Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Army Direct Report Headquarters - R&D - MHA

ArmyRDT&EReconciledPE0605898A
What it is
Army Direct Report Headquarters - R&D - MHA (0605898A) is an Army research & development line funded in the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 2 projects.
What changed
-$6.29M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No company is linked to this line. Award records do not carry the program element, so the crosswalk is silent here — why.

Budget figures

FY24 Actuals
$55.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$59.7MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$53.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$6.29MR-1 TOA · PB2026
Data coverage

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget trajectory

The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $55.5MFY25: $59.7MFY26: $53.4MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$55.5M
FY25$59.7M
FY26$53.4M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view

P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition

12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$49.0M$48.3M$49.3M$54.2M$53.5M$53.3M$50.9M$48.8M$53.0M$55.5M
Enacted$49.0M$49.9M$54.7M$54.1M$53.8M$54.6M$49.0M$53.3M$55.8M$59.7M
Request$49.9M$54.7M$54.1M$53.8M$55.0M$52.1M$53.3M$55.8M$59.7M$53.4M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $55.0M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reported $50.9M as actual total obligation authority — $4.19M below the request. 50.859 − 55.045 = -4.186 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission — Army Direct Report Headquarters - R&D - MHA

This funding line supports testing of Army Transformation Priority Programs. This Program Element (PE) provides funding for the salaries and related personnel benefits for authorized civilian personnel positions that provide for the management functions and the technical direction of the United States (U.S.) Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Headquarters mission located at Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), Maryland (Project M65 Army Test and Evaluation Command). It also provides funds for Army Headquarters to study and improve the Sexual Harassment / Assault Response and Prevention program (Project FJ2 Army SHARP RDTE). ATEC plans, conducts and integrates developmental testing, independent operational testing, independent evaluations, and assessments to provide essential information to Soldiers and acquisition decision makers supporting the American Warfighter. Additionally, ATEC provides Direct Support to Army Futures Command (AFC). ATEC provides testing and independent evaluation support to AFC Cross Functional Team (CFT) efforts including risk reduction support to experiments, demonstrations, requirements, research, development, and acquisition. As such, ATEC priorities are aligned to the Army's Transformation priorities. Project M65 includes the following functions: human resources, safety, security, environmental, strategic planning, operations, engineering and logistics, resource management, test capabilities management, policy and standardization, public affairs, legal, Inspector General, Equal Opportunity, and information/technology support for command-wide efforts in support of the developmental, evaluation and operational test missions with technical direction to the Army Evaluation Center (AEC), APG, Maryland; to the Operational Test Command (OTC), Fort Cavazos, Texas which consists of three forward Test Directorates (Airborne and Special Operations Test Directorate, Fort Liberty, North Carolina; Air Defense Artillery Test Directorate, Fort Bliss, Texas; and the Fires Test Directorate, Fort Sill, Oklahoma) together with four other Test Directorates (Aviation; Maneuver; Mission Command; Maneuver Support and Sustainment) at Ft Cavazos, Texas; and to the seven Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFBs) and one non-MRTFB test range: Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) at APG, Maryland; West Desert Test Center (WDTC) at Dugway Proving Ground (DPG), Utah; Electronic Proving Ground (EPG) at Fort Huachuca, Arizona; White Sands Test Center (WSTC) at White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), New Mexico; Yuma Test Center (YTC) at Yuma Proving Ground (YPG), Arizona; Arctic Regions Test Center (ARTC) at Fort Greely, Alaska; and Tropic Regions Test Center (TRTC) at various locations, as well as for Redstone Test Center (RTC) at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. This is the operating budget for ATEC Headquarters, which provides technical direction for the annual execution of over 2,500 developmental tests; over 755 operational events; and over 700 Evaluation and Safety documents supporting Army transformation and other acquisition programs. It also provides funding to address enterprise level operating requirements that support the entire command and its three missions. ATEC's total program averages around $2 billion in direct and reimbursable funding. Project FJ2 provides Army Management Headquarters a critical research capability to improve the Army Sexual Harassment / Assault Response and Prevention (SHARP) program, with a specific focus on prevention. This PE does not finance test facility operations, test instrumentation, or test equipment. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.427 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.337 million for civilian personnel to optimize the workforce in compliance with Executive Order 14210, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Workforce Optimization Initiative."

Mission — Army SHARP RDTE

Research related to the SHARP program provides a better understanding of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and gender discrimination in the Army, including an improved understanding of vulnerable populations, high-risk locations, and Soldier experiences of SA/SH. Results from this program of research indicate where to target prevention efforts and provide science-informed strategies to reduce/prevent SA/SH/GD. This research challenges stereotypes and ensures the Army can provide tailored prevention and response activities directed at the most prevalent sexual assault, sexual harassment, and gender discrimination behaviors and scenarios. Research funding is required to ensure that Army SHARP is best positioned to address DoD and Service requirements, including recommendations from OSD's Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military aimed at reducing sexual assault and sexual harassment in the military. Conducting research to meet these requirements is a necessary step in developing targeted training, prevention, and response activities and ensuring these activities are having the desired effect and impact on the Total Force.

Mission — Army Test and Evaluation Command

This Project provides funding for the salaries and related personnel benefits for the authorized civilian personnel positions that provide for the management functions and the technical direction of the United States (U.S.) Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Headquarters mission located at Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), Maryland. ATEC plans, conducts and integrates developmental testing, independent operational testing, independent evaluations, and assessments to provide essential information to Soldiers and acquisition decision makers supporting the American Warfighter. Additionally, ATEC provides Direct Support to the Army Futures Command (AFC). ATEC provides testing and independent evaluation support to AFC Cross Functional Team (CFT) efforts including risk reduction support to experiments, demonstrations, requirements, research, development, and acquisition. As such, ATEC priorities are aligned to the Army's Transformation priorities. This Project resources the workforce to execute the following functions: human resources, safety, security, environmental, strategic planning, operations, engineering and logistics, resource management, test capabilities management, policy and standardization, public affairs, legal, Inspector General, Equal Opportunity, and information/ technology support for command-wide databases in support of the developmental, evaluation and operational test mission with technical direction to the Army Evaluation Center (AEC), APG, Maryland; to the Operational Test Command (OTC), Fort Cavazos, Texas which consists of three forward Test Directorates (Airborne and Special Operations Test Directorate, Fort Liberty, North Carolina; Air Defense Artillery Test Directorate, Fort Bliss, Texas; and the Fires Test Directorate, Fort Sill, Oklahoma) together with four other Test Directorates (Aviation; Maneuver; Mission Command; Maneuver Support and Sustainment) at Ft Cavazos, Texas; and to the seven Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFBs) and one non-MRTFB test range: Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) at APG, Maryland; West Desert Test Center (WDTC) at Dugway Proving Ground (DPG), Utah; Electronic Proving Ground (EPG) at Fort Huachuca, Arizona; White Sands Test Center (WSTC) at White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), New Mexico; Yuma Test Center (YTC) at Yuma Proving Ground (YPG), Arizona; Arctic Regions Test Center (ARTC) at Fort Greely, Alaska; and Tropic Regions Test Center (TRTC) at various locations, as well as for Redstone Test Center (RTC) at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. This is the operating budget for ATEC Headquarters, which provides technical direction for the annual execution of over 2,500 developmental tests; over 755 operational events; and over 700 Evaluation and Safety documents supporting Army transformation and other acquisition programs. It also provides funding to address enterprise level operating requirements that support the entire command and its three missions. ATEC's total program averages around $2 billion in direct and reimbursable funding.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)

Role Identifications

This program supports retention and readiness by providing evidence to address the drivers of SA/SH in the Army, ensuring a safe and productive work environment for all Soldiers. Research in this program has expanded the Army's understanding of risk and protective factors associated with perpetration and victimization of SA/SH across individual, interpersonal, unit, installation, and Army levels. Additionally, recent findings have also provided evidence of * disproportionately targeted vulnerable populations, * the relationship between poor unit climate and higher SA/SH risk, and * the specific characteristics and experiences of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and gender discrimination in the Army. Current research will result in (1) a more comprehensive understanding of risk and protective factors associated with sexual assault and sexual harassment and their associated metrics, (2) guidance on producing timely and rapid estimates of SA/SH prevalence, (3) updated training vignettes that more closely reflect Soldiers' actual experience with SA/SH, and (4) identification of Army norms that contribute to increased risk of SA/SH/GD. Future research will expand on these findings to identify units, commands, bases, career fields, or other groups of soldiers with high or rising risk of sexual assault and sexual harassment. Research will also address the need for climate interventions and for improved training that more closely reflects Soldier experience. Work in this program is performed by the Directorate of Prevention, Resilience, and Readiness in Arlington, VA.

ATEC

Civilian labor and other support required to manage and administer the Army test and evaluation mission at ATEC. ATEC plans, conducts, and integrates developmental testing, independent operational testing, independent evaluations, assessments and experiments to provide essential information to Soldiers and acquisition decision makers supporting the American Warfighter.

Budget line items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY24 Actuals$55.5M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Enacted$59.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY25 Total$59.7M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Disc. Request$53.4M
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, ArmyAFY26 Total$53.4M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$55.5M$59.7M$53.4M$53.4M
FJ2: Army SHARP RDTE$1.21M$1.18M$1.18M$1.18M
M65: Army Test and Evaluation Command$54.3M$58.5M$52.3M$52.3M

Follow the dollar

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying mentions

11 mentions from the Senate LDA disclosure database.

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPDirect|Headquarters2026matched 2+ title words

FY26 and FY27 State and Foreign Operations & FY26 and FY27 Department of State issues and funding including but not…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPDirect|Headquarters2026matched 2+ title words

FY27 State and Foreign Operations & FY27 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to relevant…

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATIONDirect|Report2026matched 2+ title words

S 4784/HR 8800 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027, Title XII, including issues related to…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPDirect|Headquarters2025matched 2+ title words

FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPDirect|Headquarters2025matched 2+ title words

FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPDirect|Headquarters2025matched 2+ title words

FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPDirect|Headquarters2025matched 2+ title words

FY25 and FY26 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPDirect|Headquarters2024matched 2+ title words

FY25 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to relevant…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPDirect|Headquarters2024matched 2+ title words

FY25 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to relevant…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPDirect|Headquarters2024matched 2+ title words

FY25 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to relevant…

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPDirect|Headquarters2024matched 2+ title words

FY24 State and Foreign Operations & FY24 Department of State issues and funding including but not limited to relevant…

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Army Direct Report Headquarters - R&D - MHA. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

Program dossier

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →

Primary sources

Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.

Budget totals · TOA sources

Detailed budget justification

The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.