Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Cooperative Engagement Capability

NavyProcurementReconciledBLI2606
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
Cooperative Engagement Capability (2606) is a Navy procurement line funded in the Other Procurement, Navy account.
What changed
+$4.00K FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 8 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$37.7MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$26.6MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$26.6MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$4.00KP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $37.7MFY25: $26.6MFY26: $26.6MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$37.7M
FY25$26.6M
FY26$26.6M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$24.6M$33.2M$37.7M
Enacted–$33.2M$37.7M$26.6M
Request––$37.7M$26.6M$26.6M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $37.7M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $37.7M as actual total obligation authority — $25.0K below the request. 37.7 − 37.7 = -0.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Cooperative Engagement Capability

Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) significantly improves Battle Force Anti-Air Warfare (AAW) capability by coordinating all Battle Force AAW sensors into a single, real-time, composite track picture capable of fire control quality. CEC distributes sensor data from each ship and aircraft, or cooperating unit (CU), to all other CUs in the battle force through a real-time, line of sight, high data rate sensor and engagement data distribution network. CEC is highly resistant to jamming and provides accurate gridlocking between CUs. Each CU independently employs high capacity, parallel processing and advanced algorithms to combine all distributed sensor data into a fire control quality track picture which is the same for all CUs. CEC data is presented as a superset of the best AAW sensor capabilities from each CU; all of which are integrated into a single input to each CU's combat weapons system. CEC significantly improves Battle Force defense in depth, including both local area and ship defense capabilities against current and future AAW threats. Moreover, CEC provides critical connectivity and integration of over-land air defense systems capable of countering emerging air threats, including land attack cruise missiles, in a complex littoral environment. CEC consists of the Data Distribution System (DDS), the Cooperative Engagement Processor (CEP), and Combat System modifications. The DDS encodes and distributes ownship sensor and engagement data and is a high capacity, jam resistant, directive system providing a precision gridlocking and high throughput of data. The CEP is a high capacity distributed processor that is able to process force levels of data in near real time. This data is passed to the ship's combat system as high quality data for which the ship can cue its onboard sensors or use the data to engage targets without actually tracking them. The CEC suite contains a C-Band antenna, the antenna's power and cooling equipment, a Signal Data Processor (SDP), and system support equipment. The current CEC Shipboard antenna variants include the Shipboard Active Aperture (SBAA) and the Planar Array Antenna Assembly (PAAA). The SDP hosts the CEP software and is common across all CEC variants. The USG-2B articles in this budget procure support hardware consisting of a ruggedized 19-inch rack that contains a Cesium time standard, input/output converter, power distribution and user interface control devices. The 19-inch rack holds the SDP. SBAA and PAAA support are provided by an Antenna Environmental Control Unit (AECU) or Environmental Control System Controller (ECSC), which provide power and cooling oil to the CEC shipboard antenna. Funding provided also procures the required Weapon Replaceable Assembly (WRA) hardware required for airborne variants of CEC. CEC is planned for shipboard installations at various Naval and commercial shipyards aboard CG/CG Mod, DDG/DDG Mod, CV/CVN, LPD, LHD, DDG 1000, and LHA ship classes during scheduled ship availability periods and at land based test sites (LBTS). [P40A / UC002 - AN/UYQ-70 DISPLAY]: This is a sunk cost to fund the procurement of the AN/UYQ-70 display system for use and integration with the CEC system. [P40A / UC004 - ECP/KIT PROCUREMENT]: These funds are for the procurement and installation of Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs)(AN/USG-2 to AN/USG-2B upgrades/AN/USG-2A to AN/USG-2B upgrades) Field Change Kits to address CEC parts obsolescence associated with interfacing systems on multiple platforms. [P40A / UC005 - NON-RECURRING DEPOT COST]: This is a sunk cost to establish a depot for the CEC system. [P40A / UC006 - VISUAL INTERACTIVE SIMULATED TRAINING APPLICATION (VISTA) TRAINING]: This is a sunk cost to fund VISTA training related to the CEC system. [P40A / UC008 - SUPPLY SUPPORT]: This is a sunk cost for Supply Support for the CEC system. [P40A / UC011 - SIGNAL DATA PROCESSORS (SDP) BACKFITS (LBTS)]: Funds are for the procurement of Signal Data Processors (SDP) backfits at Land Based Test Sites (LBTSs). There are no installation costs associated with these procurements because the installations will be performed by employees at the LBTSs. [P40A / UC013 - AN/USG-2B HARDWARE CONVERSION KITS (AN/USG-2)]: Funds are for the procurement of AN/USG-2B hardware conversion kits for the CEC AN/USG-2 system configuration. [P40A / UC014 - AN/USG-2B HARDWARE CONVERSION KITS (AN/USG-2A)]: Funds are for the procurement of AN/USG-2B hardware conversion kits for the AN/USG-2A CEC system configuration. [P40A / UC015 - AN/USG-2B HARDWARE CONVERSION KITS (LBTS)]: Funds are for the procurement of AN/USG-2B hardware conversion kits for CEC LBTS. [P40A / UC830 - PRODUCTION ENGR. SUPPORT]: These funds are required for the production engineering support of all CEC systems. This Cost Element includes indirect costs associated with the procurement and installation of individual field changes and upgrades. These costs would include field change and upgrade support, consolidated engineering support, Program Office support, and other costs. These costs will fluctuate with increases and decreases of overall budget, number and type of field changes and upgrades, and required support. [P40A / UCCA1 - CONGRESSIONAL ADD]: These are Congressional add funds. [P40A / UC016 SYSTEM COMPONENT UPGRADES]: These funds are for the procurement and installation of replacement CEC system components (Surface and Airborne) due to existing component degradation and corrosion as a result of these existing components being in use beyond their intended service life. Funds will support procurement of Environmental Control System Controllers (ECSC) Units and replacement ECSC components, Antenna Environmental Control Units (AECU) and replacement AECU components, Airborne Weapons Replaceable Assemblies (WRAs), replacement components of the Shipboard Active Array (SBAA) Antenna, and replacement components of the Planar Array Antenna Assembly (PAAA) Antenna [P40A / UC017 SIGNAL DATA PROCESSORS (SDP) CAPABILITY ENHANCEMENT]: The Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) Signal Data Processor (SDP) will be modernized to support future CEC capabilities including CEC Enhanced Network, NIFC Passive, and integration of Office of Naval Research's (ONR) Communications and Interoperability for Integrated Fires (CIIF) Mission-based Networking for DDS (MiND) and Communications as a Service (CaaS) FNC products. This effort procures the quantities necessary to upgrade existing SDPs that will include Crypto Mod, New Transmit and Receive Cards, and CEN Firmware. Unit costs and resulting procurement quantities have been updated in FY26 to align to latest production contract firm fixed pricing. [P40A / UC009 - SDP BACKFITS (AN/USG-2) Prior Year Historical]: P3A Prior Year Historical: Strike Group Anti-Air Warfare (AAW) Improvement. Funds are for the procurement of Signal Data Processors (SDP) backfits in alignment with Fleet Modernization Procurement and Installation Plan for CEC Backfit to CG, DDG, CVN, and LHD ship classes [P40A / UC010 - SDP BACKFITS (AN/USG-2A) Prior Year Historical]: P3A Prior Year Historical: Strike Group Anti-Air Warfare (AAW) Improvement. Funds are for the procurement of Signal Data Processors (SDP) backfits for AN/USG-2A equipment in alignment with Fleet Modernization Procurement and Installation Plan for CEC Backfit to CG, DDG, CVN, and LHD ship classes [P3A / UC001 - COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT TRANSMISSION PROCESSING SET (USG-2/2A/2B)]: These funds are for the procurement of CEC to backfit CG, DDG, CVN, and LHD ship classes, as well as LBTSs. [P3A - 2 / UC003 - PAAA BACKFIT KITS]: These funds are for the procurement of Planar Antenna Array Assembly (PAAA) backfit kits.

Justification

Justification — Cooperative Engagement Capability

The FY 2026 request was reduced by $5.055 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." Funds are to procure hardware and provide associated support for the CEC system. Requirements are driven by planned procurements of Planar Array Antenna Assembly (PAAA), USG-2B ECP/Kits, System Component Upgrades (AECUs, ECSCs, WRAs, Replacement components for SBAA and PAAA antennas), Installation of CEC Systems for LHD 3 and 5 (UC001-FY 2021 Installs), Installation of Signal Data Processor (SDP) back-fit kits, and Procurement of Signal Data Processor (SDP) Capability Enhancements (No associated installation cost)

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Other Procurement, NavyNFY24 Actuals$37.7M
Other Procurement, NavyNFY25 Enacted$26.6M
Other Procurement, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$26.6M
Other Procurement, NavyNFY26 Total$26.6M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$1.00B$37.7M$26.6M$26.6M$26.6M

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 2606 (Cooperative Engagement Capability), its 3 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 2606 (Cooperative Engagement Capability), its 3 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSNProcurement appropriation260626.6M FY26N0002413C5212RAYTHEON COMPANY222.1MN0002420C5203RAYTHEON COMPANY207.5MN0002412C5231RAYTHEON COMPANY2.00MRTX CorporationFL-13

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
FL-13$419.1M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0002412C5231high
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0002413C5212high
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0002420C5203high
LAUREL TECHNOLOGIES PARTNERSHIPN0002415C5228medium
LAUREL TECHNOLOGIES PARTNERSHIPN0002417C5201medium
PORT ELECTRONICS CORPORATIONN0002420C5271medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0002418C5202medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYN0002419C5200medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Cooperative Engagement Capability. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.