Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

IAMD Battle Command System

ArmyProcurementReconciledBLI9280BZ5075
What it is
IAMD Battle Command System (9280BZ5075) is an Army procurement line funded in the Other Procurement, Army account.
What changed
+$198.6M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$418.8MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$347.9MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$546.5MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$198.6MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $418.8MFY25: $347.9MFY26: $546.5MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$418.8M
FY25$347.9M
FY26$546.5M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$399.8M$459.3M$418.8M
Enacted–$439.0M$412.6M$347.9M
Request––$412.6M$403.0M$546.5M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $412.6M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $418.8M as actual total obligation authority — $6.20M above the request. 418.8 − 412.6 = 6.2 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — IAMD Battle Command System

This funding line is directly aligned to the U.S. Army Air and Missile Defense (AMD) Modernization Priority. The Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense (AIAMD) program is a direct response to the U.S. Army AMD Concept and Operational and Organizational (O&O) Plan for the Future Force, the AIAMD System of Systems (SoS) Capabilities Development Document (CDD), and the AMD Task Force Concept of Operations (CONOPS). The AIAMD Program is uniquely structured to enable the development of an overarching system of systems (SoS) capability with all participating Air Defense Artillery (ADA) components functioning interdependently to provide total operational capabilities not achievable by the individual element systems. The AIAMD program achieves this objective by establishing the AIAMD architecture and developing (1) the IAMD Battle Command Systems (IBCS) Engagement Operations Center (EOC) that provides the common Mission Command capability, (2) the Integrated Fire Control Network (IFCN) Relay capability for fire control connectivity and distributed operations, and (3) the common Plug and Fight (P&F) Kits that network enable multiple sensor components, weapon components, and the IBCS EOC. The AIAMD Program will provide advanced capabilities to the Army and the soldier by allowing transformation to a network-centric system-of-systems capability (also referred to as "Plug and Fight") that integrates Army AMD sensors and weapons with the IBCS EOC. The AIAMD SoS architecture will enable extended range and non-line-of-sight engagements to include joint kill chain engagements across the full spectrum of aerial threats, providing fire control quality data to the most appropriate weapon to complete the mission successfully. Further, it will mitigate the coverage gaps and the single points of failure that have affected AMD defense design in the past. The AIAMD program will provide the user with the ability to train on a single IBCS that will result in overall training savings. The AIAMD program will also provide the Army with the ability to procure components that will build to established Integrated Fire Control interfaces alleviating the cost of procuring total system capabilities in the future. AIAMD will be delivered through the fielding of the IBCS-based AIAMD architecture, including the IBCS EOC, IFCN Relay, Sentinel A3, and Patriot components connected via an IFCN, working in an integrated manner. The government controlled open architecture enables integration of future capabilities to meet emerging threats and fielding to Enduring Indirect Fire Protection Capability (IFPC), Air Defense Airspace Management (ADAM) Cells, ADA Brigade, Army Air and Missile Defense Command Headquarters (AAMDC), and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD).

Justification

Justification — IAMD Battle Command System

FY 2026 base procurement dollars in the amount of $546.480 million will procure hardware to convert: Two (2) PATRIOT Battalions to IBCS Enabled Battalions (12 Engagement Operation Centers (EOC) and 24 Integrated Fire Control Network (IFCN) Relays) One (1) Indirect Fire Protection Capability (IFPC) Battalion (14 EOCs and 9 IFCN Relays) One (1) Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Battery (1 EOC) One (1) AAMDC (3 EOCs, 3 IFCN Relays) One (1) ADA BDEs (2 EOCs and 3 IFCN Relays) Two (2) Trainer (2 EOC). Funds also procure Plug and Fight Items, Prime Movers, Government Furnished Equipment, such as radios and Global Position System equipment, and initial spares. In accordance with section 1815 of the FY 2008 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 110 - 181), this item is necessary for use by the active and reserve components of the Armed Forces for homeland defense missions, domestic emergency responses, and providing military support to civil authorities.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$418.8M
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$347.9M
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$546.5M
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Total$546.5M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$1.11B$418.8M$347.9M$546.5M$546.5M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not IAMD Battle Command System. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.