Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0604003F/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS)
Watch this program
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $455.4M |
| FY25 | $611.9M |
| FY26 | $1.04B |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $0 | $27.9M | $139.2M | $152.7M | $262.5M | $229.8M | $455.4M | ||
| Enacted | – | $27.9M | $43.6M | $158.5M | $268.8M | $237.3M | $500.6M | $611.9M | |
| Request | – | – | $35.6M | $302.3M | $203.8M | $231.4M | $500.6M | $743.8M | $1.04B |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $302.3M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reported $152.7M as actual total obligation authority — $149.6M below the request. 152.7 − 302.3 = -149.6 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS)
ABMS is the PE funding architecture and systems engineering (ASE), digital infrastructure, software and applications, aerial networking, deployable systems, and long range fires for the DAF's primary contribution to the Combined Joint All-Domain Command and Control (CJADC2) warfighting concept, which the DAF formally refers to as the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. The DAF Program Executive Office for Command, Control, Communication, and Battle Management (DAF PEO C3BM) has the lead role in battle management and Command and Control (C2) capabilities for the DAF. This entails not only directing technical integration throughout the DAF but also holding acquisition authorities to develop and implement organic materiel solutions. These solutions aim to establish resilient and widely distributable command and control capabilities within the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. The ABMS PE portfolio funds specific programs over which the DAF PEO C3BM exercises direct oversight in terms of cost, schedule, and performance. This encompasses both the management of these programs and the necessary architectural and systems engineering efforts to ensure effective technical coordination across the broader DAF infrastructure. Additionally, DAF PEO C3BM has identified an initial array of approximately 50 core programs spanning various PEOs, whose organizations collectively form the C3BM Enterprise. These programs represent an evolving collection of systems that, when integrated together, are pivotal in contributing to the development of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. Collaborating closely with the PEOs overseeing these core programs, DAF PEO C3BM will orchestrate technical integration of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. This integration is essential to achieve the requisite operational decision advantage crucial for the triumph of the USAF, USSF, joint, and coalition forces in the face of evolving challenges. These inter-PEO initiatives encompass a spectrum of activities, such as technical and programmatic cooperation, comprehensive reporting, and seamless integration. With authority over technical architectures spanning the C3BM enterprise, DAF PEO C3BM will deliver C2 capabilities. To provide a "best of breed” capability across the DAF and facilitate accelerated delivery of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK, DAF PEO C3BM has aligned activities within the ABMS PE portfolio with six major thrust areas: Thrust Area 1: "Architecture and Systems Engineering (ASE)” will 1) conduct Digital Engineering to support technical development activities, 2) conduct mission domain architecture development and analysis and perform enterprise integration through domain-specific Mission Integration Teams (MITs), 3) leverage an Operational Response Team (ORT) to facilitate quick reaction prototyping and experimentation in response to warfighter-led efforts and new relevant technologies. The culmination of these activities will entail the identification, capture, refinement, and formalization of capability gaps, requirements, standards, and interface specifications, as well as potentially novel technologies, collectively paving the way for a blueprint to successfully deliver an all-encompassing integrated DAF BATTLE NETWORK architecture that informs execution of the following 3 thrust areas listed below. Thrust Area 2: "C3BM Digital Infrastructure (DI)" leverages the analysis, technical specifications and associated standards/formats produced by ASE to deliver a suite of fixed and deployable digital infrastructure solutions to enable global C2 and Battle Management (BM). To accomplish this, the following tasks are performed: 1) The Enterprise Systems Engineering Team (ESET) manages the ABMS Consortium to define the technical implementation of network architectures, style guides and standards that will facilitate integration of the larger DAF BATTLE NETWORK with ABMS (and vice versa); 2) build out of the physical DI Processing Nodes and DI Network (Software Defined Wide Area Network (SD-WAN), Tactical and Enterprise Cross Domain Solutions (CDS), and other similar requirements) that will enable the operational use of data and software to perform modern C2 functions at scale. DI activities include the ABMS Battle Lab to allow warfighters direct interaction with ABMS software development teams and prototypes in development, speeding up the feedback loop and product maturity. Thrust Area 3: "C3BM Software and Applications" provides a suite of battle management command and control (BMC2) applications and tools, conducted via two categories of activity. 1) Cloud-Based Command and Control (CBC2) is a suite of BMC2 applications and microservices in development for NORAD and USNORTHCOM & PACAF. CBC2 efforts include line of effort (LOE) #1 for a SW Integrator, LOE #2 for Agile Software Development at scale with an Integrated Digital Environment (IDE) for Model-based systems engineering (MBSE), and LOE #3 for Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) software pipelines, platform, data ingest, fusion, transport, storage, and access. CBC2 depends on the fixed DI activities of Thrust Area #2 and expects to begin scaling to support additional combatant commanders in FY26. 2) Distributed Battle Management Applications (DBMA) will continue development and extension of CBC2 functionality to other DAF BATTLE NETWORK entities (e.g. the Tactical Operations Center Family of Systems, or TOC FoS) in line with Air Combat Command's (ACC) Common BMC2 Interface concept, via the newly named CBC2+ program. Integral to the C3BM Software and Applications Thrust Area is the imperative to seamlessly align and integrate with various efforts, including multiple DoD & DAF software factories, centers of excellence dedicated to artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the DAF data fabric. Thrust Area 4: "C3BM Aerial Networking" will develop key technologies for the "final leg” connection of C3BM DI and Software and Applications to DAF aerial assets. Aerial Networking activities include: 1) Phalanx Griffon (PG), to extend C3BM aerial networking capabilities to tactically relevant aircraft. Major Release (MR) 2 will initiate and support initial capability delivery to long-range fires platforms by FY27. Phalanx Griffon will include continued development and maturation of multi-function processors, multi-function arrays, edge node hardware and software to host mission applications, and platform integration options to ease implementation and scaling. 2) The joint development of a SOSA-aligned, liquid and air-cooled integrated hybrid SATCOM chassis for rapid integration of PG capability by FY27, and 3) the C3 Hybrid SATCOM (C3HST) product line with a start date of FY26. The C3HST product line will consist of transition of the Global Lightning (GL) prototypes from AFRL to modernize and align those solutions to meet architectural requirements for multiple AF organizations. Thrust Area 5: "C3BM Deployable Systems" thrust to include Distributable Battle Management Node (DBMN) was previously captured under the C3BM Digital Infrastructure (DI) thrust area. The Deployable Systems effort will develop and deliver the Tactical Operations Center - Light (TOC-L) system. The TOC-L is a light, expeditionary BMC2 system designed to rapidly generate battle management effects tailored to mission needs, enabling the C2 warfighter to conduct independent, pulsed operations. The TOC-L enables tactical C2 elements to rapidly relocate, establish datalinks, connect to a variety of sensors, and operate in theater mission partner environments. TOC-L provides ground-based sensor and data-link integration, track correlation, and intelligence fusion, displayed on a Common Tactical Picture (CTP), leveraging and integrating with current and future capabilities across ABMS. Currently, the TOC-L program has two major releases (MR): 1) MR1 provided 16 operationally realistic experimentation kits to operational units; and 2) MR2, a Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA) Rapid Prototyping program, which builds upon the lessons learned from MR1 and integrates other ABMS sub-systems. Thrust Area 6: "C3BM DAF Integrated Fires C2" is the development of Beyond Line of Sight (BLOS) long range fire & control capability for specialized targets. The program consists of integrating multiple prototypes currently under development within AFRL and TENCAP into the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. This will include integration and synergistic fusion within the ABMS portfolio. To ensure delivery of projects in each Thrust Area, and to ensure alignment of the broader DAF from a battle management perspective, ABMS PE funding provides for program management support, operational concept development in collaboration with the ABMS Cross-Functional Team, and portfolio integration to orchestrate delivery of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. Investments in the ABMS portfolio of programs aligns USAF investment with USSF investment (e.g., Space Command and Control (C2) Program Element PE (1208248SF) and the MeshOne-T PE (1206760SF)) to eliminate duplication of effort while optimizing capability delivery to create the DAF BATTLE NETWORK deliverable. ABMS DI aligns with ISR DI PE (0303010F) to provide a consistent set of capabilities, services and customer experience across all classification levels, and meets DAF requirements while ensuring compliance with Director of National Intelligence (DNI) requirements and minimizing duplication of effort. the FY 2026 cost of the Distributable Battle Management Node (DBMN) Phase II Tactical Operations Center-Light Rapid Prototyping Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is reflected in the budget request, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. The FY 2026 cost of the Deployable Digital Infrastructure Rapid Prototyping Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is reflected in the budget request, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. The FY 2026 cost of the Digital Infrastructure Network Major Release #1 Rapid Prototyping Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is reflected in the budget request, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. The FY 2026 cost of the Fixed Digital Infrastructure (FDI) MR1 Rapid Prototyping Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is reflected in the budget request, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. The FY 2026 cost of the Phalanx Griffon (PG) MR2 Rapid Prototyping Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is reflected in the budget request, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. The FY 2026 request was reduced by 4.648 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative.” This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605833F, or 0605898F. In FY2024 3.300M was expended for civilian pay expenses in this program element, and in FY2025 6.943M is forecast for civilian pay expenses in this program element. This effort is in Budget Activity 4, Advanced Component Development and Prototypes (ACD&P), because efforts are necessary to evaluate integrated technologies, representative modes or prototype systems in a high fidelity and realistic operating environment.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (6)
Architecture and Systems Engineering (ASE)
Architecture and Systems Engineering (ASE) office is responsible for the technical integrity of the DAF BATTLE NETWORK as we integrate ABMS capabilities, the rest of the DAF's C2 systems, and other Services' capabilities under CJADC2. Architecture integration in system-of-systems mission threads and environments is critical to deliberately advancing the DAF's technological edge by informing architecture design, acquisition investments, system requirements for future capabilities, and acquisition baseline updates for current systems.
C3BM Digital Infrastructure (DI)
The C3BM DI effort reflects a composite of activities to deliver secure processing, connectivity and data management to the DAF BATTLE NETWORK. The ABMS DI activity orchestrates ongoing digital infrastructure activities to provide a multi-level security (i.e. unclassified to top secret) environment as a foundation for battle management C2 (BMC2) data and software across the space, airborne, and terrestrial domains. C3BM DI investments ensure the ability to connect the joint force and allow decision advantage at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels. In Fiscal Year 2024, C3BM DI started the initial phase of physical infrastructure procurement. Investments focus on hybrid commercial and tactical edge multi-level security, multi-cloud environments resulting in secure compute and storage capability. Solutions will provide tactical edge secure processing environments and tools to enable both "remote operations" and "on the move" operations when disconnected from the broader network and global environment. These secure processing solutions will host critical services such as robust data management solutions, zero-trust multi-level security applications, Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms and Machine Learning (ML) capabilities.
C3BM Software and Applications
Under Thrust Area #3, the C3BM Software and Applications effort encompasses ABMS portfolio activities that deliver applications to facilitate sensor and effects integration. These applications comprise front end (e.g., User Interface and User Experience, or UI/UX, Course of Action Recommendation tools, etc.) and back end microservices (data fusion, data brokering, track management, etc.). C3BM Software and Applications leverage current DAF enterprise solutions (e.g. Cloud One, Platform One, etc.), as well as ABMS DI solutions as they become available. C3BM Software and Applications develops C2 applications and integrates with DoD & DAF Software Factories (e.g. Kessel Run, Kobayashi Maru, etc.) to eliminate duplicative development. These software efforts are complementary and are working to facilitate sharing of data and products from multiple domains and echelons of command to provide decision advantage. C3BM Software development activities are executed with a continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) model that places operators as a critical member of the team via MAJCOM-approved user agreements and drives agile software development activities to generate user feedback and consistent, high frequency product improvement. Cloud-Based C2 (CBC2): CBC2 modernizes battle management and command and control functions by replacing four existing C2 systems with modern Cloud-Based applications, enhanced by AI/ML, to create a common operating picture and decision aids. Initial development efforts are focused on delivery to Air Defense Sectors (ADS) in NORAD and USNORTHCOM (N&NC) as well as Pacific Air Defense Sector (PADS) and Alaska ADS (AADS) in INDOPACOM; however, CBC2 is also working to provide hardware and software solutions that are extensible to additional Combatant Commands (COCOMs). This software suite equips operators executing tactical C2 in CONUS and OCONUS ADS with modernized applications to ingest data from civilian and military sensors, fuse it with additional sources of data, conduct mission planning with machine-to-machine ingest of higher echelon tasking products, apply force accountability and risk assessments to a dynamic air picture with thousands of tracks, facilitate real time computing and scoring of Courses of Action (CoA) in order to speed F2T2EA timelines, and provide a UI/UX for battlespace awareness. CBC2 development follows commercial best practices for agile software development with an industry software integrator driving warfighter delivery across several independently contracted microservice developers. Distributed Battle Management Apps (DBMA): -The extensibility of CBC2 aligns to Operational Imperative #2 initiatives associated with distributed battle management and ACC's Common BMC2 Interface (CBC2+). Additional software development teams will be established to increase the number of C2 services that the core CBC2 applications for N&NC provide. Requirements currently under development for joint tactical integrated fire control and long range kill chains will trigger development activities for applications and advanced targeting tools development for maturing operational concepts including those that are needed at the Tactical Operations Center Family of Systems (TOC FoS) and other maturing operational concepts. DBMA work will also encompass coalition agreements, partnerships and data sharing for enhanced battle management activities.
C3BM Aerial Networking
Under Thrust Area #4, the C3BM Aerial Networking efforts encompass two efforts to deliver secure processing and connectivity architecture solutions that will enable sensor and effects integration with DAF platforms. Aerial Networking leverages government reference architecture and the ongoing ABMS DI investments to connect select Tac Air assets and C2 functions to the ABMS cloud at the tactical edge, enhancing Situational Awareness and decision making at multiple echelons. Aerial Networking's first implementation, known as Capability Release #1 (CR #1), is a prototype communications subsystem, platform integration, and a tactical edge node planned to be demonstrated on a KC-46 in FY24. Onboard secure compute/storage infrastructure will host mission-relevant applications and be developed as a roll-on/roll-off capability using commercial solutions. C3BM Aerial Networking includes a follow-on effort, known as Phalanx Griffon (PG), which will extend AN architecture and capabilities to tactically relevant aircraft based on maturing operational concepts and aerial network road mapping activities. This capability will be targeted toward tactical aircraft such as the F-15E/EX, which can be traced back to Operational Imperative #2 operational analysis and ACC input. Aerial Networking prototype efforts will inform future design and fielding activities for platforms and C2 functions.
Deployable Systems
The Deployable Systems thrust was previously captured under the C3BM Digital Infrastructure (DI) thrust area. The Deployable Systems effort will develop and deliver the Tactical Operations Center - Light (TOC-L) system. The TOC-L is a light, expeditionary BMC2 system designed to rapidly generate battle management effects tailored to mission needs, enabling the C2 warfighter to conduct independent, pulsed operations. The TOC-L enables tactical C2 elements to rapidly relocate, establish datalinks, connect to a variety of sensors, and operate in theater mission partner environments. TOC-L provides ground-based sensor and data-link integration, track correlation, and intelligence fusion, displayed on a Common Tactical Picture (CTP), leveraging and integrating with current and future capabilities across ABMS. Currently, the TOC-L program has two major releases (MR): 1) MR1 provided 16 operationally realistic experimentation kits to operational units; and 2) MR2, a Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA) Rapid Prototyping program, which builds upon the lessons learned from MR1 and integrates other ABMS sub-systems.
DAF Integrated Fires C2
Department of the Air Force Integrated Fires Command and Control (DIFC2) is the development of Beyond Line of Sight (BLOS) long range fire & control capability for specialized targets. DIFC2 Software development efforts were included in the DBMA efforts in FY 2025. The program is charged to integrate multiple disparate systems into the DAF Battle Network. Activities include the creation and synergistic fusion of battle management software microservices, leveraging enterprise digital infrastructure to construct a scalable Battle Management Command, Control, and Communications (BMC3) technical stack, and connection to the future Joint Fires Network/Deployable Digital Infrastructure (JFN/DDI) network hardware solution for the digital ingestion and processing of command orders and intent.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $455.4M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $611.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Total | $611.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Disc. Request | $1.04B |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Total | $1.04B |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $0 | $455.4M | $611.9M | $1.04B | $1.04B |
| 640141: Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS) | $0 | $455.4M | $611.9M | $1.04B | $1.04B |
Follow the dollar
Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.
Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →
The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.
| District | Program obligations |
|---|---|
| TX-12 | $28.6M |
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION | FA861223CB002 | high |
| SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION | FA861222FB004 | medium |
| SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION | FA861223FB001 | medium |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Advanced Battle Management System (ABMS). No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J537
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J662
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J528
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J520
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J511
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J519
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J685
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
FY2026 Air Force Research and Development Test and Evaluation, Vol. I · www.saffm.hq.af.mil
PDF page 12