Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Special Equipment for Test and Evaluation

AProcurementPartial Reconciliation1573MA6820
What it is
Special Equipment for Test and Evaluation — a procurement program run by Army.
What changed
No FY25→26 comparison — trajectory data incomplete for this line.
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$52.5M
FY25 Total
FY26 Request
$93.8M
FY25→26 Change

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
FY24: $52.5MFY26: $93.8MFY24FY26
FY24
$52.5M
FY26
$93.8M
Decade view — each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY26

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$76.9M$88.8M$52.5M
Enacted$88.8M$52.5M$90.7M
Request$52.5M$90.7M$93.8M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description Special Equipment for Test and Evaluation

This funding line supports testing of Army Modernization Priority Programs. Special Equipment for User Testing is comprised of multiple programs for the Major Developmental & Operational Testing Instrumentation and Army Threat Simulator Program. Program provides funding for Major Operational Testing Instrumentation, Major Field Instrumentation for Operational Testing (OT), Force Development Testing and Experimentation (FDTE), and Army Warfighting Experiments (AWE). Initiatives are tied to tactical and instrumentation systems that support each of the five joint functional concepts outlined in the Army Modernization Plan (Force Application; Protection; Focused Logistics; Battlespace Awareness; Command and Control). The Army Threat Simulator Program procures actual foreign hardware and Non-Developmental Items (NDI) (e.g., chassis, subsystems, commercial equipment, or actual threat weapons), which are integrated into a threat simulator design for user testing and training. The program also procures a variety of test assets, such as Threat Battle Command Force, Advanced Jammer Suite, Advanced Electronic Support Sensor Suite, and spares for Threat Operations. Special Equipment for User Testing programs provides support at: Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) and Operational Test Command (OTC) facilities to include Transformation Technology Directorate (TTD) at Fort Cavazos, TX; Fire Support Test Directorate (FSTD) at Fort Sill, OK; Airborne Special Operations Test Directorate (ABSOTD) at Fort Liberty, NC; Air Defense Artillery Test Directorate (ADATD) and Electronic Proving Ground (EPG) at Fort Huachuca, AZ; Aberdeen Test Center (ATC); Redstone Test Center (RTC); White Sands Test Center (WSTC); and Yuma Test Center (YTC). Optics Modernization will provide a cost-effective and technologically superior replacement for the aging fleet of optical tracking systems at WSTC, YTC, ATC, RTC and OTC. This capability will consist of two different optical tracking systems: a small, highly dynamic Close-In Optical Tracking System readily deployed at ground level or on elevated platforms; and a medium-sized Fly-Out Optical Tracking System to accommodate larger payloads for longer range imaging requirements. Both systems will incorporate multi-waveband optics and sensors to allow simultaneous sensing in visible and infrared bands. Remote operability, weatherization, and improved data fusion with other range sensor systems will provide the efficiency and robustness unavailable with current architecture. Optics Modernization supports the Long Range Precision Fires, Next Generation Combat Vehicle, Future Vertical Lift and Air & Missile Defense Cross-Functional teams. Equipment in this line is dual purposed as needed to support Army Training.

Justification

Justification Special Equipment for Test and Evaluation

In FY 2026, Optics Modernization funding in the amount of $69.276 million will provide for the procurement of nine Close-In systems. These systems will be used at White Sands Test Center (WSTC), Yuma Test Center (YTC) and Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) in support of developmental testing requirements in support of Long Range Precision Fires and Hypersonic Missile testing. This program leveraged OSD/CTEIP funded development in order to provide modernized optical tracking systems with enhanced capabilities. In FY 2026, Threat Systems funding in the amount of $24.501 Million procures multiple threat systems (Electronic Warfare (EW); Command, Control, and Communications; and Advanced Jamming) required to support the developmental and operational testing and training of network centric threat scenarios. These threat scenarios are critical to integrating digital battlefield data collection and analysis tools that support the establishment of robust command and control capabilities. Threat jammers provide capability to test systems across the entire Radio Frequency (RF) spectrum (HF to Ka bands) and will fulfill developmental and operational test requirements for ongoing multi-domain operations by 2028. Funding will be used to procure threat validated jammers with new advanced, threat specific antennas, including advanced array systems, to maintain threat EW realism for the Army Test and Evaluation Command's (ATEC) testing environment. Funding will also procure additional Time Difference of Arrival and Angle of Arrival direction finding systems. These systems are directly tied to ATEC threat priorities and required to represent a near-peer environment. Funding will procure multiple radar emitters to address threat radar shortfalls (VHF, UHF, Ku and Ka Bands), advanced ground and aerial sensor systems, low power ground surveillance systems, and other threat sensor systems employing non-RF applications (acoustic, seismic, and electro-optical/infrared) based on ATEC priorities. These systems are required to ensure testing is being conducted in a dense RF environment representative of the modern threat picture. Funding also procures closed loop radar threat systems in the X band and Ku band for testing Future Vertical Lift and other aerial platforms. Base funding will provide in deploy, operate, and secure Threat Systems capabilities in accordance with OSD and Army Digital Engineering and Software Modernization Strategies. Efforts will promote synergies between the training and testing enablers to improve product integration, deployment, and cyber activities, and to promote re-use of common assets and services to meet Army modernization priorities. In accordance with Section 1815 of the FY 2008 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 110-181), this item is necessary for use by the active and reserve components of the Armed Forces for homeland defense missions, domestic emergency responses, and providing military support to civil authorities.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$52.5M
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$90.7M
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$93.8M
Other Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Total$93.8M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$205.1M$52.5M$90.7M$93.8M$93.8M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →