Skip to content
Fiscal Receipts

Operational Test Activities and Analyses

OTERDT&EPartial Reconciliation0605814OTE
What it is
Operational Test Activities and Analyses (0605814OTE) is an OTE research & development line funded in the Operational Test and Evaluation, Defense account. Its J-book detail breaks the line into 1 project.
What changed
-$26.4M FY25→26 R-1 TOA · PB2026
Who gets it
No award linkage at high confidence.

Budget Figures

FY24 Actuals
$95.3MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25 Total
$102.9MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY26 Request
$76.5MR-1 TOA · PB2026
FY25→26 Change
-$26.4MR-1 TOA · PB2026

FY2026 award data is a partial year — USASpending awards are reported on a rolling basis and the fiscal year does not close until September 30. why partial FY2026 data? →

Budget Trajectory
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.
The program's 3 summary figures for FY24 to FY26, plotted in fiscal-year order so the direction of travel is readable at a glance: this line ends lower than it starts. The points are the summary cards above, not a separate derivation; the table beside the chart carries each figure with its own citation.FY24: $95.3MFY25: $102.9MFY26: $76.5MFY24FY25FY26
Budget trajectory: one row per fiscal year, carrying the summary figure the sparkline plots. Every figure opens its own citation.
Fiscal yearAmount
FY24$95.3M
FY25$102.9M
FY26$76.5M

All series figures: R-1 TOA · PB2026

Decade view — P-1/R-1 workbook TOA basis, shown compact in $B/$M (the workbook records USD thousands); each figure cites its own President's Budget edition
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.
12 fiscal years of this program as published (FY2015–FY2026): a line through the actuals (filled dots), with the enacted (hollow circles) and request (diamonds) markers each edition reported. Read it for direction, not for precision — this program's actuals line rises across the span. The grid below is the same data as text, one cited figure per cell.FY2015 actuals — PB2017 editionFY2016 actuals — PB2018 editionFY2017 actuals — PB2019 editionFY2018 actuals — PB2020 editionFY2019 actuals — PB2021 editionFY2020 actuals — PB2022 editionFY2021 actuals — PB2023 editionFY2022 actuals — PB2024 editionFY2023 actuals — PB2025 editionFY2024 actuals — PB2026 editionFY2016 enacted — PB2017 editionFY2017 enacted — PB2018 editionFY2018 enacted — PB2019 editionFY2019 enacted — PB2020 editionFY2020 enacted — PB2021 editionFY2021 enacted — PB2022 editionFY2022 enacted — PB2023 editionFY2023 enacted — PB2024 editionFY2024 enacted — PB2025 editionFY2025 enacted — PB2026 editionFY2017 request — PB2017 editionFY2018 request — PB2018 editionFY2019 request — PB2019 editionFY2020 request — PB2020 editionFY2021 request — PB2021 editionFY2022 request — PB2022 editionFY2023 request — PB2023 editionFY2024 request — PB2024 editionFY2025 request — PB2025 editionFY2026 request — PB2026 editionFY15FY18FY20FY22FY24FY26

The vertical scale does not start at zero: the baseline sits just below this program’s smallest year, so a low point on this line is not a small amount. Read the shape for direction and the grid below for the figures.

● actuals (line)  ·  ○ enacted  ·  ◇ request — gaps are editions the program is absent from, never interpolated.

Decade series values by fiscal year and President's Budget edition: one row per series (actuals, enacted, request), one column per fiscal year. Every figure opens its own citation.
SeriesFY15FY16FY17FY18FY19FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
Actuals$70.3M$63.8M$59.6M$66.4M$227.0M$65.2M$69.9M$67.6M$144.6M$95.3M
Enacted$63.8M$52.6M$67.9M$227.0M$65.2M$86.2M$67.6M$144.6M$58.7M$102.9M
Request$52.6M$67.9M$71.0M$58.7M$39.1M$42.6M$57.7M$58.7M$102.9M$76.5M

blank = series not published for this year; – = absent from that edition.

Asked vs spent: the PB2019 book requested $71.0M for FY2019; the PB2021 book reported $227.0M as actual total obligation authority — $156.0M above the request. 227.071.0 = 156.0 USD millions — the compact figures above are rounded for reading.

Program Lineage

No predecessor/successor lineage was recorded for this program element — no FY-to-FY transfer into or out of this line was stated in the ingested J-books, and none was inferred from the program structure.

Description

Mission Operational Test Activities and Analyses

The Operational Test Activities and Analyses (OTA&A) programs are continuing efforts that provide management and oversight functions, as well as updates to T&E policy and directives to the Department of Defense (DOD). OTA&A programs focus on broad scopes of the weapons systems integration to joint-warfighting and national defense agencies environment; policy, and strategy updates; evolving T&E methodology changes; and data-based integration efforts to align with the DOD acquisition community’s digital transition. The OTA&A programs consist of four activities: Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E); Test and Evaluation Threat Resource Activity (TETRA); Center for Countermeasures (CCM); and Strategic Initiatives, Policy, and Emerging Technology (SIPET). JT&E projects are T&E activities conducted in a joint military environment that develop process improvements. These multi-Service projects, chartered by the Office of the Secretary of Defense and coordinated with the Joint Staff, CCMDs, and the Services, provide non-materiel solutions that improve the following: joint interoperability of Service systems, technical and operational concepts, joint operational issues, development and validation of joint test methodologies, and test data for validating models, simulations, and test beds. New projects are also encouraged to align their efforts to support the National Defense Strategy (NDS). The JT&E projects address relevant joint warfighting issues in a joint test and evaluation environment by developing and providing new tactics, techniques, and procedures to improve joint capabilities and methodologies. TETRA, based on a memorandum of agreement between the DOT&E and the Defense Intelligence Agency, provides DOT&E support in the areas of threat resource analysis, intelligence support and threat systems investments. As DOT&E’s agent, TETRA provides threat resource analyses on the availability, capabilities and limitations of threat representations (threat simulators, targets, models, U.S. surrogates, and foreign materiel) and analysis of test resources used for operational testing to support DOT&E’s assessment of the adequacy of testing for those programs designated for oversight by DOT&E and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Acquisition and Sustainment. TETRA provides DOT&E action officers and other DOT&E activities with program-specific threat intelligence support. TETRA also funds management, oversight, and the actual development of common-use threat specifications for threat simulators, threat representative targets, and digital threat models used for T&E. CCM, a Joint Service Countermeasure (CM) T&E activity, directs, coordinates, supports, and conducts independent CM/counter-CM T&E activities of U.S. and foreign weapon systems, subsystems, sensors, and related components. CCM accomplishes this work in support of DOT&E, weapon system developers, and the Services. CCM’s testing and analyses directly supports evaluations of the operational effectiveness and suitability of CM/counter-CM systems, such as aircraft survivability equipment (ASE) used on rotary-wing and fixed-wing aircraft. CCM’s support of the T&E of ASE enables the survivability of aircraft in a high threat environment to enable mission success. In addition, CCM provides test support for directed energy weapons (DEW) and counter-unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS) programs. CCM improves Service member exercises, training, and pre-deployment activities with expertise in CM/counter-CM technology and capabilities. CCM deployed specialized instrumentation to collect threat weapon data for threat model development in support of M&S evaluation efforts. Also, cooperative allied efforts are supported in the areas of ASE T&E, DEW T&E, and threat M&S development. This Program element also consists of SIPET, initiated in 2021 to codify and implement strategy and policy to keep pace with science and technology to modernize T&E tools, processes, infrastructure, and workforce. The core of the SIPET mission is to drive continuous innovation to meet the T&E demands of the future using five strategic pillars: Pillar 1: Test the way we fight Pillar 2: Accelerate the delivery of weapons that work Pillar 3: Improve the survivability of DoD in a contested environment Pillar 4: Pioneer T&E of weapon systems built to change over time Pillar 5: Foster an agile and enduring T&E Enterprise Workforce.

Mission OTA&A

The Operational Test Activities and Analyses (OTA&A) programs are continuing efforts that provide management and oversight functions, as well as updates to T&E policy and directives to the Department of Defense (DOD). OTA&A programs focus on broad scopes of the weapons systems integration to joint-warfighting and national defense agencies environment; policy, and strategy updates; evolving T&E methodology changes; and data-based integration efforts to align with the DOD acquisition community’s digital transition. The OTA&A programs consist of four activities: Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E); Test and Evaluation Threat Resource Activity (TETRA); Center for Countermeasures (CCM); and Strategic Initiatives, Policy, and Emerging Technology (SIPET). JT&E projects are T&E activities conducted in a joint military environment that develop process improvements. These multi-Service projects, chartered by the Office of the Secretary of Defense and coordinated with the Joint Staff, CCMDs, and the Services, provide non-materiel solutions that improve the following: joint interoperability of Service systems, technical and operational concepts, joint operational issues, development and validation of joint test methodologies, and test data for validating models, simulations, and test beds. New projects are also encouraged to align their efforts to support the National Defense Strategy (NDS). The JT&E projects address relevant joint warfighting issues in a joint test and evaluation environment by developing and providing new tactics, techniques, and procedures to improve joint capabilities and methodologies. TETRA, based on a memorandum of agreement between the DOT&E and the Defense Intelligence Agency, provides DOT&E support in the areas of threat resource analysis, intelligence support and threat systems investments. As DOT&E’s agent, TETRA provides threat resource analyses on the availability, capabilities and limitations of threat representations (threat simulators, targets, models, U.S. surrogates, and foreign materiel) and analysis of test resources used for operational testing to support DOT&E’s assessment of the adequacy of testing for those programs designated for oversight by DOT&E and the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Acquisition and Sustainment. TETRA provides DOT&E action officers and other DOT&E activities with program-specific threat intelligence support. TETRA also funds management, oversight, and the actual development of common-use threat specifications for threat simulators, threat representative targets, and digital threat models used for T&E. CCM, a Joint Service Countermeasure (CM) T&E activity, directs, coordinates, supports, and conducts independent CM/counter-CM T&E activities of U.S. and foreign weapon systems, subsystems, sensors, and related components. CCM accomplishes this work in support of DOT&E, weapon system developers, and the Services. CCM’s testing and analyses directly supports evaluations of the operational effectiveness and suitability of CM/counter-CM systems, such as aircraft survivability equipment (ASE) used on rotary-wing and fixed-wing aircraft. CCM’s support of the T&E of ASE enables the survivability of aircraft in a high threat environment to enable mission success. In addition, CCM provides test support for directed energy weapons (DEW) and counter-unmanned aircraft systems (C-UAS) programs. CCM improves Service member exercises, training, and pre-deployment activities with expertise in CM/counter-CM technology and capabilities. CCM deployed specialized instrumentation to collect threat weapon data for threat model development in support of M&S evaluation efforts. Also, cooperative allied efforts are supported in the areas of ASE T&E, DEW T&E, and threat M&S development. This Program element also consists of SIPET, initiated in 2021 to codify and implement strategy and policy to keep pace with science and technology to modernize T&E tools, processes, infrastructure, and workforce. The core of the SIPET mission is to drive continuous innovation to meet the T&E demands of the future using five strategic pillars: Pillar 1: Test the way we fight Pillar 2: Accelerate the delivery of weapons that work Pillar 3: Improve the survivability of DoD in a contested environment Pillar 4: Pioneer T&E of weapon systems built to change over time Pillar 5: Foster an agile and enduring T&E Enterprise Workforce.

Justification

Accomplishments & Planned Programs (1)

Operational Test Activities and Analyses (OTA&A)

OTA&A programs are continuing efforts that provide management and oversight functions, as well as updates to T&E policy and directives to the Department of Defense (DoD). OTA&A programs focus on broad scopes of the weapons systems integration to joint-warfighting and national defense agencies environment; policy, and strategy updates; evolving T&E methodology changes; and data-based integration efforts to align with the DoD acquisition community’s digital transition. The OTA&A programs consist of four activities: JT&E, TETRA, CCM, and SIPET.

Budget Line Items(workbook-cited)

P-1/R-1 workbook Total Obligation Authority basis (USD thousands) · PB2026.

Exhibit R-1

AccountOrgTypeAmount
Operational Test and Evaluation, DefenseOTEFY24 Actuals$95.3M
Operational Test and Evaluation, DefenseOTEFY25 Enacted$102.9M
Operational Test and Evaluation, DefenseOTEFY25 Total$102.9M
Operational Test and Evaluation, DefenseOTEFY26 Disc. Request$76.5M
Operational Test and Evaluation, DefenseOTEFY26 Total$76.5M

Budget Details(R-2/P-40 facts)

J-book detail basis (R-2/P-40, USD millions) · PB2026 — a different accounting basis from the P-1/R-1 workbook TOA above; where the two disagree, the reconciliation strip under Budget Figures shows both.

Wider than this screen — swipe the table sideways for the remaining fiscal-year columns.

ProjectAll Prior YearsFY24 ActualsFY25 TotalFY26 BaseFY26 Request
Program Element$214.0M$95.3M$102.9M$76.5M$76.5M
000920: OTA&A$214.0M$95.3M$102.9M$76.5M$76.5M

No follow-the-dollar view — this program's awards haven't been crosswalked at high confidence (flows cover 17 of 1,741 programs). why coverage is partial? →

Awards

No awards are linked to this program element at high confidence — the budget→award crosswalk only asserts links it can defend, and this line has none yet.

Lobbying Mentions

No Senate LDA lobbying filing in the tracked data mentions this program element by code or alias.

Oversight

Department-level designation (not specific to this program)

GAO lists 5 high-risk areas for DOD as a whole. That designation covers the department, not Operational Test Activities and Analyses — no program-specific GAO finding for this line is in the ingested data. See the DOD oversight record.

No research dossier for this program — dossiers cover 50 of 1,741 programs, the largest fully J-book-detailed lines by FY2026 requested dollars. why no dossier here? →