Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

LONG-RANGE HYPERSONIC WEAPON

ArmyProcurementReconciledBLI2611C72100
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
LONG-RANGE HYPERSONIC WEAPON (2611C72100) is an Army procurement line funded in the Missile Procurement, Army account.
What changed
-$230.8M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 1 linked award record is listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$62.8MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$669.2MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$438.4MP-1 TOA · PB2026
19.4% reconciliation

$353.4M discretionary + $85.0M one-time reconciliation. Discretionary change vs FY2025 enacted: -47.2%.

FY25→26 Change
-$230.8MP-1 TOA · PB2026

Two official figures, one label— reconciled below

Fiscal Receipts uses P-1/R-1 workbook total obligation authority (TOA) as the headline figure sitewide. The workbook TOA includes budget rows that the R-2/P-40 J-book program line excludes — advance procurement in an ordinary year, and in FY2026 the one-time reconciliation appropriation as well. Each row below names the one it is. How the two bases relate →

FY26 Request · $438.4M TOA − $353.4M J-book line = 85.0M (438.4 − 353.4 = 85.0) — $85.0M of one-time FY2026 reconciliation money accounts for this gap — not advance procurement

Figures in the sentence are rounded for reading; the parenthesised arithmetic is the same subtraction in USD millions, at the precision where it closes.

Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $62.8MFY25: $669.2MFY26: $438.4MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$62.8M
FY25$669.2M
FY26$438.4M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$249.3M$62.8M
Enacted–$249.3M$156.8M$669.2M
Request––$156.8M$744.2M$438.4M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $156.8M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $62.8M as actual total obligation authority — $94.0M below the request. 62.8 − 156.8 = -94.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — LONG-RANGE HYPERSONIC WEAPON

This funding supports the fielding of critical enabling technologies and capabilities that address near-term, and mid-term threats and is directly aligned to the Army Long Range Precision Fires modernization priority. Procurement and fielding of the LRHW to defeat Anti Access/Area Denial (A2/AD) capabilities, suppress adversary Long Range Fires, and engage other high payoff/time critical targets. The Army is working collaboratively with the Navy in the development of the LRHW. The LRHW system consists of the All-Up Rounds (AUR) plus Canister (AUR+C) which includes the Common Hypersonic Glide Body (CHGB) with the Navy 34.5-inch booster, the Battery Operations Center (BOC) for command and control (C2), and the Transporter Erector Launcher (TEL). An LRHW Battery contains a basic load of eight AUR+Cs plus a reload of eight, one BOC, four TELs, and other ground equipment including AUR emulators for soldier training purposes. Additionally, the LRHW will use a modified version of an existing C2 network, the Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS). The Army is procuring two Batteries of Ground Support Equipment (GSE) and GSE to stand up the Institutional Training Base (ITB) under a Middle Tier of Acquisition Rapid Fielding pathway. This funding line also includes procurement of tactical AUR+Cs and their associated Common Hypersonic Glide Bodies (CHGBs) as Government Furnished Equipment.

Justification

Justification — LONG-RANGE HYPERSONIC WEAPON

The FY 2026 request for Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon includes $353,415 thousand of discretionary and $85,000 thousand of mandatory (reconciliation) for a total of $438,415 thousand. The mandatory funds procure ten reload trailers in FY 2026. Further information for this reconciliation request is provided in Chapter (20004) of the Reconciliation Exhibit. The FY 2026 discretionary (Base) procurement dollars fund the production of three All-Up Round + Canisters (AUR+Cs) and twelve Emulators. The FY 2026 procurement also funds Government Furnished Equipment (GFE), refurbishment of GSE test articles, GSE software maintenance, retrofitting of Battery 1 GSE, Interim Contractor Support (CLS cost element), and Government Program Management, Engineering, and Logistics Support. Funding decrease from FY 2025 to FY 2026 is due to the procurement of five fewer AUR+Cs and no Transporter Erector Launchers (TELs) or Battery Operations Centers (BOCs) being procured in FY 2026.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$62.8M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$669.2M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$353.4M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Reconciliation$85.0M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Total$438.4M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$249.3M$62.8M$669.2M$353.4M$353.4M

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the A appropriation, program element 2611C72100 (LONG-RANGE HYPERSONIC WEAPON), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the A appropriation, program element 2611C72100 (LONG-RANGE HYPERSONIC WEAPON), its 1 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSAProcurement appropriation2611C72100438.4M FY26W31P4Q23C0008LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION593.7MLockheed Martin CorpAL-05

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
AL-05$576.7M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

RecipientPIIDConfidence
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONW31P4Q23C0008high

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

5 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

FIREHAWK AEROSPACEHYPERSONIC|WEAPON2026matched 2+ title words

Issues related to additive manufacturing for next generation rocket propellant technologies in FY27 Defense…

FIREHAWK AEROSPACEHYPERSONIC|WEAPON2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to additive manufacturing for next generation rocket propellant technologies in FY25 Defense…

FIREHAWK AEROSPACEHYPERSONIC|WEAPON2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to additive manufacturing for next generation rocket propellant technologies in FY26 Defense…

FIREHAWK AEROSPACEHYPERSONIC|WEAPON2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to additive manufacturing for next generation rocket propellant technologies in S. 2572 and H.R. 4016…

FIREHAWK AEROSPACEHYPERSONIC|WEAPON2025matched 2+ title words

Issues related to additive manufacturing for next generation rocket propellant technologies in S. 2572 and H.R. 4016…

Oversight

GAO oversight of this program

GAO assessed Long Range Hypersonic Weapon System (LRHW) in its June 2025 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as an Army MTA program.

“The Army's LRHW system is a ground-launched hypersonic missile battery designed to engage an adversary's long-range weapons and high-value, time-critical targets. The Army has two ongoing LRHW efforts. The first is a research and development effort—managed by the Army's Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office—with the goal of fielding an initial prototype battery, consisting of four launchers, related equipment, and eight missiles. The missile is common with the Navy's Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) program, which is developing a ship-fired version. The Army initiated a separate MTA rapid fielding effort in August 2023 to field two more LRHW batteries. We assessed both efforts.”

GAO-25-107569, p. 103 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2025 report

Earlier editions of the same assessment: June 2024 · June 2023

GAO assessed Long Range Hypersonic Weapon System (LRHW) in its June 2024 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as an Army Future Major Weapon Acquisition program.

“The Army's LRHW system is a ground-launched hypersonic missile battery designed to engage an adversary's long-range weapons and high-value, time-critical targets. The current research and development effort is managed by the Army's Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office. This effort's goal is to field the first LRHW battery, consisting of four launchers, related equipment, and an initial load of eight missiles. The missile is common with the Navy's Conventional Prompt Strike program, which is developing a ship-fired version. The Army initiated a separate MTA rapid fielding effort in August 2023 to field two more LRHW batteries.”

GAO-24-106831, p. 123 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2024 report

GAO assessed Long Range Hypersonic Weapon System (LRHW) in its June 2023 Weapon Systems Annual Assessment, as an Army Future Major Weapon Acquisition program.

“The Army's LRHW is a ground-launched hypersonic missile designed to engage an adversary's long-range weapons and high-value, time-sensitive targets. LRHW prototype is a research and development effort managed by the Army's Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office. It is a joint effort with the Navy's Conventional Prompt Strike program, which is developing a ship-fired version of the system. The Army expects to field a system with eight missiles by the end of fiscal year 2023. The program proposed transitioning to the MTA rapid fielding pathway, but as of January 2023, the Army had not finalized that decision.”

GAO-23-106059, p. 130 — the assessment page in GAO’s 2023 report

GAO assessed the program, not this budget line. LONG-RANGE HYPERSONIC WEAPON is one of the lines that funds it, and GAO’s work above says nothing about this line’s own figures. Which line each GAO item attaches to is a hand-ratified crosswalk — how it was checked.

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not LONG-RANGE HYPERSONIC WEAPON. GAO's program-level work on this line is above. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.