Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Ship Preliminary Design & Feasibility Studies

NavyRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0603564N

Watch this program: RSS · Atom

What it is
Ship Preliminary Design & Feasibility Studies (0603564N) is a Navy research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 6 projects.
What changed
+$43.4M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$161.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$52.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$96.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$43.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $161.6MFY25: $52.6MFY26: $96.0MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$161.6M
FY25$52.6M
FY26$96.0M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$8.01M$3.21M$13.5M$18.4M$12.8M$21.6M$45.4M$39.5M$73.3M$161.6M
Enacted$3.33M$15.8M$12.0M$13.3M$22.5M$46.7M$40.8M$75.3M$121.4M$52.6M
Request$15.8M$12.0M$13.3M$69.1M$70.3M$107.0M$75.3M$121.4M$52.6M$96.0M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2022 book requested $107.0M for FY2022; the PB2024 book reported $39.5M as actual total obligation authority — $67.5M below the request. 39.5107.0 = -67.5 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Ship Prel Design & Feasibility Studies

0409 - This project provides Test and Evaluation (T&E) requirements for DDG-51 Flight III ships and efforts for the Navigation, Aviation and Hull, Mechanical & Electrical (HM&E) Cyber Enclaves Design for implementation on future new construction ships. T&E will concentrate on verifying integration and interoperability of employed technologies and systems in the DDG-51 FLT III design to achieve the mission capabilities and performance requirements as defined in the DDG-51 Flight III Capability Development Document (CDD) to reach Initial Operational Capability (IOC). T&E functions will include the evaluation of Critical Technical Parameters (CTP), Measures of Effectiveness (MOE), Measures of Suitability (MOS), and Key Performance Parameters (KPP). Funding is also planned for the execution of Developmental Testing (DT), Operational Testing (OT), Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E), and Full Ship Shock Trials (FSST). The Navigation, Aviation and Hull, Mechanical & Electrical (HM&E) Cyber Enclaves Design effort will provide a new design to physically separate Hull, Mechanical, and Electrical (HM&E) communications from Navigation communications to meet multiple DoD Directives/Instructions on Cybersecurity and Navy Joint-SYSCOM Cybersecurity Standards on Enclave management. This design will be utilized to support implementation on future new construction DDG 51 class ships. 0411 - The Navy's DDG(X) program is the Navy's Future Guided Missile Destroyer ship acquisition program to follow the DDG 51 class that is essential to field capabilities required for the future fight as validated by the Future Surface Combatant Force (FSCF) ICD, FSCF AoA, and Future Naval Force Study (FNFS). DDG(X) will integrate non-developmental systems into a new hull design that incorporates platform flexibility and the space, weight, power and cooling (SWAP-C) to meet future combatant force capability/system requirements that are not achievable without the new hull design. The DDG(X) platform will have the flexibility to rapidly and affordably upgrade to future warfighting systems when they become available as well as have improved range and fuel efficiency for increased operational flexibility and decreased demand on the logistics force. DDG(X) will provide an Integrated Power System (IPS) with flexibility to enable fielding of high demand electronic weapons, sensor systems and computing resources. To decouple ship development risk from technology risk, accommodation of additional future capabilities will be pre-planned; these future capabilities may include missile launchers capable of larger weapons to exceed adversary capabilities, high power lasers, or other systems that can be efficiently incorporated when developed and demonstrated. 3262 - T-AGS(X), Oceanographic Survey Ship, is the planned recapitalization of the Pathfinder Class (T-AGS 60) six vessels which are approaching the end of their life starting in 2024. The T-AGS ship is a multi-mission, world-wide deployable oceanographic survey ship providing oceanographic capabilities in coastal and deep ocean areas. Data collected from charting the world's coastlines is vital in support of undersea warfare, enemy ship detection, and humanitarian assistance and disaster relief efforts. The recapitalization ensures the CNO requirement for eight T-AGS survey ships. 3389 - Naval Operational Logistics (OPLOG) Integration IPT Development - Develops enabling technologies for future and in-service afloat operational logistics and integrated supply force and combatant logistics requirements; and conducts cooperative initiatives with acquisition programs, program sponsors, engineering managers, the Navy science and technology community and Fleet customers. OPLOG develops integrated, cross-platform (i.e. applicable to more than one ship class/type) operational logistics and energy conservation technologies and capabilities as well as draft acquisition and operations policy ensuring future Naval systems leverage emerging logistic capabilities and technologies to provide operationally effective and energy efficient logistics delivery. 4044 - Medium Landing Ship (LSM) is a medium-sized landing ship that enables distributed maneuver and logistics such as Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO), Littoral Operations in a Contested Environment (LOCE), and Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO), in support of the Marine Littoral Regiment (MLR). It is designed to fill the gap in capability between the Navy's large, multipurpose amphibious warfare class ships and smaller landing vessels. This ship will deploy tailored logistics, select power projection and support strike capabilities via the embarked MLR. With the authorities granted in Section 128 of the FY 2025 National Defense Authorization Act, the LSM program will procure an existing design to construct Non-Developmental Vessels (NDV). This procurement is known as LSM Block 1.

Mission DDG-51 Flt III Concept Development

This project provides Test and Evaluation (T&E) requirements for DDG-51 Flight III ships and efforts for the Navigation, Aviation and Hull, Mechanical & Electrical (HM&E) Cyber Enclaves Design for implementation on future new construction ships. T&E will concentrate on verifying integration and interoperability of employed technologies and systems in the DDG-51 FLT III design to achieve the mission capabilities and performance requirements as defined in the DDG-51 Flight III Capability Development Document (CDD) to reach Initial Operational Capability (IOC). T&E functions will include the evaluation of Critical Technical Parameters (CTP), Measures of Effectiveness (MOE), Measures of Suitability (MOS), and Key Performance Parameters (KPP). Funding is also planned for the execution of Developmental Testing (DT), Operational Testing (OT), Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E), and Full Ship Shock Trials (FSST). The Navigation, Aviation and Hull, Mechanical & Electrical (HM&E) Cyber Enclaves Design effort will provide a new design to physically separate Hull, Mechanical, and Electrical (HM&E) communications from Navigation communications to meet multiple DoD Directives/Instructions on Cybersecurity and Navy Joint-SYSCOM Cybersecurity Standards on Enclave management. This design will be utilized to support implementation on future new construction DDG-51 class ships.

Mission DDG(X) Concept Development

To compete and win in an era of great power competition, the United States needs a balanced Naval force, capable of striking targets from all domains. The force design must emphasize distributed awareness, lethality and survivability in high-intensity conflict. The force must be adaptable, demonstrate presence, and be capable of projecting power by delivering precision effects at long ranges. The Future Naval Force Study (FNFS) and the Future Surface Combatant Force Analysis of Alternatives (FSCF AoA) identified the requirement for future large surface combatants (LSCs) to be capable of hosting directed energy (DE) weapons, larger missiles for increased range and speed, increased magazine depth, growth in organic sensors, and an efficient integrated power system to manage the dynamic loads. DDG 51 is highly capable, but after over 40 years in production and 30 years of upgrades the hull form does not provide sufficient space and center of gravity margin to host future capabilities. To reset these design allowances for the future, requirements tradeoff and design studies were performed from FY 2018 to FY 2020 that considered modification of existing surface combatant and amphibious ships in addition to new concepts. These studies concluded that DDG(X) is required to deliver the necessary margins and flexibility to succeed the DDG 51 Class as the next enduring LSC combining the DDG 51 FLT III combat system elements with new hull form, an efficient Integrated Power System (IPS) and greater endurance, reducing the Fleet logistics burden. By including the DDG 51 FLT III combat system in a new hull, mechanical and electrical (HM&E) baseline, Navy is taking an "evolutionary" (vice "revolutionary") approach to the class. This is a critical lesson learned proven by the successful evolution of the original DD 963 Spruance design of the early 1970s that focused on lead ship HM&E capabilities and upgraded warfare capability over the next 50 years, including evolving DD 963 into the CG 52 class and incorporating the Aegis Combat System. In the early 1980's, the DDG 51 class applied a similar approach by incorporating the proven Aegis Combat System into a new hull form and subsequently executed upgrades over a period greater than 40 years before reaching hull limitations on incorporation of new, larger systems. When DDG(X) enters production, over 30 DDG 51 FLT III Ships will have been in production and early DDG(X) production transition will overlap DDG 51 FLT III production ensuring stability in the Large Surface Combatant industrial base. The CNO approved DDG(X) Top Level Requirements (TLR) in December 2020 that set the basis for a draft Capabilities Development Document (CDD) released in October 2021. Based on evolving threats and recent Battlegroup deployment feedback, the operational community revalidated the requirements and in August 2024 delivered revised TLRs. The updated draft CDD focuses on concept formulation, collaboration with DDG 51 shipyards in program planning, and targeted trade studies to achieve the CNO's cost, schedule, and performance targets.

Mission T-AGS Design & Total Ship Integration

T-AGS(X), Oceanographic Survey Ship, is the planned recapitalization of the Pathfinder Class (T-AGS 60) six vessels which are approaching the end of their life starting in 2024. The T-AGS ship is a multi-mission, world-wide deployable oceanographic survey ship providing oceanographic capabilities in coastal and deep ocean areas. Data collected from charting the world's coastlines is vital in support of undersea warfare, enemy ship detection, and humanitarian assistance and disaster relief efforts. The recapitalization ensures the CNO requirement for eight T-AGS survey ships.

Mission OPLOG IPT Development

Project 3389 - Develops enabling technologies for future and in-service afloat operational logistics and integrated supply systems; defines integrated combat logistics force and combatant logistics requirements; and conducts cooperative initiatives with acquisition programs, program sponsors, engineering managers, the Navy science and technology community, and Fleet customers. Operational Logistics Integration R&D (OPLOG) develops new logistics platforms, integrated cross-platform (i.e., applicable to more than one ship class/type) operational logistics and operational energy technologies and capabilities, as well as draft acquisition and operations policy ensuring future Naval systems leverage emerging logistic capabilities and technologies to provide operationally effective and efficient logistics delivery for both peacetime and wartime contested environments. Though the operational logistics family of systems touches all aspects of Naval presence and power projection, operational logistics capability and system interfaces typically have been left to individual acquisition programs to develop and resolve. Technology development is necessary to mitigate technological and operational risk before ship acquisition programs accept new technologies. This project provides a foundation for the transition and systems development of science & technology initiatives evolving from the Office of Naval Research (ONR) Power & Energy Future Naval Capabilities (FNC), Enterprise and Platform Enablers FNC, Seabasing FNC, and from other enabling Government, industry and academia concepts to the acquisition community. Thus, this project resources continued research and development of appropriate technologies with applicability to multiple acquisition programs and defines and matures performance and interface requirements for those technologies. This project continues to identify, develop, integrate, demonstrate, and transition logistics technologies to improve both the cost effectiveness of Fleet at sea logistics delivery in peacetime, as well as delivery capability effectiveness in wartime, through outreach, coordination and collaboration with industry, academia, Fleet, and Enterprise representatives. This project will continue to develop new logistics platforms, improved shipboard replenishment, transfer, and handling systems and components, as well as asset visibility and standardized packaging technologies. This project includes development of approaches to reduce operation and maintenance costs of, and energy consumption by the logistics Fleet. This integrated suite of developed capabilities will enable multiple ship types to leverage technologies common across DoD (Joint) and commercial transportation networks to provide a more affordable, energy efficient, and contested environment mission capable force. These capabilities and system-of-systems approach will be applied to concept development of future auxiliary force architectures.

Mission Medium Landing Ship

Medium Landing Ship (LSM) is a medium-sized landing ship that enables distributed maneuver and logistics such as Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO), Littoral Operations in a Contested Environment (LOCE), and Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO), in support of the Marine Littoral Regiment (MLR). It is designed to fill the gap in capability between the Navy's large, multipurpose amphibious warfare class ships and smaller landing vessels. This ship will deploy tailored logistics, select power projection and support strike capabilities via the embarked MLR. With the authorities granted in Section 128 of the FY 2025 National Defense Authorization Act, the LSM program will procure an existing design to construct Non-Developmental Vessels (NDV). This procurement is known as LSM Block 1.

Mission Congressional Adds

To compete and win in an era of great power competition, the United States needs a balanced Naval force, capable of striking targets from all domains. The force design must emphasize distributed awareness, lethality and survivability in high-intensity conflict. The force must be adaptable, demonstrate presence, and be capable of projecting power by delivering precision effects at long ranges. The Future Naval Force Study (FNFS) and the Future Surface Combatant Force Analysis of Alternatives (FSCF AoA) identified the requirement for future large surface combatants (LSCs) to be capable of hosting directed energy (DE) weapons, larger missiles for increased range and speed, increased magazine depth, growth in organic sensors, and an efficient integrated power system to manage the dynamic loads. DDG 51 Flight (FLT) III is highly capable, but after over 40 years in production and 30 years of upgrades the hull form does not provide sufficient space and center of gravity margin to host these future capabilities. To reset these design allowances for the future of naval warfare, requirements tradeoff and design studies were performed from FY 2018 to FY 2020 that considered modification of existing surface combatant and amphibious ships in addition to new concepts. These studies concluded that DDG(X) is required to deliver the necessary margins and flexibility to succeed the DDG 51 Class as the next enduring LSC combining the DDG 51 FLT III combat system elements with new hull form, an efficient Integrated Power System (IPS) and greater endurance reducing the Fleet logistics burden. By including the DDG 51 FLT III combat system in a new DDG(X) hull, mechanical and electrical (HM&E) baseline, Navy is taking an "evolutionary" (vice "revolutionary") approach to the class. This is a critical lesson learned proven by the successful evolution of the original DD 963 Spruance design of the early 1970s that focused on lead ship HM&E capabilities and upgraded warfare capability over the next 50 years, including evolving DD 963 into the CG 52 class and incorporating the Aegis Combat System. In the early 1980's, the DDG 51 class applied a similar approach by incorporating the proven Aegis Combat System into a new hull form and subsequently executed upgrades over a period greater than 40 years before reaching hull limitations on incorporation of new, larger systems. When DDG(X) enters production, over 30 DDG 51 FLT III Ships will have been in production and early DDG(X) production transition will overlap DDG 51 FLT III production ensuring stability in the Large Surface Combatant industrial base. Furthermore, the first DDG 51 FLT III ship entered production in FY 2017 and will not be able to accommodate any significant capability upgrades dues to SWAP-c constraints. The DDG(X) design tool is intended to be a common CAD (Computer Aided Design) and PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) hardware and software suite utilized by both Shipbuilders involved in the design and construction of DDG(X) ships. The DDG(X) design tool implementation will optimize the design work between the Shipbuilders and the Navy in a common data environment for 3D models, drawings, technical information, logistics, parts data, change management and configuration control. It is part of the overall DDG(X) Digital Environment and aligns with the DoN digital engineering strategy. The objective is to significantly reduce the design hours throughout the entire lifecycle of the ship from design, production and modernization by eliminating majority of duplicative work between the Shipbuilders.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

DDG(X) Design and Analysis

DDG(X) Design and Analysis efforts include all of the program and engineering efforts necessary to mature a functional ship design that meets validated requirements. DDG(X) design maturation will occur through the development of progressive technical data packages (TDP) that form design baselines. A collaborative, multi-disciplinary Navy and industry team will develop TDPs using an Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD) programmatic approach over four phases: Concept Formulation (FY 2025 complete), Preliminary Design starting in FY 2025, followed by Contract Design, and Detail Design & Construction. Preliminary Design activities will incorporate shipbuilder design inputs into Navy managed specifications and critical system development activities. DDG(X) has assessed two critical systems in accordance with sections 1034 and 131 of the FY 2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA): Hull and Integrated Power Systems (IPS). Requirements for DDG(X) necessitate a new hull form. The new hull form will be designed, modeled, tested, and verified prior to Detail Design as risk reduction to engineering changes or potential operational limitations upon delivery. DDG(X) Design and Analysis efforts provide the management and development of derived requirements and specifications to inform the IPS risk reduction procurement and testing executed under PE 0603573N / PU 2471. IPS test findings will be incorporated in final specifications and design products developed under this PE (0603564N / PU 0411) ensuring that the ship can accommodate the space, weight, power, cooling (SWAP-C) of the IPS and that the IPS can meet DDG(X) power and energy requirements.

Logistics Architectures

This is annual funding needed by the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) to maintain the Combat Logistics Force database so OPLOG can utilize the data to support logistics R&D and concept development.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$161.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$52.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$52.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$96.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$96.0M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$200.5M$161.6M$52.6M$96.0M$96.0M
0409: DDG-51 Flt III Concept Development$17.1M$20.1M$14.1M$25.2M$25.2M
0411: DDG(X) Concept Development$69.4M$71.7M$28.3M$51.6M$51.6M
3262: T-AGS Design & Total Ship Integration$0$0$0$0$0
3389: OPLOG IPT Development$114.0M$16.0M$4.20M$7.16M$7.16M
4044: Medium Landing Ship$0$12.1M$5.99M$12.1M$12.1M
9999: Congressional Adds$0$41.7M$0$0$0

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Ship Preliminary Design & Feasibility Studies — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →