Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Integ Combat System Test Facility

NavyProcurementReconciledBLI2960
What it is
Integ Combat System Test Facility (2960) is a Navy procurement line funded in the Other Procurement, Navy account.
What changed
+$4.78M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$6.64MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$6.71MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$11.5MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$4.78MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $6.64MFY25: $6.71MFY26: $11.5MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$6.64M
FY25$6.71M
FY26$11.5M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$5.83M$6.05M$6.64M
Enacted–$6.05M$6.34M$6.71M
Request––$6.34M$6.71M$11.5M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $6.34M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $6.64M as actual total obligation authority — $296.0K above the request. 6.6 − 6.3 = 0.3 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Integ Combat System Test Facility

The 2960 Line Item (LI) is shared between the Strike Force Interoperability (SFI) and Shipboard Electronic Systems Evaluation Facilities (SESEF)programs. This program supports various Navy Land Based Test Sites (LBTS) required to support integration and interoperability testing. Sites include, but are not limited to, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Dahlgren, Surface Combat System Center (SCSC) Wallops Island, Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific, and NSWC Dam Neck. This funding also supports the Shipboard Electronic Systems Evaluation Facilities (SESEF) Program for the procurement, installation for upgrades and modernization to provide electromagnetic system test and evaluation services to afloat and shore commands for development of new and upgraded systems, to validate system performance following new construction and overhaul, and to provide real-time assessment of material readiness in an operational environment. The United States Navy has a requirement to fully test and certify computer programs for maturity, Interoperability and Integration (I&I) prior to delivery to the Fleet. Commander, U.S. Fleet Forces Command (CUSFFC) provided specific direction to develop a unified modernization process and certify all combat system baselines for integration and interoperability as an integral step in the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Optimized Fleet Response Plan (OFRP). Various Navy facilities, serving as LBTS, conduct the required testing in support of CVN, DDG, LCS, DDG 1000, CG, LHD, LHA, LPD 17 and LSD class ships. These sites also comprise the Navy's Distributed Integration & Interoperability Assessment Capability (DIIAC) (supported through the use of JMETC network) alliance, which performs Interoperability Assessment and Systems Engineering Events (SEEs) for deploying Strike Groups. These facilities also provide combat system in-service support to respond to emergent fleet problems. This capability tests and certifies new combat system baselines in a lab-based environment, which has significantly reduced the cost of corrective action and shifted the burden of problem discovery away from the operator at sea. It also provides support to the acquisition community to conduct interoperability (shift to the left) testing earlier in the acquisition cycle. As existing systems experience parts obsolescence issues and tech refresh updates, the LBTS must procure and install existing test beds to accurately replicate the Command, Control, Communication, Computer, Combat System and Intelligence (C5I) configuration that is designed for the fleet. In addition, new combat systems architectures are under development for new ship classes such as FFGs, as well as new Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) variants of legacy suites. Procurement of production representative systems of these IaaS combat systems being delivered to operational fleet units is critical to ensure that testing and subsequent certification of both current and newly installed combat systems is in accordance with NAVSEAINST 9410.2 Naval Warfare Systems Certification Policy (NWSCP) and the Optimized Fleet Response Plan (O-FRP). The basic procurement outlined herein is directed at expanding various facilities' capability to support Interoperability Integration and Stressful Endurance testing. Procurement requirements are directly tied to the interoperability testing schedule and establish independence between test beds allowing for parallel certification efforts. Procurements are required to build the necessary test beds and for laboratory support equipment. Transition to use of Virtual Test Environments will improve lab reliability while reducing lab support costs. This budget procures lab support equipment that ensures various facilities are able to support the new tactical subsystems, and new communications paths impacting interoperability, that use Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) equipment. In addition, the basic program provides for equipment/upgrades for the Navy's Distributed Integration & Interoperability Assessment Capability (DIIAC) needed to conduct interoperability assessment testing. The DIIAC consists of 23 land-based sites networked to certify computer programs prior to their delivery to the fleet and provides support to the acquisition community to conduct interoperability and integration (shift to the left) testing earlier in the acquisition cycle. Interoperability Assessment is required for all deploying strike groups per the Joint Fleet Instruction. The Shipboard Electronic Systems Evaluation Facilities (SESEF) are Navy owned and operated test sites located near heavy fleet concentrated areas and strategic Forward Deployed Naval Forces Sites. The SESEF Program mission is to provide electromagnetic systems test and evaluation services to afloat and shore commands for upgraded systems, to validate system performance following new construction and overhaul/availability, and to provide real-time assessment of material readiness in an operational environment. [P40A / M8400 - SESEF Electronic Equipment]: The Shipboard Electronic Systems Evaluation Facilities (SESEF) are Navy owned and operated test sites located near heavy fleet concentrated areas and strategic Forward Deployed Naval Forces Sites. The SESEF Program mission is to provide electromagnetic systems test and evaluation services to afloat and shore commands for upgraded systems, to validate system performance following new construction and overhaul/availability, and to provide real-time assessment of material readiness in an operational environment. Also provided are: system modernization and integration, system and equipment component procurement and software (S/W) upgrades for test systems to include, but not limited to, Tactical Control and Navigation (TACAN), Antenna Radiation Pattern (ARP) systems, Identification Friend or Foe (IFF), Direction Finder (DF)/Radio Direction Finder (RDF), LINK 11/16/22, Electronic Warfare/Electronic Attack (EW/EA) and HF/VHF/UHF communication systems, including secure voice. SESEFs are used to effectively conduct TACAN certifications, AN/SLQ-32 Electronic Warfare (EW) Planned Maintenance System (PMS) requirements checks, Ship Signals Exploitation Equipment (SSEE) calibrations and PMS checks, and to detect and to isolate shipboard system deficiencies leading to maintenance action to increase ship material readiness at the completion of construction, delivery availabilities, during routine ship operations, and prior to deployment. FY26 increase is to support upgrade of test ranges to meet AN/SLQ-32 (V)6 & (V)7 testing requirements and upgrades to various data links to ensure systems are fully mission capable for Fleet operations. This funding is associated with initial spares funding line JC2M8 Integrated Combat System Test Facility (J2960). [P40A / M8500 - Interoperability Assessment Equipment]: M8500 - Interoperability assessment equipment known as Distributed Integration & Interoperability Assessment Capability (DIIAC) procures upgrades to support the 23 sites that comprise the Navy's DIIAC sites. Procures hardware that provides the DIIAC Operations Center (DOC) the ability to support monitoring and execution of events providing data collection and distribution. Funds are also allocated for site upgrades to meet current standards and allow scalability for DIIAC requirements; and, in addition, to enable the DIIAC to maintain efficiency and product improvement to interface with other Joint communities using Joint Mission Environment Test Community (JMETC) network. Focused on the force-level impact of new systems and platforms under development, the DIIAC supports testing that ensures Commander, Naval Sea System Command/Program Executive Offices (NAVSEA/PEOs) are delivering mature and interoperable warfare systems at the Platform and Strike Group levels, with NAVSEA providing Strike Force Interoperability Certification and Assessments. This is the only such testing of combat systems and Command, Control, Communication, Computer, Combat System and Intelligence (C5I) configuration items prior to shipboard delivery for operational use. Funding increase from FY24-FY25 noted in Footnotes.

Justification

Justification — Integ Combat System Test Facility

The FY 2026 request was reduced by $1.079 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." Funding for procurements and installations for upgrades and modernization of the eight operational sites and mobile trailers across the AORs to support the Shipboard Electronic Systems Evaluation Facility (SESEF). Increase of $4.78M from FY25 to FY26 is for procurement of testing equipment for the AN/SLQ-32 (V)6 & (V)7 upgrades at all fixed and mobile sites to ensure systems are fully mission capable for Fleet operations.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Other Procurement, NavyNFY24 Actuals$6.64M
Other Procurement, NavyNFY25 Enacted$6.71M
Other Procurement, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$11.5M
Other Procurement, NavyNFY26 Total$11.5M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$80.0M$6.64M$6.71M$11.5M$11.5M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Integ Combat System Test Facility. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.