Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0606114D8Z/ — data as of August 12, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Analysis Working Group (AWG) Support
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $4.05MR-1 TOA · PB2026 |
| FY25 | $0P-40 detail · PB2026 |
| FY26 | $5.23MR-1 TOA · PB2026 |
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $0 | $0 | $4.28M | $4.05M | ||
| Enacted | – | $0 | $4.70M | $4.20M | – | |
| Request | – | – | $4.70M | $4.20M | $2.81M | $5.23M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2023 book requested $4.70M for FY2023; the PB2025 book reported $4.28M as actual total obligation authority — $421.0K below the request. 4.3 − 4.7 = -0.4 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Support for Analysis Working Group
This program supports the Department's initiative to Take Care of People, and Build Sustainable and Long-Term Advantage. This program supports the Office of the Director, Cost Assessment & Program Evaluation (CAPE). It funds assessments that help the Analysis Working Group (AWG) to assist the Secretary and Deputy Secretary in guiding the analytic community and ensuring strategic analysis products are robust and of the highest quality. The end goal is an analytic enterprise that is agile, responsive, and provides sound decision support for the Secretary and Deputy Secretary. This program provides for analytic research across the Department to guide reform of the Departments analytic enterprise. Projects that support this effort help to develop a high performing and innovative analytic enterprise with the right policies, structures, people, and tools to support timely strategic decision that create an advantage for the U.S Military now and into the future.
Mission — Analysis Working Group Support
This program supports the Office of the Director, Cost Assessment & Program Evaluation (CAPE). It funds assessments that help the Analysis Working Group (AWG) to assist the Secretary and Deputy Secretary in guiding the analytic community and ensuring strategic analysis products are robust and of the highest quality. The end goal is an analytic enterprise that is agile, responsive, and provides sound decision support for the Secretary and Deputy Secretary. This program provides for analytic research across the Department to guide reform of the Departments analytic enterprise. Projects that support this effort help to develop a high performing and innovative analytic enterprise with the right policies, structures, people, and tools to support timely strategic decisions that create an advantage for the U.S Military now and into the future.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
Analysis Working Group Support
The Analysis Working Group (AWG) was established to marshal and guide the Department’s analytic capabilities. This group is advancing key strategic priorities by improving the analytic underpinning available for senior leader decisions and addressing necessary enterprise reforms (e.g., data sharing and knowledge management) across the analytic community.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY24 Actuals | $4.05M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Disc. Request | $5.23M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Defense-Wide | OSD | FY26 Total | $5.23M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $4.05M | $4.05M | $0 | $5.23M | $5.23M |
| 109: Analysis Working Group Support | $4.05M | $4.05M | $0 | $5.23M | $5.23M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
2 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.
General discussions and lobbying on the following issues: Universal Service Funding program reform and oversight…
H.R. 46: Rural Broadband Window of Opportunity Act; all provisions H.R. 278: BROADBAND Leadership Act; all provisions H.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Analysis Working Group (AWG) Support — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →