Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

ODNA Technology and Resource Analysis

OSDRDT&EPartial Reconciliation0606225D8Z
What it is
ODNA Technology and Resource Analysis (0606225D8Z) is an OSD research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
+$558.0K FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$3.39MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$2.90MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$3.46MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
+$558.0KR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends higher than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $3.39MFY25: $2.90MFY26: $3.46MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$3.39M
FY25$2.90M
FY26$3.46M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2016–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
11 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2016–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line falls across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY16FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$3.50M$0$998.0K$1.03M$3.19M$3.20M$4.90M$3.26M$3.39M
Enacted$1.00M$1.00M$1.03M$3.19M$3.20M$4.90M$3.32M$3.39M$2.90M
Request$1.00M$1.03M$3.19M$3.20M$2.90M$3.32M$3.39M$3.40M$3.46M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2022 book requested $2.90M for FY2022; the PB2024 book reported $4.90M as actual total obligation authority — $2.00M above the request. 4.92.9 = 2.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission ODNA Technology & Resource Analysis

The Office of Net Assessment provides the Secretary of Defense, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, and other senior DoD leaders with independent, rigorous, and long-term analytical assessments of fundamental security issues. This includes, but is not limited to, identifying and analyzing emerging threats, technologies, and geopolitical trends that could significantly impact U.S. national security interests, and developing analyses that examine the standing trends and future prospects of U.S. and other military capabilities and military potential. The net assessments address near and long-term problems and opportunities for the U.S. military forces to help counter technological advantages of potential U.S. adversaries. These efforts will pursue research to analyze the future security environment. This request directly supports the interim National Defense Strategy (NDS) and the Department's initiatives to Defend the Homeland, Deter Aggression and Prevail in Conflict, Build Enduring Advantage and and critically aligns with the Department's priorities of accelerating warfighting capabilities, strengthening alliances, fostering a culture of innovation and accountability.

Mission Technology and Resource Analysis

The Office of Net Assessment develops and coordinates analyses that examine the standing trends and future prospects of U.S. and other military capabilities and military potential. The net assessments address near and long-term problems and opportunities for the U.S. military forces to help counter technological advantages of potential U.S. adversaries. These efforts will pursue research to analyze the future security environment.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Technology and Resource Analysis

The Office of Net Assessment develops and coordinates analyses that examine the standing trends and future prospect of U.S. and other military capabilities and military potential. The net assessments address near and long-term problems and opportunities for the U.S. military forces to help counter technological advantages of potential U.S. adversaries. These efforts will pursue research to analyze the future security environment.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY24 Actuals$3.39M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Enacted$2.90M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY25 Total$2.90M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Disc. Request$3.46M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-WideOSDFY26 Total$3.46M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$20.1M$3.39M$2.90M$3.46M$3.46M
106: Technology and Resource Analysis$20.1M$3.39M$2.90M$3.46M$3.46M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not ODNA Technology and Resource Analysis — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →