Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0605898A/ — data as of July 28, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Army Direct Report Headquarters - R&D - MHA
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
- FY24
- $55.5M
- FY25
- $59.7M
- FY26
- $53.4M
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $49.0M | $48.3M | $49.3M | $54.2M | $53.5M | $53.3M | $50.9M | $48.8M | $53.0M | $55.5M | ||
| Enacted | $49.0M | $49.9M | $54.7M | $54.1M | $53.8M | $54.6M | $49.0M | $53.3M | $55.8M | $59.7M | ||
| Request | $49.9M | $54.7M | $54.1M | $53.8M | $55.0M | $52.1M | $53.3M | $55.8M | $59.7M | $53.4M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $55.0M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reports $50.9M actually spent — $4.19M below the request.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Army Direct Report Headquarters - R&D - MHA
This funding line supports testing of Army Transformation Priority Programs. This Program Element (PE) provides funding for the salaries and related personnel benefits for authorized civilian personnel positions that provide for the management functions and the technical direction of the United States (U.S.) Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Headquarters mission located at Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), Maryland (Project M65 Army Test and Evaluation Command). It also provides funds for Army Headquarters to study and improve the Sexual Harassment / Assault Response and Prevention program (Project FJ2 Army SHARP RDTE). ATEC plans, conducts and integrates developmental testing, independent operational testing, independent evaluations, and assessments to provide essential information to Soldiers and acquisition decision makers supporting the American Warfighter. Additionally, ATEC provides Direct Support to Army Futures Command (AFC). ATEC provides testing and independent evaluation support to AFC Cross Functional Team (CFT) efforts including risk reduction support to experiments, demonstrations, requirements, research, development, and acquisition. As such, ATEC priorities are aligned to the Army's Transformation priorities. Project M65 includes the following functions: human resources, safety, security, environmental, strategic planning, operations, engineering and logistics, resource management, test capabilities management, policy and standardization, public affairs, legal, Inspector General, Equal Opportunity, and information/technology support for command-wide efforts in support of the developmental, evaluation and operational test missions with technical direction to the Army Evaluation Center (AEC), APG, Maryland; to the Operational Test Command (OTC), Fort Cavazos, Texas which consists of three forward Test Directorates (Airborne and Special Operations Test Directorate, Fort Liberty, North Carolina; Air Defense Artillery Test Directorate, Fort Bliss, Texas; and the Fires Test Directorate, Fort Sill, Oklahoma) together with four other Test Directorates (Aviation; Maneuver; Mission Command; Maneuver Support and Sustainment) at Ft Cavazos, Texas; and to the seven Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFBs) and one non-MRTFB test range: Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) at APG, Maryland; West Desert Test Center (WDTC) at Dugway Proving Ground (DPG), Utah; Electronic Proving Ground (EPG) at Fort Huachuca, Arizona; White Sands Test Center (WSTC) at White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), New Mexico; Yuma Test Center (YTC) at Yuma Proving Ground (YPG), Arizona; Arctic Regions Test Center (ARTC) at Fort Greely, Alaska; and Tropic Regions Test Center (TRTC) at various locations, as well as for Redstone Test Center (RTC) at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. This is the operating budget for ATEC Headquarters, which provides technical direction for the annual execution of over 2,500 developmental tests; over 755 operational events; and over 700 Evaluation and Safety documents supporting Army transformation and other acquisition programs. It also provides funding to address enterprise level operating requirements that support the entire command and its three missions. ATEC's total program averages around $2 billion in direct and reimbursable funding. Project FJ2 provides Army Management Headquarters a critical research capability to improve the Army Sexual Harassment / Assault Response and Prevention (SHARP) program, with a specific focus on prevention. This PE does not finance test facility operations, test instrumentation, or test equipment. The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.427 million for Advisory and Assistance Services to promote efficiencies and advance the policies of the Administration in alignment with Executive Order 14222, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Cost Efficiency Initiative." The FY 2026 request was reduced by $0.337 million for civilian personnel to optimize the workforce in compliance with Executive Order 14210, "Implementing the President's Department of Government Efficiency Workforce Optimization Initiative."
Mission — Army Test and Evaluation Command
This Project provides funding for the salaries and related personnel benefits for the authorized civilian personnel positions that provide for the management functions and the technical direction of the United States (U.S.) Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Headquarters mission located at Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), Maryland. ATEC plans, conducts and integrates developmental testing, independent operational testing, independent evaluations, and assessments to provide essential information to Soldiers and acquisition decision makers supporting the American Warfighter. Additionally, ATEC provides Direct Support to the Army Futures Command (AFC). ATEC provides testing and independent evaluation support to AFC Cross Functional Team (CFT) efforts including risk reduction support to experiments, demonstrations, requirements, research, development, and acquisition. As such, ATEC priorities are aligned to the Army's Transformation priorities. This Project resources the workforce to execute the following functions: human resources, safety, security, environmental, strategic planning, operations, engineering and logistics, resource management, test capabilities management, policy and standardization, public affairs, legal, Inspector General, Equal Opportunity, and information/ technology support for command-wide databases in support of the developmental, evaluation and operational test mission with technical direction to the Army Evaluation Center (AEC), APG, Maryland; to the Operational Test Command (OTC), Fort Cavazos, Texas which consists of three forward Test Directorates (Airborne and Special Operations Test Directorate, Fort Liberty, North Carolina; Air Defense Artillery Test Directorate, Fort Bliss, Texas; and the Fires Test Directorate, Fort Sill, Oklahoma) together with four other Test Directorates (Aviation; Maneuver; Mission Command; Maneuver Support and Sustainment) at Ft Cavazos, Texas; and to the seven Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFBs) and one non-MRTFB test range: Aberdeen Test Center (ATC) at APG, Maryland; West Desert Test Center (WDTC) at Dugway Proving Ground (DPG), Utah; Electronic Proving Ground (EPG) at Fort Huachuca, Arizona; White Sands Test Center (WSTC) at White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), New Mexico; Yuma Test Center (YTC) at Yuma Proving Ground (YPG), Arizona; Arctic Regions Test Center (ARTC) at Fort Greely, Alaska; and Tropic Regions Test Center (TRTC) at various locations, as well as for Redstone Test Center (RTC) at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. This is the operating budget for ATEC Headquarters, which provides technical direction for the annual execution of over 2,500 developmental tests; over 755 operational events; and over 700 Evaluation and Safety documents supporting Army transformation and other acquisition programs. It also provides funding to address enterprise level operating requirements that support the entire command and its three missions. ATEC's total program averages around $2 billion in direct and reimbursable funding.
Mission — Army SHARP RDTE
Research related to the SHARP program provides a better understanding of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and gender discrimination in the Army, including an improved understanding of vulnerable populations, high-risk locations, and Soldier experiences of SA/SH. Results from this program of research indicate where to target prevention efforts and provide science-informed strategies to reduce/prevent SA/SH/GD. This research challenges stereotypes and ensures the Army can provide tailored prevention and response activities directed at the most prevalent sexual assault, sexual harassment, and gender discrimination behaviors and scenarios. Research funding is required to ensure that Army SHARP is best positioned to address DoD and Service requirements, including recommendations from OSD's Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military aimed at reducing sexual assault and sexual harassment in the military. Conducting research to meet these requirements is a necessary step in developing targeted training, prevention, and response activities and ensuring these activities are having the desired effect and impact on the Total Force.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)
ATEC
Civilian labor and other support required to manage and administer the Army test and evaluation mission at ATEC. ATEC plans, conducts, and integrates developmental testing, independent operational testing, independent evaluations, assessments and experiments to provide essential information to Soldiers and acquisition decision makers supporting the American Warfighter.
Role Identifications
This program supports retention and readiness by providing evidence to address the drivers of SA/SH in the Army, ensuring a safe and productive work environment for all Soldiers. Research in this program has expanded the Army's understanding of risk and protective factors associated with perpetration and victimization of SA/SH across individual, interpersonal, unit, installation, and Army levels. Additionally, recent findings have also provided evidence of * disproportionately targeted vulnerable populations, * the relationship between poor unit climate and higher SA/SH risk, and * the specific characteristics and experiences of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and gender discrimination in the Army. Current research will result in (1) a more comprehensive understanding of risk and protective factors associated with sexual assault and sexual harassment and their associated metrics, (2) guidance on producing timely and rapid estimates of SA/SH prevalence, (3) updated training vignettes that more closely reflect Soldiers' actual experience with SA/SH, and (4) identification of Army norms that contribute to increased risk of SA/SH/GD. Future research will expand on these findings to identify units, commands, bases, career fields, or other groups of soldiers with high or rising risk of sexual assault and sexual harassment. Research will also address the need for climate interventions and for improved training that more closely reflects Soldier experience. Work in this program is performed by the Directorate of Prevention, Resilience, and Readiness in Arlington, VA.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY24 Actuals | $55.5M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY25 Enacted | $59.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY25 Total | $59.7M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY26 Disc. Request | $53.4M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Army | A | FY26 Total | $53.4M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
| Project | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FJ2: Army SHARP RDTE | $1.21M | $1.18M | $1.18M | $1.18M |
| M65: Army Test and Evaluation Command | $54.3M | $58.5M | $52.3M | $52.3M |
| Program Element | $55.5M | $59.7M | $53.4M | $53.4M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →