Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS)

Air ForceRDT&EReconciledPE0604003F
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) (0604003F) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
+$428.5M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 3 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$455.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$611.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$1.04BR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$428.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $455.4MFY25: $611.9MFY26: $1.04BFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$455.4M
FY25$611.9M
FY26$1.04B

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

9 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2018–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
9 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2018–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$27.9M$139.2M$152.7M$262.5M$229.8M$455.4M
Enacted–$27.9M$43.6M$158.5M$268.8M$237.3M$500.6M$611.9M
Request––$35.6M$302.3M$203.8M$231.4M$500.6M$743.8M$1.04B

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $302.3M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reported $152.7M as actual total obligation authority — $149.6M below the request. 152.7 − 302.3 = -149.6 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS)

ABMS is the PE funding architecture and systems engineering (ASE), digital infrastructure, software and applications, aerial networking, deployable systems, and long range fires for the DAF's primary contribution to the Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) warfighting concept, which the DAF formally refers to as the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. The DAF Program Executive Office for Command, Control, Communication, and Battle Management (DAF PEO C3BM) has the lead role in battle management and Command and Control (C2) capabilities for the DAF. This entails not only directing technical integration throughout the DAF but also holding acquisition authorities to develop and implement organic materiel solutions. These solutions aim to establish resilient and widely distributable command and control capabilities within the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. The ABMS PE portfolio funds specific programs over which the DAF PEO C3BM exercises direct oversight in terms of cost, schedule, and performance. This encompasses both the management of these programs and the necessary architectural and systems engineering efforts to ensure effective technical coordination across the broader DAF infrastructure. Additionally, DAF PEO C3BM has identified an initial array of approximately 50 core programs spanning various PEOs, whose organizations collectively form the C3BM Enterprise. These programs represent an evolving collection of systems that, when integrated together, are pivotal in contributing to the development of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. Collaborating closely with the PEOs overseeing these core programs, DAF PEO C3BM will orchestrate technical integration of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. This integration is essential to achieve the requisite operational decision advantage crucial for the triumph of the USAF, USSF, joint, and coalition forces in the face of evolving challenges. These inter-PEO initiatives encompass a spectrum of activities, such as technical and programmatic cooperation, comprehensive reporting, and seamless integration. With authority over technical architectures spanning the C3BM enterprise, DAF PEO C3BM will deliver C2 capabilities. To provide a "best of breed” capability across the DAF and facilitate accelerated delivery of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK, DAF PEO C3BM has aligned activities within the ABMS PE portfolio with six major thrust areas: Thrust Area 1: "Architecture and Systems Engineering (ASE)” will 1) conduct Digital Engineering to support technical development activities, 2) conduct mission domain architecture development and analysis and perform enterprise integration through domain-specific Mission Integration Teams (MITs), 3) leverage an Operational Response Team (ORT) to facilitate quick reaction prototyping and experimentation in response to warfighter-led efforts and new relevant technologies. The culmination of these activities will entail the identification, capture, refinement, and formalization of capability gaps, requirements, standards, and interface specifications, as well as potentially novel technologies, collectively paving the way for a blueprint to successfully deliver an all-encompassing integrated DAF BATTLE NETWORK architecture that informs execution of the following 3 thrust areas listed below. Thrust Area 2: "C3BM Digital Infrastructure (DI)" leverages the analysis, technical specifications and associated standards/formats produced by ASE to deliver a suite of fixed and deployable digital infrastructure solutions to enable global C2 and Battle Management (BM). To accomplish this, the following tasks are performed: 1) The Enterprise Systems Engineering Team (ESET) manages the ABMS Consortium to define the technical implementation of network architectures, style guides and standards that will facilitate integration of the larger DAF BATTLE NETWORK with ABMS (and vice versa); 2) build out of the physical DI Processing Nodes and DI Network (Software Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN), Tactical and Enterprise Cross Domain Solutions (CDS), and other similar requirements) that will enable the operational use of data and software to perform modern C2 functions at scale. DI activities include the ABMS Battle Lab to allow warfighters direct interaction with ABMS software development teams and prototypes in development, speeding up the feedback loop and product maturity. Thrust Area 3: "C3BM Software and Applications" provides a suite of battle management command and control (BMC2) applications and tools, conducted via two categories of activity. 1) Cloud-Based Command and Control (CBC2) is a suite of BMC2 applications and microservices in development for NORAD and USNORTHCOM & PACAF. CBC2 efforts include line of effort (LOE) #1 for a SW Integrator, LOE #2 for Agile Software Development at scale with an Integrated Digital Environment (IDE) for Model-based systems engineering (MBSE), and LOE #3 for Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) software pipelines, platform, data ingest, fusion, transport, storage, and access. CBC2 depends on the fixed DI activities of Thrust Area #2 and expects to begin scaling to support additional combatant commanders in FY26. 2) Distributed Battle Management Applications (DBMA) will continue development and extension of CBC2 functionality to other DAF BATTLE NETWORK entities (e.g. the Tactical Operations Center Family of Systems, or TOC FoS) in line with Air Combat Command's (ACC) Common BMC2 Interface concept, via the newly named CBC2+ program. Integral to the C3BM Software and Applications Thrust Area is the imperative to seamlessly align and integrate with various efforts, including multiple DoD & DAF software factories, centers of excellence dedicated to artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the DAF data fabric. Thrust Area 4: "C3BM Aerial Networking" will develop key technologies for the "final leg” connection of C3BM DI and Software and Applications to DAF aerial assets. Aerial Networking activities include: 1) Phalanx Griffon (PG), to extend C3BM aerial networking capabilities to tactically relevant aircraft. Major Release (MR) 2 will initiate and support initial capability delivery to long-range fires platforms by FY27. Phalanx Griffon will include continued development and maturation of multi-function processors, multi-function arrays, edge node hardware and software to host mission applications, and platform integration options to ease implementation and scaling. 2) The joint development of a SOSA-aligned, liquid and air-cooled integrated hybrid SATCOM chassis for rapid integration of PG capability by FY27, and 3) the C3 Hybrid SATCOM (C3HST) product line with a start date of FY26. The C3HST product line will consist of transition of the Global Lightning (GL) prototypes from AFRL to modernize and align those solutions to meet architectural requirements for multiple AF organizations. Thrust Area 5: "C3BM Deployable Systems" thrust to include Distributable Battle Management Node (DBMN) was previously captured under the C3BM Digital Infrastructure (DI) thrust area. The Deployable Systems effort will develop and deliver the Tactical Operations Center - Light (TOC-L) system. The TOC-L is a light, expeditionary BMC2 system designed to rapidly generate battle management effects tailored to mission needs, enabling the C2 warfighter to conduct independent, pulsed operations. The TOC-L enables tactical C2 elements to rapidly relocate, establish datalinks, connect to a variety of sensors, and operate in theater mission partner environments. TOC-L provides ground-based sensor and data-link integration, track correlation, and intelligence fusion, displayed on a Common Tactical Picture (CTP), leveraging and integrating with current and future capabilities across ABMS. Currently, the TOC-L program has two major releases (MR): 1) MR1 provided 16 operationally realistic experimentation kits to operational units; and 2) MR2, a Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA) Rapid Prototyping program, which builds upon the lessons learned from MR1 and integrates other ABMS sub-systems. Thrust Area 6: "C3BM DAF Integrated Fires C2" is the development of Beyond Line of Sight (BLOS) long range fire & control capability for specialized targets. The program consists of integrating multiple prototypes currently under development within AFRL and TENCAP into the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. This will include integration and synergistic fusion within the ABMS portfolio. To ensure delivery of projects in each Thrust Area, and to ensure alignment of the broader DAF from a battle management perspective, ABMS PE funding provides for program management support, operational concept development in collaboration with the ABMS Cross-Functional Team, and portfolio integration to orchestrate delivery of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. Investments in the ABMS portfolio of programs aligns USAF investment with USSF investment (e.g., Space Command and Control (C2) Program Element PE (1208248SF) and the MeshOne-T PE (1206760SF)) to eliminate duplication of effort while optimizing capability delivery to create the DAF BATTLE NETWORK deliverable. ABMS DI aligns with ISR DI PE (0303010F) to provide a consistent set of capabilities, services and customer experience across all classification levels, and meets DAF requirements while ensuring compliance with Director of National Intelligence (DNI) requirements and minimizing duplication of effort. the FY 2026 cost of the Distributable Battle Management Node (DBMN) Phase II Tactical Operations Center-Light Rapid Prototyping Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is reflected in the budget request, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. The FY 2026 cost of the Deployable Digital Infrastructure Rapid Prototyping Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is reflected in the budget request, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. The FY 2026 cost of the Digital Infrastructure Network Major Release #1 Rapid Prototyping Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is reflected in the budget request, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. The FY 2026 cost of the Fixed Digital Infrastructure (FDI) MR1 Rapid Prototyping Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is reflected in the budget request, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. The FY 2026 cost of the Phalanx Griffon (PG) MR2 Rapid Prototyping Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is reflected in the budget request, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. The FY 2026 request was reduced by 4.648 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative.” This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, or 0605898F. In FY2024 3.300M was expended for civilian pay expenses in this program element, and in FY2025 6.943M is forecast for civilian pay expenses in this program element. This effort is in Budget Activity 4, Advanced Component Development and Prototypes (ACD&P), because efforts are necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative modes or prototype systems in a high fidelity and realistic operating environment.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (6)

Architecture and Systems Engineering (ASE)

Architecture and Systems Engineering (ASE) office is responsible for the technical integrity of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK as we integrate ABMS capabilities, the rest of the DAF's C2 systems, and other Services' capabilities under CJADC2. Architecture integration in system-of-systems mission threads and environments is critical to deliberately advancing the DAF's technological edge by informing architecture design, acquisition investments, system requirements for future capabilities, and acquisition baseline updates for current systems.

C3BM Digital Infrastructure (DI)

The C3BM DI effort reflects a composite of activities to deliver secure processing, connectivity and data management to the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. The ABMS DI activity orchestrates ongoing digital infrastructure activities to provide a multi-level security (i.e. unclassified to top secret) environment as a foundation for battle management C2 (BMC2) data and software across the space, airborne, and terrestrial domains. C3BM DI investments ensure the ability to connect the joint force and allow decision advantage at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels. In Fiscal Year 2024, C3BM DI started the initial phase of physical infrastructure procurement. Investments focus on hybrid commercial and tactical edge multi-level security, multi-cloud environments resulting in secure compute and storage capability. Solutions will provide tactical edge secure processing environments and tools to enable both "remote operations" and "on the move" operations when disconnected from the broader network and global environment. These secure processing solutions will host critical services such as robust data management solutions, zero-trust multi-level security applications, Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms and Machine Learning (ML) capabilities.

C3BM Software and Applications

Under Thrust Area #3, the C3BM Software and Applications effort encompasses ABMS portfolio activities that deliver applications to facilitate sensor and effects integration. These applications comprise front end (e.g., User Interface and User Experience, or UI/UX, Course of Action Recommendation tools, etc.) and back end microservices (data fusion, data brokering, track management, etc.). C3BM Software and Applications leverage current DAF enterprise solutions (e.g. Cloud One, Platform One, etc.), as well as ABMS DI solutions as they become available. C3BM Software and Applications develops C2 applications and integrates with DoD & DAF Software Factories (e.g. Kessel Run, Kobayashi Maru, etc.) to eliminate duplicative development. These software efforts are complementary and are working to facilitate sharing of data and products from multiple domains and echelons of command to provide decision advantage. C3BM Software development activities are executed with a continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) model that places operators as a critical member of the team via MAJCOM-approved user agreements and drives agile software development activities to generate user feedback and consistent, high frequency product improvement. Cloud-Based C2 (CBC2): CBC2 modernizes battle management and command and control functions by replacing four existing C2 systems with modern Cloud-Based applications, enhanced by AI/ML, to create a common operating picture and decision aids. Initial development efforts are focused on delivery to Air Defense Sectors (ADS) in NORAD and USNORTHCOM (N&NC) as well as Pacific Air Defense Sector (PADS) and Alaska ADS (AADS) in INDOPACOM; however, CBC2 is also working to provide hardware and software solutions that are extensible to additional Combatant Commands (COCOMs). This software suite equips operators executing tactical C2 in CONUS and OCONUS ADS with modernized applications to ingest data from civilian and military sensors, fuse it with additional sources of data, conduct mission planning with machine-to-machine ingest of higher echelon tasking products, apply force accountability and risk assessments to a dynamic air picture with thousands of tracks, facilitate real time computing and scoring of Courses of Action (CoA) in order to speed F2T2EA timelines, and provide a UI/UX for battlespace awareness. CBC2 development follows commercial best practices for agile software development with an industry software integrator driving warfighter delivery across several independently contracted microservice developers. Distributed Battle Management Apps (DBMA): -The extensibility of CBC2 aligns to Operational Imperative #2 initiatives associated with distributed battle management and ACC's Common BMC2 Interface (CBC2+). Additional software development teams will be established to increase the number of C2 services that the core CBC2 applications for N&NC provide. Requirements currently under development for joint tactical integrated fire control and long range kill chains will trigger development activities for applications and advanced targeting tools development for maturing operational concepts including those that are needed at the Tactical Operations Center Family of Systems (TOC FoS) and other maturing operational concepts. DBMA work will also encompass coalition agreements, partnerships and data sharing for enhanced battle management activities.

C3BM Aerial Networking

Under Thrust Area #4, the C3BM Aerial Networking efforts encompass two efforts to deliver secure processing and connectivity architecture solutions that will enable sensor and effects integration with DAF platforms. Aerial Networking leverages government reference architecture and the ongoing ABMS DI investments to connect select Tac Air assets and C2 functions to the ABMS cloud at the tactical edge, enhancing Situational Awareness and decision making at multiple echelons. Aerial Networking's first implementation, known as Capability Release #1 (CR #1), is a prototype communications subsystem, platform integration, and a tactical edge node planned to be demonstrated on a KC-46 in FY24. Onboard secure compute/storage infrastructure will host mission-relevant applications and be developed as a roll-on/roll-off capability using commercial solutions. C3BM Aerial Networking includes a follow-on effort, known as Phalanx Griffon (PG), which will extend AN architecture and capabilities to tactically relevant aircraft based on maturing operational concepts and aerial network road mapping activities. This capability will be targeted toward tactical aircraft such as the F-15E/EX, which can be traced back to Operational Imperative #2 operational analysis and ACC input. Aerial Networking prototype efforts will inform future design and fielding activities for platforms and C2 functions.

Deployable Systems

The Deployable Systems thrust was previously captured under the C3BM Digital Infrastructure (DI) thrust area. The Deployable Systems effort will develop and deliver the Tactical Operations Center - Light (TOC-L) system. The TOC-L is a light, expeditionary BMC2 system designed to rapidly generate battle management effects tailored to mission needs, enabling the C2 warfighter to conduct independent, pulsed operations. The TOC-L enables tactical C2 elements to rapidly relocate, establish datalinks, connect to a variety of sensors, and operate in theater mission partner environments. TOC-L provides ground-based sensor and data-link integration, track correlation, and intelligence fusion, displayed on a Common Tactical Picture (CTP), leveraging and integrating with current and future capabilities across ABMS. Currently, the TOC-L program has two major releases (MR): 1) MR1 provided 16 operationally realistic experimentation kits to operational units; and 2) MR2, a Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA) Rapid Prototyping program, which builds upon the lessons learned from MR1 and integrates other ABMS sub-systems.

DAF Integrated Fires C2

Department of the Air Force Integrated Fires Command and Control (DIFC2) is the development of Beyond Line of Sight (BLOS) long range fire & control capability for specialized targets. DIFC2 Software development efforts were included in the DBMA efforts in FY 2025. The program is charged to integrate multiple disparate systems into the DAF Battle Network. Activities include the creation and synergistic fusion of battle management software microservices, leveraging enterprise digital infrastructure to construct a scalable Battle Management Command, Control, and Communications (BMC3) technical stack, and connection to the future Joint Fires Network/Deployable Digital Infrastructure (JFN/DDI) network hardware solution for the digital ingestion and processing of command orders and intent.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$455.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$611.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY25 Total$611.9M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$1.04B
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY26 Total$1.04B

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$455.4M$611.9M$1.04B$1.04B
640141: Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS)$0$455.4M$611.9M$1.04B$1.04B

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the F appropriation, program element 0604003F (Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS)), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the F appropriation, program element 0604003F (Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS)), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSFRDT&E appropriation0604003F1.04B FY26FA861223CB002LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION28.6MLockheed Martin CorpTX-12

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
TX-12$28.6M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONFA861223CB002high
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONFA861222FB004medium
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONFA861223FB001medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS). No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.