Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0605865N/ — built September 26, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Operational Test and Evaluation Capability
Budget figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USAspending reports awards on a rolling basis, and this corpus runs through 2026-09-04. why partial FY2026 data? →
Budget trajectory
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $28.9M |
| FY25 | $30.6M |
| FY26 | $30.9M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
Decade view
P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $16.4M | $17.8M | $18.0M | $20.3M | $21.2M | $24.7M | $25.1M | $25.3M | $27.8M | $28.9M | ||
| Enacted | $18.0M | $18.2M | $20.3M | $21.6M | $25.1M | $26.1M | $24.9M | $27.8M | $29.4M | $30.6M | ||
| Request | $18.2M | $20.3M | $21.6M | $25.1M | $27.2M | $24.9M | $27.8M | $29.4M | $30.6M | $30.9M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2021 book requested $27.2M for FY2021; the PB2023 book reported $25.1M as actual total obligation authority — $2.12M below the request. 25.1 − 27.2 = -2.1 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Operational Test & Eval Capability
This program is funded under RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST and EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT because it supports efforts directed toward sustaining or modernizing facilities and conducting operations required for general research, development, test and evaluation. Headquartered in Norfolk, Virginia, OPTEVFOR serves as the Service Operational Test Agency for the Navy and for Marine Corps Aviation. In addition to the headquarters element, OPTEVFOR includes a Fleet-scheduling detachment in San Diego, a detachment supporting the Joint Strike Fighter, and the US Operational Test Team at Nellis, Air Force Base (AFB), NV. There are four Navy and Marine Corps Squadrons that conduct OT&E under the direction of the OPTEVFOR Director. Air Test and Evaluation Squadron ONE (VX-1), located at Patuxent River, MD, is under the administrative control of Commander, Naval Air Forces, Atlantic. Air Test and Evaluation Squadron NINE (VX-9), located at China Lake, CA, is under the administrative control of Commander, Naval Air Forces, Pacific. Marine Operational Test and Evaluation Squadron ONE (VMX-1), located at Yuma, AZ is administratively aligned under the Deputy Commandant for Aviation. Marine Helicopter Squadron ONE (HMX-1), located at Quantico, VA, responsible for OT of aircraft assigned for Presidential transport. OPTEVFOR utilizes a competency- and warfare-aligned organizational structure to apply rigorous scientific and technical methods within mission-based evaluations of complex systems and capabilities being delivered to the Fleet. OPTEVFOR's Warfare Divisions are responsible for delivering test documents ready for the Director's signature and executing adequate operational test and evaluation (OT&E) for Naval systems and reporting defendable conclusions about capabilities potentially being fielded. They are supported by Competency Divisions, who ensure the product meets technical requirements, and DoN and OPTEVFOR standards. There are six warfare divisions: Undersea Warfare (40), Air Warfare (50), Information Warfare (60), Surface Warfare (70), Expeditionary Warfare (80), and Advanced Programs (90). Each warfare division is led by a Navy Captain as the Division Director with a senior civil servant as the Deputy; or led by a senior civil servant with a Navy Captain/Commander as the Deputy. There are four competency divisions: Policy, Operations, and Training (01A); Test Design and Analysis (01B); Test Planning and Evaluation (01C); and Cybersecurity Testing (01D). In addition, the Technical Director (00TD) supports all divisions on technical aspects of the test products. Operations and business support divisions include the Staff Commanding Officer and Administration (10), Chief Information Officer (CIO) (20), Contracts (01K), and the Comptroller (30).
Mission — OPTEVFOR Support
This program element (PE) provides OPTEVFOR general support funding for headquarters annual operating expenses and ensures OPTEVFOR compliance with Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) and Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) directives during the conduct of independent operational testing and evaluation (OT&E). This funding supports planning, testing, and reporting on the operational effectiveness, suitability, and cyber survivability of new and improved systems and recommending Fleet usage to the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO). Funding also supports initiatives (including the manpower to execute) that improve OPTEVFOR's ability to develop "minimum, adequate" test strategies maximizing efficiencies and minimizing assets/time required to conduct planned operational testing, thereby driving down overall T&E costs for the Navy. The CNO, as well as acquisition executives and managers at all levels, have a continuing need for expeditious and efficient OT&E to make decisions on providing new/upgraded warfighting capabilities to the Fleet. To this end, this funding supports OPTEVFOR's continued pursuit of a variety of initiatives aimed at increasing efficiencies in T&E. These initiatives include the development of organizational level metrics that align with and inform North Star performance; develop IT infrastructure to enable/support planning/testing/analyzing/reporting to address data needs and venues for multiple stakeholders; maximize leverage of operational test data collection opportunities while ensuring OT insight is provided with agility to Fleet and Acquisition decision makers across the DON Enterprise; reduce data collection burden through streamlined development of measures and data requirements during Mission Based Test Design (MBTD). All of these initiatives improve the quality of OT&E, thus ensuring adequate test of combat systems prior to delivery to Fleet units. Issues discovered by OT&E have direct, long-term, Navy-wide implications on the Fleet's readiness and warfighting capability. Rapid advances in technology, changes in fleet tactics, and increased complexity of weapons systems and platforms have increased the need for technical and operational analyses that are sophisticated and timely in order to ensure an optimal return on investment of Navy resources.
Mission — Cyberspace Activities
This project funds the civilian salaries and supports associated maintenance and sustainment of cyber hygiene and resiliency of network infrastructure, as well as enterprise IT services for OPTEVFOR operational support networks. Additionally, these funds ensure the hardware and software required to maintain is in compliance with cybersecurity directives that support command operations as required. The Cyber Pure funding under this project directly supports the Assessment & Authorization (A&A) of OPTEVFOR IT systems and the monthly patching and scanning, and reauthorization required for continuous monitoring.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (2)
OPTEVFOR SUPPORT
Funding in this project funds the civilian salaries and operating costs for the Operational Test and Evaluation Force (OPTEVOR). In addition, it supports several initiatives aimed at increasing efficiencies in Test and Evaluation (T&E) to facilitate the Navy's ability to deliver warfighting capability to the fleet at the speed of relevance. These initiatives include IT Network, database and decision-making technology upgrades; implementation of Integrated Testing and Mission Based Test Design across all programs; and improved staffing and expertise in the areas of DON acquisition processes, Modeling and Simulation, Statistical Studies, Information Assurance, and related disciplines. All of these initiatives are aimed at improving the quality of testing and evaluation, thus ensuring delivery to fleet units of appropriately tested and capable combat capabilities.
Cyberspace Activities
Funding will support maintenance of cyber hygiene and resiliency of network infrastructure and enterprise IT services for OPTEVFOR operational support networks, as well as the hardware and software required to maintain compliance with cybersecurity directives. Funding ensures ability of OPTEVFOR network engineers to comply with cybersecurity requirements for the networks used in support of command operations as required. Facilitates the monthly network patching and scanning required to protect networks from cyber-attacks and intrusions.
Budget line items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY24 Actuals | $28.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Enacted | $30.6M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY25 Total | $30.6M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Disc. Request | $30.9M |
| Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy | N | FY26 Total | $30.9M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $0 | $28.9M | $30.6M | $30.9M | $30.9M |
| 0831: OPTEVFOR Support | $0 | $26.7M | $28.3M | $28.6M | $28.6M |
| 2958: Cyberspace Activities | $0 | $2.13M | $2.29M | $2.30M | $2.30M |
Follow the dollar
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 312 of 1,938 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high or medium confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Operational Test and Evaluation Capability. No program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
Program dossier
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,938 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →
Primary sources
Open any budget figure for its exact receipt. Verified line items lead with the highlighted government PDF; original spreadsheets download with their budget edition and exhibit in the filename.
Budget totals · TOA sources
FY2026 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J438
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2026_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2017 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J387
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2017_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2018 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J419
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2018_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2019 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J433
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2019_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2020 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J443
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2020_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2021 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J452
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2021_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2022 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J425
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2022_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2023 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J416
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2023_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2024 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J412
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2024_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
FY2025 Department of Defense Budget: RDT&E Programs (R-1) · comptroller.war.gov
Exhibit R-1 · J420
Complete workbook · unchanged saved copy. Saves as PB2025_DoD_R-1_Research-Development-Test-Evaluation.xlsx.
Detailed budget justification
The related TOA spreadsheets above use a different accounting basis from R-2/P-40 detail. Their amounts are not assumed to match these detailed sources.
RDTEN BA1-3 Book · www.secnav.navy.mil