Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0606355N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Warfare Innovation Management
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $36.5M |
| FY25 | $50.7M |
| FY26 | $37.6M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $0 | $0 | $14.8M | $27.8M | $40.7M | $27.7M | $32.0M | $38.1M | $41.4M | $36.5M | ||
| Enacted | $0 | $21.1M | $28.8M | $41.9M | $28.8M | $33.1M | $39.0M | $52.1M | $37.3M | $50.7M | ||
| Request | $21.1M | $28.8M | $41.9M | $28.8M | $37.0M | $39.0M | $52.1M | $37.3M | $50.7M | $37.6M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $52.1M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $41.4M as actual total obligation authority — $10.6M below the request. 41.42 − 52.06 = -10.64 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Warfare Innovation Management
Allied/Coalition Maritime Environment (ACME) 0798: This project promotes interoperability with allied and coalition forces by facilitating maritime interoperability in both processes and communication systems, including emerging capabilities, to counter growing high-end asymmetric threats. Space & Electronic Warfare (SEW) Engineering 2144: This project is a systems engineering non-acquisition program to develop, test, implement Technical Authority (TA) products, and validate Naval Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR), Business Information Technology (IT), and Space System architectures to support naval, joint and coalition missions across normal, contested, and degraded cyber/operational environments. The objective of this project is performed through multiple tasks that ensure development and delivery of Naval Information Warfare (IW) capabilities that are well integrated, interoperable, secure, and resilient to meet validated warfighting requirements. NAVWAR leads SECNAV guidance under Cybersecurity Technical Authority (CSTA) to define and employ a uniform objective recursive approach employing Cyber Ready strategy shifting away from a compliance only methodology. Efforts will automate program engineering reviews and speed IW capability certification and authorization to overmatch our adversaries in a Cyber contested environment. Fleet Experimentation 3319: The U.S. Navy's Fleet Experimentation (FLEX) project advances operational and tactical warfighter capabilities through the experimentation of high payoff initiatives, technologies and concepts, Fleet Concepts of Operations (CONOPS), doctrine, and new tactics, techniques and procedures (TTP). The primary focus of FLEX between 2026 and 2030 is to address priority warfighting gaps identified by the four-star Fleet Commanders through the execution of experimentation events focused on materiel/non-materiel capabilities. Trident Warrior Project 3320: The U.S. Navy's Trident Warrior (TW) experimentation campaign enables early delivery of capabilities to the warfighter via Fleet-directed Trident Warrior operational events with an emphasis on United States Fleet Forces/Commander Pacific Fleet (USFF/CPF) directed focus areas.
Mission — Allied/Coalition Maritime Environment (ACME)
The ACME program advances Information Warfare (IW) to include Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR); Electronic Warfare (EW); and Cyber Warfare, interoperability with Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, United States (AUSCANNZUKUS), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and other Allied and Coalition partners. The program determines maritime operational gaps with our allies, identifies Doctrine, Organization, Training, Material, Leadership, Personnel, and Facilities (DOTMLPF) solutions with the potential to fill those gaps, and assesses these solutions and associated concepts of operation in laboratory and at-sea environments. The ACME program includes integration and testing in support of Allied and Coalition warfighting capabilities, including interoperability testing of IW equipment. Allied and Coalition interoperability is critical for future maritime operations, especially as the United States Navy cooperatively works towards a federated environment leveraging initiatives such as Federated Mission Networking (FMN), Secret and Below Releasable Environment (SABRE), and Combatant Command solutions such as Indo-Pacific Command Mission Network and Cooperative Partner Environment. Currently, connectivity with AUSCANNZUKUS and other Allied/Coalition forces is focused on traditional paths, requiring extensive backhaul through ashore infrastructure. Higher bandwidth solutions suitable for use over tactical networks require development and assessment for emerging coalition and joint interoperability requirements, such as Network Operations Without Shore (NOWS), Denied, Degraded, Intermittent and Low-bandwidth (DDIL) operations, and to counter Anti-Access Area Denial (A2/AD) threats. Increases in data throughput are required for the effective exchange of rich IW data sets and services via Service Oriented Architectures (SOA) within the limitations of High Frequency (HF), Ultra-High Frequency (UHF), and other portions of the radio frequency spectrum, coupled with appropriate Information Assurance and Computer Network Defense (IA/CND) mechanisms. Development and assessment of potential solutions will integrate improved IP capabilities with the Advanced Digital Network Systems (ADNS) and existing international standards (e.g. Allied Communications Publication 200, NATO Standardization Agreements 5066 and 4691). The continued development and refinement of advanced tactical networking technologies and protocols, to include Low Probability of Intercept (LPI), Low Probability of Detection (LPD), and Anti-Jam (AJ) capabilities as well as Automatic Link Establishment (ALE) standards, will provide for a significant improvement in secure data sharing within, and between, coalition maritime elements. Coalition Warrior Interoperability eXperiment (CWIX) has been integrated within the ACME program. CWIX efforts are focused on assessing federated Coalition capabilities within the NATO command construct via connected Live, Virtual, Constructive (LVC) capabilities resident in the Combined Federated Battle Laboratories Network (CFBLNet). CWIX also resources engineering activities in cooperation with PEO C4I to integrate USN Expeditionary Mission Partner Environment with US Air Force (USAF) Mission Partner Capabilities Office (MPCO) Enterprise Mission Partner Environment efforts. Additionally, CWIX resourcing enables assessment of NATO Federated Mission Networking Spiral Specifications as they relate to USN Programs of Record via the Coalition Interoperability Assurance and Validation (CIAV) construct in conjunction with Joint Staff J6. Australia, UK, US (AUKUS) Electronic Warfare (EW) efforts have been integrated starting in FY24. Specific efforts focus on: Threat Assessment, Blue Force Data Analysis, Tactical Data Movement, Effects optimization, and Scenario development in Synthetic Environments.
Mission — Space & Elec Warfare Engineering
To support Navy objectives in advancing Information Warfare (IW) capabilities, the Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) Engineering project primary functions are: Develop the architectures, specifications and standards, tools, and processes to support a single integrated Navy Cybersecurity plan. Develop cybersecurity engineering criteria within Navy specific guidance to drive common and consistent implementation of security controls within a threat informed mission impact approach across current and future Navy Programs of Record/projects. This eliminates redundancies and inefficiencies characteristic of previous stove-pipe development efforts in which each system addressed security individually. These efforts enable a standardized approach to improve the Navy's cyber resiliency to Cyber Adversary's weaponization of IT/OT susceptibility to attack. Provide the cybersecurity vulnerability and functional test standards, which supports cybersecurity test requirements and the Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence (C4I) components of Naval Information Warfare Systems Command (NAVWARSYSCOM) Information Warfare (IW) Kill Chain Testing for SYSCOM Red Team. NAVWAR develops and deploys innovative Naval approach for rapid delivery of software applications with emphasis on security & automation via Certified Continuous Integration (CI) / Continuous Delivery (CD) pipeline tools based upon NAVWAR designed SECDEVOPS services under SECNAV Rapid Assess & Incorporate Software Engineering (RAISE). This combination of Systems Commands functions, services and tools ensures Navy platforms in operational maritime environments can effectively defend and "fight through" cyber adversary attacks under a framework of mission thread analysis and assessment. NAVWAR establishes an integrated Enterprise Architecture to support design, development and delivery of integrated Navy Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR), Business Information Technology (IT), and Space System capabilities. This architecture reflects current (as-is) and future (target) end states to support technical analyses, program planning, and enterprise-level investment decisions across IW capabilities on both ashore and afloat platforms. Provides engineering tools and processes to drive rigorous systems engineering discipline across the acquisition lifecycle to support rapid development and delivery of secure and interoperable C4ISR, Business IT, and Space Systems capabilities that meet Fleet requirements. Conduct Systems Engineering Technical Reviews (SETRs) to provide independent, objective assessments and certifications of technical maturity and compliance with applicable architectures, specifications and standards across IW capabilities.
Mission — Fleet Experimentation
Mission: The Fleet Experimentation (FLEX) program seeks out and examines potential materiel and non-materiel solutions (initiatives) to the Fleet's highest priority warfighting gaps and generates data-driven findings and actionable recommendations to resolve or mitigate those gaps. As part of a multi-year campaign, 10 to 15 major analytic experimentation activities take place annually that include workshops, war-games, and with a focus on live force, operationally oriented at-sea events. The FLEX Program is owned by Commander U.S. Fleet Forces Command (CUSFFC), Commander U.S. Pacific Fleet (CPF), and Commander U.S. Naval Forces Europe - Africa (CNE-AF). The three four-star Fleet Commanders identify the Fleet priorities and warfighting gaps for FLEX to address, and Navy Warfare Development Center (NWDC), as the Executive Agent (EA), designs, plans, executes, analyzes, and reports on the FLEX initiatives. Commanders' FLEX guidance is linked to the January 2024 Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Navigation Plan (NAVPLAN) direction to continue refinement of concepts and capabilities through experimentation. FLEX priorities are also aligned to the Warfighting Integration NAVPLAN Implementation Framework (WIN NIF) Operating Review for the CNO that identifies the North Star, supporting pillars, and approach. FLEX initiatives are tied to CNO-approved Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO) and Joint Warfighting Concept (JWC) concept capability requirements, Fleet warfighting gaps, and Key Operational Problems (KOP). FLEX aligns with National Defense Strategy priorities, lines of effort 1 (lethality) and 3 (reform), and numerous other strategic guidance documents highlighting the need to increase organizational learning and capability development in experimentation, wargames, and exercises. USFFC N8/N9-manages the FLEX investment -- $12.585M (FY26) to support planning, execution, analysis, and reporting for analytically rigorous experiments leveraging Limited Objective Experiments (LOE) and scheduled fleet exercises.
Mission — TRIDENT Warrior
U.S. Navy's Trident Warrior (TW) experiment campaign enables early delivery of Information Warfare (IW) capabilities to the warfighter via Fleet-directed TW operational events. It integrates stand-alone systems and efforts to achieve enhanced capabilities and demonstrates these capabilities in operational environments. This places innovative technologies into the hands of the warfighter to evaluate their effectiveness. Additionally, it develops supporting doctrine and Concepts of Operation to improve warfighting effectiveness. Coordinates IW efforts with other Service/Joint/Department of Defense/National efforts to ensure Joint/Interagency/ Allied/Coalition applicability and interoperability.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
Fleet Experimentation (FLEX)
$12.8M in FY26 will fund experimentation planning, execution, analysis, and reporting to examine initiatives to implement Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO) and other Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) approved foundational warfighting concepts. Through experimentation, materiel and non-materiel solutions to concept required capabilities are examined and refined, and post-experiment recommendations support non-materiel solution implementation (e.g., TTP promulgation) and capability development, investment, and transition decisions. FLEX is a proven and efficient approach to improving warfighting effectiveness. FLEX deliverables are focused on operational and tactical warfighting capabilities in the near term (within the Future Years Defense Plan) and prioritized by Commanders' FLEX Guidance to enhance warfighting capability across priority warfare areas. FLEX initiatives support the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO)-directed Fleet Battle Problems (FBP) and the Large-Scale Exercise (LSE) series as identified in the DMO concept and the CNO Navigation Plan (NAVPLAN) signed in January 2024.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $36.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $50.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $50.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $37.6M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $37.6M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $0 | $36.5M | $50.7M | $37.6M | $37.6M |
| 0798: Allied/Coalition Maritime Environment (ACME) | $0 | $7.20M | $7.19M | $0 | $0 |
| 2144: Space & Elec Warfare Engineering | $0 | $14.9M | $28.7M | $25.0M | $25.0M |
| 3319: Fleet Experimentation | $0 | $11.9M | $12.3M | $12.6M | $12.6M |
| 3320: TRIDENT Warrior | $0 | $2.44M | $2.43M | $0 | $0 |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Warfare Innovation Management. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J444
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J392
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J424
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J438
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J448
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J457
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J430
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J421
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J417
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J426
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil