Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Replac Equip & War Consumables

Air ForceProcurementReconciledBLI222000
What it is
Replac Equip & War Consumables (222000) is an Air Force procurement line funded in the Missile Procurement, Air Force account.
What changed
+$5.90M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 1 linked award record is listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$33.8MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$6.53MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$12.4MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$5.90MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $33.8MFY25: $6.53MFY26: $12.4MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$33.8M
FY25$6.53M
FY26$12.4M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$7.68M$30.5M$33.8M
Enacted–$30.5M$37.3M$6.53M
Request––$37.3M$6.53M$12.4M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $37.3M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $33.8M as actual total obligation authority — $3.47M below the request. 33.8 − 37.3 = -3.5 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Replac Equip & War Consumables

Common Munitions BIT Reprogramming Equipment (CMBRE) Cyber Enhanced (CE) is a critical program replacing a legacy system fielded in the 1990s utilizing floppy drives and a DOS/Win XP operating system. The CMBRE CE program will mitigate the effects and risk associated with a growing list of 20+ obsolete components, outdated technology, and insufficient cybersecurity outlined in Red Team and POA&M findings in order to sustain current capabilities. CMBRE SLEP will effectively support the 20+ smart munitions and weapon systems currently fielded for the warfighter today, as well as advanced systems currently in development. CMBRE SLEP is needed to verify weapons built-in test status, reprogram operational flight data, and up/download mission and GPS data. Cruise Missile Automatic Test System (CM-ATS) The CM-ATS is a nuclear certified tester designed to test the AGM-86 Cruise Missile fleet, the B-2 RLA, and associated Carrier Aircraft Equipment (CAE) used to launch missiles. Funding for this exhibit is contained in PE 0701212F.

Justification

Justification — Replac Equip & War Consumables

FY 2026 Funds are required for the Common Munitions BIT Reprogramming Equipment (CMBRE) Cyber Enhanced (CE) Program and the Cruise Missile Automatic Test System (CM-ATS). FY 2026 funding increase is due to increase in production hardware kits. The cost of Munitions Application Programs (MAPs) an average cost increase of 500K per Munitions Application Program (MAP) for established munitions and increases of up to $2M or more advanced/newer munitions. CMBRE system procurement costs have increased from originally estimated costs due to the inflated costs of CCA components, digital controller unit components, and assembly labor costs. Funds will be used to procure and recapitalize the ATS Product Group which consists of: Armament and Stores ATS and Software Loader/Verifier and Built-in-Test ATS to include proven commercial and/or Government off-the-shelf ATS to replace legacy and obsolete systems to ensure persistent logistics and enable agile combat employment. Funds are required in order to upgrade the CMBRE CE and CM-ATS system. CMBRE is comprised of three major components that must be replaced: Digital Computer System Assembly (DCSA), Test Adapter Unit (TAU), and ADU. There will be no test capability for smart munitions and Bomber Rack Unit, BRU-61, for fighter aircraft if upgrades are not complete. CMBRE Tester is used to initiate built-in test (BIT), reprogram the Operational Flight Programs (OFPs) for MIL-STD-1760/Non-1760 smart bombs and missiles, upload mission planning, and upload/download Global Positioning System (GPS) crypto keys. CMBRE SLEP breaks vendor lock, allowing the Government to own full data rights and the technical data package (TDP). It also addresses obsolescence and cyber security issues. The CM-ATS is a nuclear certified tester designed to test the AGM-86 Cruise Missile fleet, the B-2 Rotary Launcher Assembly (RLA), and associated Carrier Aircraft Equipment (CAE) used to launch missiles.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Missile Procurement, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$33.8M
Missile Procurement, Air ForceFFY25 Enacted$6.53M
Missile Procurement, Air ForceFFY26 Disc. Request$12.4M
Missile Procurement, Air ForceFFY26 Total$12.4M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$33.8M$6.53M$12.4M$12.4M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — none of this program's high-confidence awards records a positive obligation at any place of performance (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

RecipientPIIDConfidence
ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS OPERATIONS LLCFA853319D0009high

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Replac Equip & War Consumables. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.