Printed from https://fiscalreceipts.com/program/0605814OTE/ — data as of August 12, 2026. Every figure is citation-backed; see the page online for per-number provenance.
Operational Test Activities and Analyses
Budget Figures
FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →
| Fiscal year | Amount |
|---|---|
| FY24 | $95.3M |
| FY25 | $102.9M |
| FY26 | $76.5M |
All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026
The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.
● actuals (line) · ○ enacted · ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.
| Series | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actuals | $70.3M | $63.8M | $59.6M | $66.4M | $227.0M | $65.2M | $69.9M | $67.6M | $144.6M | $95.3M | ||
| Enacted | $63.8M | $52.6M | $67.9M | $227.0M | $65.2M | $86.2M | $67.6M | $144.6M | $58.7M | $102.9M | ||
| Request | $52.6M | $67.9M | $71.0M | $58.7M | $39.1M | $42.6M | $57.7M | $58.7M | $102.9M | $76.5M |
blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.
Asked vs spent: the PB2019 book requested $71.0M for FY2019; the PB2021 book reported $227.0M as actual total obligation authority — $156.0M above the request. 227.0 − 71.0 = 156.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.
Program Lineage
No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.
Description
Mission — Operational Test Activities and Analyses
The Operational Test Activities and Analyses (OTA&A) programs are continuing efforts that provide management and oversight functions, as well as updates to T&E policy and directives to the Department of Defense (DOD). OTA&A programs focus on broad scopes of the weapons systems integration to joint-warfighting and national defense agencies environment; policy, and strategy updates; evolving T&E methodology changes; and data-based integration efforts to align with the DOD acquisition community’s digital transition. The OTA&A programs consist of four activities: Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E); Test and Evaluation Threat Resource Activity (TETRA); Center for Countermeasures (CCM); and Strategic Initiatives, Policy, and Emerging Technology (SIPET). JT&E projects are T&E activities conducted in a joint military environment that develop process improvements. These multi-Service projects, chartered by the Office of the Secretary of Defense and coordinated with the Joint Staff, CCMDs, and the Services, provide non-materiel solutions that improve the following: joint interoperability of Service systems, technical and operational concepts, joint operational issues, development and validation of joint test methodologies, and test data for validating models, simulations, and test beds. New projects are also encouraged to align their efforts to support the National Defense Strategy (NDS). The JT&E projects address relevant joint warfighting issues in a joint test and evaluation environment by developing and providing new tactics, techniques, and procedures to improve joint capabilities and methodologies. TETRA, based on a memorandum of agreement between the DOT&E and the Defense Intelligence Agency, provides DOT&E support in the areas of threat resource analysis, intelligence support and threat systems investments. As DOT&E’s agent, TETRA provides threat resource analyses on the availability, capabilities and limitations of threat representations (threat simulators, targets, models, U.S. surrogates, and foreign materiel) and analysis of test resources used for operational testing to support DOT&E’s assessment of the adequacy of testing for those programs designated for oversight by DOT&E and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Acquisition and Sustainment. TETRA provides DOT&E action officers and other DOT&E activities with program-specific threat intelligence support. TETRA also funds management, oversight, and the actual development of common-use threat specifications for threat simulators, threat representative targets, and digital threat models used for T&E. CCM, a Joint Service Countermeasure (CM) T&E activity, directs, coordinates, supports, and conducts independent CM/counter-CM T&E activities of U.S. and foreign weapon systems, subsystems, sensors, and related components. CCM accomplishes this work in support of DOT&E, weapon system developers, and the Services. CCM’s testing and analyses directly supports evaluations of the operational effectiveness and suitability of CM/counter-CM systems, such as aircraft survivability equipment (ASE) used on rotary-wing and fixed-wing aircraft. CCM’s support of the T&E of ASE enables the survivability of aircraft in a high threat environment to enable mission success. In addition, CCM provides test support for directed energy weapons (DEW) and counter-unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS) programs. CCM improves Service member exercises, training, and pre-deployment activities with expertise in CM/counter-CM technology and capabilities. CCM deployed specialized instrumentation to collect threat weapon data for threat model development in support of M&S evaluation efforts. Also, cooperative allied efforts are supported in the areas of ASE T&E, DEW T&E, and threat M&S development. This Program element also consists of SIPET, initiated in 2021 to codify and implement strategy and policy to keep pace with science and technology to modernize T&E tools, processes, infrastructure, and workforce. The core of the SIPET mission is to drive continuous innovation to meet the T&E demands of the future using five strategic pillars: Pillar 1: Test the way we fight Pillar 2: Accelerate the delivery of weapons that work Pillar 3: Improve the survivability of DoD in a contested environment Pillar 4: Pioneer T&E of weapon systems built to change over time Pillar 5: Foster an agile and enduring T&E Enterprise Workforce.
Mission — OTA&A
The Operational Test Activities and Analyses (OTA&A) programs are continuing efforts that provide management and oversight functions, as well as updates to T&E policy and directives to the Department of Defense (DOD). OTA&A programs focus on broad scopes of the weapons systems integration to joint-warfighting and national defense agencies environment; policy, and strategy updates; evolving T&E methodology changes; and data-based integration efforts to align with the DOD acquisition community’s digital transition. The OTA&A programs consist of four activities: Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E); Test and Evaluation Threat Resource Activity (TETRA); Center for Countermeasures (CCM); and Strategic Initiatives, Policy, and Emerging Technology (SIPET). JT&E projects are T&E activities conducted in a joint military environment that develop process improvements. These multi-Service projects, chartered by the Office of the Secretary of Defense and coordinated with the Joint Staff, CCMDs, and the Services, provide non-materiel solutions that improve the following: joint interoperability of Service systems, technical and operational concepts, joint operational issues, development and validation of joint test methodologies, and test data for validating models, simulations, and test beds. New projects are also encouraged to align their efforts to support the National Defense Strategy (NDS). The JT&E projects address relevant joint warfighting issues in a joint test and evaluation environment by developing and providing new tactics, techniques, and procedures to improve joint capabilities and methodologies. TETRA, based on a memorandum of agreement between the DOT&E and the Defense Intelligence Agency, provides DOT&E support in the areas of threat resource analysis, intelligence support and threat systems investments. As DOT&E’s agent, TETRA provides threat resource analyses on the availability, capabilities and limitations of threat representations (threat simulators, targets, models, U.S. surrogates, and foreign materiel) and analysis of test resources used for operational testing to support DOT&E’s assessment of the adequacy of testing for those programs designated for oversight by DOT&E and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Acquisition and Sustainment. TETRA provides DOT&E action officers and other DOT&E activities with program-specific threat intelligence support. TETRA also funds management, oversight, and the actual development of common-use threat specifications for threat simulators, threat representative targets, and digital threat models used for T&E. CCM, a Joint Service Countermeasure (CM) T&E activity, directs, coordinates, supports, and conducts independent CM/counter-CM T&E activities of U.S. and foreign weapon systems, subsystems, sensors, and related components. CCM accomplishes this work in support of DOT&E, weapon system developers, and the Services. CCM’s testing and analyses directly supports evaluations of the operational effectiveness and suitability of CM/counter-CM systems, such as aircraft survivability equipment (ASE) used on rotary-wing and fixed-wing aircraft. CCM’s support of the T&E of ASE enables the survivability of aircraft in a high threat environment to enable mission success. In addition, CCM provides test support for directed energy weapons (DEW) and counter-unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS) programs. CCM improves Service member exercises, training, and pre-deployment activities with expertise in CM/counter-CM technology and capabilities. CCM deployed specialized instrumentation to collect threat weapon data for threat model development in support of M&S evaluation efforts. Also, cooperative allied efforts are supported in the areas of ASE T&E, DEW T&E, and threat M&S development. This Program element also consists of SIPET, initiated in 2021 to codify and implement strategy and policy to keep pace with science and technology to modernize T&E tools, processes, infrastructure, and workforce. The core of the SIPET mission is to drive continuous innovation to meet the T&E demands of the future using five strategic pillars: Pillar 1: Test the way we fight Pillar 2: Accelerate the delivery of weapons that work Pillar 3: Improve the survivability of DoD in a contested environment Pillar 4: Pioneer T&E of weapon systems built to change over time Pillar 5: Foster an agile and enduring T&E Enterprise Workforce.
Justification
Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)
Operational Test Activities and Analyses (OTA&A)
OTA&A programs are continuing efforts that provide management and oversight functions, as well as updates to T&E policy and directives to the Department of Defense (DoD). OTA&A programs focus on broad scopes of the weapons systems integration to joint-warfighting and national defense agencies environment; policy, and strategy updates; evolving T&E methodology changes; and data-based integration efforts to align with the DoD acquisition community’s digital transition. The OTA&A programs consist of four activities: JT&E, TETRA, CCM, and SIPET.
Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)
P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.
Exhibit R-1
| Account | Org | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense | OTE | FY24 Actuals | $95.3M |
| Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense | OTE | FY25 Enacted | $102.9M |
| Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense | OTE | FY25 Total | $102.9M |
| Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense | OTE | FY26 Disc. Request | $76.5M |
| Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense | OTE | FY26 Total | $76.5M |
Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)
J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.
Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.
| Project | All Prior Years | FY24 Actuals | FY25 Total | FY26 Base | FY26 Request |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Program Element | $214.0M | $95.3M | $102.9M | $76.5M | $76.5M |
| 000920: OTA&A | $214.0M | $95.3M | $102.9M | $76.5M | $76.5M |
No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →
Awards
No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.
Lobbying Mentions
No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.
Oversight
Department-level designation (not specific to this program)
GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Operational Test Activities and Analyses — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.
No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →