Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2-I

ArmyProcurementReconciledBLI8930C61001
What it is
INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2-I (8930C61001) is an Army procurement line funded in the Missile Procurement, Army account.
What changed
+$466.1M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 1 linked award record is listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$256.8MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$552.4MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$1.02BP-1 TOA · PB2026
18.5% reconciliation

$830.6M discretionary + $188.0M one-time reconciliation. Discretionary change vs FY2025 enacted: +50.3%.

FY25→26 Change
+$466.1MP-1 TOA · PB2026

Two official figures, one label— reconciled below

Fiscal Receipts uses P-1/R-1 workbook total obligation authority (TOA) as the headline figure sitewide. The workbook TOA includes budget rows that the R-2/P-40 J-book program line excludes — advance procurement in an ordinary year, and in FY2026 the one-time reconciliation appropriation as well. Each row below names the one it is. How the two bases relate →

FY26 Request · $1.02B TOA − $830.6M J-book line = 188.0M (1,018.6 − 830.6 = 188.0) — $188.0M of one-time FY2026 reconciliation money accounts for this gap — not advance procurement

Figures in the sentence are rounded for reading; the parenthesised arithmetic is the same subtraction in USD millions, at the precision where it closes.

Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $256.8MFY25: $552.4MFY26: $1.02BFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$256.8M
FY25$552.4M
FY26$1.02B

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$19.1M$22.7M$256.8M
Enacted–$18.9M$313.2M$552.4M
Request––$313.2M$657.6M$1.02B

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $313.2M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $256.8M as actual total obligation authority — $56.4M below the request. 256.8 − 313.2 = -56.4 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2-I

Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment (IFPC) is part of the Army Transformation Initiative. This funding line is directly aligned to one of the Army Air and Missile Defense Modernization Priorities. The FY 2026 request for IFPC Inc 2 includes $830,579 thousands of discretionary and $188,000 thousands of mandatory (reconciliation) for a total of $1,018,579 thousands. The mandatory funds procure an additional 284 AIM-9X and associated magazines in FY 2026. Further information for this reconciliation request is provided in Section 20003 (Missile Defense) of the Reconciliation Exhibit. The Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 (IFPC Inc 2) will provide a ground-based weapon system designed to acquire, track, engage, and defeat Cruise Missiles (CM), Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), Rocket, Artillery, and Mortar (RAM) threats. The IFPC Inc 2 system consists of a launcher and interceptor integrated with the Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense (AIAMD) open systems architecture, IAMD Battle Command System (IBCS), and the Sentinel sensor to support the CM and UAS defeat mission. On 9 February 2019, the Army approved a Directed Requirement to initiate procurement of the Israeli IDDS-A for the Interim CMD capability. The Army contracted for two interim CMD (IDDS-A) batteries. The United States Government (USG) leased the IDDS-A assets to the Government of Israel (GOI) beginning in 1QFY2024. The Army entered a Middle Tier of Acquisition (MTA) Rapid Prototyping (RP) in September 2021, awarding a Firm Fixed Price Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreement to Dynetics, Inc. to deliver the IFPC Inc 2 prototype solution. Upon completion of the MTA RP phase in April 2025, IFPC Inc 2 entered an MTA Rapid Fielding (RF). The FY 2026 cost of the IFPC Inc 2 MTA RF effort is $951,370 thousand, including RDT&E and MIPA for procurement of MEIs. The Department will certify Future Years Defense Program (FYDP) funding in a future budget submission. This program supports the Air and Missile Defense Cross Functional Team (CFT). The IFPC Inc 2 Product Office will support coordination of the IFPC Directed Energy (DE) transfer of responsibility, as well as determine product requirements.

Justification

Justification — INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2-I

FY 2026 Base procurement dollars in the amount of $830.579 million are designated for 62 IFPC Inc 2 launchers, 148 AIM-9X missiles, 24 IFPC magazines. Funding increase from FY 2025 to FY 2026 is due to increased procurement quantity of IFPC Inc 2 launchers, interceptors, and IFPC magazines. The Army intends to convert any price advantage created through contract negotiations, other service procurement, and/or foreign military sales to increase the Army procurement of IFPC Inc 2. In response to National Defense Authorization Act for 2019, the Army approved a Directed Requirement to initiate procurement of the Israeli Iron Dome Missile System for an Interim CMD capability on 9 Feb 2019. IFPC's two Interim CMD (Iron Dome Defense System - Army (IDDS-A) batteries were delivered to the Army in FY 2021 to prove out their readiness for deployment. Initial Army direction is to have one battery deployed OCONUS and the other battery stationed CONUS for rapid deployment, as needed. Concurrently, the Army will integrate an IFPC capability of a launcher and interceptor leveraging the Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense (AIAMD) open systems architecture and IAMD Battle Command System (IBCS) as the Fire Control component, and US sensor (Sentinel) with Pacific Deterrence Initiative (PDI) Launcher procurement in FY 2024 for delivery in FY 2026.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$256.8M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$552.4M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$830.6M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Reconciliation$188.0M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Total$1.02B

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$355.7M$256.8M$552.4M$830.6M$830.6M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
OSHKOSH DEFENSE LLCW912CH25F0318medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not INDIRECT FIRE PROTECTION CAPABILITY INC 2-I. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.