Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

SOF Tactical Vehicles

SOCOMRDT&EPartial Reconciliation1160480BB
What it is
SOF Tactical Vehicles (1160480BB) is a SOCOM research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
+$2.19M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$8.99MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$7.03MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$9.21MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$2.19MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $8.99MFY25: $7.03MFY26: $9.21MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$8.99M
FY25$7.03M
FY26$9.21M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$3.55M$2.48M$3.21M$2.48M$1.81M$11.1M$13.7M$7.77M$10.5M$8.99M
Enacted$3.21M$3.32M$2.58M$1.85M$11.2M$14.3M$7.70M$10.7M$9.34M$7.03M
Request$3.32M$2.58M$1.85M$11.2M$9.26M$7.70M$13.6M$9.34M$9.03M$9.21M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $9.26M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reported $13.7M as actual total obligation authority — $4.47M above the request. 13.7369.263 = 4.473 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission SOF Tactical Vehicles

This Program Element provides for the development and testing of a variety of capability upgrades to Special Operations Forces (SOF) Vehicles and mission enabling equipment. Current SOF tactical vehicles are categorized into Light, Medium, Heavy, and Commercial, which include the Lightweight Tactical All-Terrain Vehicle (LTATV); Ground Mobility Vehicle (GMV 1.0 / 1.1); Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV); Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicle; Armored Ground Mobility System (AGMS); Non-Standard Commercial Vehicle (NSCV); and Special Operations-peculiar (SO-p) modifications for commercially available and service common platforms, such as the Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV), Squad Multipurpose Equipment Transport (SMET) and JLTV. The SOF mission mandates that SOF vehicles remain technologically superior, able to operate in multiple environments, meet any threat to provide a maximum degree of survivability, and build enduring advantages and campaigning to advance strategy-aligned priorities. FOSOV utilizes evolutionary acquisition, leveraging emerging technology and rapid prototyping efforts when appropriate. An evolutionary approach delivers capability in increments, recognizing, up front, the need for future capability improvements. Full and open competition with Firm-Fixed Price contracts and Other Transaction Authorities (OTAs). The total cost of the FSOV JLTV SO-p modifications (Program Number P7Z) Middle Tier of Acquisition effort is $111.735 million, including RDT&E and procurement of prototype units. The FSOV JLTV is fully funded across the Future Years Defense Program.

Mission SOF Tactical Vehicles

This project provides for the development and testing of a variety of capability upgrades to Special Operations Forces (SOF) Vehicles and mission enabling equipment. Current SOF tactical vehicles are categorized into Light, Medium, Heavy, and Commercial, which include the Lightweight Tactical All-Terrain Vehicle (LTATV); Ground Mobility Vehicle (GMV 1.0 / 1.1); Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV); Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicle; Armored Ground Mobility System (AGMS); Non-Standard Commercial Vehicle (NSCV); and Special Operations-peculiar (SO-p) modifications for commercially available and service common platforms. The SOF mission mandates that SOF vehicles remain technologically superior, operate in multiple environments, and able to meet any threat to provide a maximum degree of survivability.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Family of Special Operations Vehicles (FSOV)

Funding provides for design/engineering, test, and evaluation costs related to capability upgrades in the following areas: survivability; lethality; signature management; mobility/performance; communications; and product development. These capability upgrades and Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) are incorporated across the FSOV family of vehicles: Ground Mobility Vehicle (GMV 1.1), Program Number 803; Non-Standard Commercial Vehicle (NSCV), Program Number 804; Lightweight Tactical All-Terrain Vehicle (LTATV), Program Number Q8M; Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) Vehicle, Program Number 802; and commercially available and other service common platforms such as the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV), Program Number P7Z and Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV).

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideSOCOMFY24 Actuals$8.99M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideSOCOMFY25 Enacted$7.03M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideSOCOMFY25 Total$7.03M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideSOCOMFY26 Disc. Request$9.21M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideSOCOMFY26 Total$9.21M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$77.7M$8.99M$7.03M$9.21M$9.21M
S910: SOF Tactical Vehicles$77.7M$8.99M$7.03M$9.21M$9.21M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not SOF Tactical Vehicles — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →