well as emerging challenges, such as Transformation in Contact (Tic) and Next Generation Command and Control (NGC2), to Army aircrew safety and performance caused by limited Situational Awareness (SA), lack of protection from emerging threats, and a lack of functionally integrated mission electronics and protective/ survival equipment. Air SS delivers enhanced aircrew survivability, Situational Awareness (SA), interoperability, and improved mission performance. The Air SS offers enhanced mission planning and execution through the introduction of upgraded hardware and software components, enabling improved connectivity among aircrew members, other aircraft, and ground assets. Capabilities further enhance terrain mapping, threat, and obstacle avoidance information through improved Heads-Up Display (HUD) technologies, which also align with platform needs such as the Future Long Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA), Black Hawk, Chinook, and Apache. Additionally, Air SS includes a digital replacement for paper-based DoD Flight Information Publications and the Aircrew Combat Equipment (ACE), a replacement for the legacy survival vest. These enhanced capabilities support both the enduring fleet and future fleet.

Mission — Individual Weapons Engineering Development

The Individual Weapons Engineering Development program provides funds to transition components or prototypes from Budget Activity 4 (BA 4) Element (PE) 0603827A Soldier Systems - Advanced Development Project S54 Small Arms Improvement Program, and other domestic and foreign sources of small arms weapon systems, to demonstrate, test, and evaluate capability near or at planned operational requirements. The Maneuver Center of Excellence (MCoE) and Soldier Lethality Cross Functional Team (CFT) at Fort Moore, GA (User Community) identifies the Individual Weapons Engineering Development activities as critical to addressing or closing capability gaps for our Soldiers in combat. Small arms systems include weapons ranging up to 40 millimeter (mm) in caliber. Current and future efforts focus on system development, system improvements, and integration (to include human-systems) to enhance lethality, target acquisition and tracking, fire control, usability, training effectiveness, and reliability. System improvements include ammunition when developing and/or evaluating standard and non-standard weapons. In addition to training, system integration of ammunition includes the capability to defeat personnel in defilade, personnel in close quarters, and unmanned aerial systems. Benefits include continuous improvements to small arms weapon systems, fire control equipment, optics, gun barrels, ancillary equipment, training devices, component mounts, weapon mounts, and weapon/ammunition interfaces of current or new small arms weapon systems.

Mission — Personnel Recovery Support System (PRSS)

The Personnel Recovery Support System (PRSS) consists of components that include Personnel Recovery Devices (PRD) and other Personnel Recovery Support Equipment (PRSE) items that provide the capability to report and locate isolated Soldiers, forces and elements in a GPS denied environment. Funding supports system research, development, testing, and evaluation of next-generation PRSS/PRSE items to enhance capability and provide a secure waveform with Low Probability of Intercept (LPI)/Low Probability of Detection (LPD) while operating in increasingly contested environments utilizing secure signals of opportunity that meet Army qualifications. It ensures continued technology insertion within the relevant theaters of operations and the Continental United States (CONUS).

Mission — Soldier Protective Equipment

Funding in this project supports the Army Modernization priority. It supports Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) to include design integration and manufacturing of production representative articles, formal developmental testing / operational testing (DT/OT), Soldier touchpoints, and continued development of SPS technologies transitioning from Project VS4. It leverages advancements in technology to continue improvements to the Army's Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) portfolio to include hard and soft body armor components such as Vital Torso Protection (VTP) and Torso and Extremity Protection (TEP), Next Generation (NG) IHPS, Military Protective Eyewear systems, hearing protection, and other personal protective equipment. This project will continue to support cross-service initiatives to increase commonality.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (26)

Integrated Soldier Systems

Test, maintain, and evolve a Soldier/squad equipment configuration baseline, the Architecture Assessment Tool (AAT) and conduct configuration management at the system level. Physically integrate components, improve compatibility and interoperability across programs. Establish and maintain tools that provide Systems Engineering, Configuration Management and Evaluation in a virtual and physical environment. Conduct evaluations and integrate mission-specific equipment into the Adaptive Squad Architecture (ASA) with continued emphasis on development of ICDs, evaluations, and improved fidelity.

ASA/SIF Evaluations

ASA provides a digital engineering foundation for Soldier Centered Design in a virtual (Army Cloud) environment to provide a common operating picture across the CCIE. The ASA requirement is based on the 2018 Soldier Lethality Initial Capabilities Document which promotes "capturing models in the ASA that identify specific connection points for development, integration and commonality of new systems that exchange data to provide information to warfighters that augment the speed of decisions with improved accuracy and reliability". ASA provides a starting point for new integration efforts to explore integration gaps and opportunities prior to and as part of the prototyping phase, before a Soldier Touch Point, and throughout the acquisition life cycle.

Integrated Soldier/Squad as a System

Test, maintain, and evolve a Soldier/squad equipment configuration baseline and mature digital models in the Architecture Assessment Tool (AAT). Physically integrating components, improve interoperability of systems by defining and demonstrating virtual interface connection points on the soldier and squad in the Close Combat Formation. Integrated Soldier/Squad as a System continues maturing a metrics-based approach to virtually demonstrate the interaction between other Service models to demonstrate and maintain configuration management of the SaaS and archive Soldier Load with AAT. ASA continues to connect and improve Formation Bases Architectures to show a full digital linkage of systems to Close Combat Formation missions.

SIF Evaluations

ASA provides a digital engineering architecture foundation for the SaaS. SIF verifies, validates and tests in both indoor and outdoor evaluations for interoperability and integration of the Soldier/Squad in Close Combat Formations. Information is used in managing configurations as the Lead Systems Integrators for SaaS. Interactions and evaluations with Innovation facilities located at the Division, Corps, Services and Allies address system interoperability on the Soldier/Squad platforms.

SBIR/STTR Transfer

Funding transferred in accordance with Title 15 USC §638.

Advanced Tactical Parachute System

Advanced Tactical Parachute System funds improvements and testing/evaluation of personnel parachute systems. Project supports improved Low Altitude and High Altitude personnel parachute systems and associated equipment to include test and evaluation of items transitioning from Advance Component Development and prototype (6.4) efforts, with the goal of enhancing the insertion capability and safety of the airborne Soldier and increasing the performance, reliability, and durability of personnel airdrop equipment.

Design and Development

Design and development of Crew Served Weapons

Test and Evaluation

Test and evaluation of Crew Served Weapons

Design, Develop and Fabricate

Includes contract awards for improvements of all Fire Control configurations, enhancements, and other weapon mounted enablers.

Engineering Support

Government engineering support, providing oversight of design development and contractor performance.

Test and Evaluation

Government testing and evaluation of prototypes, articles, and improvements. Includes Soldier Touch Point evaluations.

Program Management

Program management office non-labor activities, to include travel and other indirect costs.

Contractor Design and Improvements

Contractor design, development and improvements.

Engineering Support

Government engineering support, providing oversight of design, development and contractor performance.

Test and Evaluation

Testing and evaluation at government ranges and facilities.

Program Management

Program management office and oversight of government and contractor efforts.

Evaluate COTS/GOTS/NDI equipment that have the potential to enhance Soldier combat effectiveness.

The Soldier Enhancement Program (SEP) was established by the National Defense Authorization Act in Fiscal Year 1990 to provide a rapid approach to evaluate Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS), Government off-the shelf (GOTS), or Non-Developmental Items (NDI) capabilities to increase the combat effectiveness of the Soldier. SEP now uses a "buy, try and decide" methodology. SEP provides significant savings and acceleration in the evaluation of leading-edge Soldier capabilities in order to provide combat overmatch. The SEP tri-chair leadership consists of the Director, Maneuver Capabilities Development and Integration Directorate (MCDID), the Infantry Commandant, and Program Executive Officer (PEO) Soldier. Proposals are submitted by Soldiers and industry at any time, are reviewed monthly and new projects are approved semi-annually by the SEP Council of Colonels (CoC). Approved proposals are validated by the Director, MCDID. Validated SEP initiatives are procured and then evaluated by Soldiers for feasibility and suitability. Based on the evaluation findings, the SEP CoC provides one or more of the following courses of action: (1) inform deliberate or urgent/emerging requirements generation, (2) initiate a new Program of Record (POR) or improve an existing POR, (3) provide a national stock number (NSN) for unit procurement or (4) the item did not meet objectives and no further action is necessary. The funding supports SEP evaluation preparation, conducting evaluations, and documenting results. Funding for this project aligns with the Army's priorities in support of the National Defense Strategy and is a priority of the Army Futures Command (AFC).

SEP Evaluations

The Soldier Enhancement Program (SEP) was established by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 1990 and informs Army requirements generation and capitalizes on industry capabilities to support current and future force modernization. SEP provides a rapid approach to evaluate Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS), Government off-the shelf (GOTS), or Non-Developmental Items (NDI) capabilities to increase Soldier combat effectiveness. Using a "buy, try and decide" methodology, SEP provides significant savings and accelerates the evaluation of leading-edge Soldier capabilities to provide combat overmatch. Proposals are submitted by Soldiers, commanders, commercial industry and others at any time, are reviewed quarterly and new starts are approved semi-annually by the SEP Council of Colonels (CoC). Approved proposals are validated by the Director, Maneuver Capability Development and Integration Directorate (MCDID), the Infantry Commandant, and Program Executive Office (PEO) Soldier. Validated SEP initiatives are procured and evaluated by Soldiers for feasibility and suitability. The funding supports SEP evaluation preparation, execution, and results documentation. Funding for this project aligns with the Army's priorities in support of the National Defense Strategy and is an Army Futures Command (AFC)priority.

SBIR/STTR Transfer

Funding transferred in accordance with Title 15 USC §638.

Soldier Uniforms and Clothing

Evaluate superior, integrated, and sustainable clothing and footwear for the Soldier in an evolving global security environment.

Individual Equipment

Evaluate superior, integrated, and sustainable individual equipment for the Soldier in an evolving global security environment.

Air Soldier System

This project conducts development, integration, and qualification activities in support of the Air SS program. The Air SS addresses capability gaps identified during previous combat operations. It includes impacts on safety resulting from excessive pilot workload and limited aircrew Situational Awareness (SA), as well as inadequate aircrew protection from environmental extremes, hostile threats, and induced threats resulting from aircraft mishaps or crashes.

Design and Development

Design and development of Individual Weapons

Testing and Evaluation

Test and evaluation of Individual Weapons

Personnel Recovery Systems

The Personnel Recovery Support System (PRSS) consists of items including Personnel Recovery Devices (PRD) and other Personnel Recovery Support Equipment (PRSE) items that provide the capability to report and locate isolated Soldiers, forces and elements. Funding supports system research, development, testing, and evaluation of next-generation PRSS/PRSE items to enhance capability and provide a secure waveform with Low Probability of Intercept (LPI)/Low Probability of Detection (LPD) while operating in increasingly contested environments utilizing secure signals of opportunity that meet Army qualifications. It ensures continued successful interoperability within the relevant theaters of operations and the Continental United States (CONUS).

Soldier Protective Equipment

Project VS5 (Soldier Protective Equipment) supports engineering and manufacturing development of Individual Soldier Ballistic Protection equipment. It will leverage advancements in technology to continue incremental improvements to Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$80.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$57.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Total$57.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$56.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Total$56.6M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$80.8M$57.7M$56.6M$56.6M
CF3: Integrated Soldier Systems (SL CFT)$4.25M$4.35M$10.7M$10.7M
ES9: Advanced Tactical Parachute System$2.67M$3.65M$3.17M$3.17M
EW4: Crew Served Weapons Engineering Development$19.6M$3.69M$3.68M$3.68M
FF2: Small Arms Fire Control$16.7M$3.35M$4.69M$4.69M
FM4: Next Generation Squad Weapons$8.55M$10.8M$4.56M$4.56M
S58: Soldier Enhancement Program$4.72M$10.1M$9.84M$9.84M
S60: Clothing & Equipment$3.90M$6.22M$7.84M$7.84M
S61: Acis Engineering Development$3.59M$3.02M$3.44M$3.44M
S63: Individual Weapons Engineering Development$3.42M$3.43M$1.48M$1.48M
VS5: Soldier Protective Equipment$7.85M$8.51M$7.15M$7.15M
S70: Personnel Recovery Support System (PRSS)$5.50M$591.0K——

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Infantry Support Weapons. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.