Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0606225D8Z/ — data as of August 12, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
ODNA Technology and Resource Analysis
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $3.39M |
| FY25 | $2.90M |
| FY26 | $3.46M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $3.50M | $0 | $998.0K | $1.03M | $3.19M | $3.20M | $4.90M | $3.26M | $3.39M | ||
| Enacted | – | $1.00M | $1.00M | $1.03M | $3.19M | $3.20M | $4.90M | $3.32M | $3.39M | $2.90M | |
| Request | – | $1.00M | $1.03M | $3.19M | $3.20M | $2.90M | $3.32M | $3.39M | $3.40M | $3.46M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2022 book requested $2.90M for FY2022; the PB2024 book reported $4.90M as actual total obligation authority — $2.00M above the request. 4.9 − 2.9 = 2.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — ODNA Technology & Resource Analysis
The Office of Net Assessment provides the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, and other senior DoD leaders with independent, rigorous, and long-term analytical assessments of fundamental security issues. This includes, but is not limited to, identifying and analyzing emerging threats, technologies, and geopolitical trends that could significantly impact U.S. national security interests, and developing analyses that examine the standing trends and future prospects of U.S. and other military capabilities and military potential. The net assessments address near and long-term problems and opportunities for the U.S. military forces to help counter technological advantages of potential U.S. adversaries. These efforts will pursue research to analyze the future security environment. This request directly supports the interim National Defense Strategy (NDS) and the Department's initiatives to Defend the Homeland, Deter Aggression and Prevail in Conflict, Build Enduring Advantage and and critically aligns with the Department's priorities of accelerating warfighting capabilities, strengthening alliances, fostering a culture of innovation and accountability.
Mission — Technology and Resource Analysis
The Office of Net Assessment develops and coordinates analyses that examine the standing trends and future prospects of U.S. and other military capabilities and military potential. The net assessments address near and long-term problems and opportunities for the U.S. military forces to help counter technological advantages of potential U.S. adversaries. These efforts will pursue research to analyze the future security environment.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
Technology and Resource Analysis
The Office of Net Assessment develops and coordinates analyses that examine the standing trends and future prospect of U.S. and other military capabilities and military potential. The net assessments address near and long-term problems and opportunities for the U.S. military forces to help counter technological advantages of potential U.S. adversaries. These efforts will pursue research to analyze the future security environment.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY24 Actuals | $3.39M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Enacted | $2.90M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY25 Total | $2.90M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Disc. Request | $3.46M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Total | $3.46M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $20.1M | $3.39M | $2.90M | $3.46M | $3.46M |
| 106: Technology and Resource Analysis | $20.1M | $3.39M | $2.90M | $3.46M | $3.46M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not ODNA Technology and Resource Analysis — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →