Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

DDG-51

NavyProcurementReconciledBLI2122
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
DDG-51 is the U.S. Navy's Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer program, funded under the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy account. The Navy describes the DDG 51 as able to operate offensively and defensively, independently or as part of Carrier Strike Groups and Surface Action Groups, in multi-threat environments that include air, surface and subsurface threats.
What changed
-$2.86B FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES leads 5 contractor families sharing $29.0B in high-confidence matched awards.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$6.37BP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$8.27BP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$5.41BP-1 TOA · PB2026
99.8% reconciliation

$10.8M discretionary + $5.40B one-time reconciliation. Discretionary change vs FY2025 enacted: -99.9%.

FY25→26 Change
-$2.86BP-1 TOA · PB2026

Two official figures, one label— reconciled below

Fiscal Receipts uses P-1/R-1 workbook total obligation authority (TOA) as the headline figure sitewide. The workbook TOA includes budget rows that the R-2/P-40 J-book program line excludes — advance procurement in an ordinary year, and in FY2026 the one-time reconciliation appropriation as well. Each row below names the one it is. How the two bases relate →

FY26 Request · $5.41B TOA − $10.8M J-book line = 5.40B (5,410.8 − 10.8 = 5,400.0) — $5.40B of one-time FY2026 reconciliation money accounts for this gap — not advance procurement

Figures in the sentence are rounded for reading; the parenthesised arithmetic is the same subtraction in USD millions, at the precision where it closes.

Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $6.37BFY25: $8.27BFY26: $5.41BFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$6.37B
FY25$8.27B
FY26$5.41B

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$3.84B$7.87B$6.37B
Enacted–$7.87B$4.48B$8.27B
Request––$4.48B$6.45B$5.41B

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $4.48B for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $6.37B as actual total obligation authority — $1.88B above the request. 6,366.4 − 4,483.2 = 1,883.2 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — DDG-51

DDG 51 will be able to operate offensively and defensively, independently or as units of Carrier Strike Groups and Surface Action Groups, in support of Marine Amphibious Task Forces in multi-threat environments that include air, surface and subsurface threats. These ships will respond to Low Intensity Conflict/Coastal and Littoral Offshore Warfare (LIC/CALOW) scenarios as well as open ocean conflict providing or augmenting power projection and forward presence requirements, and escort operations at sea. Beginning in FY17, DDG 51 Flight III with the Air and Missile Defense Radar (SPY-6(V)1) will significantly enhance Integrated Air and Missile Defense capability against current and future threats. Starting in FY22, DDG 51 Flight III AN/SLQ-32 system is upgraded from AN/SLQ-32(V)6 to AN/SLQ-32(V)7, with the addition of SEWIP Block 3, which provides advanced Electronic Attack (EA) capability to keep pace with the evolving Anti-Ship Missile (ASM) threat and counter-targeting. Starting in FY23, the MK38 Gun Weapon System is being upgraded to the Mod 4 configuration and transitions from a post construction to an in-line installation, the WSN-7 inertial navigation system is being replaced with the follow-on WSN-12 navigation system, 15 additional berths are being introduced, and the Bridgemaster Surface Search Radar is being replaced by the Next-Generation Surface Search Radar (NGSSR). For the DDG 51 Program, the Department requests a total of $5,410,773 thousand and a total quantity of two. This request includes includes $10,773 thousand and quantity of 0 of discretionary funding and $5,410,000 thousand and quantity of 2 of mandatory funding for a total FY 2026 request of $5,410,773 thousand and quantity of 2. The mandatory and discretionary funds support the contract award for two FY 2026 ships. Further information for this reconciliation request will be provided in Section 20002 (Shipbuilding) of the Reconciliation Exhibit. Note: (1) The FY 2018-2022 acquisition strategy is a 10 ship Multi-year Procurement (MYP) with options. This budget request reflects savings for the ships in FY 2018-FY 2022 associated with EOQ procurement and a MYP strategy. Additional ships in FY 2019 and FY 2020 also reflect quantity savings over annual ship prices. (2) The Navy awarded two Multi-year Procurement (MYP) contracts for FY 2023 - FY 2027 for 9 ships with options. This budget request reflects savings for the ships in FY 2023-FY 2027 associated with EOQ procurement and a MYP strategy. The additional ships in FY 2023 and FY 2025 also reflect quantity savings over annual ship prices. (3) FY 2025 includes subsequent year full funding for the following: $923,808K for FY 2023 ships and $759,563K for FY 2024 ships.

Justification

Justification — DDG-51

The FY 2026 request for DDG51 includes $10,773 thousand and quantity of 0 of discretionary funding and $5,400,000 thousand and quantity of 2 of mandatory funding for a total of $5,410,773 thousand and a quantity of 2. The mandatory funds support the contract award for two FY 2026 ships. Further information for this reconciliation request will be provided in Section 20002 (Shipbuilding) of the Reconciliation Exhibit.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Shipbuilding and Conversion, NavyNFY24 Actuals$6.37B
Shipbuilding and Conversion, NavyNFY25 Enacted$8.27B
Shipbuilding and Conversion, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$10.8M
Shipbuilding and Conversion, NavyNFY26 Reconciliation$5.40B
Shipbuilding and Conversion, NavyNFY26 Total$5.41B

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$110.3B$6.37B$8.27B$10.8M$10.8M

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 2122 (DDG-51), its 12 largest high-confidence awards, the 5 recipient families behind them, and the 5 congressional districts the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the N appropriation, program element 2122 (DDG-51), its 12 largest high-confidence awards, the 5 recipient families behind them, and the 5 congressional districts the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSNProcurement appropriation21225.41B FY26N0002423C2307HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPOR…8.43BN0002418C2307HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPOR…7.01BN0002423C2305BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION6.59BN0002418C2305BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION5.50BN0002416C4202TIMKEN GEARS & SERVICES INC.667.6MN0002418C2313BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION331.3MN0002424C2313BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION195.6MN0002418C2312HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPOR…154.9MN0002418C4208LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION121.4MN0002419C4101NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CO…113.1MN0002424C2312HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPOR…85.0MN0002419C4109LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION43.7MHuntington Ingalls Indust…General Dynamics CorpTIMKEN GEARS & SERVICES I…Lockheed Martin CorpNorthrop Grumman Corporat…MS-04ME-01CA-38FL-10VA-05

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
MS-04$15.5B
ME-01$12.6B
CA-38$667.6M
FL-10$162.8M
VA-05$113.1M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

Showing 25 of 34 award records (this program's published budget→award crosswalk links — see methodology)

RecipientPIIDConfidence
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATIONN0002418C2305high
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATIONN0002418C2313high
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATIONN0002423C2305high
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATIONN0002424C2313high
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATEDN0002418C2307high
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATEDN0002418C2312high
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATEDN0002423C2307high
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATEDN0002424C2312high
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONN0002418C4208high
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONN0002419C4109high
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONN0002419C4101high
TIMKEN GEARS & SERVICES INC.N0002410C2310high
TIMKEN GEARS & SERVICES INC.N0002416C4202high
BAE SYSTEMS JACKSONVILLE SHIP REPAIR LLCN0002419C2317medium
BAE SYSTEMS MARITIME SOLUTIONS SAN DIEGO INC.N0002417C2310medium
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATIONN0002411C2305medium
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATIONN0002412C2313medium
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATIONN0002413C2305medium
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATIONN6278618F0038medium
DIXIE SEAT COVER SHOP INCN6278621P0002medium
GOODRICH CORPORATIONN0016418FG068medium
GOODRICH CORPORATIONN0016419FG062medium
GOODRICH CORPORATIONN0016420FG061medium
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATEDN0002412C2312medium
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATEDN0002413C2307medium

Contractor concentration

HHI Indexⓘ
4742
Highly Concentrated
2023 Merger Guidelines bands
Top Contractor
HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES
Contractor Families
5
Program Obligationsⓘ
$29.0B

High-confidence award links only, pooled across ingested years. The index uses positive obligations; program obligations are net of deobligations. The figures over every published link, including medium-confidence ones, are in the downloadable warehouse, not on this page — why.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not DDG-51. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

Every sentence below carries its citation — warehouse figures open the citation panel, news claims link the cached source.

Research dossiers exist for 50 of 1,938 programs — the 50 largest fully J-book-detailed programs by FY2026 request. why no dossier here? →

What it is

  • DDG-51 is the U.S. Navy's Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer program, funded under the Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy account.
  • The Navy describes the DDG 51 as able to operate offensively and defensively, independently or as part of Carrier Strike Groups and Surface Action Groups, in multi-threat environments that include air, surface and subsurface threats.
  • Beginning in FY2017, DDG 51 Flight III ships added the Air and Missile Defense Radar (SPY-6(V)1) to significantly enhance Integrated Air and Missile Defense capability against current and future threats.
  • Starting in FY2023, the program is upgrading the MK38 Gun Weapon System to the Mod 4 configuration, replacing the WSN-7 inertial navigation system with the follow-on WSN-12, adding 15 additional berths, and replacing the Bridgemaster Surface Search Radar with the Next-Generation Surface Search Radar.
  • For FY2026 the Department requests a total of $5,410,773 thousand (about $5.4 billion) and a total quantity of two ships.
  • That FY2026 request combines $10,773 thousand of discretionary funding (quantity of 0) with $5,400,000 thousand of mandatory funding (quantity of 2), supporting the contract award for two FY2026 ships.

Why it matters

  • DDG-51 is a large shipbuilding line: FY2024 actual funding totaled $6,366,431 thousand (about $6.4 billion).
  • For FY2025, Congress enacted $8,268,628 thousand (about $8.3 billion) for the program.
  • The FY2026 total request drops to $5,410,773 thousand (about $5.4 billion), lower than the prior year's enacted level.
  • Most of the FY2026 request comes as a reconciliation (mandatory) request of $5,400,000 thousand rather than through the regular discretionary budget.
  • Only $10,773 thousand of the FY2026 request is discretionary funding.
  • The Navy awarded two Multi-year Procurement contracts covering FY2023-FY2027 for 9 ships with options, with the budget reflecting savings from economic order quantity procurement and the multi-year strategy.
  • DDG-51 FY2024 actuals came in about $1.9 billion above the original PB2024 request, rising from a $4,483,214 thousand request to $6,366,431 thousand in actuals — a roughly 42% increase.

Key players

  • The program is run by the Department of the Navy (organization code N).

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.