Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Management, Technical & International Support

DTRARDT&EPartial Reconciliation0606853BR
What it is
Management, Technical & International Support (0606853BR) is a DTRA research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
+$4.80M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$11.6MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$10.0MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$14.8MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$4.80MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $11.6MFY25: $10.0MFY26: $14.8MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$11.6M
FY25$10.0M
FY26$14.8M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
6 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2021–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
6 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2021–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$0$10.0M$11.6M
Enacted$0$10.3M$11.9M$10.0M
Request$12.4M$11.9M$12.1M$14.8M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $12.4M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $10.0M as actual total obligation authority — $2.31M below the request. 10.0412.35 = -2.31 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT

The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), as the DoD Center of Excellence for Mission Assurance Assessments, has been tasked by Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Defense Continuity and Mission Assurance with leading change within the MA community on behalf of Office of the Under Secretary of Defense to ensure best practices are documented during the Joint Mission Assurance Assessments (JMAA), Balanced Survivability Assessments (BSA), and Red Team Assessments. Including but not limited to dependency analysis, asymmetric threats, cyber operations, general engineering, security operations, and emergency management. In partnership with the Critical Infrastructure Defense Analysis Center (CIDAC) and the U.S. Department of the Navy's Defense Critical Infrastructure - Mission Assurance program, DTRA’s Mission Assurance program will perform mission analysis; engineering and commercial infrastructure network interdependency analysis; MA assessments; information enterprise design, implementation, and support; and defense industrial base supply chain network and related analysis. Efforts provide broad leadership, best practices, research, development, coordination, support to DoD Components around specific focus areas to drive solution-oriented efficiencies, collaboration, and results that benefit the entire DoD MA enterprise.

Mission DEFENSE CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE - MISSION ASSURANCE

This project supports the development of a series of advanced analytic efforts to more effectively identify risks and threats to Surge-Layer Defense and, more broadly, DoD’s Mission Assurance (MA) as identified in the current Interim National Defense Strategic Guidance (INDSG). The Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) as the DoD Center of Excellence for Mission Assurance Assessments has been tasked by Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Defense Continuity and Mission Assurance with leading change within the MA community on behalf of OSD to ensure best practices are documented during Joint Mission Assurance Assessments, Balanced Survivability Assessments, and Red Team Assessments. Including but not limited to dependency analysis, asymmetric threats, cyber operations, general engineering, security operations, and emergency management. In partnership with the Critical Infrastructure Defense Analysis Center (CIDAC) and the U.S. Department of the Navy's Defense Critical Infrastructure - Mission Assurance program, DTRA’s Mission Assurance program will perform mission analyses; engineering, and commercial infrastructure network interdependency analyses; MA assessments; information enterprise design, implementation, and support; and defense industrial base supply chain network and related analysis. Efforts provide broad leadership, best practices, research, development, coordination, and support to DoD Components around specific focus areas to drive solution-oriented efficiencies, collaboration, and results that benefit the entire DoD MA enterprise.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

MN - Defense Critical Infrastructure - Mission Assurance

This program establishes an integrated and comprehensive approach to deliver vastly improved threat data and operational support to the DoD mission assurance enterprise.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDTRAFY24 Actuals$11.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDTRAFY25 Enacted$10.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDTRAFY25 Total$10.0M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDTRAFY26 Disc. Request$14.8M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideDTRAFY26 Total$14.8M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$10.0M$11.6M$10.0M$14.8M$14.8M
MN: DEFENSE CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE - MISSION ASSURANCE$10.0M$11.6M$10.0M$14.8M$14.8M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Management, Technical & International Support — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →