Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Teleport Program

DISARDT&EPartial Reconciliation1203610K
What it is
Teleport Program (1203610K) is a DISA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
No FY25→26 comparison — endpoints unavailable or on different bases.
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$0P-40 detail · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$0P-40 detail · PB2026
FY26 Request
$24.3MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
No comparison: endpoints unavailable or on different bases

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $0FY25: $0FY26: $24.3MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$0P-40 detail · PB2026
FY25$0P-40 detail · PB2026
FY26$24.3MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2016–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span, and 1 year is a break in the line rather than a low value: an edition the program is absent from, never interpolated. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2016–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span, and 1 year is a break in the line rather than a low value: an edition the program is absent from, never interpolated. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY16FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$0$574.0K$706.0K$5.54M$2.70M$0$19.5M
Enacted$0$642.0K$723.0K$5.54M$3.24M$0$1.27M
Request$642.0K$2.32M$6.16M$3.24M$0$1.27M$0$24.3M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $1.27M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $19.5M as actual total obligation authority — $18.2M above the request. 19.51.3 = 18.2 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Teleport Program

The ability of the current ground infrastructure to be responsively resilient is limited: much of the baseband and satellite equipment must be manually reconfigured and, if shifting from one SATCOM system to another is required, manually-performed reconnections are required. This is inconsistent with the advent of Enterprise Satellite Communications Management and Control (ESC-MC) which is under development and will provide for automated resource allocation and reallocation and improved situational awareness of the status of the DoD SATCOM Enterprise. DISA will develop ground management and control capability that will provide the ability for automated coordination by ESC-MC of the ground infrastructure as well as the various space systems supporting U.S. Warfighters. Gateway Optimization and Resiliency (GOaR) Study. DoD CIO commissioned the GOaR Study, which was finalized and accepted by the DoD CIO in July 2022, to evaluate the overall resiliency of the entire DoD Satellite Communication (SATCOM) Enterprise. The purpose of the GOaR Study was to determine whether there is sufficient resiliency across the ground infrastructure of the DoD SATCOM Enterprise. The GOaR Study concluded that the DoD must improve the quality of technology across the DoDIN ground entry points (GEPs). The DoD must increase the capacity of each GEP. Should one or more GEP become unavailable, the remainder of the ground infrastructure must be able to continue to support U.S. Warfighting forces engaged in operational missions. Additionally, the GEPs must provide redundancy across multiple frequency bands and sites. DISA is prioritizing Research, Development, Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) to develop a ground infrastructure management and control system. Specifically, RDT&E investments will provide mechanisms to integrate existing Teleport management capabilities so that machine-to-machine exchanges with the broad Enterprise Satellite Management and Control (ESC-MC) capability can begin to occur. This integration will contribute to improved situational awareness at the ground infrastructure and the SATCOM Enterprise levels by providing real-time data to feed a common operating picture for better understanding of the SATCOM environment, enhanced network orchestration for better management and coordination of DoD’s SATCOM resources, and automated resource allocation for rapid allocation (hours vice weeks or months) of SATCOM resources to meet rapidly changing Warfighting needs. Finally, RDT&E will determine how to seamlessly integrate Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) satellite services through the SATCOM ground infrastructure/Joint SATCOM Teleports into the existing DoD SATCOM Enterprise. This will provide access to the terrestrial portions of the DoD Information Network (DoDIN) and DISN services by enabling ground integration of LEO/MEO services.

Mission Resilient Ground Infrastructure

The Department of Defense (DoD) relies heavily on satellite communications (SATCOM) and DISA is committed to improving the resilience of the ground infrastructure for this critical capability. A key component of this effort is strategic investment in Research, Development, Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) to develop innovative solutions that enhance the resiliency, and redundancy of the DoD SATCOM ground infrastructure. RDT&E funding is required for developing the ground infrastructure management and control capability with and its interface to Enterprise Satellite Management and Control (ESC-MC), Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) integration, and Low Earth Orbit (LEO) integration. To realize the promise of the ESC-MC Reference Architecture, DISA will invest in developing the ground management and control capability for the Joint SATCOM Teleports and interfacing it with the Enterprise Satellite Management and Control (ESC-MC) capability. This will provide a common operating picture, improve network orchestration, and enable automated SATCOM resource allocation. The integration of MEO satellite services offers the potential for increased bandwidth, reduced latency, and improved coverage. To capitalize on these advantages, RDT&E funding will be allocated to research and determine the best methods for integration of commercial MEO services into the DoD SATCOM Enterprise through the Joint SATCOM Teleports. Similar to MEO, the integration of LEO satellite services offers unique advantages, including low latency and with some systems, coverage over the Arctic and Antarctic that is at best marginal when using satellites in geosynchrous orbit. To leverage these capabilities, RDT&E funding will be used to research and determine the optimal methods for facilitating the integration of commercial LEO services into the DoD SATCOM Enterprise.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Resilient Ground Infrastructure

Develop solutions that integrate teleport systems with Enterprise Satellite Management and Control (ESC-MC) that will support providing situation awareness/common operating picture, network orchestration, and automated resource allocation. Determine how access to DISN services may be provided for DoD users of commercial mid earth orbit (MEO) and proliferated low earth orbit (pLEO) services.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY26 Disc. Request$24.3M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDISAFY26 Total$24.3M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$0$0$24.3M$24.3M
NS01: Resilient Ground Infrastructure$0$0$0$24.3M$24.3M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Teleport Program — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →