Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/8082C14300/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
M-SHORAD - Procurement
Budget figures
$679.1M discretionary + $50.0M one-time reconciliation. Discretionary change vs FY2025 enacted: +882.9%.
Two official figures, one label— reconciled below
Fiscal Receipts uses P-1/R-1 workbook total obligation authority (TOA) as the headline figure sitewide. The workbook TOA includes budget rows that the R-2/P-40 J-book program line excludes — advance procurement in an ordinary year, and in FY2026 the one-time reconciliation appropriation as well. Each row below names the one it is. How the two bases relate →
FY26 Request · $729.1M TOA − $679.1M J-book line = 50.0M (729.1 − 679.1 = 50.0) — $50.0M of one-time FY2026 reconciliation money accounts for this gap — not advance procurement
Figures in the sentence are rounded for reading; the parenthesised arithmetic is the same subtraction in USD millions, at the precision where it closes.
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $892.5M |
| FY25 | $69.1M |
| FY26 | $729.1M |
All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $333.0M | $246.9M | $892.5M | ||
| Enacted | – | $135.7M | $400.7M | $69.1M | |
| Request | – | – | $400.7M | $69.1M | $729.1M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $400.7M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $892.5M as actual total obligation authority — $491.8M above the request. 892.5 − 400.7 = 491.8 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Description — M-SHORAD - Procurement
This funding line is directly aligned to the Army Air and Missile Defense Modernization Priority. SGT STOUT is an Air Defense weapon system consisting of multiple ground-to-air missile launchers, sensors, and a gun integrated on a Stryker Combat Vehicle. The SGT STOUT system provides the Army improved capabilities for defense of maneuver formations and other tactical echelons from low altitude air attack and surveillance. The system is in response to an adaptive suite of airborne threat capabilities, supported by an integrated mix of surface-to-air and surface-to-surface shooters that threaten the ability of maneuver forces to conduct operations. Specifically, maneuver formations require the SGT STOUT air defense identification and defeat capabilities to counter FW, RW, and UAS threats. This system provides the capability to identify, track, and neutralize or destroy low-altitude air threats to include FW, RW, and Group 3 UAS while keeping pace and surviving with the maneuver Brigades. The Army began fielding the SGT STOUT solution based on a FY 2018 Directed Requirement (DR) and transitioned to a Middle Tier Acquisition - Rapid Fielding (MTA-RF) in FY 2024. The SGT STOUT program will be fielded to eight SGT STOUT battalions. SGT STOUT will provide the long-term capability to counter a broader range of FW, RW and UAS threats. The FY 2026 cost of the SGT STOUT Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is $689.8 million, including RDT&E and MIPA for procurement of MEIs. The Department will certify FYDP funding in a future budget submission. M-SHORAD (SGT STOUT) is part of the Army Transformation Initiative.
Justification
Justification — M-SHORAD - Procurement
The Army has an active Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract with General Dynamic Land Systems (GDLS) for the procurement and fielding of systems, spares, engineering services and logistics support. FY 2026 procurement will be used to purchase 44 SGT STOUT systems, retrofit single Stinger Vehicle Universal Launcher (SVUL) systems to dual SVUL, initial spares, software maintenance, GFE, Fielding, and program mgmt. support. 44 systems in FY2026 are under MTA-RF. The SGT STOUT procurement funding profile was built in accordance with the Directed Requirement (DR) of 144 systems + 20 systems Public Interest Determination + 66 systems approved through Acquisition Decision Memorandums (ADM) required by Middle Tier Acquisition Rapid Fielding (MTA-RF) in FY 2024. Total assets approved 230. Funding increase from FY 2025 to FY 2026 is supporting the procurement of 44 SGT STOUT systems. Prior year quantity of 165 should reflect 148 systems procured in prior years. In FY24, 59 systems should be reflected as 55 systems. The FY 2026 request for SGT STOUT includes $679,114 thousand of discretionary and $50,000 thousand of mandatory (reconciliation) for a total of $729,114 thousand. The mandatory funds procure an additional 4 SGT STOUT systems in FY 2026. Further information for this reconciliation request is provided in Section 20004 (Munitions and Supply Chain) of the Reconciliation Exhibit.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit P-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missile Procurement, Army | A | FY24 Actuals | $892.5M |
| Missile Procurement, Army | A | FY25 Enacted | $69.1M |
| Missile Procurement, Army | A | FY26 Disc. Request | $679.1M |
| Missile Procurement, Army | A | FY26 Reconciliation | $50.0M |
| Missile Procurement, Army | A | FY26 Total | $729.1M |
Exhibit P-1R
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missile Procurement, Army | A | FY 2026 request | $679.1M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $1.36B | $892.5M | $69.1M | $679.1M | $679.1M |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — none of this program's high-confidence awards records a positive obligation at any place of performance (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Related awards
Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →
| Recipient | PIID | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC. | W31P4Q20D0039 | high |
Contractor concentration
No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not M-SHORAD - Procurement. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: Procurement Programs (P-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit P-1 · O51
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_P-1_Procurement.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: Procurement Programs (P-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit P-1 · O56
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_P-1_Procurement.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: Procurement Programs (P-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit P-1 · O51
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_P-1_Procurement.xlsx.
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: Procurement Programs (P-1R) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit P-1R · R19
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_P-1R_Procurement.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
Missile Procurement Army · www.asafm.army.mil
PDF page 34