Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Small Diameter Bomb II

NavyProcurementReconciledBLI2238
What it is
Small Diameter Bomb II (2238) is a Navy procurement line funded in the Weapons Procurement, Navy account.
What changed
+$10.1M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 10 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$63.0MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$76.1MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$86.3MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$10.1MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $63.0MFY25: $76.1MFY26: $86.3MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$63.0M
FY25$76.1M
FY26$86.3M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$33.8M$100.7M$63.0M
Enacted–$100.7M$65.9M$76.1M
Request––$65.9M$76.1M$86.3M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $65.9M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $63.0M as actual total obligation authority — $2.83M below the request. 63.035 − 65.863 = -2.828 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Small Diameter Bomb II (SDB II)

Small Diameter Bomb Increment II (SDB II) is an ACAT 1C program providing the warfighter a capability to attack mobile targets in all weather. The U.S. Air Force (USAF) is the lead service. The SDB II increases joint lethality in contested environments. The SDB II can strike a diverse set of targets inside an adversary's air and missile defense networks to destroy mobile platforms through the weather. With increased loadout, range, and munitions effect the network enabled SDB II enhances close combat lethality in complex terrain. Threshold aircraft are the F-15E for the USAF and F-35B and F-35C for the Department of Navy (DON). Objective aircraft include the F/A-22, B-1, B2, F-117, F-16, B-52, Predator B, F/A-18 E/F. Milestone C was achieved June 2015. The Acquisition Decision Memorandum was signed 4 June 2015. Lots 1 through 3 are Air Force only procurements; Lot 1 awarded 12 June 2015. SDB II will be integrated on F-35B and F-35C using BRU-61 (due to the cancellation of the Joint Miniature Munitions Bomb Rack contract), and on F/A-18 E/F using BRU-55. The F/A-18 E/F Initial Operational Capability (IOC) is planned for FY 2025; F-35 IOC is planned for FY 2027. The total planned SDB II procurement is 29,110 weapons; 21,610 for the AF and 7,500 for the DON. Funds may be used to resolve production DMS/MS/Obsolescence issues through studies, bridge buys, life of type buys, supplier/parts replacement and qualification activities to preserve future production capabilities and capacities.

Justification

Justification — Small Diameter Bomb II (SDB II)

The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.207 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." FY 2026 funding continues procurement of SDB II All Up Rounds (AUR) to support warfighter requirements as well as Containers, Test Vehicles, Production support, Production Test Support, and Obsolescence.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY24 Actuals$63.0M
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY25 Enacted$76.1M
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$86.3M
Weapons Procurement, NavyNFY26 Total$86.3M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$423.1M$63.0M$76.1M$86.3M$86.3M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
RAYTHEON COMPANYFA867216C0001medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYFA867218C0010medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYFA867218F4010medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYFA867219C0010medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYFA867219F1101medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYFA867219F1102medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYFA867219F1103medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYFA867219F4054medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYFA867219F4055medium
RAYTHEON COMPANYFA867220C0005medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Small Diameter Bomb II. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.