Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Patriot Mods

ArmyProcurementReconciledBLI0962C50700
Watch this program

Published budget signals for this program, with links to receipts.

Updates appear after a data refresh and publication. No fixed update schedule is available.

Paste the RSS address into a feed reader. No Fiscal Receipts account is required.

RSSAtom

What it is
Patriot Mods (0962C50700) is an Army procurement line funded in the Missile Procurement, Army account.
What changed
+$585.8M FY25→26 P-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No single contractor is published as this line's leader. 6 linked award records are listed below. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. Why the crosswalk is partial.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$262.4MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Enacted
$172.0MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$757.8MP-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$585.8MP-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $262.4MFY25: $172.0MFY26: $757.8MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$262.4M
FY25$172.0M
FY26$757.8M

All series figures: P-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
5 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2022–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$287.5M$463.0M$262.4M
Enacted–$253.7M$212.2M$172.0M
Request––$212.2M$172.0M$757.8M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $212.2M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reported $262.4M as actual total obligation authority — $50.2M above the request. 262.4 − 212.2 = 50.2 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Description — Patriot Mods

This funding line is a key enabler of the Army Modernization Priorities in support of Air and Missile Defense. The PATRIOT Mods program implements critical capability, readiness and sustainability modifications to the weapon system, maintains Integrated Logistics Support, and supports materiel solutions to counter cybersecurity and electronic warfare shortcomings to all elements of the Lower Tier Battle Space. Required modifications are identified through various means to include: validated requirement documents such as the Capability Production Document (CPD), Capabilities Development Document (CDD), and the Operational Needs Statement (ONS); material changes supported by improved operational effectiveness as identified in the PATRIOT Product Improvement Program (PIP); material deficiencies identified in the field; obsolescence mitigation; emerging technologies; software improvements related to warfighter machine and crew interface requirements and communication upgrades. Modifications outlined below are critical to maintain capabilities in the field for enduring PATRIOT components, or are critical in support of the transition to an Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense (AIAMD) in convergence efforts with the Integrated Battle Command System (IBCS). FY 2026 PATRIOT Mods funding supports International Engineering Services Program (IESP); Integrated Logistics Support (ILS); System Engineering and Technical Analysis activities supporting Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) Mods; Recapitalization (RECAP); Battery Command Post/ Tactical Command System /Computer Software Module (BCP/TCS/CSM) Mod; Assured Position, Navigation, and Timing (APNT), continued unit ONS fielding support while awaiting the Army standard solution, Report Rocket Classification and Army Capabilities Manager (ACM) Priorities. 1. RAM modifications provide resolution to field failures which are identified through component analysis, field data collection, obsolescence issues and emerging technologies which are prioritized based on readiness and Operations and Support (O&S) impacts. This effort includes the engineering, acquisition, qualification testing, installation, technical support and training device upgrades associated with modification and design changes which are essential to stabilize the system at the highest readiness posture available and reduction of O&S. Kit quantity is based on expected Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) to be applied to Major End Items (MEIs). Quantities will be procured at an optimized rate utilizing price advantage created through contract negotiation, other service procurement, and/or foreign military sales into a buy-to-budget procurement strategy. 2. Recapitalization (RECAP) Modifications (1 battalion/year) include critical upgrades including but not limited to: Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV), PATRIOT-unique prime mover obsolescence mitigation, Depot Maintenance Plant Equipment (DMPE), Harmonic Generator Kits, Post Deployment Build 8.1 (PDB-8.1) and Hardware (H/W), Cryptographic Modernization Kits, Missile Segment Enhancement (MSE) Launching station upgrades; Radar Digital Sidelobe Canceller upgrade, Radar Weapons Control Interface Unit (RWCIU) obsolescence mitigation, Radar Search/Track Microwave Front Ends modernization, Radar Peripheral Electronics Assembly (PEA) box modernization, Electronic Power Plant (EPP) obsolescence mitigation, and Cooling Liquid Electron Tube (CLET) kits. These modifications are synchronized within the RECAP program. RECAP is a battalion set, resulting in a more supportable, reliable, and capable unit in the force. 3. Digital Exciter (DEX) is an obsolescence mitigation effort to the Patriot Radar's Analog Exciter (AEX). Thirty total DEX Kits will be produced to ensure the operational Patriot capability is able to be retained until full divestment by LTAMDS. 5. The Air Defense Interrogator (ADI) TPX-57 uses an Interrogator Reply Processor (IRP) card that is obsolete. To mitigate the obsolescence and to be compliant to the Position, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Reference Architecture (RA) v1.0, Patriot began the nonrecurring engineering for the integration of the AN/TPX-57A(V)1 Identify Friend or Foe (IFF) interrogator which was defined in the Patriot Assured PNT Strategy document to be the next generation upgrade for the ADI TPX. The current internal PNT card is removed and replaced by an external Next Generation Global Positioning System (GPS) solution. 7. The Battery Command Post/Tactical Command System/Computer Software Module (BCP/TCS/CSM) effort continues the development of the Capabilities Development Document (CDD) required Battle Management, Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (BMC4I) capability to maintain compatibility with tactical software enhancements, while enhancing and improving the defense design and planning capabilities for the PATRIOT warfighter. This includes systems engineering, software requirements, software design/code/test and independent validation and verification testing. This effort also provides Integrated Logistics Support, required due to the large amount of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf components, of the 62 Battery Command Posts and 17 Tactical Command Systems. Additionally, this effort supports the BCP/TCS/CSM fielding upgrades for each PATRIOT Post Deployment Build update. Note: Quantities procured and installed in prior years. 8. The Tactical Planner Workstation Augmentation Support provides for Subject Matter Expert training augmentation to assist in training the Schoolhouse trainers (Train the Trainers) with advanced concepts, capabilities and processes for training the full capabilities and uses of the Tactical Planner Workstation (TPW) software for the Schoolhouse and Deployed Units. This training is an augmentation to the NET training enabling trainers to receive advanced training for full capability of the TPW software. 9. PATRIOT's International Engineering Services Program (IESP) is a US chartered multi-national cost sharing program which allows the current 17 FMS partners to contribute toward common, non-RDTE engineering activities required to sustain PATRIOT capability. This cost share program structure is at a ratio of 2:1 FMS dollars to USD investment. Consolidated funds provide essential engineering services toward enhancing PATRIOT fleet readiness for both the United States Army and International partners. Significant cost avoidance is achieved by sharing expenses that would otherwise be fully funded by the United States to achieve the same result. 10. Logistics Recurring includes all aspects of Integrated Logistics Support (ILS) management, e.g., maintenance support, facilities, personnel, training, testing, and fielding. 11. Report Rocket Classification: The modern Air and Missile Defense environment contains a wide variety and large quantities of TBM and rocket threats. This task provides situational awareness for operators and allows for greater efficiency in management of interceptor inventories in the complex AMD environment. 25. Assured Position, Navigation and Timing (A-PNT) (Mod Item 25 of 28) - Purchases integrated Project Manager (PM) PNT M-code capable hardware for integration on Patriot Major End Items (MEI). Effort supports mandated FY 2011 National Defense Authorization Act; public law 111-383 Sec. 913. .

Justification

Justification — Patriot Mods

FY 2026 procurement dollars in the amount of $757.800 million support the modifications for Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability Modifications (RAM Mods), Recapitalization (RECAP), Battery Command Post/ Tactical Command System/ Computer Software Module (BCP/TCS/CSM), PATRIOT Radar Digital Exciter, Report Rocket Classification, Assured PNT, the Tactical Planner Workstation Augmentation, and Communications Obsolescence. FY 2026 procurement dollars will also fund the Air Defense Interrogator (ADI) TPX 57 Obsolescence, IESP, system engineering, program management, launcher hardware and logistics support. Increase from FY 2025 to FY 2026 of $588.842 million results from the addition of IAMD Mix Study funding supporting PATRIOT Readiness Requirements.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit P-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$262.4M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$172.0M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$757.8M
Missile Procurement, ArmyAFY26 Total$757.8M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$5.80B$262.4M$172.0M$757.8M$757.8M

Follow the dollar

Appropriation → program element → top high-confidence awards → recipient families → congressional districts.

Follow-the-dollar covers 312 of 1,938 programs — only high-confidence budget→award links are shown. why coverage is partial? →

The program's money traced left to right: the A appropriation, program element 0962C50700 (Patriot Mods), its 2 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.
The program's money traced left to right: the A appropriation, program element 0962C50700 (Patriot Mods), its 2 largest high-confidence awards, the 1 recipient family behind them, and the 1 congressional district the work is recorded in. Read it for concentration — how few families and districts the awards run through. Amounts inside the diagram are illustrative per-award transaction sums; the table below carries the cited per-district obligations.APPROPRIATIONPROGRAM ELEMENTTOP AWARDSRECIPIENT FAMILIESDISTRICTSAProcurement appropriation0962C50700757.8M FY26W31P4Q19C0055RAYTHEON COMPANY206.9MW15QKN16C0020RAYTHEON COMPANY2.44MRTX CorporationMA-06

The diagram illustrates the cited table below — amounts shown in the diagram are transaction sums per award (no citation chips); the per-district obligations in the table cite USAspending queries.

The diagram as text: one row per congressional district in the diagram, the recipient families shown there, and that district's cited program obligations.
DistrictProgram obligations
MA-06$207.7M

Related awards

Award linkage is shown for 32 of 200 profiled companies — high- and medium-confidence USAspending matches, each row labeled; medium is the weaker evidence. why partial award coverage? →

Rows marked medium rest on evidence weaker than a program-level match, and of more than one kind. An account-based row, where the award drew from the same appropriation account as this program, is an association, not evidence that this program paid for the contract. Where the evidence is instead an FPDS acquisition-program tag or a subaward description, the program is established but which of its budget lines paid is not. An announcement link a recorded review did not leave standing is medium too. Only high rows rest on the contract naming this program with a recorded review upholding it and no recorded rejection or refutation applying.

RecipientPIIDConfidence
RAYTHEON COMPANYW15QKN16C0020high
RAYTHEON COMPANYW31P4Q19C0055high
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONW31P4Q09C0002medium
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONW31P4Q10C0002medium
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONW31P4Q12C0100medium
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONW31P4Q14C0022medium

Contractor concentration

No concentration index is published for this line. This line's high-confidence links do not clear the floor for a published concentration index — at least 3 awards across 2 contractor families holding positive obligations, with positive net linked dollars. An index below that floor is a fact about the sample, not about the market. Whatever further links this line carries are medium-confidence, and what each medium evidence path does and does not establish is set out in the methodology. Both bases are in the downloadable warehouse.

Lobbying mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Patriot Mods. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.