Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Network-Centric Warfare Technology

DARPARDT&EReconciledPE0603766E
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
Network-Centric Warfare Technology (0603766E) is a DARPA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 3 projects.
What changed
No FY25→26 comparison — endpoints unavailable or on different bases.
Who gets it
RTX leads 5 contractor families sharing $261.3M in high-confidence matched awards.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$922.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$866.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$0J-book detail · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
No comparison: endpoints unavailable or on different bases

No FY2026 R-1/P-1 request line for this program element. The FY2026 President's Budget request workbook carries no FY2026 line for it; its last workbook figure is FY2025. The PB2026 J-book detail below does carry an FY2026 row for this line, recorded as zero. A workbook blank and a documented zero are different records, and this page shows both. An absent line is not by itself an ending — PB2026 renumbered program elements at scale across the services and defense agencies, so this work may continue under a different number. Where this line's funding went is recorded under Program Lineage below.

Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $922.2MFY25: $866.5MFY26: $0FY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$922.2MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25$866.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26$0J-book detail · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2025): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2025): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY15FY17FY19FY21FY23FY25

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25
Actuals$350.3M$411.1M$417.8M$429.7M$413.9M$515.9M$628.5M$654.0M$662.1M$922.2M
Enacted$425.9M$428.9M$439.4M$434.1M$507.4M$641.2M$668.3M$673.6M$885.4M$866.5M
Request$428.9M$439.4M$438.6M$512.4M$661.2M$584.8M$678.6M$885.4M$886.5M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2022 book requested $584.8M for FY2022; the PB2024 book reported $654.0M as actual total obligation authority — $69.2M above the request. 654.0 − 584.8 = 69.2 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

This program
0603766E — Network-Centric Warfare Technology

Successors (funding flowed out)

  • renamed to · per FY2024 J-book · BA2
    show sentence
    “Based on technologies developed in the Resilient Synchronized Planning and Assessment for the Contest Environment (RSPACE) program (previously budgeted in PE 0603766E, Project NET-01), ACK will assist users with selecting sensors, effectors, and support elements across military domains (space, air, land, surface, subsurface, and cyber) to form and adapt kill chains to deliver desired effects on targets.”
  • renamed to · per FY2023 J-book · BA3
    show sentence
    “The program builds upon technology developed as a part of the Resilient Synchronized Planning and Assessment Contested Environment (RSPACE) program, previously budgeted in PE 0603766E/Project NET-01.”

Family Funding Line

Funding chain: 0602716E — Electronics Technology

  • FY2017$221.9M
  • FY2018$295.4M
  • FY2019$333.8M
  • FY2020$332.2M
  • FY2021$322.7M
  • FY2022$357.4M
  • FY2023$557.7M
  • FY2024$572.7M
  • FY2025$573.3M

This family branches — the funding line above is shown for the 1:1 chain only. Branch arms (splits or merges) are not summed into this series.

See this family in the lineage map →

Description

Mission — NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY

The efforts described in this Program Element (PE) address the Advanced Technology Development associated with the Network-Centric Warfare Technology Program that addresses high payoff opportunities to develop and rapidly mature advanced technologies and systems required for today's network-centric warfare concepts. It is imperative for the future of the U.S. forces to operate flawlessly with each other, regardless of which services and systems are involved in any particular mission. The overarching goal of this PE is to enable technologies at all levels, regardless of service component, to operate as one system. The objective of the Joint Warfare Systems project is to create enabling technologies for seamless joint operations, from strategic planning to tactical and urban operations. Joint Warfare Systems leverage current and emerging network, robotic, and information technology and provide next generation U.S. forces with greatly increased capability, lethality, and rapid responsiveness. Critical issues facing this project are: (1) U.S. opponents using systems that are flexible, robust, and difficult to neutralize; and (2) U.S. doctrine that limits the use of firepower to lessen the impact of operations on noncombatants. These problems are magnified in urban and semi-urban areas where combatants and civilians are often co-located and in peacekeeping operations where combatants and civilians are often indistinguishable. Meeting these challenges places a heavy burden on joint war planning. Understanding opponent networks is essential so that creative options can be developed to counter their strategies. Synchronization of air and ground operations to apply force only where needed and with specific effects is required. This project supports all levels of the force structure including: (1) the strategic/operational level by generating targeting options against opponents' centers of gravity that have complex networked relationships; (2) the tactical/operational level by managing highly automated forces with tight coupling between air and ground platforms; and (3) the focused tactical level by developing platforms and tools, which acquire targets of opportunity and cue network-based analysis of likely enemy operations thus maximizing the effectiveness of ground forces in stability and support operations. The Maritime Systems project is identifying, developing and rapidly maturing critical advanced technologies and system concepts for the naval forces' role in today's network-centric warfare concept. Improvements in communications between and among submarines, surface ships and naval aircraft have allowed these forces to operate seamlessly with each other and with other Service's network-centric systems. Naval forces will play an ever-increasing role in network-centric warfare because of their forward deployed nature, their unique capability to operate simultaneously in the air, on the sea and under the sea, and their versatile ability to provide both rapid strike and project sustained force. The technologies developed under this project will capitalize on these attributes, improve them and enable them to operate with other network-centric forces. Beginning in FY 2026, efforts in this PE will be funded in PE 0603467E, DARPA Advanced Technology Development.

Mission — JOINT WARFARE SYSTEMS

The objective of the Joint Warfare Systems project is to create enabling technologies for seamless joint operations, from strategic planning to tactical and urban operations. Joint Warfare Systems leverage current and emerging network, robotic, and information technology and provide next generation U.S. forces with greatly increased capability, lethality, and rapid responsiveness. Critical issues facing this project are: (1) U.S. opponents using systems that are flexible, robust, and difficult to neutralize; and (2) U.S. doctrine that limits the use of firepower to lessen the impact of operations on noncombatants. These problems are magnified in urban and semi-urban areas where combatants and civilians are often co-located and in peacekeeping operations where combatants and civilians are often indistinguishable. Meeting these challenges places a heavy burden on joint war planning. Understanding opponent networks is essential so that creative options can be developed to counter their strategies. Synchronization of air and ground operations to apply force only where needed and with specific effects is required. This project supports all levels of the force structure including: (1) the strategic/operational level by generating targeting options against opponents' centers of gravity that have complex networked relationships; (2) the tactical/operational level by managing highly automated forces with tight coupling between air and ground platforms; and (3) the focused tactical level by developing platforms and tools, which acquire targets of opportunity and cue network-based analysis of likely enemy operations thus maximizing the effectiveness of ground forces in stability and support operations. Beginning in FY 2026, efforts in this Project will be funded in PE 0603467E, Project DAT-01.

Mission — MARITIME SYSTEMS

The Maritime Systems project is identifying, developing and rapidly maturing critical advanced technologies and system concepts for the naval forces' role in today's network-centric warfare concept. Improvements in communications between and among submarines, surface ships and naval aircraft have allowed these forces to operate seamlessly with each other and with other Service's network-centric systems. Naval forces will play an ever-increasing role in network centric warfare because of their forward deployed nature, their unique capability to operate simultaneously in the air, on the sea and under the sea, and their versatile ability to provide both rapid strike and project sustained force. The technologies developed under this project will capitalize on these attributes, improve them and enable them to operate with other network-centric forces. Beginning in FY 2026, efforts in this Project will be funded in PE 0603467E, Projects DAT-01.

Mission — NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY

This project funds classified DARPA programs that are reported in accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 119(a)(1) or its successor. Beginning in FY 2026, efforts in this Project will be funded in PE 0603467E, Project DAT-06.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (15)

Time-definite Capability Delivery

As an outgrowth from the success of Awareness in Joint Warfighting Technology, the Time-definite Capability Delivery effort will plan, research, and execute activities designed to field capabilities based on proven technologies on relevant timelines and at sufficient quantities. The effort will achieve this objective by planning and coordinating virtual, live, constructive modelling and simulation in conjunction with in-theater demonstrations and experimentation to help orient programs on acute warfighting problems. Additionally, the effort will establish industry and policy-oriented working groups, host technical exchanges and exercises, conduct research, and develop analytic tools that will explore systemic options to speed time to field and ramp production to relevant volumes to support national security objectives. The effort will probe the boundaries of the current institutional processes through rapid experimentation, novel transition frameworks, and technology analysis to provide proof points that rationally challenge existing process boundaries and identify ways to complement, adapt, or replace institutional processes in order to deliver operationally relevant capabilities on strategically relevant timescales. Time-definite Capability Delivery will create frameworks to evaluate technology investment, policy changes, and other government levers to generate competitive advantage. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603467E, Project DAT-01.

Autonomy Standards and Ideals with Military Operational Values (ASIMOV)

The Autonomy Standards and Ideals with Military Operational Values (ASIMOV) program will develop autonomy benchmarks to objectively and quantitatively measure the ethical readiness of future autonomous systems and the ethical difficulty of proposed use-cases in support of military operational values (e.g., international humanitarian law, rules of engagement, etc.) in increasingly complex and changing scenarios. In order to accelerate the development and eventual use of ethical autonomous systems, an implementable measurement and benchmarking framework of military autonomy must be developed. ASIMOV's benchmark will enable future autonomous systems that undergo the intensive testing to be evaluated and scored with autonomy readiness levels (ARL) much like how technology readiness levels (TRL) and manufacturing readiness levels (MRL) are used to describe the maturity of technology and manufacturing processes, respectively. ASIMOV will decompose the five Department of Defense's Responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethical Principles (Responsibility, Equitability, Reliability, Traceability, and Governability) in a structured, observable, and independently verifiable manner to measure the readiness of specific autonomous systems to perform ethically within those scenarios. Technology developed under ASIMOV will be transitioned to the demonstration and operational testing (DT/OT) community, the Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) and the Services. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603467E, Project DAT-01.

FLexible networking Using Intelligent Dialecting (FLUID)

FLexible networking Using Intelligent Dialecting (FLUID) will enable command and control (C2) under extremely challenged internet protocol (IP) networking environments, including those networks with capacities in the 100s to 10s of bits per second. To do this, FLUID will research technologies that reduce network and user communications with semantically correct but condensed data, application, and/or protocol information. Like many elements of information related technologies, the power of software is impacting the ability to customize design. However, not much focus has been given to adapting application, transport, and network layers in the protocol stack holistically to meet the capacity constraints of their operating environment. FLUID will apply intelligent mechanisms to reduce the capacity required for C2 applications to operate at scale. FLUID research will focus on extracting and communicating only the operationally relevant data from user data, application messages, and network protocol messages to fit within the network capacity constraints; thus, creating the potential for greatly increased efficiency at and across the tactical edge. Software developed under the program will transition to the Services. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603467E, Project DAT-01.

Assault Breaker II (ABII)

Assault Breaker II (ABII) sought to change the current warfighting paradigm of reliance on a Service-specific and platform centric force that executes prescribed kill chains to a highly adaptable and capability-based force. This new paradigm operated as a disaggregated kill web able to execute rapidly composable, joint, and all domain kill chains. ABII exploited both existing and emerging technologies across the Services to address known capability gaps, opportunities, and threats. ABII conducted mission-centric, multi-Service and multi-domain analyses, modeling & simulation (M&S), and experimentation to inform research and development and program of record recommendations. ABII built an enduring, multi-service M&S environment to support complex mission level kill web analysis. ABII also designed and developed a Vanguard Force DevOps Environment (VFDE) and battle management enclave with physical nodes that enabled the transition of ABII technologies, concepts and architectures to the Services. ABII completed development and transitioned to the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

Air Combat Evolution (ACE)

As the Services develop new Joint Multi-Domain Battle warfighting concepts, there is a strong demand for innovative ways to assess architectures, advance technology, and support operators developing advanced multi-domain tactics. The Air Combat Evolution (ACE) program applied technologies and principles of distributed autonomy and artificial intelligence (AI) to aerial within-visual-range (WVR) maneuvering, colloquially known as a dogfight, in modeling and simulation (M&S), surrogate, and ultimately full-scale vehicles. The program delivered an initial instantiation of a scalable AI controller enabling aircraft autonomy at levels ranging from an advanced tactical autopilot for dynamic maneuver to a form of multi-domain mosaic battle management controller. Experiments explored both augmentation of existing manned platforms and enhanced future unmanned systems. ACE provided an early opportunity to build operator trust in combat autonomy and demonstrate adaptive human-machine teaming tools and architectures.

Advanced Propulsor, Experimental (APEX)

Current submarine propulsor and propeller designs have reached the technical limits of achieving significant improvements, constrain ship layouts and maneuvering capabilities. The Advanced Propulsor, Experimental (APEX) program is developing and demonstrating a new generation of submarine propulsor designs enabling revolutionary improvements in submarine design, maneuverability, speed, and quieting that will transform future submarine designs. The anticipated transition is to the Navy. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603467E, Project DAT-01.

Pulling Guard

The Pulling Guard program will revolutionize Freedom of Navigation escort operations. The program will create semi-autonomous, modular, point-defense overwatch/escort systems, and an ecosystem that commercially delivers these escort services in partnership with the DoD. Pulling Guard will dramatically reduce risk and insurance costs for logistics platforms in peacetime (piracy and terror) and wartime (blockades), while increasing large combatant availability for other critical missions. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603467E, Project DAT-01.

Scorpionfish

The Scorpionfish program will design and test novel undersea weapon technologies. Successful execution of the program will be a revolutionary step in the execution of missions in the undersea domain. The anticipated transition is to the Navy. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603467E, Project DAT-01.

Willow

The Willow program is developing innovative payloads to conduct Acoustic Warfare (AW) to counter active surface sonars using a unique combination of acoustic hardware and waveforms provided by advanced sonar signal processing algorithms. Willow will provide a robust capability to help the Navy respond to active sonar threats. No current method exists to challenge adversary active sonars. Willow will use advanced hardware-in-the-loop simulations, Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V), and stressing at-sea testing to create this capability. Technology developed under this program will transition to the Navy. Beginning in FY 2026, this program will be funded in PE 0603467E, Project DAT-01.

No Manning Required Ship (NOMARS)

No Manning Required Ship (NOMARS) developed a small, low-cost, disaggregated naval platform to demonstrate the ability to perform persistent power projection and force application combat missions currently conducted from large, high-value capital ships. The NOMARS program designed a ship that can operate autonomously for long durations at sea, enabling a ship design process that eliminates considerations associated with crew. NOMARS focused on exploring novel approaches to the design of the sea frame (the ship without mission systems) while accommodating representative payload size, weight, and power. The goal of the program was to demonstrate the feasibility of Unmanned Surface Vessels (USVs) that operate autonomously for months to years without human intervention, in large numbers, with only periodic, depot-based maintenance. This capability will enable disaggregated persistent USVs, allowing the surface fleet to credibly threaten peer adversaries and negate their investments in high-cost weapon systems designed to counter large naval targets such as aircraft carriers. The NOMARS program was successful and proves the feasibility of a small, unmanned ship with significantly improved reliability and functional performance over current USVs providing a pathway to allow a distributed lethality concept to become viable: small ships, in large numbers, each of which is individually low-cost and low value, but in aggregate presents a significant deterrent. The transition partner is the Navy.

Goblin

The undersea domain has significant importance to national security and military operations, but manned missions are restricted in their operational ranges. The Goblin program will enhance U.S. autonomous capabilities in the challenging undersea domain by developing and demonstrating complex underwater systems able to search, locate, and execute mission objectives without the need for human control. Navigation approaches will focus on the use of commercial, low-cost navigation hardware combined with environmental feature-based algorithm approaches to eliminate reliance on the Global Positioning System (GPS) for long-duration missions. Key Goblin technical challenges include sensing techniques that provide high-resolution navigation without GPS, perception and effector strategies for objects with unknown parameters, long-duration autonomy approaches to support mission execution, and autonomy approaches that do not rely on human interaction. The anticipated transition is to the Navy.

Manta Ray

The Manta Ray program developed and demonstrated a new class of long-duration, long-range unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) at an acquisition and lifecycle cost significantly less than current payload-capable UUVs. This new class of UUV gives the combatant commander an amplification of capacity without disrupting current operations by remaining independent of manned vessels and ports once deployed. The primary goal of the Manta Ray program was to open a design space for future UUVs capable of both long-duration missions and large payload capacity. A secondary goal of the program was to advance key technologies benefiting other naval designs such as low lifecycle cost UUV operations, energy management technologies to enable long-duration operations, biofouling reduction technologies, and long-duration navigational enablers. The transition partner is the Navy.

Trenton

The Trenton program will enable the production of a wide range of structural objects and underwater repairs through the optimization of three-dimensional concrete printing (3DCP) formulations and fabrications at depth. Building on technologies developed in the Persistent Aquatic Living Sensors program (budgeted in PE 0602715E, Project MBT-02), Trenton will enable the development of the first underwater 3DCP (U3DCP) formulations utilizing in-situ materials to support various marine engineering needs. Current technologies rely on land-based techniques that require forming on land then deployment by barge or ship. Trenton will overcome this challenge by developing the formulations and fabrication technologies necessary for U3DCP. Technology developed under this program will transition to the Services and commercial partners.

Sea Train

The Sea Train program supported the delivery of masses of Unmanned Surface Vessels (USVs) into theater, without reliance on large, manned capital assets. The Sea Train program developed and demonstrated approaches to exploit the efficiencies of longer slender hulls, while enabling a distributed fleet of tactical USVs. The Sea Train concept enables vessels that are efficient for transoceanic transport while enabling dispersed operations as individual vessels. The Sea Train program also developed and demonstrated connectors and approaches to couple the vessels, the control laws required to drive the vessel in open ocean conditions, sensor approaches to understand the wave environment to efficiently navigate the vessel, and the autonomy required to connect and disconnect the vessels without human intervention. The goal of the effort was to improve transport efficiency over what can be achieved with current monohull designs.

Timely Information for Maritime Engagements (TIMEly)

Integration of undersea elements for joint cross-domain operations is critical for developing the most effective distributed kill webs. The Timely Information for Maritime Engagements (TIMEly) program created a heterogeneous underwater network architecture that spanned the ocean and bridges to other operating domains. TIMEly provided an adaptive, heterogeneous, scalable communications capability to link undersea and cross-domain assets together into kill webs with minimal operator burden. The program focused on developing architectures with the capability to transfer the right information to its intended recipient. TIMEly worked within commonly understood limitations, with a focus on protocols, quality of service, and information exchange. The program leveraged developments demonstrating short-range and long-range acoustic communications at higher bandwidth and greater reliability, while minimizing detectability. The program also leveraged recent developments in network interoperability to manage heterogeneous undersea and cross-domain networks. Technology developed by this program transitioned to the Navy.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDARPAFY24 Actuals$922.2M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDARPAFY25 Enacted$866.5M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDARPAFY25 Total$866.5M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$922.2M$866.5M$0$0
NET-01: JOINT WARFARE SYSTEMS$0$62.4M$45.0M$0$0
NET-02: MARITIME SYSTEMS$0$142.6M$149.7M$0$0
NET-06: NETWORK-CENTRIC WARFARE TECHNOLOGY$0$717.1M$671.9M$0$0

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the DARPA appropriation, program element 0603766E (Network-Centric Warfare Technology), its 8 largest high-confidence awards, the 5 recipient families behind them, and the 4 congressional districts the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the DARPA appropriation, program element 0603766E (Network-Centric Warfare Technology), its 8 largest high-confidence awards, the 5 recipient families behind them, and the 4 congressional districts the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSDARPARDT&E appropriation0603766ENetwork-Centric Warfare Techn…HR001121C0206PACMAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC69.6MN6523618C8009RAYTHEON COMPANY53.5MFA865016C7656LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION42.1MHR001122C0021NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CO…41.8MHR001120C0008RAYTHEON COMPANY36.2MHR001119F0091THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSIT…9.73MHR001119F0018THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSIT…8.28MHR001119F0093THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSIT…590.5KPACMAR TECHNOLOGIES LLCRTX CorporationLockheed Martin CorpNorthrop Grumman Corporat…The Johns Hopkins Univers…MA-06HI-01MD-03TX-12

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
MA-06$89.6M
HI-01$69.6M
MD-03$60.0M
TX-12$42.1M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

Showing 25 of 34 award records (this program's published budget→award crosswalk links — see methodology)

RecipientPIIDConfidence
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONFA865016C7656high
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONHR001122C0021high
PACMAR TECHNOLOGIES LLCHR001121C0206high
RAYTHEON COMPANYHR001120C0008high
RAYTHEON COMPANYN6523618C8009high
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLCHR001119F0018high
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLCHR001119F0091high
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLCHR001119F0093high
ACCELINT AI, LLCN6600119C4005medium
ADELPHI TECHNOLOGY INCHR001117C0020medium
BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC.HR001119C0054medium
BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC.HR001119C0090medium
COHERENT AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, INC.HR001119C0101medium
GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC.HR001117C0060medium
GOODRICH CORPORATIONHR001114C0054medium
HALFAKER AND ASSOCIATES, LLCHR001115C0077medium
HRL LABORATORIES, LLCHR001113C0052medium
KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLCHR001117C0082medium
LEIDOS, INC.W911SR19F0002medium
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONHR001109C0062medium
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONHR001119C0087medium
PHOTONIC SYSTEMS, INC.HR001119C0109medium
ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC.HR001117C0040medium
RTX BBN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.HR001115C0113medium
RTX BBN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.HR001117C0049medium

Contractor concentration

HHI Indexⓘ
2444
Highly Concentrated
2023 Merger Guidelines bands
Top Contractor
RTX
Contractor Families
5
Program Obligationsⓘ
$261.3M

High-confidence award links only, pooled across ingested years. The index uses positive obligations; program obligations are net of deobligations. The figures over every published link, including medium-confidence ones, are in the downloadable warehouse, not on this page — why.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Network-Centric Warfare Technology. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.