Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

RC-135

Air ForceProcurementReconciledBLIDARP01
What it is
RC-135 (DARP01) is an Air Force procurement line funded in the Aircraft Procurement, Air Force account.
What changed
-$11.1M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$220.1MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$242.1MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$231.0MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$11.1MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $220.1MFY25: $242.1MFY26: $231.0MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$220.1M
FY25$242.1M
FY26$231.0M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$213.5M$234.2M$220.1M
Enacted–$213.4M$220.1M$242.1M
Request––$220.1M$223.0M$231.0M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $220.1M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $220.1M as actual total obligation authority — $17.0K below the request. 220.1 − 220.1 = -0.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — RC-135

The USAF's Manned Reconnaissance Systems program includes seventeen (17) RC-135V/W RIVET JOINT, three (3) RC-135S COBRA BALL and two (2) RC-135U COMBAT SENT mission aircraft performing Air Combat Command (ACC) operational missions. The RC-135V/W RIVET JOINT is the majority variant that drives the Baseline integration and modification upgrade strategy for the entire RC-135 fleet. Therefore, a significant amount of the modification budget is directly related to RIVET JOINT weapon system baseline strategy enhancements which subsequently transfer into the follow-on baseline strategy enhancements for the COBRA BALL and COMBAT SENT weapon systems. RC-135 Viability Assessments in 2008, 2012, and 2019 reported that despite the fleet average airframe age (57 years) and accumulated flight hours (42,740) as of the end of FY 2018, the RC-135 should be able to continue to meet the user's needs by performing intended operations through at least 2050. Viability was assessed based on underlying analyses of reliability, maintainability, performance, corrosion, fatigue, architectural stability, safety and availability. The Viability Assessment also summarized that the RC-135 fleet has experienced significant improvements in reliability, maintainability and availability since FY 2001. The Program Manager attributes these improvements directly to the 645th Aeronautical Systems Group's (645 AESG) Baseline integration and spiral modification upgrade strategy and synergies gained with long-standing relationships with the RC-135 industry partners. The RIVET JOINT Baseline integration efforts of Baselines 12 and 13 which started in early FY19, address the 2012 RC-135 Multi-Attribute Utility Assessment (MUA) that detailed operational effectiveness, cost and program analyses of the alternative weapon system configurations. The MUA determined that retaining and sustaining the RC-135V/W airframe offers the highest assessed weapons system utility (measured as a benefit of cost-to-risk ratio) over the 25-year assessment period. Funding for this exhibit is contained in PE 0305207F.

Justification

Justification — RC-135

FY26 procurement funding will concentrate on three major efforts: (1) initiate the integration and testing of Baseline 15, (2) continue the conversion of Baseline 12 aircraft into Baseline 14 aircraft, and (3) start the conversion of Baseline 13 aircraft into Baseline 15 aircraft. Nine USAD RIVET JOINT aircraft are projected to receive the Baseline 14 configuration and eight USAF RIVET JOINT aircraft are projected to receive the Baseline 15 configuration. During this same period, COMBAT SENT will complete the conversion of the Baseline 5 aircraft to Baseline 6, and the COBRA BALL complete integration and testing of Baseline 14. The COMBAT SENT and COBRA BALL baselines closely align with RIVET JOINT Baseline 14. Additionally, FY26 procurement will ensure integration and fielding updates to the RC-135 ground systems, which include RIVET JOINT Ground Data Processing Systems (GDPS), Distributed Mission Shelters (DMS), Mission Crew Training Systems (MCTS), Airborne Capabilities Extension System (ACES) and Operational Flight Trainers (OFT). The ground systems are upgraded to remain consistent with the fielded aircraft configurations to allow for training and qualification of the aircrew and maintenance personnel assigned, plus verification and certification of software builds that are continuously modified to address the dynamic mission requirements of these weapons systems. Due to the changing threat and rapidly evolving near peer electromagnetic combat environment, the acquisition program manager has the authority to redirect funding as necessary to meet current and emerging Combatant Commander and/or Intelligence Community requirements to better meet the war fighting objectives.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Aircraft Procurement, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$220.1M
Aircraft Procurement, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$242.1M
Aircraft Procurement, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$231.0M
Aircraft Procurement, Air ForceFFY26 Total$231.0M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$1.85B$220.1M$242.1M$231.0M$231.0M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not RC-135. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.