Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Warfare Innovation Management

NRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0606355N
What it is
Warfare Innovation Management — a research & development program run by Navy.
What changed
-$13.1M FY25→26
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$36.5M
FY25 Total
$50.7M
FY26 Request
$37.6M
FY25→26 Change
-$13.1M

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
FY24: $36.5MFY25: $50.7MFY26: $37.6MFY24FY25FY26
FY24
$36.5M
FY25
$50.7M
FY26
$37.6M
Decade view — each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY26

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$0$0$14.8M$27.8M$40.7M$27.7M$32.0M$38.1M$41.4M$36.5M
Enacted$0$21.1M$28.8M$41.9M$28.8M$33.1M$39.0M$52.1M$37.3M$50.7M
Request$21.1M$28.8M$41.9M$28.8M$37.0M$39.0M$52.1M$37.3M$50.7M$37.6M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $52.1M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reports $41.4M actually spent — $10.6M below the request.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Warfare Innovation Management

Allied/Coalition Maritime Environment (ACME) 0798: This project promotes interoperability with allied and coalition forces by facilitating maritime interoperability in both processes and communication systems, including emerging capabilities, to counter growing high-end asymmetric threats. Space & Electronic Warfare (SEW) Engineering 2144: This project is a systems engineering non-acquisition program to develop, test, implement Technical Authority (TA) products, and validate Naval Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR), Business Information Technology (IT), and Space System architectures to support naval, joint and coalition missions across normal, contested, and degraded cyber/operational environments. The objective of this project is performed through multiple tasks that ensure development and delivery of Naval Information Warfare (IW) capabilities that are well integrated, interoperable, secure, and resilient to meet validated warfighting requirements. NAVWAR leads SECNAV guidance under Cybersecurity Technical Authority (CSTA) to define and employ a uniform objective recursive approach employing Cyber Ready strategy shifting away from a compliance only methodology. Efforts will automate program engineering reviews and speed IW capability certification and authorization to overmatch our adversaries in a Cyber contested environment. Fleet Experimentation 3319: The U.S. Navy's Fleet Experimentation (FLEX) project advances operational and tactical warfighter capabilities through the experimentation of high payoff initiatives, technologies and concepts, Fleet Concepts of Operations (CONOPS), doctrine, and new tactics, techniques and procedures (TTP). The primary focus of FLEX between 2026 and 2030 is to address priority warfighting gaps identified by the four-star Fleet Commanders through the execution of experimentation events focused on materiel/non-materiel capabilities. Trident Warrior Project 3320: The U.S. Navy's Trident Warrior (TW) experimentation campaign enables early delivery of capabilities to the warfighter via Fleet-directed Trident Warrior operational events with an emphasis on United States Fleet Forces/Commander Pacific Fleet (USFF/CPF) directed focus areas.

Mission TRIDENT Warrior

U.S. Navy's Trident Warrior (TW) experiment campaign enables early delivery of Information Warfare (IW) capabilities to the warfighter via Fleet-directed TW operational events. It integrates stand-alone systems and efforts to achieve enhanced capabilities and demonstrates these capabilities in operational environments. This places innovative technologies into the hands of the warfighter to evaluate their effectiveness. Additionally, it develops supporting doctrine and Concepts of Operation to improve warfighting effectiveness. Coordinates IW efforts with other Service/Joint/Department of Defense/National efforts to ensure Joint/Interagency/ Allied/Coalition applicability and interoperability.

Mission Fleet Experimentation

Mission: The Fleet Experimentation (FLEX) program seeks out and examines potential materiel and non-materiel solutions (initiatives) to the Fleet's highest priority warfighting gaps and generates data-driven findings and actionable recommendations to resolve or mitigate those gaps. As part of a multi-year campaign, 10 to 15 major analytic experimentation activities take place annually that include workshops, war-games, and with a focus on live force, operationally oriented at-sea events. The FLEX Program is owned by Commander U.S. Fleet Forces Command (CUSFFC), Commander U.S. Pacific Fleet (CPF), and Commander U.S. Naval Forces Europe - Africa (CNE-AF). The three four-star Fleet Commanders identify the Fleet priorities and warfighting gaps for FLEX to address, and Navy Warfare Development Center (NWDC), as the Executive Agent (EA), designs, plans, executes, analyzes, and reports on the FLEX initiatives. Commanders' FLEX guidance is linked to the January 2024 Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Navigation Plan (NAVPLAN) direction to continue refinement of concepts and capabilities through experimentation. FLEX priorities are also aligned to the Warfighting Integration NAVPLAN Implementation Framework (WIN NIF) Operating Review for the CNO that identifies the North Star, supporting pillars, and approach. FLEX initiatives are tied to CNO-approved Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO) and Joint Warfighting Concept (JWC) concept capability requirements, Fleet warfighting gaps, and Key Operational Problems (KOP). FLEX aligns with National Defense Strategy priorities, lines of effort 1 (lethality) and 3 (reform), and numerous other strategic guidance documents highlighting the need to increase organizational learning and capability development in experimentation, wargames, and exercises. USFFC N8/N9-manages the FLEX investment -- $12.585M (FY26) to support planning, execution, analysis, and reporting for analytically rigorous experiments leveraging Limited Objective Experiments (LOE) and scheduled fleet exercises.

Mission Space & Elec Warfare Engineering

To support Navy objectives in advancing Information Warfare (IW) capabilities, the Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Engineering project primary functions are: Develop the architectures, specifications and standards, tools, and processes to support a single integrated Navy Cybersecurity plan. Develop cybersecurity engineering criteria within Navy specific guidance to drive common and consistent implementation of security controls within a threat informed mission impact approach across current and future Navy Programs of Record/projects. This eliminates redundancies and inefficiencies characteristic of previous stove-pipe development efforts in which each system addressed security individually. These efforts enable a standardized approach to improve the Navy's cyber resiliency to Cyber Adversary's weaponization of IT/OT susceptibility to attack. Provide the cybersecurity vulnerability and functional test standards, which supports cybersecurity test requirements and the Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence (C4I) components of Naval Information Warfare Systems Command (NAVWARSYSCOM) Information Warfare (IW) Kill Chain Testing for SYSCOM Red Team. NAVWAR develops and deploys innovative Naval approach for rapid delivery of software applications with emphasis on security & automation via Certified Continuous Integration (CI) / Continuous Delivery (CD) pipeline tools based upon NAVWAR designed SECDEVOPS services under SECNAV Rapid Assess & Incorporate Software Engineering (RAISE). This combination of Systems Commands functions, services and tools ensures Navy platforms in operational maritime environments can effectively defend and "fight through" cyber adversary attacks under a framework of mission thread analysis and assessment. NAVWAR establishes an integrated Enterprise Architecture to support design, development and delivery of integrated Navy Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR), Business Information Technology (IT), and Space System capabilities. This architecture reflects current (as-is) and future (target) end states to support technical analyses, program planning, and enterprise-level investment decisions across IW capabilities on both ashore and afloat platforms. Provides engineering tools and processes to drive rigorous systems engineering discipline across the acquisition lifecycle to support rapid development and delivery of secure and interoperable C4ISR, Business IT, and Space Systems capabilities that meet Fleet requirements. Conduct Systems Engineering Technical Reviews (SETRs) to provide independent, objective assessments and certifications of technical maturity and compliance with applicable architectures, specifications and standards across IW capabilities.

Mission Allied/Coalition Maritime Environment (ACME)

The ACME program advances Information Warfare (IW) to include Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR); Electronic Warfare (EW); and Cyber Warfare, interoperability with Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, United States (AUSCANNZUKUS), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and other Allied and Coalition partners. The program determines maritime operational gaps with our allies, identifies Doctrine, Organization, Training, Material, Leadership, Personnel, and Facilities (DOTMLPF) solutions with the potential to fill those gaps, and assesses these solutions and associated concepts of operation in laboratory and at-sea environments. The ACME program includes integration and testing in support of Allied and Coalition warfighting capabilities, including interoperability testing of IW equipment. Allied and Coalition interoperability is critical for future maritime operations, especially as the United States Navy cooperatively works towards a federated environment leveraging initiatives such as Federated Mission Networking (FMN), Secret and Below Releasable Environment (SABRE), and Combatant Command solutions such as Indo-Pacific Command Mission Network and Cooperative Partner Environment. Currently, connectivity with AUSCANNZUKUS and other Allied/Coalition forces is focused on traditional paths, requiring extensive backhaul through ashore infrastructure. Higher bandwidth solutions suitable for use over tactical networks require development and assessment for emerging coalition and joint interoperability requirements, such as Network Operations Without Shore (NOWS), Denied, Degraded, Intermittent and Low-bandwidth (DDIL) operations, and to counter Anti-Access Area Denial (A2/AD) threats. Increases in data throughput are required for the effective exchange of rich IW data sets and services via Service Oriented Architectures (SOA) within the limitations of High Frequency (HF), Ultra-High Frequency (UHF), and other portions of the radio frequency spectrum, coupled with appropriate Information Assurance and Computer Network Defense (IA/CND) mechanisms. Development and assessment of potential solutions will integrate improved IP capabilities with the Advanced Digital Network Systems (ADNS) and existing international standards (e.g. Allied Communications Publication 200, NATO Standardization Agreements 5066 and 4691). The continued development and refinement of advanced tactical networking technologies and protocols, to include Low Probability of Intercept (LPI), Low Probability of Detection (LPD), and Anti-Jam (AJ) capabilities as well as Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) standards, will provide for a significant improvement in secure data sharing within, and between, coalition maritime elements. Coalition Warrior Interoperability eXperiment (CWIX) has been integrated within the ACME program. CWIX efforts are focused on assessing federated Coalition capabilities within the NATO command construct via connected Live, Virtual, Constructive (LVC) capabilities resident in the Combined Federated Battle Laboratories Network (CFBLNet). CWIX also resources engineering activities in cooperation with PEO C4I to integrate USN Expeditionary Mission Partner Environment with US Air Force (USAF) Mission Partner Capabilities Office (MPCO) Enterprise Mission Partner Environment efforts. Additionally, CWIX resourcing enables assessment of NATO Federated Mission Networking Spiral Specifications as they relate to USN Programs of Record via the Coalition Interoperability Assurance and Validation (CIAV) construct in conjunction with Joint Staff J6. Australia, UK, US (AUKUS) Electronic Warfare (EW) efforts have been integrated starting in FY24. Specific efforts focus on: Threat Assessment, Blue Force Data Analysis, Tactical Data Movement, Effects optimization, and Scenario development in Synthetic Environments.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Fleet Experimentation (FLEX)

$12.8M in FY26 will fund experimentation planning, execution, analysis, and reporting to examine initiatives to implement Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO) and other Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) approved foundational warfighting concepts. Through experimentation, materiel and non-materiel solutions to concept required capabilities are examined and refined, and post-experiment recommendations support non-materiel solution implementation (e.g., TTP promulgation) and capability development, investment, and transition decisions. FLEX is a proven and efficient approach to improving warfighting effectiveness. FLEX deliverables are focused on operational and tactical warfighting capabilities in the near term (within the Future Years Defense Plan) and prioritized by Commanders' FLEX Guidance to enhance warfighting capability across priority warfare areas. FLEX initiatives support the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO)-directed Fleet Battle Problems (FBP) and the Large-Scale Exercise (LSE) series as identified in the DMO concept and the CNO Navigation Plan (NAVPLAN) signed in January 2024.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY24 Actuals$36.5M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Enacted$50.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY25 Total$50.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Disc. Request$37.6M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, NavyNFY26 Total$37.6M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
2144: Space & Elec Warfare Engineering$0$14.9M$28.7M$25.0M$25.0M
Program Element$0$36.5M$50.7M$37.6M$37.6M
0798: Allied/Coalition Maritime Environment (ACME)$0$7.20M$7.19M$0$0
3320: TRIDENT Warrior$0$2.44M$2.43M$0$0
3319: Fleet Experimentation$0$11.9M$12.3M$12.6M$12.6M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →