Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0901226F/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Air Force Studies and Analysis Agency
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $875.0K
- FY25
- $9.94M
- FY26
- $14.8M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $1.35M | $1.06M | $1.42M | $1.51M | $1.36M | $1.39M | $1.15M | $1.20M | $866.0K | $875.0K | ||
| Enacted | $1.10M | $1.52M | $1.56M | $1.42M | $1.44M | $1.20M | $1.25M | $899.0K | $5.31M | $9.94M | ||
| Request | $1.52M | $1.56M | $1.42M | $1.44M | $1.20M | $1.25M | $899.0K | $5.31M | $18.9M | $14.8M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2024 book requested $5.31M for FY2024; the PB2026 book reports $875.0K actually spent — $4.43M below the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — M & S DEVELOPMENT
The Office of Studies and Analysis (SAF/SA) leads strategic assessments of USAF and USSF contributions to Joint-all domain warfighting capabilities regarding current/future force structure, operational lethality, risk/issues and combat agility in military scenarios. The Secretary of the Air Force, Chief of Staff of the Air Force and Chief of Space Operations utilize these analytical assessments to inform Strategy, Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution decisions regarding modernization, development, and procurement quantities of DAF weapon platforms to ultimately provide effective and affordable warfighting capabilities aligned with the National Defense Strategy. From nuclear modernization, autonomous collaborative combat aircraft, integrated missile/homeland/base defense, long range Joint kill-chains, SAF/SA provides a wide breadth of analytical insights enabling US decision overmatch through effective and affordable enterprise modeling, simulation and analysis (MS&A) capabilities. SAF/SA utilizes RDT&E funding to modernize and develop MS&A capabilities not just for SAF/SA use, but also as enterprise products used by the DoD, Joint Force, Intelligence Community, industry, academia, and Coalition Partners. This program is in Budget Activity 7, Operational System Development because this budget activity includes development efforts to upgrade systems that have been fielded or have received approval for full rate production and anticipate production funding in the current or subsequent fiscal year.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (5)
Synthetic Theater Operations Research Model (STORM)
The DoD's analytic tool of choice for campaign level, constructive MS&A assessments of highly-contested military scenarios to understand strategic impacts of modernization and development of new military capabilities, science and technology investment tradeoffs, concepts of operations, and procurement quantities providing analytically driven insights on DoD military lethality and agility, Future Force Design, Airbase Defense, Missile Defense, Space Force structure, nuclear modernization, agile combat support, etc informing essentially every major DAF weapon platform modernization/development investment decision made by the SecAF, CSO and CSAF. STORM is also used by industry and coalition partners (South Korea, Türkiye, United Kingdom, Taiwan). SAF/SA executes STORM development activities and capabilities identified and prioritized by an OSD led Joint governance structure.
Analytical Framework for Simulation Integration and Modeling (AFSIM)
Delivers a government-owned simulation framework to conduct medium-fidelity / operational level live-virtual-constructive modeling, simulation, and analytic assessments of warfighting capabilities, strategies, concepts of operation, tactics, emerging technologies, and human system interfaces in the context of multi-domain military conflicts. AFSIM is the operational simulation tool of choice of 40,000 users/400 organization across the DoD, Intelligence Community, Joint, academic, industry and coalition partners (United Kingdom, Australia, Japan) informing development/modernization investment decisions on nearly every major USAF and USSF weapon system (Sentinel, B-21, F-35, F-22, Next-Generation Air Dominance, Collaborative Combat Aircraft, Low-Cost Cruise Missile, etc).
Airfield Damage-Assessment and Resiliency Model (AD-ARM)
A prototype simulation tool developed to tactically assess agile combat support concepts in a highly-contested threat environment for analytics directly informed/informing 2024 OSD Protraction Strategic Portfolio Review, Future Force Design and Agile Combat Employment Concept of Operations efforts. Analytical insights to airbase combat sortie production are provided through multiple factors including runway/taxiway/parking area damage-repair capacity, aircraft ground attrition, fuel availability and transport, and airbase defense tradeoffs.
Joint Modeling, Simulation and Analytics Gateway
An enterprise digital platform providing common, reusable and interoperable enterprise funded modeling, simulation and analysis (MS&A) software tools, data and High Performance Computer resources for 40,000 DoD, Intelligence Community, academic, industry and coalition partner users collectively conducting operations, acquisition, test, training, and other functions at all classification levels. Funding builds upon FY24 prototype through enhancements and integration with other existing platforms into a larger Joint MS&A solution for effective and affordable information sharing. Development priorities are identified and prioritized by a Joint governance structure.
Next-Generation Campaign Modeling Tool Suite Development
The Synthetic Theater Operations Research Model (STORM) has served as the campaign-level tool of choice for the Joint community informing service-level investment and COCOM operational planning decisions for over 20 years, but its software architecture is increasingly challenging to effectively model space, cyber, and electromagnetic spectrum domains in current/future Joint force operations. OSD designated SAF/SA as the Joint Service Lead to develop a next-generation campaign tool and infrastructure for OSD-wide model software development analytical assessments. A STORM replacement capability is required to deliver analytical overmatch in National Security Strategy, aligned to Golden Dome, future force designs, Long-Range Kill Chain, Homeland Defense, Space Orbital Warfare, and war-winning operational planning.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY24 Actuals | $875.0K |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Enacted | $9.94M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY25 Total | $9.94M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Disc. Request | $14.8M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Air Force | F | FY26 Total | $14.8M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 676009: M & S DEVELOPMENT | $0 | $875.0K | $9.94M | $14.8M | $14.8M |
| Program Element | $0 | $875.0K | $9.94M | $14.8M | $14.8M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →