Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Service Support to SPACECOM Activities

Air ForceRDT&EReconciledPE1202140F
What it is
Service Support to SPACECOM Activities (1202140F) is an Air Force research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
No FY25→26 comparison — endpoints unavailable or on different bases.
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$9.75MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$0J-book detail · PB2026
FY26 Request
$0J-book detail · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
No comparison: endpoints unavailable or on different bases

No FY2026 R-1/P-1 request line for this program element. The FY2026 President's Budget request workbook carries no FY2026 line for it; its last workbook figure is FY2024. The PB2026 J-book detail below does carry an FY2026 row for this line, recorded as zero. A workbook blank and a documented zero are different records, and this page shows both. An absent line is not by itself an ending — PB2026 renumbered program elements at scale across the services and defense agencies, so this work may continue under a different number. No successor is linked for this line: this site's program-lineage layer holds no keyed edge pointing forward from here. That is an absence in this site's lineage layer, not a finding about the program: if the J-book narrative on this page describes a realignment, it is quoted below in the document's own words, and this note does not restate it.

Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $9.75MFY25: $0FY26: $0FY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$9.75MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25$0J-book detail · PB2026
FY26$0J-book detail · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

7 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2018–FY2024): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
7 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2018–FY2024): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24
Actuals$0$0$11.4M$8.98M$6.55M$13.4M$9.75M
Enacted–$0$11.9M$8.98M$6.74M$13.4M$9.78M
Request––$11.9M$9.00M$6.74M$13.8M$9.78M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2020 book requested $11.9M for FY2020; the PB2022 book reported $11.4M as actual total obligation authority — $434.0K below the request. 11.43 − 11.86 = -0.43 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Service Support to SPACECOM Activities

The Space Analysis and Application Development program integrates space based effects into Department's ‘Model of Record' for joint campaign analysis. Current modeling and simulation [M&S] models are inadequate to represent the contribution that U.S space capabilities make to the air, sea, and land fight and do not accurately portray current and future space threats. This line of effort integrates effects of space capabilities into mission and campaign-level M&S tools. Enhanced space M&S will enable the DoD to make informed decisions regarding the direction of U.S. Space Doctrine, Tactics, Techniques, Procedures, and Resource Decisions. The DoD requires the ability to conduct campaign-level analysis to quantify the holistic operational impacts of adversary space actions on military campaigns and U.S. global operations. Navigation Warfare [NAVWAR] is deliberate defensive and offensive action to assure and prevent positioning, navigation, and timing [PNT] information through coordinated employment of space, cyberspace, and electronic warfare [EW] operations. Funds are used to create and maintain NAVWAR knowledge and ensure NAVWAR superiority across the DoD. IAW the most recent Unified Command Plan, USSPACECOM is responsible for [a] [U] Advocating for requirements and capabilities supporting NAVWAR operations and joint resilient PNT for the DoD, and [b] [U] Providing contingency and operations support to CCMDs for NAVWAR and joint resilient PNT planning. USSPACECOM will research, develop, test, assess and evaluate NAVWAR options IOT advocate across Services and the other CCMDs to achieve PNT overmatch. Funds are used to create and maintain NAVWAR knowledge. NAVWAR expertise is developed in part by execution of PNT Operational Field Assessments [POFAs] that assess Red and Blue PNT-related capabilities, limitations, and vulnerabilities. GYPSY POFA's are linked to Commander USSPACECOM's Joint Exercise Program [JEP] and nested within the Chairman's Exercise Program [CEP]and Combatant Commander's [CCMD] Tier 1 exercises [PACIFIC SENTRY AND AUSTERE CHALLENGE are examples] and provide operationally realistic threat-representative, PNT-contested environments for analytical assessment of air, ground, maritime, space & cyberspace mission capability. FORTUNE POFAs are PNT capability and vulnerability assessments associate with a Service exercise or mission event. PRISM POFAs encompass all other Operations, Actions, and Activities [OAAs] and other assessments to include evaluation of rapid innovative NAVWAR capabilities and/or solutions. Assessments inform materiel and non-materiel solutions, service acquisition decisions, capability gaps, intelligence gaps and tactics, techniques and procedures [TTP] development and implementation to mitigate effects on warfighter operations in the anticipated theater NAVWAR threat environments. JNWC assesses department wide PNT posture through the PNT Biennial assessment IAW DoDI 4650.08. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver Space Analysis and Application Development capability. The use of such programs funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605827F, 0605828F, 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605832F, 0605833F, 0605898F, 0606398F. In FY2023 $0 was expended in this program element and in FY2024 $0 is forecasted for civilian pay expenses in this program element. This program is in Budget Activity 7, Operational System Development because this budget activity includes development efforts to upgrade systems that have been fielded or have received approval for full rate production and anticipate production funding in the current or subsequent fiscal year.

Mission — JOINT NAVWAR CENTER (JNWC) SPACE ACTIVITIES

Navigation Warfare [NAVWAR] is deliberate defensive and offensive action to assure and prevent positioning, navigation, and timing [PNT] information through coordinated employment of space, cyberspace, and electronic warfare [EW] operations. Funds are used to create and maintain NAVWAR knowledge and ensure NAVWAR superiority across the DoD. IAW the most recent Unified Command Plan, USSPACECOM is responsible for [a] [U] Advocating for requirements and capabilities supporting NAVWAR operations and joint resilient PNT for the DoD, and [b] [U] Providing contingency and operations support to CCMDs for NAVWAR and joint resilient PNT planning. USSPACECOM will research, develop, test, assess and evaluate NAVWAR options IOT advocate across Services and the other CCMDs to achieve PNT overmatch. Funds are used to create and maintain NAVWAR knowledge. NAVWAR expertise is developed in part by execution of PNT Operational Field Assessments [POFAs] that assess Red and Blue PNT-related capabilities, limitations, and vulnerabilities. GYPSY POFA's are linked to Commander USSPACECOM's Joint Exercise Program [JEP] and nested within the Chairman's Exercise Program [CEP]and Combatant Commander's [CCMD] Tier 1 exercises [PACIFIC SENTRY AND AUSTERE CHALLENGE are examples] and provide operationally realistic threat-representative, PNT-contested environments for analytical assessment of air, ground, maritime, space & cyberspace mission capability. FORTUNE POFAs are PNT capability and vulnerability assessments associate with a Service exercise or mission event. PRISM POFAs encompass all other Operations, Actions, and Activities [OAAs] and other assessments to include evaluation of rapid innovative NAVWAR Capabilities and/or solutions. Assessments inform materiel and non-materiel solutions, service acquisition decisions, capability gaps, intelligence gaps and tactics, techniques and procedures [TTP] development and implementation to mitigate effects on warfighter operations in the anticipated theater NAVWAR threat environments. JNWC assesses department wide PNT posture through the PNT Biennial assessment IAW DoDI 4650.08. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605827F, 0605828F, 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605832F, 0605833F, 0605898F, 0606398F. In 2023 $0 was expended for civilian pay expenses in the program element and in FY2024 $0 is forecasted for civilian pay expenses in this program element.

Mission — Space Analysis and Application Development

The Space Analysis and Application Development program integrates space based effects into Department's ‘Model of Record' for joint campaign analysis. Current modeling and simulation [M&S] models are inadequate to represent the contribution that U.S space capabilities make to the air, sea, and land fight and do not accurately portray current and future space threats. This line of effort integrates effects of space capabilities into mission and campaign-level M&S tools. Enhanced space M&S will enable the DoD to make informed decisions regarding the direction of U.S. Space Doctrine, Tactics, Techniques, Procedures, and Resource Decisions. The DoD requires the ability to conduct campaign-level analysis to quantify the holistic operational impacts of adversary space actions on military campaigns and U.S. global operations. This program element may include necessary civilian pay expenses required to manage, execute, and deliver weapon system capability. The use of such program funds would be in addition to the civilian pay expenses budgeted in program element 0605827F, 0605828F, 0605829F, 0605831F, 0605832F, 0605833F, 0605898F, 0606398F. In FY2023 $0 was expended for civilian pay expenses in the program element and in FY2024 $0 is forecasted for civilian pay expenses in this program element.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

PNT Operational Assessments

The JNWC will investigate, operationally assess, and simulate current, emerging, and potential threats and mitigation strategies for denial of blue force PNT capabilities as well as preventing the hostile use of PNT information. Major Performers - Best value to the government selected contractors, universities, government facilities, federally funded research and development centers, laboratories, or other organizations.

Space Campaign Modeling and Simulation, Development/Modification/Verification/Validation

Developed, modifies, verifies, and validates new models for Space mission areas and modifies existing models to portray new capabilities

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air ForceFFY24 Actuals$9.75M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$0$9.75M$0$0$0
672486: JOINT NAVWAR CENTER (JNWC) SPACE ACTIVITIES$0$8.01M$0$0$0
67A011: Space Analysis and Application Development$0$1.74M$0$0$0

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Service Support to SPACECOM Activities. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.